I met an err when I installed JikesRVM, that is,
skipping incompatible /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.4/libstdc++.so when searching for -lstdc++
So I am trying to install/update it to a later version. Now, the machine already has
gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.4.1 [gcc-4_4-branch revision 150839]
I am new to openSUSE, could you help?
Thanks!
You need to install 32 bit support for the GNU C/C++ compiler since JikesRVM on x86_64 currently supports only the 32 bit architecture.
To install this support in OpenSuSE 11.2 type
sudo zypper install gcc44-32bit gcc-32bit libstdc++44-devel-32bit
The first two provide runtime support for the C language and the 32-bit version of libgcc, the GCC low level runtime library. The third provides the 32-bit version of libstdc++, both the static import library and the dynamic library. It is the static libstdc++.a that was missing for JikesRVM.
To verify that the 32bit C++ build system is installed correctly you can test it with the following
echo "int main(){}" | g++ -x c++ -m32 -
Note Official support for OpenSuSE 11.2 has ended. Evergreen support will be available through 2013. Yet it is reasonable to update to 11.3 or a later version soon.
Related
I have a bunch of libraries built in RHEL 7 using gcc 4.7. Is the following possible
1) Can the binary be executed in RHEL 6 host without re-compiling ?
2) The shared objects produced in RHEL 7 hosts with gcc 4.7 be used
on a RHEL 6 with gcc 4.4 compiler ?
What are the caveats here ?
If you won't link your binary statically, your problem would be shared libraries:
gcc usually links C programs with:
glibc -- implementation for C runtime library. RHEL 6 and 7 have different versions of that library. glibc uses symbol tagging, i.e.:
myaut#panther:/tmp> readelf -s /lib64/libc.so.6 | grep ' open#'
1679: 00000000000d8a70 90 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT 12 open##GLIBC_2.2.5
So if your program with link with function which has newer tag that is present in RHEL6, you won't be able to run your program.
libgcc_s is a GCC runtime that mostly contains functions that are not available on hardware platform (i.e. 32-bit binaries doesn't support 64-bit long long arithmetic, so they require library to do that), put it seem to be optional.
Finally, GCC 4.4 and 4.7 have compatible ABIs, so you shouldn't run into trouble due to different compilers.
If you use the GCC compiler included with the Red Hat Developer Toolset, RH guarantees that an app compiled on a major RHEL version will also run on the +1 version, e.g compile on RHEL 6 and run on either RHEL 6 or 7.
There's v4, but also GCC 5 and working on 6.
See http://developers.redhat.com/products/developertoolset/overview/
I need to use tools that depend on clang on a Unix machine I remote onto at work. Anything I install is locally installed onto ~/local. I do not have root permissions.
/usr is pretty outdated, with gcc being at version 4.4.7. clang requires gcc 4.7+
I read on linux from scratch that a gcc 6.1 installation requires 8.4 gb. This is not something I can do, because that's huge.
Can someone advise me on the best workaround to install up to date clang on my ~/local?
Please and thanks.
Edit:
Courtesy of Nishant, here is the short answer:
Set up a personal machine running the same linux distro and cross compile using gcc to your specific architecture. For me, I will run a Redhat 6.5 VM and compile using gcc an arm x64 binary. Thanks Nishant!
You can get pre-build binaries for Unix system from LLVM's release website: http://llvm.org/releases/
You can then put the binaries in any local folder you want and source it using the PATH variable, which can be done by modifying your ~/.bashrc file by appending:
export PATH=$PATH:<clang-binary-directory>
Now you will able to use clang from the command line terminal as if it was installed.
If you want to build from source only, you can get older source code of clang which will use gcc 4.4.7 and build it and then use clang to build clang. Or get the latest clang binary and use it to build latest clang.
I have problem using gcc/g++ after I changed the machine I use,
I installed gcc-4.9.2 in my previous machine, when I moved to the new machine, I copied gcc folder to the new machine.
When I try to use I get this error :
/data/obenchek/gcc-4.9.2/bin/g++: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by /data/obenchek/gcc-4.9.2/bin/g++)
I have already checked this question :
`GLIBC_2.11' not found
If it says right, the version of libc and g++ are not compatible , libc version :
/lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library stable release version 2.4 (20090904), by Roland McGrath et al.
...
So I should reinstall gcc completely or there is a easier way to resolve this ??
I copied gcc folder to the new machine.
That's your problem: don't copy, install appropriate GCC package instead.
Most UNIX systems, including Linux, guarantee backward compatibility: a binary compiled on an older system continues to run on a newer one.
The reverse is not true: a binary compiled on a newer system often will not run on an older one. This is working "as designed".
In this particular instance, you copied GCC compiled with GLIBC-2.11 or newer to a machine that has GLIBC-2.10 or older. And that doesn't work.
I have a c++11 library ( https://github.com/matiu2/cdnalizer ). I want to distribute it on centos6 and ubuntu12.04 LTS.
It compiles happily on Ubuntu 13.10 and Gentoo.
I tried compiling with as much staticness as I could, but it still depends on a glibc that centos doesn't have:
matiu#matiu-laptop:~/projects/cdnalizer/build/src/apache$ readelf -d mod_cdnalizer.so | grep NEED
0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libapr-1.so.0]
0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libstdc++.so.6]
0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libgcc_s.so.1]
0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6]
0x000000006ffffffe (VERNEED) 0xd520
0x000000006fffffff (VERNEEDNUM) 3
build line:
/usr/bin/g++ -fPIC -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/c++/4.8 -Wall -Wextra -g -shared -Wl,-soname,mod_cdnalizer.so -o mod_cdnalizer.so CMakeFiles/mod_cdnalizer.dir/mod_cdnalizer.cpp.o CMakeFiles/mod_cdnalizer.dir/config.cpp.o CMakeFiles/mod_cdnalizer.dir/filter.cpp.o ../libbase.a -lapr-1
I have tried compiling gcc-4.8.2 on centos, but the binaries it produces have similar glibc dependencies:
[root#matt src]# ./test_config
./test_config: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found (required by ./test_config)
./test_config: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./test_config)
I heard that you can't escape glibc dependencies for shared libraries because c++ throws excoptions and so needs the shared libstdc++ (but my lib doesn't throw exceptions across the library boundary).
I also heard that you can't link in glibc statically because the static lib was not compiled with -fPIC.
My main question is:
How can I distribute my c++11 shared library on centos6 ?
My sub questions are:
Can I compile a c++11 shared library on ubuntu 13.10, and have it load on centos6 (and older ubuntus) ? how ?
Can I compile a c++11 shared library on centos6 and have it work on standard centos installs ?
(Don't worry about Apache2.2 vs 2.4 dependency .. that's the easy bit)
Can I compile a c++11 shared library on centos6 and have it work on standard centos installs ?
If you can't build your code with the standard CentOS 6 g++/glibc/libstdc++, then no, it's not going to run on standard CentOS 6 installs.
The CentOS distro is for long term support (LTS). Critical bugs get fixed with updates, but software otherwise doesn't change, usually. This is a feature. Even with 3rd party repositories (e.g. EPEL), the available software for CentOS isn't really recent.
Can I compile a c++11 shared library on ubuntu 13.10, and have it load on centos6 (and older ubuntus) ? how ?
If you can compile it using the g++ 4.4 toolchain, sure. In this case, you cannot use a more advanced compiler. A quick search on Ubuntu's 12.04 LTS package list shows libstdc++6-4.5-dbg using a version of libstdc++.so.6 which would be backward incompatible, based on error messages above.
How can I distribute my c++11 shared library on centos6 ?
As you've shown above, you'll have at least one updated dependency (libstdc++.so.6) that you'll need to ship with your library, and install in some odd location, with it's attendant headaches (LD_LIBRARY_PATH, what happens to any other C++ plugins, etc.). And update at some point.
Some enterprise users would object to something like this, mainly because it doesn't mesh well with the existing OS.
Statically linking in dependencies (like in Ali's answer with the Developer Toolset below) could work also. It's also not without problems (updates to dependencies again), but might be the best chance for your code to work on CentOS 6.
I see from comments to Ali's answer, that devtools 1 (gcc 4.7.0) didn't work, making it unlikely that devtools 1.1 would work. So it seems you do need C++11 support up to the level of gcc 4.8 in this case.
Your problem has nothing to do with GLIBC.
Your problem is that libstdc++.so.6 on the CentOS6 is too old.
According to distrowatch, CentOS 6.5 shipped with GCC 4.4.7. C++11 support was mostly complete in GCC 4.8, and in 4.4 had only incomplete support.
If you can build your library with GCC 4.4.7, then it should work (provided you build it on an old enough system). If you can't, then you'll have to update GCC on your target CentOS system.
Alternatively, you can distribute a newer version of libstdc++.so.6 (one from GCC 4.8), install it in non-default location, and ask your customers to link against that newer version (either via LD_LIBRARY_PATH, or better by supplying appropriate -Wl,-rpath=... option at link time).
In short:
Things are only backward compatible. You need to pick the oldest
release of the distro you want to support and build on
that. The later releases of that distro will most likely be backward
compatible so your shared library will do just fine on later releases.
You either need to build the compiler with C++11 support from source or install it from some repo of the distro. Prefer the latter if possible due to compatibility issues.
Any non-system library should be statically linked into your shared
library: -Wl,--static -lmylib1 -lmylib2 -Wl,--dynamic. The important here is that -Wl,--dynamic is at the end, after all statically linked stuff.
I haven't tried it myself but my colleague who does this routinely says:
Use CentOS 6.5 (the latest of the 6.x versions as of writing).
Install devtools / Developer Toolset. The compatibility issues are supposed to be resolved by special, patched version of the developer tools. Developer Toolset 2.1 Beta comes with gcc 4.8.
Link statically all third party libraries and libstdc++. However, do not
link glibc and other system libraries statically that are supposed to be on the target machine
anyway.
The programs that my colleague compiles this way work on my Ubuntu machine just fine. (He uses CentOS 5.10, which seems to be the oldest, still supported distro that has glibc 2.5.)
Hope this helps.
I downgraded my gcc version 4.6.3 to 4.3.4 but ada version is not changed gnat-4.6.3 so I got error
Ada compiler not installed on this system.
How to set my ada to gnat 4.3.4?
It depends on what system you're running on and how you installed it. You need to either install GNAT from the same build of GCC, or you need to install GNAT in such a way that it doesn't interfere with the rest of GCC.