I have a host list hostfile that i'm doing name lookup just to know if the host has records in DNS or not with the help of Linux native tool nslookup.
Below is what i'm doing and its working, however there is a situation when nslookup don't find anything thus the result is nothing in that case i want to fill "no dns record"
What i'm trying:
$ for i in `cat hostfile`;
> do
> echo $i $result
> result=$(nslookup $i | awk 'FNR==6{print $2}')
> done
OR
for i in `cat hostfile`;
do
printf "$i: %s\\n" $(nslookup $i | awk 'FNR==6{print $2}');
done
Its not giving correct output if there is no nslookup found.
Desired:
myhosts01 192.168.1.1
myhosts02 192.168.1.2
myhosts03 192.168.1.3
myhosts04 192.168.1.4
myhosts03 no dns record
myhosts04 no dns record
You can either use a full if statement to check whether the result is blank (-z for zero-length):
if [[ -z "$result" ]]; then
result="no dns record"
fi
echo "$i $result"
Or use a default value when expanding the variable:
echo "$i ${result:-no dns record}"
In either case, I'd recommend using a while read loop to read the file instead of for (assuming there's one hostname per line), using dig +short instead trying to parse nslookup, doing the lookup before printing the result, and double-quoting all variable references (and probably using more descriptive variable names). Something like this:
while read -r hostname; do
hostIP=$(dig +short "$hostname")
echo "$hostname ${hostIP:-no dns record}"
done <hostfile
Please explain to me why the very last echo statement is blank? I expect that XCODE is incremented in the while loop to a value of 1:
#!/bin/bash
OUTPUT="name1 ip ip status" # normally output of another command with multi line output
if [ -z "$OUTPUT" ]
then
echo "Status WARN: No messages from SMcli"
exit $STATE_WARNING
else
echo "$OUTPUT"|while read NAME IP1 IP2 STATUS
do
if [ "$STATUS" != "Optimal" ]
then
echo "CRIT: $NAME - $STATUS"
echo $((++XCODE))
else
echo "OK: $NAME - $STATUS"
fi
done
fi
echo $XCODE
I've tried using the following statement instead of the ++XCODE method
XCODE=`expr $XCODE + 1`
and it too won't print outside of the while statement. I think I'm missing something about variable scope here, but the ol' man page isn't showing it to me.
Because you're piping into the while loop, a sub-shell is created to run the while loop.
Now this child process has its own copy of the environment and can't pass any
variables back to its parent (as in any unix process).
Therefore you'll need to restructure so that you're not piping into the loop.
Alternatively you could run in a function, for example, and echo the value you
want returned from the sub-process.
http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/subshells.html#SUBSHELL
The problem is that processes put together with a pipe are executed in subshells (and therefore have their own environment). Whatever happens within the while does not affect anything outside of the pipe.
Your specific example can be solved by rewriting the pipe to
while ... do ... done <<< "$OUTPUT"
or perhaps
while ... do ... done < <(echo "$OUTPUT")
This should work as well (because echo and while are in same subshell):
#!/bin/bash
cat /tmp/randomFile | (while read line
do
LINE="$LINE $line"
done && echo $LINE )
One more option:
#!/bin/bash
cat /some/file | while read line
do
var="abc"
echo $var | xsel -i -p # redirect stdin to the X primary selection
done
var=$(xsel -o -p) # redirect back to stdout
echo $var
EDIT:
Here, xsel is a requirement (install it).
Alternatively, you can use xclip:
xclip -i -selection clipboard
instead of
xsel -i -p
I got around this when I was making my own little du:
ls -l | sed '/total/d ; s/ */\t/g' | cut -f 5 |
( SUM=0; while read SIZE; do SUM=$(($SUM+$SIZE)); done; echo "$(($SUM/1024/1024/1024))GB" )
The point is that I make a subshell with ( ) containing my SUM variable and the while, but I pipe into the whole ( ) instead of into the while itself, which avoids the gotcha.
#!/bin/bash
OUTPUT="name1 ip ip status"
+export XCODE=0;
if [ -z "$OUTPUT" ]
----
echo "CRIT: $NAME - $STATUS"
- echo $((++XCODE))
+ export XCODE=$(( $XCODE + 1 ))
else
echo $XCODE
see if those changes help
Another option is to output the results into a file from the subshell and then read it in the parent shell. something like
#!/bin/bash
EXPORTFILE=/tmp/exportfile${RANDOM}
cat /tmp/randomFile | while read line
do
LINE="$LINE $line"
echo $LINE > $EXPORTFILE
done
LINE=$(cat $EXPORTFILE)
I have a file containing multiple hosts and IPs in the format above:
alpha, 192.168.1.1
beta, 192.168.1.2
gamma, 192.168.1.3
I am trying to create a script that says something like:
"Pinging hostname alpha"
ping 192.168.1.1
and jump to the next ip in the list.
I don't want the entire script, just some suggestions.
Thanks,
Alex
If you add a comma to the input field separator, it'll help parse the lines:
IFS=$IFS,
while read name ip; do
echo -n "Pinging hostname $name..."
ping -c2 "$ip" &>/dev/null && echo success || echo fail
done < /tmp/hosts
I'd read in the lines with read. You'll probably also want to give ping an option telling it how many times to ping. The default on most Linux systems for example is to ping forever, which doesn't seem like it would work well in your situation.
You could use AWK:
$ awk '{print "Pinging hostname "$1; system("ping -c 3 "$2) }' ips
Pinging hostname alpha,
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
You can also remove that comma if is it important to you:
$ awk '{sub(/,/,"");print "Pinging hostname "$1; system("ping -c 3 "$2) }' ips
Pinging hostname alpha
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
I might be a bit late to the party, but how about fping? Use -f to read from a file (requires sudo), or pipe the file with < (as suggested on the man page). It won't tell you "pinging alpha", but it will quickly tell you whether or not you can get in touch with the hosts.
Script for hosting 100+ hosts in same scheme like 192.168.xx.xxx
#!/bin/bash
for i in `seq ${2} ${3}`
do
ping -c 1 ${1}.${i} > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "${1}.${i} responded."
else
echo "${1}.${i} did not respond."
fi
done
command to ping the host
bash test.sh 192.168.1 0 100
Try this
#!/bin/bash
IPLIST="path_to_the_Ip_list_file"
for ip in $(cat $IPLIST)
do
ping $ip -c 1 -t 1 &> /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo $ip ping faild;
else
echo $ip ping passed;
fi
done
How can I write a Linux Bash script that tells me which computers are ON in my LAN?
It would help if I could give it a range of IP addresses as input.
I would suggest using nmap's ping-scan flag,
$ nmap -sn 192.168.1.60-70
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2009-04-09 20:13 BST
Host machine1.home (192.168.1.64) appears to be up.
Host machine2.home (192.168.1.65) appears to be up.
Nmap finished: 11 IP addresses (2 hosts up) scanned in 0.235 seconds
That said, if you want to write it yourself (which is fair enough), this is how I would do it:
for ip in 192.168.1.{1..10}; do ping -c 1 -t 1 $ip > /dev/null && echo "${ip} is up"; done
..and an explanation of each bit of the above command:
Generating list of IP addresses
You can use the {1..10} syntax to generate a list of numbers, for example..
$ echo {1..10}
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(it's also useful for things like mkdir {dir1,dir2}/{sub1,sub2} - which makes dir1 and dir2, each containing sub1 and sub2)
So, to generate a list of IP's, we'd do something like
$ echo 192.168.1.{1..10}
192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 [...] 192.168.1.10
Loops
To loop over something in bash, you use for:
$ for thingy in 1 2 3; do echo $thingy; done
1
2
3
Pinging
Next, to ping.. The ping command varies a bit with different operating-systems, different distributions/versions (I'm using OS X currently)
By default (again, on the OS X version of ping) it will ping until interrupted, which isn't going to work for this, so ping -c 1 will only try sending one packet, which should be enough to determine if a machine is up.
Another problem is the timeout value, which seems to be 11 seconds on this version of ping.. It's changed using the -t flag. One second should be enough to see if a machine on the local network is alive or not.
So, the ping command we'll use is..
$ ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
Checking ping result
Next, we need to know if the machine replied or not..
We can use the && operator to run a command if the first succeeds, for example:
$ echo && echo "It works"
It works
$ nonexistantcommand && echo "This should not echo"
-bash: nonexistantcommand: command not found
Good, so we can do..
ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1 && echo "192.168.1.1 is up!"
The other way would be to use the exit code from ping.. The ping command will exit with exit-code 0 (success) if it worked, and a non-zero code if it failed. In bash you get the last commands exit code with the variable $?
So, to check if the command worked, we'd do..
ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1;
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "192.168.1.1 is up";
else
echo "ip is down";
fi
Hiding ping output
Last thing, we don't need to see the ping output, so we can redirect stdout to /dev/null with the > redirection, for example:
$ ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1 > /dev/null && echo "IP is up"
IP is up
And to redirect stderr (to discard the ping: sendto: Host is down messages), you use 2> - for example:
$ errorcausingcommand
-bash: errorcausingcommand: command not found
$ errorcausingcommand 2> /dev/null
$
The script
So, to combine all that..
for ip in 192.168.1.{1..10}; do # for loop and the {} operator
ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1 > /dev/null 2> /dev/null # ping and discard output
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then # check the exit code
echo "${ip} is up" # display the output
# you could send this to a log file by using the >>pinglog.txt redirect
else
echo "${ip} is down"
fi
done
Or, using the && method, in a one-liner:
for ip in 192.168.1.{1..10}; do ping -c 1 -t 1 $ip > /dev/null && echo "${ip} is up"; done
Problem
It's slow.. Each ping command takes about 1 second (since we set the -t timeout flag to 1 second). It can only run one ping command at a time.. The obvious way around this is to use threads, so you can run concurrent commands, but that's beyond what you should use bash for..
"Python threads - a first example" explains how to use the Python threading module to write a multi-threaded ping'er.. Although at that point, I would once again suggest using nmap -sn..
In the real world, you could use nmap to get what you want.
nmap -sn 10.1.1.1-255
This will ping all the addresses in the range 10.1.1.1 to 10.1.1.255 and let you know which ones answer.
Of course, if you in fact want to do this as a bash exercise, you could run ping for each address and parse the output, but that's a whole other story.
Assuming my network is 10.10.0.0/24, if i run a ping on the broadcast address like
ping -b 10.10.0.255
I'll get an answer from all computers on this network that did not block their ICMP ping port.
64 bytes from 10.10.0.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.0.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.0.71: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.000 ms
So you just have to extract the 4th column, with awk for example:
ping -b 10.10.0.255 | grep 'bytes from' | awk '{ print $4 }'
10.10.0.12:
10.10.0.6:
10.10.0.71:
10.10.0.95:
Well, you will get duplicate, and you may need to remove the ':'.
EDIT from comments :
the -c option limits the number of pings
since the script will end, we can also limit ourself on unique IPs
ping -c 5 -b 10.10.0.255 | grep 'bytes from' | awk '{ print $4 }' | sort | uniq
There is also fping:
fping -g 192.168.1.0/24
or:
fping -g 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.255
or show only hosts that are alive:
fping -ag 192.168.1.0/24
It pings hosts in parallel so the scan is very fast. I don't know a distribution which includes fping in its default installation but in most distributions you can get it through the package manager.
Also using the "ping the broadcast address" method pointed out by chburd, this pipe should do the trick for you:
ping -c 5 -b 10.11.255.255 | sed -n 's/.* \([0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\).*/\1/p' | sort | uniq
Of course, you'd have to change the broadcast address to that of your network.
Just for fun, here's an alternate
#!/bin/bash
nmap -sP 192.168.1.0/24 > /dev/null 2>&1 && arp -an | grep -v incomplete | awk '{print$2}' | sed -e s,\(,, | sed -e s,\),,
If you're limiting yourself to only having the last octet changing, this script should do it. It should be fairly obvious how to extend it from one to multiple octets.
#! /bin/bash
BASE=$1
START=$2
END=$3
counter=$START
while [ $counter -le $END ]
do
ip=$BASE.$counter
if ping -qc 2 $ip
then
echo "$ip responds"
fi
counter=$(( $counter + 1 ))
done
ip neighbor
arp -a
Arpwatch
As other posters pointed out, nmap is the way to go, but here's how to do the equivalent of a ping scan in bash. I wouldn't use the broadcast ping, as a lot of systems are configured not to respond to broadcast ICMP nowadays.
for i in $(seq 1 254); do
host="192.168.100.$i"
ping -c 1 -W 1 $host &> /dev/null
echo -n "Host $host is "
test $? -eq 0 && echo "up" || echo "down"
done
#!/bin/bash
#Get the ip address for the range
ip=$(/sbin/ifconfig eth0 | grep 'inet addr:' | cut -d: -f2 | awk '{ print $1}' | cut -d"." -f1,2,3)
# ping test and list the hosts and echo the info
for range in $ip ; do [ $? -eq 0 ] && ping -c 1 -w 1 $range > /dev/null 2> /dev/null && echo "Node $range is up"
done
Although an old question, it still seems to be important (at least important enough for me to deal with this). My script relies on nmap too, so nothing special here except that ou can define which interface you want to scan and the IP Range is created automagically (at least kind of).
This is what I came up with
#!/bin/bash
#Script for scanning the (local) network for other computers
command -v nmap >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "I require nmap but it's not installed. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; }
if [ -n ""$#"" ]; then
ip=$(/sbin/ifconfig $1 | grep 'inet ' | awk '{ print $2}' | cut -d"." -f1,2,3 )
nmap -sP $ip.1-255
else
echo -e "\nThis is a script for scanning the (local) network for other computers.\n"
echo "Enter Interface as parameter like this:"
echo -e "\t./scannetwork.sh $(ifconfig -lu | awk '{print $2}')\n"
echo "Possible interfaces which are up are: "
for i in $(ifconfig -lu)
do
echo -e "\033[32m \t $i \033[39;49m"
done
echo "Interfaces which could be used but are down at the moment: "
for i in $(ifconfig -ld)
do
echo -e "\033[31m \t $i \033[39;49m"
done
echo
fi
One remark: This script is created on OSX, so there might be some changes to linux environments.
If you want to provide a list of hosts it can be done with nmap, grep and awk.
Install nmap:
$ sudo apt-get install nmap
Create file hostcheck.sh like this:
hostcheck.sh
#!/bin/bash
nmap -sP -iL hostlist -oG pingscan > /dev/null
grep Up pingscan | awk '{print $2}' > uplist
grep Down pingscan | awk '{print $2}' > downlist
-sP: Ping Scan - go no further than determining if host is online
-iL : Input from list of hosts/networks
-oG : Output scan results in Grepable format, to the given filename.
/dev/null : Discards output
Change the access permission:
$ chmod 775 hostcheck.sh
Create file hostlist with the list of hosts to be checked (hostname or IP):
hostlist (Example)
192.168.1.1-5
192.168.1.101
192.168.1.123
192.168.1.1-5 is a range of IPs
Run the script:
./hostcheck.sh hostfile
Will be generated files pingscan with all the information, uplist with the hosts online (Up) and downlist with the hosts offline (Down).
uplist (Example)
192.168.1.1
192.168.1.2
192.168.1.3
192.168.1.4
192.168.1.101
downlist (Example)
192.168.1.5
192.168.1.123
Some machines don't answer pings (e.g. firewalls).
If you only want the local network you can use this command:
(for n in $(seq 1 254);do sudo arping -c1 10.0.0.$n & done ; wait) | grep reply | grep --color -E '([0-9]+\.){3}[0-9]+'
Explanations part !
arping is a command that sends ARP requests. It is present on most of linux.
Example:
sudo arping -c1 10.0.0.14
the sudo is not necessary if you are root ofc.
10.0.0.14 : the ip you want to test
-c1 : send only one request.
&: the 'I-don't-want-to-wait' character
This is a really useful character that give you the possibility to launch a command in a sub-process without waiting him to finish (like a thread)
the for loop is here to arping all 255 ip addresses. It uses the seq command to list all numbers.
wait: after we launched our requests we want to see if there are some replies. To do so we just put wait after the loop.
wait looks like the function join() in other languages.
(): parenthesis are here to interpret all outputs as text so we can give it to grep
grep: we only want to see replies. the second grep is just here to highlight IPs.
hth
Edit 20150417: Maxi Update !
The bad part of my solution is that it print all results at the end. It is because grep have a big enough buffer to put some lines inside.
the solution is to add --line-buffered to the first grep.
like so:
(for n in $(seq 1 254);do sudo arping -c1 10.0.0.$n & done ; wait) | grep --line-buffered reply | grep --color -E '([0-9]+\.){3}[0-9]+'
#!/bin/bash
for ((n=0 ; n < 30 ; n+=1))
do
ip=10.1.1.$n
if ping -c 1 -w 1 $ip > /dev/null 2> /dev/null >> /etc/logping.txt; then
echo "${ip} is up" # output up
# sintax >> /etc/logping.txt log with .txt format
else
echo "${ip} is down" # output down
fi
done
The following (evil) code runs more than TWICE as fast as the nmap method
for i in {1..254} ;do (ping 192.168.1.$i -c 1 -w 5 >/dev/null && echo "192.168.1.$i" &) ;done
takes around 10 seconds, where the standard nmap
nmap -sP 192.168.1.1-254
takes 25 seconds...
Well, this is part of a script of mine.
ship.sh 🚢 A simple, handy network addressing 🔎 multitool with plenty of features 🌊
Pings network, displays online hosts on that network with their local IP and MAC address
It doesn't require any edit. Needs root permission to run.
GOOGLE_DNS="8.8.8.8"
ONLINE_INTERFACE=$(ip route get "${GOOGLE_DNS}" | awk -F 'dev ' 'NR == 1 {split($2, a, " "); print a[1]}')
NETWORK_IP=$(ip route | awk "/${ONLINE_INTERFACE}/ && /src/ {print \$1}" | cut --fields=1 --delimiter="/")
NETWORK_IP_CIDR=$(ip route | awk "/${ONLINE_INTERFACE}/ && /src/ {print \$1}")
FILTERED_IP=$(echo "${NETWORK_IP}" | awk 'BEGIN{FS=OFS="."} NF--')
ip -statistics neighbour flush all &>/dev/null
echo -ne "Pinging ${NETWORK_IP_CIDR}, please wait ..."
for HOST in {1..254}; do
ping "${FILTERED_IP}.${HOST}" -c 1 -w 10 &>/dev/null &
done
for JOB in $(jobs -p); do wait "${JOB}"; done
ip neighbour | \
awk 'tolower($0) ~ /reachable|stale|delay|probe/{printf ("%5s\t%s\n", $1, $5)}' | \
sort --version-sort --unique