I use pkg install gcc-3 in solaris 11 to install gcc 3. Where did pkg store the downloaded package install files / gcc-3.pkg file?
I tried /etc/pkg/, only get some useless mako file there.
I can see the pkg thread downloading the file, is there any way to monitor I/O status in solaris and get the path the pkg process is writing to? iostat seems only give the io rate and not the actually path.
It caches downloaded files under /var/pkg but the exact paths are usually hashes and not generally useful. It doesn't download a complete copy of the package, but only the files you need that aren't already located or cached on the system, so that upgrades to new versions are usually much faster, because they only download changed files.
Related
I was trying to install RStudio-v2022.07.1-554 (server) under Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (arm64). Because there doesn't exist a binary for arm64, I have to build the RStudio from the source. After download the source (tag 2022.07.1-554), and installed all dependencies. I was able to install the binary.
However, after make install, I found out that the default CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX was set to /usr/local, not as the INSTALL file claimed: /usr/local/lib/rstudio-server! Now, all the 1560 library and binary files of RStudio-server are spread over under the folder /usr/local(Thank you RStudio team!):
/usr/local/./README.md
/usr/local/./INSTALL
/usr/local/./COPYING
/usr/local/./NOTICE
/usr/local/./SOURCE
/usr/local/./VERSION
...
When I try to make uninstall, I found out the makefile doesn't define any uninstall action. Fortunately, there is an install_manifest.txt file which listed all the files installed under usr/local. What I could think of to "uninstall" RStudio is to use shell script to loop through the files list and remove them one by one.
Is there any better way to uninstall the RStudio-server compiled from source other than manually delete the files one by one.
Thank you for your attention and reply in advance.
Internet research indicates that one can remove the Cygwin package files to save space. Within the Cygwin installation folder, I have a subfolder (say) http%3a%2f%2fcygwin.mirror.constant.com%2f reflecting the mirror site. The file http%3a%2f%2fcygwin.mirror.constant.com%2f/x86_64/setup.ini seems to contain all the information about installed packages. The only other folders/files are in the following two folder trees:
http%3a%2f%2fcygwin.mirror.constant.com%2f/noarch/release/*
http%3a%2f%2fcygwin.mirror.constant.com%2f/x86_64/release/*
Can I remove everything in the http%3a%2f%2fcygwin.mirror.constant.com%2f folder tree except http%3a%2f%2fcygwin.mirror.constant.com%2f/x86_64/setup.ini and still have the installer know what I have installed, what needs updating, and what needs downloading for a re-install?
The information about installed package is stored in
/etc/setup/installed.db
the cache in http%3a%2f%2fcygwin.mirror.constant.com%2f
is only needed during installation or re-installation of any package.
See info in the Cygwin User Guide
https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/setup-net.html#setup-localdir
After installing Cygwin, the cache is no longer necessary, but you may
want to retain the packages as backups, for installing Cygwin to
another system, or in case you need to reinstall a package.
Currently I am trying to install a rpm secured_soft_2.0.0.rpm and i am
unable to install it as we already have secured_soft_1.3.0 installed.
Requirement is that we need to have both the versions installed.
Complexities :
These package inturn have dependent rpm's (lot of them ) and all these
interdependent rpm's also have versions
ex: secured_soft_1.3.0 works only with packages which are of version 1.3,
and secured_soft_2.0.0.rpm work only with dependecies of version 2.0 only.
So all these dependencies also need to be reinstalled and even these
dependenies should be parallely installed, without deleting old.
Finally , both these versions contain shared libraries and these shared
lib's do not have version numbers in their name.
#rpm -ivh secured_soft_2.0.0.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
init-class >= 1.4.17.1-1 is needed by secured_soft_2.0.0.rpm
init-connection-interface >= 2.0.11.0 is needed by secured_soft_2.0.0.rpm
init-logger >= 2.0.11.0 is needed by secured_soft_2.0.0.rpm
init-security >= 2.0.11.0 is needed by secured_soft_2.0.0.rpm
As i have specified we already have secured_soft_1.3.0.rpm installed and
above dependencies are also available but of different version.
So we need the to install above dependencies and also need the old version's
of dependencies for the old rpm's to work
ex : secured_soft_2.0.0.rpm has libArt.so libSec.so and so on
which are copied to /usr/lib
Similarly secured_soft_1.3.0.rpm also has libArt.so libSec.so and so on
which are already available in /usr/lib
I tried to rename the so's but still iam not able to install.
Is it possible to change the location for these so's and get the things done
Is there any way we can do it.
At the moment, iam stuck here and would need advice on this
Appreciate any help on this.
Since the programs use the same filenames, and you need to put them on the same machine, you might be able to move the older version to another directory tree and make it work there.
You can do this with many applications which do not have compiled-in pathnames.
For instance,
install the older version (this sounds like where you are starting from)
use rpm -ql for each of the packages containing unversioned executables, libraries and associated files.
use tar to capture an archive of those files, relative to /usr (but omitting directories not owned by the packages).
create a new directory, e.g., /usr/local/myapp and untar the older version there.
update configuration files in the new location as needed
For applications such as this, I would run in a script that updates PATH (and perhaps sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH) to force the program to run from the new location. You can verify if this works using tools such as strace and lsof, i.e., by looking for the files that the program opens.
Once you have the older version working properly in the new location, you can uninstall its rpms and install the new version of the application.
Caveat: If the newer package is copied from a newer version of the operating system, however, the task is likely to be beyond your ability, whether or not you choose the alternative approach of recompiling the newer packages to fit on the existing system.
Building new/custom packages is one route to recompiling the newer version. If you have the source-RPMs for each part, that is a starting point:
extract the files from the source-RPM, e.g., using a script such as unrpm (see for example HowTo: Extract an RPM Package Files Without Installing It), and
copy those extracted files to their as-expected locations in your build-tree, e.g., $HOME/rpmbuild/SOURCES and $HOME/rpmbuild/SPECS
modify the spec-file to use the alternative location
build the new/modified package using the modified spec-file.
No, out of the box, you cannot.
I'd highly recommend looking into Docker, where you can throw each one into their own container and let them take care of all their dependency problems.
I'm running gentoo and have manually compiled and installed the flann library. I need to create a binary package with the extension of .tar.tbz2 that has all the required files. I tried installing into a separate folder and compressing it but it wasn't recognized as an actual package. (Using make install DESTDIR=folder)
My attempt at the file contained usr as a subdirectory.
Additional info: I'm packaging the library as a part of cross-compiling.
Add --prefix=pathtoinstall to ./configure,then execute make and make install and generate tar from pathtoinstall
./configure --prefix=pathtoinstall
make
make install
tar -cjvf flann.tar.bz2 pathtoinstall
you could write an ebuild for your library and use quickpkg to do the binary package.
Advantage: if a dependency breaks, it's rebuilt (emerge #preserved-rebuild / revdep-rebuild)
I have a debian package that I built that contains a tar ball of the files, a control file, and a postinst file. Its built using dpkg-deb and it installs properly using dpkg.
The modification I would like to make is to have the installation directory of the files be determined at runtime based on an environment variable that will be set when dpkg -i is run on the deb file. I echo out the environment variable in the postinst script and I can see that its set properly.
My questions:
1) Is it possible to dynamically determine the installation directory at runtime?
2) If its possible how would I go about this? I have read about the rules file and the mypackage.install files but I don't know if either of these would allow me to accomplish this.
I could hack it by copying the files to the target location in the posinst script but I would prefer to do it the right way if possible.
Thanks in advance!
So this is what I found out about this problem over the past couple of weeks.
With prepackaged binaries you can't build a debian package with a destination directory dynamicall determined at runtime. I believe that this might be possible if installing a package that is built from source where you can set the install directory using configure. But in this case since these are embedded Ubuntu machines they don't have make so I didn't pursue such an option. I did work out a non traditional method (hack) for installing that did work. Since debian packages simply contain a tar ball relative to / simply build your package relative to a directory under /tmp. In the postinst script you can then determine where to copy the files from the archive into a permanent location.
I expected that after rebooting and the automatic deletion of the subdirectory under /tmp that dpkg might not know that the file package existed. This wasn't a problem. When I ran 'dpkg -l myapp' it showed as still installed. Updating the package using dpkg/apt-get also worked without a hitch.
What I did find is that if you attempted to remove the package using 'dpkg -r myapp' that dpkg would try and remove /tmp which wasn't good. However /tmp isn't easily removed so it never succeeded. Plus in our situation we never remove packages but instead simply upgrade them.
I eventually had to abandon the universal package due to code differences in the sources resulting in having to recompile per platform but I would have left it this way and it did work.
I tried using --instdir to change the install directory of the package and it does relocate the files but dpkg fails since the dpkg file can't be found relative to the new instdir. Using --instdir is sort of like a chroot. I also tried --admindir and --root in various combinations to see if I could use the dpkg system relative to / but install relocate the files but they didn't work. I guess rpm has a relocate option that works but not Ubuntu.
You can also write a script that runs dpkg-deb with a different environment for 6 times, generating 6 different packages. When you make a modification, you simply have to run your script, and all 6 packages gets generated and you can install them on your machines avoiding postinst hacking!
Why not install to a standard location, and simply use a postinst script to create symbolic links to the desired location? This is much cleaner, and shouldn't break anything in dpk -I.