Orchard CMS - Grouping fields - orchardcms

Is there a possibility to have fields that are added to a contentpart to be grouped. I don't know upfront what fields the customer will add. And if he adds a lot of fields to the contentpart, it would be nice if there was some kind of identifier to group them.
Should I take over the Orchard.Fields module and modify it or is there an easier way?

There is no easy way to do that today, but this is such a common request that I think it should be submitted as a work item (or even better, a patch) on CodePlex. We should add a group attribute to fields and maybe even parts.
UPDATE: I created it for you: http://orchard.codeplex.com/workitem/18920 Feel free to vote for it.

Related

Is there a simple example on how to add an entity extension for customers with field in the admin of shopware 6?

I want to add an entity extension to a customer in shopware 6. I was able to do so with the examples in the documentation of shopware on the PHP side and now I wonder how to display and modify this new "field" in the shopware 6 backend.
I searched a lot and also tried to find a simple plugin where I could get some inspiration from, but unfortunately I'm not able to find.
So again the question 😊 Is there any simple example on how to add an entity extension for customers with field in the admin of shopware 6? Or an example plugin, where I can see how it could be done?
What you're (likely) trying to achieve would be the combination of multiple separate tasks.
If you want to store data in the database you'd need a new custom entity
If you want to associate the new entity with the customer you'll need the entity extension
You'll need to add a new field in the administration
I've linked to examples respectively, but you'll probably need to take the time and invest in studying the documentation regardless.
I also created an example plugin that combines all these steps and adds a new entity with a height field as association to the customer and displays the field in the administration. You can find the repository here.
Not sure if you considered this, but depending on what you are trying to accomplish, the simplest way is probably adding a custom field (this can be done progamatically or even via the admin panel).
The drawback is, that those fields' values are stored as JSON and it has drawbacks when you try to search through them.

Kentico cms.file publish date

I've got a simple repeater that list links to uploaded documents using cms.file. I'm drawing a blank on adjust the ORDER BY based on publish date. I can't find anything here on this, so i apologize if this is a duplicate.
Best practice is to add custom field to page type (in this case cms.file or better create the new one) and set ORDER BY condition to this new field. There are also properties like DocumentModifiedWhen, DocumentCreatedWhen, DocumentCheckedOutWhen you can use.
I'm going to use DocumentModifiedWhen as the ORDER By statement.
There are two fields [DocumentPublishTo] and [DocumentPublishFrom] that you can think of using. These are the two fields which appear at the bottom of each form page by default.

Create domino view dynamically in XPages

I want to know if I can click a button in my XPage and dynamically create a Domino View and then show it in a panel control on the same page. The reason I want to do this is because I have a categorized view and I don't want to lose category data by using full text search. So I am thinking of creating a new view dynamically and pass my search parameters, like end date or start date, into the view selection formula.
Is it possible? Any other alternative solution is also welcome.
yes you can, but you don't want to. A Domino view takes space in the database and quite some time for its first use. So you end up with a lot of views taking space and the need to adjust database space after removal. Your response times will suck big time.
Categories as shown in Notes views are no web interaction pattern, so you might want to solve a problem that actually shouldn't exist.
The preferred method for Domino application is navigation / drill down over search. But you could do a FTSearch where you add your category to the search parameters and render your results in a repeat control instead of a view control. There you have more control over the look and feel.
Whether or not it's the best solution, the answer to the immediate question about creating a view on the fly is yes: the Database class has a couple "createView" methods to allow you to create a new view, either entirely from scratch or based on a named other view. From there, you can use the "setSelectionFormula" and "createColumn" methods in the created View to build what you want. You can't do EVERYTHING with those methods, but it may be enough.
One problem you'd likely run into is ACL access: you'll need Designer rights to the database, which a normal user most likely wouldn't have. If you use the sessionAsSigner object to fetch a signer version of the DB (say, "var signerDB = sessionAsSigner.getDatabase(database.getServer(), database.getFilePath())"), you can work from there. Off the top of my head, I don't remember if you will also have to up the "Maximum Internet access" setting on the last tab of the ACL to Designer as well, but you may.
I am assuming that you are referring to the problem that exists when you choose the documents based on the category. This is something that I find highly annoying and I wish that it was possible to turn this on and off. It makes sense for embedded views, but not for much else.
What I did to solve this was to include the category value in the next column. In this way that text could still be seen, even if it was a flat view.
Alternatively, you could also look into using a repeater control and create your own way of presenting the information. This would be used instead of a (Dynamic)ViewPanel control. You could then present the information any way you wanted as long as it is returned in the viewrow set.
Happy Programming!

CRM 2011 Filtering view on related record type

I want to create a new view for the activities entity. My aim was to show only the activities that were related to a record of a certain type eg account. But when i was creating it i saw that aside from saying if it contains data or not, and for specific records, there isnt an option for entity type.
I can understand why this isnt an option in the list, as its not really something people would need to do, but is this possible at all?
Thanks
Create an Advanced Find and specify the following criteria:
Look for: Activities
Related > Regarding (Account)
This will get you all activities which are related to an account.

Sharepoint WSS 3.0 Attributes returned from GetListItems

Is there some definition around the attributes that are returned from the Lists.GetListItems? I am able to view the attributes retuned just fine but I am wondering if they would ever change?
Here are some examples of what I am seeing... #ows_Author, #ows_FileDirRef, #ows_PermMask
I would like to build some classes around these values and my concern is that if they are not published somewhere Microsoft may up and change them or some setting in Sharepoint may.
It is possible that they change as sharepoint (major) version changes. Every change is possible then.
Don't think it would happen in minor version.
However they may also change depending on what list you query. But fields your mentioned and many other fields are basic fields that every list will contain.
If you want to view field data yourself (for example, what Type they are), download Sharepoint Manager - it's invaluable tool for a developer.
These are internal field names for default SharePoint fields. Unless you explicitly change them, they will remain the same.
Micheal Yeager's blog has a table which describes these fields and their data types:
http://blogs.msdn.com/michael_yeager/archive/2008/11/03/reference-list-for-internal-field-names.aspx

Resources