In Vim I (of course) use keymappings to make my life easier, but when making a key mapping of my own I would really know if that key (or key combination) had some purpose before I potentially remap it.
So my question is: which keys/key combinations in Vim does not have a function? and is there by any chance a way to get Vim to list which?
You can generally use :help <key> to see if it's taken in normal mode and :help i_<key> to see if it's used in insert mode. Furthermore, you can use :map <key> to check if anything is mapped by your vimrc or plugins. This also works for imap, nmap, etc.
For example:
:help j
:help i_CTRL-N
:imap <Tab>
As far as a list goes, all of the capital and lowercase letters from A-Z have some meaning assigned to them. Most CTRL+<key> keys have meaning in all modes but some don't. The default <leader> key is \, but many people set that to ,; however, , has a special meaning in normal mode (opposite of ;). I suspect that most people map custom keys to <leader><key> or an <F#>. Often times keys that do have a default meaning aren't ones you actually desire, so looking up :help is a good practice since it not only increases your understanding of vim but also lets you make a judgment call on whether you need that functionality or not.
Related
Vim seems to have bound every key on the keyboard with actions. If I wanted to create some custom keymaps for often-executed commands, are there any keys that are recommended that I use or that are intended to be overridden?
You're right, for often-invoked mappings, the default <Leader> of \ isn't optimal. Some people reassign via mapleader, but if you use many plugins, that again leads to contention and long <Leader>abc... mappings.
My approach is to keep the leader, and start the few quick and often-used mappings with , instead. The original functionality of , isn't that important, but I've reassigned it to ' (for which I can alternatively use `; I don't usually need line-only jumps):
:noremap ' ,
In addition, you have the function keys for very quick access (though you have to lift the hand from the home row). If you're mainly in GVIM, you can also map all Shift / Ctrl / Alt combinations; in the terminal, these might not work.
Finally, there are some unused combinations. For example, yr (though there's yank and replace, there's no r motion), or q followed by any non-(writable-) register: q., q#, ...
I'll assume you don't want to use a <leader> mapping.
There are an infinite number of possible mappings, you can check if one you are thinking of is in use by a plugin via::map, :nmap and :imap.
You can check default mappings using :help
You may also be interested in Tim Pope's thought on the subject:
leader maps are pretty lame
After attempting to use vim a number of times, I'm always been put off by its default key bindings. After some research, I decided to remap the default keys to more sane ones (at least for my tastes). I have a few questions about changing bindings that I could not find answers to through Google.
Is there a way to map a key to an action rather than another key. For example:
:noremap a h
will bind the a key to move the cursor left. Is there something along the lines of
:noremap a move-cursor-left
or
:noremap a :move-cursor-left<Enter>
so I can read my config file afterwards?
Is there a way to unbind all of the default key bindings? I've tried :mapclear but it doesn't seem to work, although it might just be clearing non-default bindings. Unmapping every key manually is not an option. If possible, I would like to export the defaults to a file so I can edit them as I need.
Is there another language I can use to write my own commands for vim other than vim-script? I haven't actually looked into this one so much though. If I can bind an external executable to a command, that would be good enough.
I haven't given up on vim although I would like to ask if there are any vim-like alternatives out there. My Google searches came up with nothing actively developed. If the above cannot be done, or reasonably hacked together, I would like to find a fully configurable, modal, command line text editor that can.
The command set of vi / Vim has 40 years of wisdom encoded into it; completely changing it is a bad idea. I can only repeat the reference to this answer from the comments; that should convince you (to accept this, or choose another editor).
Give the default commands another try. It'll take some time to get used to, but most Vim users swear by these. It's fine to make minor adjustments "for personal style": careful evolution, but not revolution. Also, some people with odd keyboard layouts (like Dvorak or Colemak) swap several keys for convenience.
The move-cursor-left is just h; aided by the excellent :help, you should be able to "read" your remappings just fine.
In general, even though it's possible to write extensions / plugins in integrated languages like Perl, Python, Ruby, etc. (based on support for them compiled into the Vim binary), you won't get around learning some key Vim internals and parts of Vimscript. If you don't feel comfortable at all about this, I'd suggest to use another editor. Unfortunately, with your requirements of full extensibility (and probably broad acceptance and platform support), there's only one serious alternative: Emacs (which cannot only be turned into everything but a kitchen sink, but also into a modal editor, too).
(i know this question is old)
you can reset the binds by just over-writing them
on vim you can use many <things> (idk the name)
e.g.
<Up> = Up-arrow-key
<C-f> = Ctrl, f
<A-Down> = Alt, Down-arrow-key
<Esc> = Escape-key
it's possible to remap the hjkl keys to wasd like this:
nmap w <Up>
nmap a <Left>
nmap s <Down>
nmap d <Right>
In Emacs, key sequences beginning with C-c are, by convention, reserved for individual users to set. I think there is at least one more convention, too.
What, if any, are Vim's conventions for custom key bindings?
You can use commands prefixed with your <leader> key as a convention to separate your own individual keymaps from default ones.
Set your <leader> key with a like this in your .vimrc file:
let mapleader = "_"
Then you can create key mappings that are prefixed with whatever you set your leader to like this:
nnoremap <leader><space> :noh<cr>
For more info see here
In Emacs, I would't say it was so much of a a convention, as much of a popular choice.
In Vim there is not even that, and although Ctrl+something or the F keys are popular, it is far from being a wide spread "convention".
A lot of Vim users just use the default "letter operations" in normal mode, with which they accomplish in text editing, what a majority of Emacs users must depend on functions.
There is a backslash which does nothing by default, only being the default value of mapping leader (both mapleader and maplocalleader). This leader is used in plugins and I strongly suggest to leave it for them only, using keys that have default actions attached, but that are not much useful. Common keys are , (repeats t/T/f/F motion in the opposite direction) and _ (moves one line downward, on the first non-blank character), you can also check which ones you don’t use (I, for example, don’t use + and -, latter is good replacement for _). The reasons why I unlike #stonesam92 suggest not to set mapleader to them and instead put your own leader in your mappings directly are the following:
It makes plugins possibly add mappings conflicting with your own ones.
You get used to typing ,a, _a or whatever, not to <Leader>a.
It makes mapping commands work differently depending on their location in the vimrc (<Leader> is computed only once, if you change mapleader afterwards already defined mappings won’t change).
It obfuscates the reading: you have to always remember, what <Leader> is.
If you are writing plugin, always use <Leader> and also leave the user the better way to customize them, two common solutions are using global options and using hasmapto:
" Global option
if !exists('g:plugin_mapping_key')
let g:plugin_mapping_key='<Leader>a'
endif
execute 'nnoremap '.g:plugin_mapping_key.' :DoSomething<CR>'
" hasmapto
nnoremap <Plug>PluginDoSomething :DoSomething<CR>
if !hasmapto('<Plug>PluginDoSomething', 'n', 0)
nmap <Leader>a <Plug>PluginDoSomething
endif
Is there any feature in Vim which shows me what a keyboard shortcut is bound to in the current context? Something like describe-key in emacs.
I'm trying to find out which keys i can safely rebind and which are bound to something useful.
If your key is manually mapped, you can check the mapping by evoking:
:map <keys>
if it is not, then you can check the manual:
:help <keys>
The first google hit says:
is there anything like "describe-key" (EMacs) in vim ?
The simplest might be the Vim help system. For example:
:h ^X
describes Ctrl-X. You have to type "^X" as two characters, not one.
To see how a key is mapped, you can use :map <whatever key sequence>, or just :map to see all non-default bindings. Mappings of keys may contain non-trivial sequences, so you might need to look up several other keys used in the mapping with :h as said above.
I'm trying to create two mappings which are efficient for myself:
map X ddp
Which I'd use to delete and paste in one go.
map X "_dw
Which would delete a word without yanking into a register.
However I don't want to break any existing, useful shortcuts so I'm wondering what keys I could use - any suggestions? Am I being too uptidy?
vim help has a section :he map-which-keys
1.7 WHAT KEYS TO MAP *map-which-keys*
If you are going to map something, you will need to choose which key(s) to use
for the {lhs}. You will have to avoid keys that are used for Vim commands,
otherwise you would not be able to use those commands anymore. Here are a few
suggestions:
- Function keys <F2>, <F3>, etc.. Also the shifted function keys <S-F1>,
<S-F2>, etc. Note that <F1> is already used for the help command.
- Meta-keys (with the ALT key pressed). |:map-alt-keys|
- Use the '_' or ',' character and then any other character. The "_" and ","
commands do exist in Vim (see |_| and |,|), but you probably never use them.
- Use a key that is a synonym for another command. For example: CTRL-P and
CTRL-N. Use an extra character to allow more mappings.
See the file "index" for keys that are not used and thus can be mapped without
losing any builtin function. You can also use ":help {key}^D" to find out if
a key is used for some command. ({key} is the specific key you want to find
out about, ^D is CTRL-D).
Many Vim plugins use an initial <Leader> to start their key sequences; this is an (otherwise normally) unused key that is configurable by the user.
*<Leader>* *mapleader*
To define a mapping which uses the "mapleader" variable, the special string
"<Leader>" can be used. It is replaced with the string value of "mapleader".
If "mapleader" is not set or empty, a backslash is used instead. Example:
:map <Leader>A oanother line<Esc>
Works like:
:map \A oanother line<Esc>
But after:
:let mapleader = ","
It works like:
:map ,A oanother line<Esc>
Note that the value of "mapleader" is used at the moment the mapping is
defined. Changing "mapleader" after that has no effect for already defined
mappings.
Every single ASCII character, upper and lower case, is used for something in Vim. So you're going to wind up overwriting something--just pick something that you don't use. It may help to use a common idiom for your own extensions. I use a leading comma, for example:
map ,w :w!<CR>
map ,e :e #<CR>
imap ,, <ESC>
(The last is particularly useful for me, since I pretty much never need to write two consecutive commas in insert mode, and it's nice not to have to go all the way to the Esc key.)
Typically I use control + [letter] or alt + [letter] for most mappings and it's safe, but watch out for 'w' since that's needed for window commands. You might also be interested in arpeggio.vim which lets you create mappings to simultaneously pressed groups of keys - it will massively expand the possibilities for your mappings with no danger of over-mapping something. For example, you could map "dp" (pressed simultaneously) to execute "ddp" to delete and paste in one command.
Uhmm, no, don't. When creating your mappings try not to overwrite anything ... not so much because you don't use the command you're overmapping, but because some plugin which you have/or will have maybe using it.
And then you overmap it, and then you have to worry.
Personally, for commands such as you gave as an example, I like Ctrl+some key combinations. There are a lot of free ones in vim, and the letters on the left side near Ctrl make a nice pair then.
Btw, what are you trying to do with those mappings ... I understand the second one (delete word by word), but the first doesn't make sense to me. What is it supposed to do ? Transpose lines ?