Let's say I am using rendered as basically a case statement. I have a label and message for an input field, but I want the field itself to change depending on the case. As such:
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{myBean.params[paramKey]}"
rendered="#{paramIsInput}" />
<p:calendar id="foo" value="#{myBean.params[paramKey]}"
rendered="#{paramIsCalendar}" />
If I do that then I get the following error: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Component ID j_idt64:foo has already been found in the view.
As a workaround I created lots of labels/messages for each param type and changed their ids. But this brings my question. If only one component with an id is actually rendered, why would it matter that I have multiple defined in my jsf file? Is there a way to keep them with all the same ID?
JSF component IDs are supposed to be unique during view build time already, not during view render time only. This way you effectively end up with two JSF components with the same ID which is indeed invalid. You'd like to effectively end up with one JSF component with the desired ID in the JSF component tree after view build time.
You can achieve this by populating the component during the view build time instead of generating its HTML output conditionally during the view render time. You can use the JSTL <c:if> tag for this.
<c:if test="#{paramIsInput}">
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{myBean.params[paramKey]}" />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{paramIsCalendar}">
<p:calendar id="foo" value="#{myBean.params[paramKey]}" />
</c:if>
This has however caveats: the <c:if test> condition can't depend on a variable which is only known during JSF render time. So it has not to depend on var of a JSF iterating component, or to be a property of a view scoped bean, etc.
See also:
JSTL in JSF2 Facelets... makes sense?
If only one component with an id is actually rendered, why would it matter that I have multiple defined in my jsf file?
How would JSF know that only one component will be rendered? You are using EL in rendered and both can evaluate to true. Here is the documentation which says you can't have duplicate ids inside a naming container.
The specified identifier must be unique among all the components (including facets) that are descendents of the nearest ancestor UIComponent that is a NamingContainer, or within the scope of the entire component tree if there is no such ancestor that is a NamingContainer.
-
Is there a way to keep them with all the same ID?
In case you still want to have same ids on more than one components you need to separate the naming container.
You can use PanelGrid as a naming container.
Related
I would like to output a bit of Facelets code conditionally.
For that purpose, the JSTL tags seem to work fine:
<c:if test="${lpc.verbose}">
...
</c:if>
However, I'm not sure if this is a best practice? Is there another way to achieve my goal?
Introduction
JSTL <c:xxx> tags are all taghandlers and they are executed during view build time, while JSF <h:xxx> tags are all UI components and they are executed during view render time.
Note that from JSF's own <f:xxx> and <ui:xxx> tags only those which do not extend from UIComponent are also taghandlers, e.g. <f:validator>, <ui:include>, <ui:define>, etc. The ones which extend from UIComponent are also JSF UI components, e.g. <f:param>, <ui:fragment>, <ui:repeat>, etc. From JSF UI components only the id and binding attributes are also evaluated during view build time. Thus the below answer as to JSTL lifecycle also applies to the id and binding attributes of JSF components.
The view build time is that moment when the XHTML/JSP file is to be parsed and converted to a JSF component tree which is then stored as UIViewRoot of the FacesContext. The view render time is that moment when the JSF component tree is about to generate HTML, starting with UIViewRoot#encodeAll(). So: JSF UI components and JSTL tags doesn't run in sync as you'd expect from the coding. You can visualize it as follows: JSTL runs from top to bottom first, producing the JSF component tree, then it's JSF's turn to run from top to bottom again, producing the HTML output.
<c:forEach> vs <ui:repeat>
For example, this Facelets markup iterating over 3 items using <c:forEach>:
<c:forEach items="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:outputText id="item_#{item.id}" value="#{item.value}" />
</c:forEach>
...creates during view build time three separate <h:outputText> components in the JSF component tree, roughly represented like this:
<h:outputText id="item_1" value="#{bean.items[0].value}" />
<h:outputText id="item_2" value="#{bean.items[1].value}" />
<h:outputText id="item_3" value="#{bean.items[2].value}" />
...which in turn individually generate their HTML output during view render time:
<span id="item_1">value1</span>
<span id="item_2">value2</span>
<span id="item_3">value3</span>
Note that you need to manually ensure the uniqueness of the component IDs and that those are also evaluated during view build time.
While this Facelets markup iterating over 3 items using <ui:repeat>, which is a JSF UI component:
<ui:repeat id="items" value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:outputText id="item" value="#{item.value}" />
</ui:repeat>
...already ends up as-is in the JSF component tree whereby the very same <h:outputText> component is during view render time being reused to generate HTML output based on current iteration round:
<span id="items:0:item">value1</span>
<span id="items:1:item">value2</span>
<span id="items:2:item">value3</span>
Note that the <ui:repeat> as being a NamingContainer component already ensured the uniqueness of the client ID based on iteration index; it's also not possible to use EL in id attribute of child components this way as it is also evaluated during view build time while #{item} is only available during view render time. Same is true for an h:dataTable and similar components.
<c:if>/<c:choose> vs rendered
As another example, this Facelets markup conditionally adding different tags using <c:if> (you can also use <c:choose><c:when><c:otherwise> for this):
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'TEXT'}">
<h:inputText ... />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'PASSWORD'}">
<h:inputSecret ... />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'SELECTONE'}">
<h:selectOneMenu ... />
</c:if>
...will in case of type = TEXT only add the <h:inputText> component to the JSF component tree:
<h:inputText ... />
While this Facelets markup:
<h:inputText ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'TEXT'}" />
<h:inputSecret ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'PASSWORD'}" />
<h:selectOneMenu ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'SELECTONE'}" />
...will end up exactly as above in the JSF component tree regardless of the condition. This may thus end up in a "bloated" component tree when you have many of them and they are actually based on a "static" model (i.e. the field does not ever change during at least the view scope). Also, you may run into EL trouble when you deal with subclasses with additional properties in Mojarra versions before 2.2.7.
<c:set> vs <ui:param>
They are not interchangeable. The <c:set> sets a variable in the EL scope, which is accessible only after the tag location during view build time, but anywhere in the view during view render time. The <ui:param> passes an EL variable to a Facelet template included via <ui:include>, <ui:decorate template>, or <ui:composition template>. Older JSF versions had bugs whereby the <ui:param> variable is also available outside the Facelet template in question, this should never be relied upon.
The <c:set> without a scope attribute will behave like an alias. It does not cache the result of the EL expression in any scope. It can thus perfectly fine be used inside for example iterating JSF components. Thus, e.g. below will work fine:
<ui:repeat value="#{bean.products}" var="product">
<c:set var="price" value="#{product.price}" />
<h:outputText value="#{price}" />
</ui:repeat>
It's only not suitable for e.g. calculating the sum in a loop. For that instead use EL 3.0 stream:
<ui:repeat value="#{bean.products}" var="product">
...
</ui:repeat>
<p>Total price: #{bean.products.stream().map(product->product.price).sum()}</p>
Only, when you set the scope attribute with one of allowable values request, view, session, or application, then it will be evaluated immediately during view build time and stored in the specified scope.
<c:set var="dev" value="#{facesContext.application.projectStage eq 'Development'}" scope="application" />
This will be evaluated only once and available as #{dev} throughout the entire application.
Use JSTL to control JSF component tree building
Using JSTL may only lead to unexpected results when being used inside JSF iterating components such as <h:dataTable>, <ui:repeat>, etc, or when JSTL tag attributes depend on results of JSF events such as preRenderView or submitted form values in the model which aren't available during view build time. So, use JSTL tags only to control flow of JSF component tree building. Use JSF UI components to control flow of HTML output generation. Do not bind the var of iterating JSF components to JSTL tag attributes. Do not rely on JSF events in JSTL tag attributes.
Anytime you think you need to bind a component to the backing bean via binding, or grab one via findComponent(), and create/manipulate its children using Java code in a backing bean with new SomeComponent() and what not, then you should immediately stop and consider using JSTL instead. As JSTL is also XML based, the code needed to dynamically create JSF components will become so much better readable and maintainable.
Important to know is that Mojarra versions older than 2.1.18 had a bug in partial state saving when referencing a view scoped bean in a JSTL tag attribute. The whole view scoped bean would be newly recreated instead of retrieved from the view tree (simply because the complete view tree isn't available yet at the point JSTL runs). If you're expecting or storing some state in the view scoped bean by a JSTL tag attribute, then it won't return the value you expect, or it will be "lost" in the real view scoped bean which is restored after the view tree is built. In case you can't upgrade to Mojarra 2.1.18 or newer, the work around is to turn off partial state saving in web.xml like below:
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING</param-name>
<param-value>false</param-value>
</context-param>
See also:
What's the view build time?
How does the 'binding' attribute work in JSF? When and how should it be used?
How to refactor snippet of old JSP to some JSF equivalent?
Should PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING be set to false?
Communication in JSF 2.0 - #ViewScoped fails in tag handlers
To see some real world examples where JSTL tags are helpful (i.e. when really properly used during building the view), see the following questions/answers:
How to make a grid of JSF composite component?
Create table columns dynamically in JSF
How to custom layout h:selectOneRadio
Conditional variable definition in JSF
How to make composite component similar to <h:selectOneRadio />
JSF 2 -- Composite component with optional listener attribute on f:ajax
Nested JSF Composite Components leading to a Stack Overflow exception
In a nutshell
As to your concrete functional requirement, if you want to render JSF components conditionally, use the rendered attribute on the JSF HTML component instead, particularly if #{lpc} represents the currently iterated item of a JSF iterating component such as <h:dataTable> or <ui:repeat>.
<h:someComponent rendered="#{lpc.verbose}">
...
</h:someComponent>
Or, if you want to build (create/add) JSF components conditionally, then keep using JSTL. It's way much better than verbosely doing new SomeComponent() in java.
<c:if test="#{lpc.verbose}">
<h:someComponent>
...
</h:someComponent>
</c:if>
See also:
Conditionally displaying JSF components
JSTL c:if doesn't work inside a JSF h:dataTable
Specify conditional rendering of element inside <ui:repeat>? The <c:if> does not seem to work
use
<h:panelGroup rendered="#{lpc.verbose}">
...
</h:panelGroup>
For switch-like output, you can use the switch face from PrimeFaces Extensions.
I would like to output a bit of Facelets code conditionally.
For that purpose, the JSTL tags seem to work fine:
<c:if test="${lpc.verbose}">
...
</c:if>
However, I'm not sure if this is a best practice? Is there another way to achieve my goal?
Introduction
JSTL <c:xxx> tags are all taghandlers and they are executed during view build time, while JSF <h:xxx> tags are all UI components and they are executed during view render time.
Note that from JSF's own <f:xxx> and <ui:xxx> tags only those which do not extend from UIComponent are also taghandlers, e.g. <f:validator>, <ui:include>, <ui:define>, etc. The ones which extend from UIComponent are also JSF UI components, e.g. <f:param>, <ui:fragment>, <ui:repeat>, etc. From JSF UI components only the id and binding attributes are also evaluated during view build time. Thus the below answer as to JSTL lifecycle also applies to the id and binding attributes of JSF components.
The view build time is that moment when the XHTML/JSP file is to be parsed and converted to a JSF component tree which is then stored as UIViewRoot of the FacesContext. The view render time is that moment when the JSF component tree is about to generate HTML, starting with UIViewRoot#encodeAll(). So: JSF UI components and JSTL tags doesn't run in sync as you'd expect from the coding. You can visualize it as follows: JSTL runs from top to bottom first, producing the JSF component tree, then it's JSF's turn to run from top to bottom again, producing the HTML output.
<c:forEach> vs <ui:repeat>
For example, this Facelets markup iterating over 3 items using <c:forEach>:
<c:forEach items="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:outputText id="item_#{item.id}" value="#{item.value}" />
</c:forEach>
...creates during view build time three separate <h:outputText> components in the JSF component tree, roughly represented like this:
<h:outputText id="item_1" value="#{bean.items[0].value}" />
<h:outputText id="item_2" value="#{bean.items[1].value}" />
<h:outputText id="item_3" value="#{bean.items[2].value}" />
...which in turn individually generate their HTML output during view render time:
<span id="item_1">value1</span>
<span id="item_2">value2</span>
<span id="item_3">value3</span>
Note that you need to manually ensure the uniqueness of the component IDs and that those are also evaluated during view build time.
While this Facelets markup iterating over 3 items using <ui:repeat>, which is a JSF UI component:
<ui:repeat id="items" value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:outputText id="item" value="#{item.value}" />
</ui:repeat>
...already ends up as-is in the JSF component tree whereby the very same <h:outputText> component is during view render time being reused to generate HTML output based on current iteration round:
<span id="items:0:item">value1</span>
<span id="items:1:item">value2</span>
<span id="items:2:item">value3</span>
Note that the <ui:repeat> as being a NamingContainer component already ensured the uniqueness of the client ID based on iteration index; it's also not possible to use EL in id attribute of child components this way as it is also evaluated during view build time while #{item} is only available during view render time. Same is true for an h:dataTable and similar components.
<c:if>/<c:choose> vs rendered
As another example, this Facelets markup conditionally adding different tags using <c:if> (you can also use <c:choose><c:when><c:otherwise> for this):
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'TEXT'}">
<h:inputText ... />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'PASSWORD'}">
<h:inputSecret ... />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'SELECTONE'}">
<h:selectOneMenu ... />
</c:if>
...will in case of type = TEXT only add the <h:inputText> component to the JSF component tree:
<h:inputText ... />
While this Facelets markup:
<h:inputText ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'TEXT'}" />
<h:inputSecret ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'PASSWORD'}" />
<h:selectOneMenu ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'SELECTONE'}" />
...will end up exactly as above in the JSF component tree regardless of the condition. This may thus end up in a "bloated" component tree when you have many of them and they are actually based on a "static" model (i.e. the field does not ever change during at least the view scope). Also, you may run into EL trouble when you deal with subclasses with additional properties in Mojarra versions before 2.2.7.
<c:set> vs <ui:param>
They are not interchangeable. The <c:set> sets a variable in the EL scope, which is accessible only after the tag location during view build time, but anywhere in the view during view render time. The <ui:param> passes an EL variable to a Facelet template included via <ui:include>, <ui:decorate template>, or <ui:composition template>. Older JSF versions had bugs whereby the <ui:param> variable is also available outside the Facelet template in question, this should never be relied upon.
The <c:set> without a scope attribute will behave like an alias. It does not cache the result of the EL expression in any scope. It can thus perfectly fine be used inside for example iterating JSF components. Thus, e.g. below will work fine:
<ui:repeat value="#{bean.products}" var="product">
<c:set var="price" value="#{product.price}" />
<h:outputText value="#{price}" />
</ui:repeat>
It's only not suitable for e.g. calculating the sum in a loop. For that instead use EL 3.0 stream:
<ui:repeat value="#{bean.products}" var="product">
...
</ui:repeat>
<p>Total price: #{bean.products.stream().map(product->product.price).sum()}</p>
Only, when you set the scope attribute with one of allowable values request, view, session, or application, then it will be evaluated immediately during view build time and stored in the specified scope.
<c:set var="dev" value="#{facesContext.application.projectStage eq 'Development'}" scope="application" />
This will be evaluated only once and available as #{dev} throughout the entire application.
Use JSTL to control JSF component tree building
Using JSTL may only lead to unexpected results when being used inside JSF iterating components such as <h:dataTable>, <ui:repeat>, etc, or when JSTL tag attributes depend on results of JSF events such as preRenderView or submitted form values in the model which aren't available during view build time. So, use JSTL tags only to control flow of JSF component tree building. Use JSF UI components to control flow of HTML output generation. Do not bind the var of iterating JSF components to JSTL tag attributes. Do not rely on JSF events in JSTL tag attributes.
Anytime you think you need to bind a component to the backing bean via binding, or grab one via findComponent(), and create/manipulate its children using Java code in a backing bean with new SomeComponent() and what not, then you should immediately stop and consider using JSTL instead. As JSTL is also XML based, the code needed to dynamically create JSF components will become so much better readable and maintainable.
Important to know is that Mojarra versions older than 2.1.18 had a bug in partial state saving when referencing a view scoped bean in a JSTL tag attribute. The whole view scoped bean would be newly recreated instead of retrieved from the view tree (simply because the complete view tree isn't available yet at the point JSTL runs). If you're expecting or storing some state in the view scoped bean by a JSTL tag attribute, then it won't return the value you expect, or it will be "lost" in the real view scoped bean which is restored after the view tree is built. In case you can't upgrade to Mojarra 2.1.18 or newer, the work around is to turn off partial state saving in web.xml like below:
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING</param-name>
<param-value>false</param-value>
</context-param>
See also:
What's the view build time?
How does the 'binding' attribute work in JSF? When and how should it be used?
How to refactor snippet of old JSP to some JSF equivalent?
Should PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING be set to false?
Communication in JSF 2.0 - #ViewScoped fails in tag handlers
To see some real world examples where JSTL tags are helpful (i.e. when really properly used during building the view), see the following questions/answers:
How to make a grid of JSF composite component?
Create table columns dynamically in JSF
How to custom layout h:selectOneRadio
Conditional variable definition in JSF
How to make composite component similar to <h:selectOneRadio />
JSF 2 -- Composite component with optional listener attribute on f:ajax
Nested JSF Composite Components leading to a Stack Overflow exception
In a nutshell
As to your concrete functional requirement, if you want to render JSF components conditionally, use the rendered attribute on the JSF HTML component instead, particularly if #{lpc} represents the currently iterated item of a JSF iterating component such as <h:dataTable> or <ui:repeat>.
<h:someComponent rendered="#{lpc.verbose}">
...
</h:someComponent>
Or, if you want to build (create/add) JSF components conditionally, then keep using JSTL. It's way much better than verbosely doing new SomeComponent() in java.
<c:if test="#{lpc.verbose}">
<h:someComponent>
...
</h:someComponent>
</c:if>
See also:
Conditionally displaying JSF components
JSTL c:if doesn't work inside a JSF h:dataTable
Specify conditional rendering of element inside <ui:repeat>? The <c:if> does not seem to work
use
<h:panelGroup rendered="#{lpc.verbose}">
...
</h:panelGroup>
For switch-like output, you can use the switch face from PrimeFaces Extensions.
I would like to output a bit of Facelets code conditionally.
For that purpose, the JSTL tags seem to work fine:
<c:if test="${lpc.verbose}">
...
</c:if>
However, I'm not sure if this is a best practice? Is there another way to achieve my goal?
Introduction
JSTL <c:xxx> tags are all taghandlers and they are executed during view build time, while JSF <h:xxx> tags are all UI components and they are executed during view render time.
Note that from JSF's own <f:xxx> and <ui:xxx> tags only those which do not extend from UIComponent are also taghandlers, e.g. <f:validator>, <ui:include>, <ui:define>, etc. The ones which extend from UIComponent are also JSF UI components, e.g. <f:param>, <ui:fragment>, <ui:repeat>, etc. From JSF UI components only the id and binding attributes are also evaluated during view build time. Thus the below answer as to JSTL lifecycle also applies to the id and binding attributes of JSF components.
The view build time is that moment when the XHTML/JSP file is to be parsed and converted to a JSF component tree which is then stored as UIViewRoot of the FacesContext. The view render time is that moment when the JSF component tree is about to generate HTML, starting with UIViewRoot#encodeAll(). So: JSF UI components and JSTL tags doesn't run in sync as you'd expect from the coding. You can visualize it as follows: JSTL runs from top to bottom first, producing the JSF component tree, then it's JSF's turn to run from top to bottom again, producing the HTML output.
<c:forEach> vs <ui:repeat>
For example, this Facelets markup iterating over 3 items using <c:forEach>:
<c:forEach items="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:outputText id="item_#{item.id}" value="#{item.value}" />
</c:forEach>
...creates during view build time three separate <h:outputText> components in the JSF component tree, roughly represented like this:
<h:outputText id="item_1" value="#{bean.items[0].value}" />
<h:outputText id="item_2" value="#{bean.items[1].value}" />
<h:outputText id="item_3" value="#{bean.items[2].value}" />
...which in turn individually generate their HTML output during view render time:
<span id="item_1">value1</span>
<span id="item_2">value2</span>
<span id="item_3">value3</span>
Note that you need to manually ensure the uniqueness of the component IDs and that those are also evaluated during view build time.
While this Facelets markup iterating over 3 items using <ui:repeat>, which is a JSF UI component:
<ui:repeat id="items" value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:outputText id="item" value="#{item.value}" />
</ui:repeat>
...already ends up as-is in the JSF component tree whereby the very same <h:outputText> component is during view render time being reused to generate HTML output based on current iteration round:
<span id="items:0:item">value1</span>
<span id="items:1:item">value2</span>
<span id="items:2:item">value3</span>
Note that the <ui:repeat> as being a NamingContainer component already ensured the uniqueness of the client ID based on iteration index; it's also not possible to use EL in id attribute of child components this way as it is also evaluated during view build time while #{item} is only available during view render time. Same is true for an h:dataTable and similar components.
<c:if>/<c:choose> vs rendered
As another example, this Facelets markup conditionally adding different tags using <c:if> (you can also use <c:choose><c:when><c:otherwise> for this):
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'TEXT'}">
<h:inputText ... />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'PASSWORD'}">
<h:inputSecret ... />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'SELECTONE'}">
<h:selectOneMenu ... />
</c:if>
...will in case of type = TEXT only add the <h:inputText> component to the JSF component tree:
<h:inputText ... />
While this Facelets markup:
<h:inputText ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'TEXT'}" />
<h:inputSecret ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'PASSWORD'}" />
<h:selectOneMenu ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'SELECTONE'}" />
...will end up exactly as above in the JSF component tree regardless of the condition. This may thus end up in a "bloated" component tree when you have many of them and they are actually based on a "static" model (i.e. the field does not ever change during at least the view scope). Also, you may run into EL trouble when you deal with subclasses with additional properties in Mojarra versions before 2.2.7.
<c:set> vs <ui:param>
They are not interchangeable. The <c:set> sets a variable in the EL scope, which is accessible only after the tag location during view build time, but anywhere in the view during view render time. The <ui:param> passes an EL variable to a Facelet template included via <ui:include>, <ui:decorate template>, or <ui:composition template>. Older JSF versions had bugs whereby the <ui:param> variable is also available outside the Facelet template in question, this should never be relied upon.
The <c:set> without a scope attribute will behave like an alias. It does not cache the result of the EL expression in any scope. It can thus perfectly fine be used inside for example iterating JSF components. Thus, e.g. below will work fine:
<ui:repeat value="#{bean.products}" var="product">
<c:set var="price" value="#{product.price}" />
<h:outputText value="#{price}" />
</ui:repeat>
It's only not suitable for e.g. calculating the sum in a loop. For that instead use EL 3.0 stream:
<ui:repeat value="#{bean.products}" var="product">
...
</ui:repeat>
<p>Total price: #{bean.products.stream().map(product->product.price).sum()}</p>
Only, when you set the scope attribute with one of allowable values request, view, session, or application, then it will be evaluated immediately during view build time and stored in the specified scope.
<c:set var="dev" value="#{facesContext.application.projectStage eq 'Development'}" scope="application" />
This will be evaluated only once and available as #{dev} throughout the entire application.
Use JSTL to control JSF component tree building
Using JSTL may only lead to unexpected results when being used inside JSF iterating components such as <h:dataTable>, <ui:repeat>, etc, or when JSTL tag attributes depend on results of JSF events such as preRenderView or submitted form values in the model which aren't available during view build time. So, use JSTL tags only to control flow of JSF component tree building. Use JSF UI components to control flow of HTML output generation. Do not bind the var of iterating JSF components to JSTL tag attributes. Do not rely on JSF events in JSTL tag attributes.
Anytime you think you need to bind a component to the backing bean via binding, or grab one via findComponent(), and create/manipulate its children using Java code in a backing bean with new SomeComponent() and what not, then you should immediately stop and consider using JSTL instead. As JSTL is also XML based, the code needed to dynamically create JSF components will become so much better readable and maintainable.
Important to know is that Mojarra versions older than 2.1.18 had a bug in partial state saving when referencing a view scoped bean in a JSTL tag attribute. The whole view scoped bean would be newly recreated instead of retrieved from the view tree (simply because the complete view tree isn't available yet at the point JSTL runs). If you're expecting or storing some state in the view scoped bean by a JSTL tag attribute, then it won't return the value you expect, or it will be "lost" in the real view scoped bean which is restored after the view tree is built. In case you can't upgrade to Mojarra 2.1.18 or newer, the work around is to turn off partial state saving in web.xml like below:
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING</param-name>
<param-value>false</param-value>
</context-param>
See also:
What's the view build time?
How does the 'binding' attribute work in JSF? When and how should it be used?
How to refactor snippet of old JSP to some JSF equivalent?
Should PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING be set to false?
Communication in JSF 2.0 - #ViewScoped fails in tag handlers
To see some real world examples where JSTL tags are helpful (i.e. when really properly used during building the view), see the following questions/answers:
How to make a grid of JSF composite component?
Create table columns dynamically in JSF
How to custom layout h:selectOneRadio
Conditional variable definition in JSF
How to make composite component similar to <h:selectOneRadio />
JSF 2 -- Composite component with optional listener attribute on f:ajax
Nested JSF Composite Components leading to a Stack Overflow exception
In a nutshell
As to your concrete functional requirement, if you want to render JSF components conditionally, use the rendered attribute on the JSF HTML component instead, particularly if #{lpc} represents the currently iterated item of a JSF iterating component such as <h:dataTable> or <ui:repeat>.
<h:someComponent rendered="#{lpc.verbose}">
...
</h:someComponent>
Or, if you want to build (create/add) JSF components conditionally, then keep using JSTL. It's way much better than verbosely doing new SomeComponent() in java.
<c:if test="#{lpc.verbose}">
<h:someComponent>
...
</h:someComponent>
</c:if>
See also:
Conditionally displaying JSF components
JSTL c:if doesn't work inside a JSF h:dataTable
Specify conditional rendering of element inside <ui:repeat>? The <c:if> does not seem to work
use
<h:panelGroup rendered="#{lpc.verbose}">
...
</h:panelGroup>
For switch-like output, you can use the switch face from PrimeFaces Extensions.
I want to inlude <ui:include> one page dynamically several times.
Code:
<h:dataTable ..>
<h:column>
<ui:include src="#{create_page}">
<h:column>
<h:dataTable>
Now when I submit it persists only the last inlude. It remembers only the values for the last included page. I want unique entity object in each create_page. How can I do that?
The <ui:include> is as being a tag handler executed during view build time, while the <h:dataTable> is as being an UI component executed during view render time. This means that the <ui:include> is executed only once before the <h:dataTable> and thus not during the iteration. You effectively end up with exactly the same include source in every row. When the form is submitted the rows are processed one by one until the last row, that's why you effectively end up with the values of the last row.
There are basically 2 ways to solve this:
Use <c:forEach> instead of <h:dataTable>, this runs also during view build time.
Use a tag file or a composite component instead of <ui:include>, this runs also during view render time.
Either way, you also need to ensure that the input values are bound to the object behind the var attribute of the datatable, not to one and same backing bean property.
See also:
JSTL in JSF2 Facelets... makes sense? (the <ui:include> falls in the same category as JSTL)
When to use <ui:include>, tag files, composite components and/or custom components?
I would like to output a bit of Facelets code conditionally.
For that purpose, the JSTL tags seem to work fine:
<c:if test="${lpc.verbose}">
...
</c:if>
However, I'm not sure if this is a best practice? Is there another way to achieve my goal?
Introduction
JSTL <c:xxx> tags are all taghandlers and they are executed during view build time, while JSF <h:xxx> tags are all UI components and they are executed during view render time.
Note that from JSF's own <f:xxx> and <ui:xxx> tags only those which do not extend from UIComponent are also taghandlers, e.g. <f:validator>, <ui:include>, <ui:define>, etc. The ones which extend from UIComponent are also JSF UI components, e.g. <f:param>, <ui:fragment>, <ui:repeat>, etc. From JSF UI components only the id and binding attributes are also evaluated during view build time. Thus the below answer as to JSTL lifecycle also applies to the id and binding attributes of JSF components.
The view build time is that moment when the XHTML/JSP file is to be parsed and converted to a JSF component tree which is then stored as UIViewRoot of the FacesContext. The view render time is that moment when the JSF component tree is about to generate HTML, starting with UIViewRoot#encodeAll(). So: JSF UI components and JSTL tags doesn't run in sync as you'd expect from the coding. You can visualize it as follows: JSTL runs from top to bottom first, producing the JSF component tree, then it's JSF's turn to run from top to bottom again, producing the HTML output.
<c:forEach> vs <ui:repeat>
For example, this Facelets markup iterating over 3 items using <c:forEach>:
<c:forEach items="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:outputText id="item_#{item.id}" value="#{item.value}" />
</c:forEach>
...creates during view build time three separate <h:outputText> components in the JSF component tree, roughly represented like this:
<h:outputText id="item_1" value="#{bean.items[0].value}" />
<h:outputText id="item_2" value="#{bean.items[1].value}" />
<h:outputText id="item_3" value="#{bean.items[2].value}" />
...which in turn individually generate their HTML output during view render time:
<span id="item_1">value1</span>
<span id="item_2">value2</span>
<span id="item_3">value3</span>
Note that you need to manually ensure the uniqueness of the component IDs and that those are also evaluated during view build time.
While this Facelets markup iterating over 3 items using <ui:repeat>, which is a JSF UI component:
<ui:repeat id="items" value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
<h:outputText id="item" value="#{item.value}" />
</ui:repeat>
...already ends up as-is in the JSF component tree whereby the very same <h:outputText> component is during view render time being reused to generate HTML output based on current iteration round:
<span id="items:0:item">value1</span>
<span id="items:1:item">value2</span>
<span id="items:2:item">value3</span>
Note that the <ui:repeat> as being a NamingContainer component already ensured the uniqueness of the client ID based on iteration index; it's also not possible to use EL in id attribute of child components this way as it is also evaluated during view build time while #{item} is only available during view render time. Same is true for an h:dataTable and similar components.
<c:if>/<c:choose> vs rendered
As another example, this Facelets markup conditionally adding different tags using <c:if> (you can also use <c:choose><c:when><c:otherwise> for this):
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'TEXT'}">
<h:inputText ... />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'PASSWORD'}">
<h:inputSecret ... />
</c:if>
<c:if test="#{field.type eq 'SELECTONE'}">
<h:selectOneMenu ... />
</c:if>
...will in case of type = TEXT only add the <h:inputText> component to the JSF component tree:
<h:inputText ... />
While this Facelets markup:
<h:inputText ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'TEXT'}" />
<h:inputSecret ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'PASSWORD'}" />
<h:selectOneMenu ... rendered="#{field.type eq 'SELECTONE'}" />
...will end up exactly as above in the JSF component tree regardless of the condition. This may thus end up in a "bloated" component tree when you have many of them and they are actually based on a "static" model (i.e. the field does not ever change during at least the view scope). Also, you may run into EL trouble when you deal with subclasses with additional properties in Mojarra versions before 2.2.7.
<c:set> vs <ui:param>
They are not interchangeable. The <c:set> sets a variable in the EL scope, which is accessible only after the tag location during view build time, but anywhere in the view during view render time. The <ui:param> passes an EL variable to a Facelet template included via <ui:include>, <ui:decorate template>, or <ui:composition template>. Older JSF versions had bugs whereby the <ui:param> variable is also available outside the Facelet template in question, this should never be relied upon.
The <c:set> without a scope attribute will behave like an alias. It does not cache the result of the EL expression in any scope. It can thus perfectly fine be used inside for example iterating JSF components. Thus, e.g. below will work fine:
<ui:repeat value="#{bean.products}" var="product">
<c:set var="price" value="#{product.price}" />
<h:outputText value="#{price}" />
</ui:repeat>
It's only not suitable for e.g. calculating the sum in a loop. For that instead use EL 3.0 stream:
<ui:repeat value="#{bean.products}" var="product">
...
</ui:repeat>
<p>Total price: #{bean.products.stream().map(product->product.price).sum()}</p>
Only, when you set the scope attribute with one of allowable values request, view, session, or application, then it will be evaluated immediately during view build time and stored in the specified scope.
<c:set var="dev" value="#{facesContext.application.projectStage eq 'Development'}" scope="application" />
This will be evaluated only once and available as #{dev} throughout the entire application.
Use JSTL to control JSF component tree building
Using JSTL may only lead to unexpected results when being used inside JSF iterating components such as <h:dataTable>, <ui:repeat>, etc, or when JSTL tag attributes depend on results of JSF events such as preRenderView or submitted form values in the model which aren't available during view build time. So, use JSTL tags only to control flow of JSF component tree building. Use JSF UI components to control flow of HTML output generation. Do not bind the var of iterating JSF components to JSTL tag attributes. Do not rely on JSF events in JSTL tag attributes.
Anytime you think you need to bind a component to the backing bean via binding, or grab one via findComponent(), and create/manipulate its children using Java code in a backing bean with new SomeComponent() and what not, then you should immediately stop and consider using JSTL instead. As JSTL is also XML based, the code needed to dynamically create JSF components will become so much better readable and maintainable.
Important to know is that Mojarra versions older than 2.1.18 had a bug in partial state saving when referencing a view scoped bean in a JSTL tag attribute. The whole view scoped bean would be newly recreated instead of retrieved from the view tree (simply because the complete view tree isn't available yet at the point JSTL runs). If you're expecting or storing some state in the view scoped bean by a JSTL tag attribute, then it won't return the value you expect, or it will be "lost" in the real view scoped bean which is restored after the view tree is built. In case you can't upgrade to Mojarra 2.1.18 or newer, the work around is to turn off partial state saving in web.xml like below:
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING</param-name>
<param-value>false</param-value>
</context-param>
See also:
What's the view build time?
How does the 'binding' attribute work in JSF? When and how should it be used?
How to refactor snippet of old JSP to some JSF equivalent?
Should PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING be set to false?
Communication in JSF 2.0 - #ViewScoped fails in tag handlers
To see some real world examples where JSTL tags are helpful (i.e. when really properly used during building the view), see the following questions/answers:
How to make a grid of JSF composite component?
Create table columns dynamically in JSF
How to custom layout h:selectOneRadio
Conditional variable definition in JSF
How to make composite component similar to <h:selectOneRadio />
JSF 2 -- Composite component with optional listener attribute on f:ajax
Nested JSF Composite Components leading to a Stack Overflow exception
In a nutshell
As to your concrete functional requirement, if you want to render JSF components conditionally, use the rendered attribute on the JSF HTML component instead, particularly if #{lpc} represents the currently iterated item of a JSF iterating component such as <h:dataTable> or <ui:repeat>.
<h:someComponent rendered="#{lpc.verbose}">
...
</h:someComponent>
Or, if you want to build (create/add) JSF components conditionally, then keep using JSTL. It's way much better than verbosely doing new SomeComponent() in java.
<c:if test="#{lpc.verbose}">
<h:someComponent>
...
</h:someComponent>
</c:if>
See also:
Conditionally displaying JSF components
JSTL c:if doesn't work inside a JSF h:dataTable
Specify conditional rendering of element inside <ui:repeat>? The <c:if> does not seem to work
use
<h:panelGroup rendered="#{lpc.verbose}">
...
</h:panelGroup>
For switch-like output, you can use the switch face from PrimeFaces Extensions.