I've got a simple model (simplified of source):
class Collection
{
public $page;
public $limit;
}
And a form type:
class CollectionType extends AbstractType
{
public function buildForm(FormBuilderInterface $builder, array $options)
{
$builder->add('page', 'integer');
$builder->add('limit', 'integer');
}
public function setDefaultOptions(OptionsResolverInterface $resolver)
{
$resolver->setDefaults(array(
'data_class' => 'FSC\Common\Rest\Form\Model\Collection',
));
}
}
My controller:
public function getUsersAction(Request $request)
{
$collection = new Collection();
$collection->page = 1;
$collection->limit = 10;
$form = $this->createForm(new CollectionType(), $collection)
$form->bind($request);
print_r($collection);exit;
}
When i POST /users/?form[page]=2&form[limit]=20, the response is what i expect:
Collection Object
(
[page:public] => 2
[limit:public] => 20
)
Now, when i POST /users/?form[page]=3, the response is:
Collection Object
(
[page:public] => 3
[limit:public] =>
)
limit becomes null, because it was not submitted.
I wanted to get
Collection Object
(
[page:public] => 3
[limit:public] => 10 // The default value, set before the bind
)
Question: How can i change the form behaviour, so that it ignores non submitted values ?
If is only a problem of parameters (GET parameters) you can define the default value into routing file
route_name:
pattern: /users/?form[page]={page}&form[limit]={limit}
defaults: { _controller: CompanyNameBundleName:ControllerName:ActionName,
limit:10 }
An alternative way could be to use a hook (i.e. PRE_BIND) and update manually that value into this event. In that way you haven't the "logic" spreaded into multi pieces of code.
Final code - suggested by Adrien - will be
<?php
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormEvent;
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormFactoryInterface;
use Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\EventSubscriberInterface;
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormEvents;
class IgnoreNonSubmittedFieldSubscriber implements EventSubscriberInterface
{
private $factory;
public function __construct(FormFactoryInterface $factory)
{
$this->factory = $factory;
}
public static function getSubscribedEvents()
{
return array(FormEvents::PRE_BIND => 'preBind');
}
public function preBind(FormEvent $event)
{
$submittedData = $event->getData();
$form = $event->getForm();
// We remove every child that has no data to bind, to avoid "overriding" the form default data
foreach ($form->all() as $name => $child) {
if (!isset($submittedData[$name])) {
$form->remove($name);
}
}
}
}
Here's a modification of the original answer. The most important benefit of this solution is that validators can now behave as if the form post would always be complete, which means there's no problems with error bubbling and such.
Note that object field names must be identical to form field names for this code to work.
<?php
namespace Acme\DemoBundle\Form;
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormEvent;
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormFactoryInterface;
use Symfony\Component\EventDispatcher\EventSubscriberInterface;
use Symfony\Component\Form\FormEvents;
class FillNonSubmittedFieldsWithDefaultsSubscriber implements EventSubscriberInterface
{
private $factory;
public function __construct(FormFactoryInterface $factory)
{
$this->factory = $factory;
}
public static function getSubscribedEvents()
{
return array(FormEvents::PRE_BIND => 'preBind');
}
public function preBind(FormEvent $event)
{
$submittedData = $event->getData();
$form = $event->getForm();
// We complete partial submitted data by inserting default values from object
foreach ($form->all() as $name => $child) {
if (!isset($submittedData[$name])) {
$obj = $form->getData();
$getter = "get".ucfirst($name);
$submittedData[$name] = $obj->$getter();
}
}
$event->setData($submittedData);
}
}
Related
I have code in my controller
public function __construct()
{
return redirect()->to('/auth');
$this->validation =
\Config\Services::validation();
$this->title = 'Header Menu';
$this->controller = 'user';
}
public function index()
{
$data = [
'title_prefix' => 'Profil',
'title' => $this->title,
'controller' => $this->controller,
'button_add' => false,
'validation' => $this->validation
];
return view('user/index', $data);
}
it still show view('user/index'). How to get to return redirect()->to('/auth') in __construct() ?
sorry i'm not speaking english well
It is an expected behavior that redirect() doesn't work inside a constructor.
redirect() in CI4 doesn't just set headers but return a RedirectResponse object.
Problem is : while being in the constructor of your controller, you can't return an instance of something else. You're trying to construct a Controller not a RedirectResponse.
Good practice is to use Controller Filters
Or you could add the redirect() inside your index function if there's only at this endpoint that you would like to redirect the user.
Here's an example of the filter that would fit your need :
Watch out your CI version. The parameter $arguments is needed since 4.0.4. Otherwise you have to remove it
<?php
namespace App\Filters;
use CodeIgniter\HTTP\RequestInterface;
use CodeIgniter\HTTP\ResponseInterface;
use CodeIgniter\Filters\FilterInterface;
class AuthFilter implements FilterInterface {
public function before(RequestInterface $request, $arguments = null) {
return redirect()->to('/auth');
}
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
public function after(RequestInterface $request, ResponseInterface $response, $arguments = null) {
}
}
And in your app/Config/Filters edit those 2 variables in order to activate your filter :
public $aliases = [
'auth' => \CodeIgniter\Filters\AuthFilter::class,
];
public $globals = [
'before' => ['auth' => 'the_routes_you_want_to_redirect']
];
You might want to check this thread aswell : https://forum.codeigniter.com/thread-74537.html
you can't use redirect() inside __construct() function or initController() directly.
But you can use $response parameter in initController() or $this->response attribute.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/65814413/1462903
in controller class
<?php namespace App\Controllers;
class Data extends BaseController
{
public function initController(\CodeIgniter\HTTP\RequestInterface $request, \CodeIgniter\HTTP\ResponseInterface $response, \Psr\Log\LoggerInterface $logger)
{
// Do Not Edit This Line
parent::initController($request, $response, $logger);
if($this->session->get('is_loggedin') !== true){
$response->redirect(base_url('login')); // or use $this->response->redirect(base_url('login'));
}
}
public function index()
{
return view('dashboard');
}
}
in BaseController class
/**
* Constructor.
*/
public function initController(\CodeIgniter\HTTP\RequestInterface $request, \CodeIgniter\HTTP\ResponseInterface $response, \Psr\Log\LoggerInterface $logger)
{
// Do Not Edit This Line
parent::initController($request, $response, $logger);
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
// Preload any models, libraries, etc, here.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
$this->session = \Config\Services::session();
}
header("Location: ".site_url().'/dashboard');
die();
I get tutorial from here : https://laravel-excel.maatwebsite.nl/docs/3.0/export/basics
<?php
...
use App\Exports\ItemsDetailsExport;
class ItemController extends Controller
{
...
public function exportToExcel(ItemsDetailsExport $exporter, $id)
{
//dd($id); I get the result
return $exporter->download('Summary Detail.xlsx');
}
}
My export like this :
<?php
namespace App\Exports;
use App\Repositories\Backend\ItemDetailRepository;
use Maatwebsite\Excel\Concerns\FromCollection;
use Maatwebsite\Excel\Concerns\Exportable;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Input;
class ItemsDetailsExport implements FromCollection
{
use Exportable;
protected $itemDetailRepository;
public function __construct(ItemDetailRepository $itemDetailRepository)
{
$this->itemDetailRepository = $itemDetailRepository;
}
public function collection()
{
$test = Input::get('id');
dd('yeah', $test);
}
}
I want to pass id parameter to export file. I try like that, but I don't get the id. The id is null
How can I solve this problem?
For passing data from controller to laravel excel function we can pass and use data like below
For example, we have to pass data year like 2019 we will pass like below
in controller
Excel::download(new UsersExport(2019), 'users.xlsx');
In laravel import file
class UsersExport implements FromCollection {
private $year;
public function __construct(int $year)
{
$this->year = $year;
}
public function collection()
{
return Users::whereYear('created_at', $this->year)->get();
}
}
you can refer all following official documentation link
https://docs.laravel-excel.com/3.1/architecture/objects.html#plain-old-php-object
Unfortunately you can't use normal dependency injection when you have a specific parameter. This is what you can do though:
class ItemsDetailsExport implements FromCollection
{
use Exportable;
protected $itemDetailRepository;
protected $id;
public function __construct(ItemDetailRepository $itemDetailRepository, $id)
{
$this->itemDetailRepository = $itemDetailRepository;
$this->id = $id;
}
public function collection()
{
$test = $this->id;
dd('yeah', $test);
}
}
Now the problem is that the container doesn't know how to resolve $id however there are two ways around this.
Manual passing of $id:
public function exportToExcel($id)
{
$exporter = app()->makeWith(ItemsDetailsExport::class, compact('id'));
return $exporter->download('Summary Detail.xlsx');
}
Route injection:
Define your route as:
Route::get('/path/to/export/{itemExport}', 'ItemController#exportToExcel');
In your RouteServiceProvider.php:
public function boot() {
parent::boot();
//Bindings
Route::bind('itemExport', function ($id) { //itemExport must match the {itemExport} name in the route definition
return app()->makeWith(ItemsDetailsExport::class, compact('id'));
});
}
Then your route method is simplified as:
public function exportToExcel(ItemsDetailsExport $itemExport)
{
//It will be injected based on the parameter you pass to the route
return $itemExport->download('Summary Detail.xlsx');
}
I have few classes and they have multiple list items like below:
public class Request1
{
public List<AdditionalApplicantData> AdditionalApplicantData { get; set;}
public List<ApplicantData> ApplicantData { get; set; }
}
public class Request2
{
public List<ApplicantDetails> ApplicantData { get; set; }
}
I want to map Request1 to Request2 but List of ApplicantData has to be mapped from multiple sources like List of ApplicantData & List of AdditionalApplicantData but not sure how to achieve it can someone please help me here?
You can use function below with createMap() function. Source: https://github.com/AutoMapper/AutoMapper/wiki/Before-and-after-map-actions
.AfterMap((src, dest) => {
dest.ApplicantData = /*your logic here*/
});
And you should mark ApplicantData as don't map because you have a variable named ApplicantData at the source class. You should implement the logic yourself.
EDIT:
When you are initializing mapper, you create map for each object. So for your case it would be like:
Mapper.Initialize(cfg => {
cfg.CreateMap<Request1, Request2>()
.ForMember(x => x.ApplicantData, opt => opt.Ignore()) //You want to implement your logic so ignore mapping
.AfterMap((src, dest) =>
{
dest.ApplicantData = /*implement your logic here*/
});
});
public class ApplicantDetailsResolver : IValueResolver<Request1, Request2, List<ApplicantDetails>>
{
public List<ApplicantDetails> Resolve(Request1 source, Request2 destination,List<ApplicantDetails> destMember, ResolutionContext context)
{
destination.ApplicantDetails = context.Mapper.Map<List<ApplicantDetails>>(source.ApplicantData);
for (int i = 0; i < destination.ApplicantDetails.Count(); i++)
{
context.Mapper.Map(source.AdditionalApplicantData.ElementAt(i), destination.ApplicantDetails.ElementAt(i));
}
return destination.ApplicantDetails;
}
}
I have written above custom value resolver for mapping list from multiple sources and its working fine but problem, is it can't match properties which are differently named, is there way I can handle this scenario as well?
I am creating a rule set engine that looks kinda like a unit test framework.
[RuleSet(ContextA)]
public class RuleSet1
{
[Rule(TargetingA)]
public Conclusion Rule1(SubjectA subject)
{ Create conclusion }
[Rule(TargetingA)]
public Conclusion Rule2(SubjectA subject)
{ Create conclusion }
[Rule(TargetingB)]
public Conclusion Rule3(SubjectB subject)
{ Create conclusion }
}
[RuleSet(ContextB)]
public class RuleSet2
{
[Rule(TargetingB)]
public Conclusion Rule1(SubjectB subject)
{ Create conclusion }
[Rule(TargetingA)]
public Conclusion Rule2(SubjectA subject)
{ Create conclusion }
[Rule(TargetingB)]
public Conclusion Rule3(SubjectB subject)
{ Create conclusion }
}
public class Conclusion()
{
// Errorcode, Description and such
}
// contexts and targeting info are enums.
The goal is to create an extensible ruleset that doesn't alter the API from consumer POV while having good separation-of-concerns within the code files. Again: like a unit test framework.
I am trying to create a library of these that expose the following API
public static class RuleEngine
{
public static IEnumerable<IRuleSet> RuleSets(contextFlags contexts)
{
{
return from type in Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes()
let attribute =
type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof (RuleSetAttribute), true)
.OfType<RuleSetAttribute>()
.FirstOrDefault()
where attribute != null
select ?? I don't know how to convert the individual methods to Func's.
}
}
}
internal interface IRuleset
{
IEnumerable<Func<SubjectA, Conclusion>> SubjectARules { get; }
IEnumerable<Func<SubjectB, Conclusion>> SubjectBRules { get; }
}
...which allows consumers to simply use like this (using foreach instead of LINQ for readability in this example)
foreach (var ruleset in RuleEgine.RuleSets(context))
{
foreach (var rule in ruleset.SubjectARules)
{
var conclusion = rule(myContextA);
//handle the conclusion
}
}
Also, it would be very helpful if you could tell me how to get rid of "TargetingA" and "TargetingB" as RuleAttribute parameters and instead use reflection to inspect the parameter type of the decorated method directly. All the while maintaining the same simple external API.
You can use Delegate.CreateDelegate and the GetParameters method to do what you want.
public class RuleSet : IRuleSet
{
public IEnumerable<Func<SubjectA, Conclusion>> SubjectARules { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<Func<SubjectB, Conclusion>> SubjectBRules { get; set; }
}
public static class RuleEngine
{
public static IEnumerable<IRuleSet> RuleSets() // removed contexts parameter for brevity
{
var result = from t in Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes()
where t.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(RuleSetAttribute), true).Any()
let m = t.GetMethods().Where(m => m.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(RuleAttribute)).Any()).ToArray()
select new RuleSet
{
SubjectARules = CreateFuncs<SubjectA>(m).ToList(),
SubjectBRules = CreateFuncs<SubjectB>(m).ToList()
};
return result;
}
}
// no error checking for brevity
// TODO: use better variable names
public static IEnumerable<Func<T, Conclusion>> CreateFuncs<T>(MethodInfo[] m)
{
return from x in m
where x.GetParameters()[0].ParameterType == typeof(T)
select (Func<T, Conclusion>)Delegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(Func<T, Conclusion>), null, x);
}
Then you can use it like this:
var sa = new SubjectA();
foreach (var ruleset in RuleEngine.RuleSets())
{
foreach (var rule in ruleset.SubjectARules)
{
var conclusion = rule(sa);
// do something with conclusion
}
}
In your LINQ query you headed straight for RuleSetAttribute, and so lost other information. If you break the query in several lines of code you can get methods from the type with GetMethods(), and then you can call GetCustomAttribute<RuleAttribute>().
Given a EF-Code First CTP5 entity layout like:
public class Person { ... }
which has a collection of:
public class Address { ... }
which has a single association of:
public class Mailbox { ... }
I want to do:
PersonQuery.Include(x => x.Addresses).Include("Addresses.Mailbox")
WITHOUT using a magic string. I want to do it using a lambda expression.
I am aware what I typed above will compile and will bring back all Persons matching the search criteria with their addresses and each addresses' mailbox eager loaded, but it's in a string which irritates me.
How do I do it without a string?
Thanks Stack!
For that you can use the Select method:
PersonQuery.Include(x => x.Addresses.Select(a => a.Mailbox));
You can find other examples in here and here.
For any one thats still looking for a solution to this, the Lambda includes is part of EF 4+ and it is in the System.Data.Entity namespace; examples here
http://romiller.com/2010/07/14/ef-ctp4-tips-tricks-include-with-lambda/
It is described in this post: http://www.thomaslevesque.com/2010/10/03/entity-framework-using-include-with-lambda-expressions/
Edit (By Asker for readability):
The part you are looking for is below:
public static class ObjectQueryExtensions
{
public static ObjectQuery<T> Include<T>(this ObjectQuery<T> query, Expression<Func<T, object>> selector)
{
string path = new PropertyPathVisitor().GetPropertyPath(selector);
return query.Include(path);
}
class PropertyPathVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
private Stack<string> _stack;
public string GetPropertyPath(Expression expression)
{
_stack = new Stack<string>();
Visit(expression);
return _stack
.Aggregate(
new StringBuilder(),
(sb, name) =>
(sb.Length > 0 ? sb.Append(".") : sb).Append(name))
.ToString();
}
protected override Expression VisitMember(MemberExpression expression)
{
if (_stack != null)
_stack.Push(expression.Member.Name);
return base.VisitMember(expression);
}
protected override Expression VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression expression)
{
if (IsLinqOperator(expression.Method))
{
for (int i = 1; i < expression.Arguments.Count; i++)
{
Visit(expression.Arguments[i]);
}
Visit(expression.Arguments[0]);
return expression;
}
return base.VisitMethodCall(expression);
}
private static bool IsLinqOperator(MethodInfo method)
{
if (method.DeclaringType != typeof(Queryable) && method.DeclaringType != typeof(Enumerable))
return false;
return Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(method, typeof(ExtensionAttribute)) != null;
}
}
}