Mapping multiple collections to a single collection using Automapper - automapper

I am able to map group of sametype of collections to a single collection using the below code.
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<Source, Destination>().ForMember(
dest => dest.Drivers,
opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.BikeDrivers.Concat(src.CarDrivers).Concat(src.TruckDrivers)));
With the above solution I am able to map all the three type of drivers into one collection.
My destination object (Driver) has a property called DriverType which helps in identifying the type of driver. (BikeDriver/CarDriver/TruckDriver)
In the above code, how i can set the DriverType property based on the collection I am adding.
for eg: i have to hard code
DriverType = CarDriver for CarDrivers collection items
DriverType = BikeDriverfor BikeDrivers collection item.
Thanks in advance

To set the DriverType property you have to have this knowledge in your source object. I can't see your big picture, but this maybe used as a sample
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace ConsoleApplication2
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var s = new Source()
{
BikeDrivers = new List<BikeDriver>() {new BikeDriver()},
CarDrivers = new List<CarDriver>() {new CarDriver()},
TruckDrivers = new List<TruckDriver>() {new TruckDriver()},
};
var d = new Destination();
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<Source, Destination>().ForMember(
dest => dest.Drivers,
opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.BikeDrivers.Concat<IDriver>(src.CarDrivers).Concat<IDriver>(src.TruckDrivers)));
var result = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map(s, d);
}
public class Driver : IDriver
{
public string DriverType { get; set; }
}
public class Destination
{
public IEnumerable<IDriver> Drivers { get; set; }
}
public class Source
{
public IEnumerable<BikeDriver> BikeDrivers { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<CarDriver> CarDrivers { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<TruckDriver> TruckDrivers { get; set; }
}
public interface IDriver
{
string DriverType { get; set; }
}
public class BikeDriver : IDriver
{
public string DriverType
{
get { return "BikeDriver"; }
set { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
}
public class CarDriver : IDriver
{
public string DriverType
{
get { return "CarDriver"; }
set { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
}
public class TruckDriver : IDriver
{
public string DriverType
{
get { return "TruckDriver"; }
set { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
}
}
}

Related

Automapper - v5.2.0 Nullsubstitute String working with Map but not with ProjectTo

I tried to use AutoMapper NullSubstitute feature with source member and destination member of type string.
It doesn't seem to work with Projection.
As an example, I adapted src/UnitTests/Projection/NullSubstitutes.cs.
namespace AutoMapper.UnitTests.Projection
{
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using QueryableExtensions;
using Xunit;
public class NullSubstitutesWithMapFrom
{
private List<Dest> _dests;
public class Source
{
public string Value { get; set; }
}
public class Dest
{
public string ValuePropertyNotMatching { get; set; }
}
[Fact]
public void Can_substitute_null_values()
{
MapperConfiguration Configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>().ForMember(m => m.ValuePropertyNotMatching, opt =>
{
opt.MapFrom(src => src.Value);
opt.NullSubstitute("5");
});
});
var source = new[] { new Source { Value = null } }.AsQueryable();
_dests = source.ProjectTo<Dest>(Configuration).ToList();
Assert.Equal("5", _dests[0].ValuePropertyNotMatching);
}
}
}
Expected : "5" equals "5"
Actual : "5" equals null
With Map everything is ok
namespace AutoMapper.UnitTests.Projection
{
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Xunit;
public class NullSubstitutesWithMapFrom
{
private List<Dest> _dests;
public class Source
{
public string Value { get; set; }
}
public class Dest
{
public string ValuePropertyNotMatching { get; set; }
}
[Fact]
public void Can_substitute_null_values()
{
MapperConfiguration Configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>().ForMember(m => m.ValuePropertyNotMatching, opt =>
{
opt.MapFrom(src => src.Value);
opt.NullSubstitute("5");
});
});
var source = new[] { new Source { Value = null } }.ToList();
_dests = Configuration.CreateMapper().Map<List<Dest>>(source);
Assert.Equal("5", _dests[0].ValuePropertyNotMatching);
}
}
}
It looks a bit like what was described in https://github.com/AutoMapper/AutoMapper/issues/642

inherited class AutoMapper.AutoMapperMappingException

I am new at automapper and it is a very good stuff easy to use, but now I have a problem with it. Trying to convert my derived class to base and it gives me
AutoMapper.AutoMapperMappingException
Missing type map configuration or unsupported mapping.
Mapping types: ClientEventDb -> EventId
Database.ClientEventDb -> EventId
Destination path: ClientEvent
Source value:
Event:Login
Automapper wants to convert ClientEventDb to EventId? I don't understand why. EventId is an enum...
Please help me I have run out of ideas.
Here is the code which I run:
ClientEventDb[] edbl;
using (var context = new DbEntities())
{
edbl=context.Events.Take(1000).ToArray();
}
Mapper.CreateMap<ClientEventDb, ClientEvent>();
Console.WriteLine("hello");
return edbl.Select(edb => Mapper.Map<ClientEvent>(edb)).ToArray();
Here are my classes
[Table("events", Schema = "public")]
public class ClientEventDb : ClientEvent
{
public ClientEventDb(string userName, EventId happening, object userObject = null)
: base(userName, happening, userObject)
{
}
public ClientEventDb()
{
}
}
[ProtoContract]
[Table("events", Schema = "public")]
public class ClientEvent : ClientEventBase
{
[ProtoMember(1)]
[Column("username")]
public string UserName { get; private set; }
[ProtoMember(2)]
[Column("time")]
public DateTime DateTime { get; private set; }
[ProtoMember(3)]
[Key]
[Column("id")]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]
public string Id { get; private set; }
[ProtoMember(4)]
[Column("data")]
public byte[] UserObject { get; set; }
public ClientEvent(string userName,EventId happening, object userObject=null) : base(happening)
{
UserName = userName;
DateTime = DateTime.Now;
//UserObject = null;
if (userObject!=null) throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public ClientEvent()
{
}
protected ClientEvent Clone()
{
return (ClientEvent)MemberwiseClone();
}
}
[ProtoContract]
[ProtoInclude(10, typeof(ClientEvent))]
public class ClientEventBase
{
[Column("eventid")]
[ProtoMember(1)]
public int EventIdValue { get; set; } //must be public because of entity framework
[NotMapped]
public EventId EventId
{
get { return (EventId) EventIdValue; }
set { EventIdValue = (int) value; }
}
public ClientEventBase(EventId eventId)
{
EventId = eventId;
}
public ClientEventBase()
{
}
public override string ToString()
{
return String.Format("Event:{0}",EventId);
}
}
public enum EventId
{
Login = 1,
Logout,
ExitApplication,
}
UPDATE
bugfix: ClientEvent [Key] attribute moved to id property
Solution was this (thx to stuartd):
ClientEventDb[] edbl;
using (var context = new DbEntities())
{
edbl=context.Events.ToArray();
}
Mapper.CreateMap<ClientEventDb, ClientEvent>().ConstructUsing((ClientEventDb src) => new ClientEvent());
return edbl.Select(Mapper.Map<ClientEvent>).ToArray();
AutoMapper is confused as its made to map between similar properties in different classes, you are using it incorrectly - you just need to go from the derived class to the base which does not require AutoMapper. You could use this to do what you need....
ClientEventDb[] edbl;
using (var context = new DbEntities())
{
edbl=context.Events.Take(1000).ToArray();
}
return edbl.Cast<ClientEvent>().ToList();
I'd be looking at why you even feel you need a derived ClientEventDb though - understand we dont have the whole picture here but it seems to do nothing in addition to what the base class already does.
The issue is that ClientEvent has two constructors but you have not told AutoMapper which to use.
If you want it to use your constructor with parameters, change your mapping code to this and it will work:
Mapper.CreateMap<ClientEventDb, ClientEvent>()
.ConstructUsing(src => new ClientEvent(src.UserName, src.EventId));
Or to make AutoMapper use the default constructor:
Mapper.CreateMap<ClientEventDb, ClientEvent>()
.ConstructUsing((ClientEventDb src) => new ClientEvent());

Generic Automapper function with custom convension for underscored properties

I simply need to map some auto generated classes from database to domain/viewmodels classes. The autogenerated class may have names like customer_id that I want to be mapped with CustomerId. Somehow I want to register my own convention with auto mapper. I have started with following code however the mapped object properties are not populated:
// Generic method that should map source to target
public static TTarget MapWithUnderScoreConvension(TSource source, TTarget target)
{
Mapper.Initialize(cfg=> cfg.AddProfile<AutoMapperUnderScoreProfile>());
Mapper.CreateMap<TSource, TTarget>();
var mapped = Mapper.Map(source, target);
return mapped;
}
// New underscore profile
public class AutoMapperUnderScoreProfile : Profile
{
public AutoMapperUnderScoreProfile()
{
Mapper.Initialize(configuration => configuration.CreateProfile("UnderScoreProfile", UnderScoreProfile));
Mapper.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
}
private void UnderScoreProfile(IProfileExpression profile)
{
profile.SourceMemberNamingConvention = new PascalCaseNamingConvention();
profile.DestinationMemberNamingConvention = new SourceUnderScoreNamingConvension();
}
}
// Convention class
public class SourceUnderScoreNamingConvension : INamingConvention
{
private readonly string _separatorCharacter="_";
private readonly Regex _splittingExpression = new Regex(#"[\p{Lu}0-9]+(?=_?)");
public Regex SplittingExpression { get { return _splittingExpression;} private set{} }
public string SeparatorCharacter { get { return _separatorCharacter; } private set{} }
}
// Test cases
[TestMethod()]
public void Test_Map_Db_Generated_Class_To_Model()
{
var dbGenerated = new QuestionTypeFromDb()
{
QuestionType_Description = "1",
QuestionType_Id = 1,
QuestionType_Is_Default = true,
QuestionType_Is_TimeBased = true,
QuestionType_Sequence = 1,
QuestionType_Time_In_Seconds = 1
};
var mappedObject = AutoMapperHelper<QuestionTypeFromDb, QuestionType>
.MapWithUnderScoreConvension(dbGenerated, new QuestionType());
mappedObject.QuestionTypeId.Should().Be(dbGenerated.QuestionType_Id);
mappedObject.QuestionTypeDescription.Should().Be(dbGenerated.QuestionType_Description);
mappedObject.TimeInSeconds.Should().Be(dbGenerated.QuestionType_Time_In_Seconds);
mappedObject.QuestionTypeSequence.Should().Be(dbGenerated.QuestionType_Sequence);
}
public class TestQuestionWithAnswerType
{
public int QuestionTypeId { get; set; }
public string QuestionTypeDescription { get; set; }
public int QuestionTypeSequence { get; set; }
public bool QuestionTypeIsTimeBased { get; set; }
public int? QuestionTypeTimeInSeconds { get; set; }
public bool QuestionTypeIsDefault { get; set; }
}
any comments will be appreciated.
Update
I have found that the following workaround works:
I simply replaced used this -> to replace 'underscore' with nothing (Mapper.Initialize(c => c.ReplaceMemberName("_", ""));
public static TTarget MapWithUnderScoreConvension(TSource source, TTarget target)
{
Mapper.Initialize(c => c.ReplaceMemberName("_", ""));
//Mapper.Initialize(cfg => cfg.AddProfile<AutoMapperUnderScoreProfile>());
Mapper.CreateMap<TSource, TTarget>();
var mapped = Mapper.Map(source, target);
return mapped;
}
Your regex needs to be changed to : [\p{L}}0-9]+(?=_?)
This will take care of Customer_Id, CUSTOMER_ID, customer_id
The {L} unicode category includes Lu, Lt, Ll, Lm and Lo characters as mentioned here.
Answer is added in the Update section of the question. Basically the solution for me was very simple -> Mapper.Initialize(c => c.ReplaceMemberName("_", ""));

Problems mapping a type that inherits from IEnumerable

I have a problem mapping a property containing a custom list that inherits from IEnumerable (if i remove that inheritance, this example works). I have simplified the problem into this model:
public interface IMyEnumerable<T> : IEnumerable<T> { }
public class MyIEnumerable<T> : IMyEnumerable<T>
{
private readonly IEnumerable<T> _items;
public MyIEnumerable(IEnumerable<T> items)
{
_items = items;
}
public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
{
return _items.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
}
public class Source
{
public List<SourceItem> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Destination
{
public IMyEnumerable<DestinationItem> Items { get; set; }
}
public class SourceItem
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class DestinationItem
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
Then i try to use is this way:
public class MyResolver : ValueResolver<Source, IMyEnumerable<DestinationItem>>
{
protected override IMyEnumerable<DestinationItem> ResolveCore(Source source)
{
var destinationItems = Mapper.Map<List<SourceItem>, IEnumerable<DestinationItem>>(source.Items);
return new MyIEnumerable<DestinationItem>(destinationItems);
}
}
// Mappings
Mapper.CreateMap<Source, Destination>()
.ForMember(x => x.Items, m => m.ResolveUsing<MyResolver>());
Mapper.CreateMap<SourceItem, DestinationItem>();
// Using the mappings
var source = // not really relevant
var destination = Mapper.Map<Destination>(source);
This gives me the following exception (slightly edited for readability):
Mapping types:
MyIEnumerable`1 -> IMyEnumerable`1
MyIEnumerable`1[[DestinationItem]] -> IMyEnumerable`1[[DestinationItem]]
Destination path:
Destination.Items.Items
Source value:
MyIEnumerable`1[DestinationItem]
----> System.ArgumentException : Object of type System.Collections.Generic.List`1[DestinationItem] cannot be converted to type IMyEnumerable`1[DestinationItem].
Any idea how i can fix the mapping so that i can get this to work?
Assuming the following:
var source = new Source
{
Items = new List<SourceItem>
{
new SourceItem { Name = "foo" },
new SourceItem { Name = "bar" },
new SourceItem { Name = "cow" },
}
};
Then the following work:
// Method 1: Straight up mapping the collections:
Mapper.CreateMap<List<SourceItem>, IMyEnumerable<DestinationItem>>()
.ConstructUsing(list => new MyEnumerable<DestinationItem>(list.ConvertAll(Mapper.Map<SourceItem, DestinationItem>)));
// Method 2: Ignore the property and do it ourselves after the rest of the mapping:
Mapper.CreateMap<Source, Destination>()
.ForMember(q => q.Items, r => r.Ignore())
.AfterMap((s, d) => d.Items = new MyEnumerable<DestinationItem>(
s.Items.Select(Mapper.Map<SourceItem, DestinationItem>)));
Nothing else seems to work due to some combination of covariance and contravariance between List<T>, IEnumerable<T> and IMyEnumerable<T>

Automapper: How to leverage a custom INamingConvention?

I am working with a database where the designers really seemed to enjoy capital letters and the underscore key. Since I have a simple ORM, my data models use these names as well. I need to build DTOs and I would prefer to give them standard names since we are exposing them through services.
The code below is now corrected! The test passes so use this as a reference if you need to use multiple naming conventions
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
using AutoMapper;
using NUnit.Framework;
namespace AutomapperTest
{
public class DATAMODEL
{
public Guid ID { get; set; }
public string FIRST_NAME { get; set; }
public List<CHILD_DATAMODEL> CHILDREN { get; set; }
}
public class CHILD_DATAMODEL
{
public Guid ID { get; set; }
public int ORDER_ID { get; set; }
}
public class DataModelDto
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public List<ChildDataModelDto> Children { get; set; }
}
public class ChildDataModelDto
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public int OrderId { get; set; }
}
public class UpperUnderscoreNamingConvention : INamingConvention
{
private readonly Regex _splittingExpression = new Regex(#"[\p{Lu}0-9]+(?=_?)");
public Regex SplittingExpression { get { return _splittingExpression; } }
public string SeparatorCharacter { get { return "_"; } }
}
public class Profile1 : Profile
{
protected override void Configure()
{
SourceMemberNamingConvention = new UpperUnderscoreNamingConvention();
DestinationMemberNamingConvention = new PascalCaseNamingConvention();
CreateMap<DATAMODEL, DataModelDto>();
CreateMap<CHILD_DATAMODEL, ChildDataModelDto>();
}
}
[TestFixture]
public class Tests
{
[Test]
public void CanMap()
{
//tell automapper to use my convention
Mapper.Initialize(x => x.AddProfile<Profile1>());
//make a dummy source object
var src = new DATAMODEL();
src.ID = Guid.NewGuid();
src.FIRST_NAME = "foobar";
src.CHILDREN = new List<CHILD_DATAMODEL>
{
new CHILD_DATAMODEL()
{
ID = Guid.NewGuid(),
ORDER_ID = 999
}
};
//map to destination
var dest = Mapper.Map<DATAMODEL, DataModelDto>(src);
Assert.AreEqual(src.ID, dest.Id);
Assert.AreEqual(src.FIRST_NAME, dest.FirstName);
Assert.AreEqual(src.CHILDREN.Count, dest.Children.Count);
Assert.AreEqual(src.CHILDREN[0].ID, dest.Children[0].Id);
Assert.AreEqual(src.CHILDREN[0].ORDER_ID, dest.Children[0].OrderId);
}
}
}
Create your mappings in profiles, and define the INamingConvention parameters as appropriate.
I don't like the global/static, so I prefer using Initialize and define all of my mappings together. This also has the added benefit of allowing a call to AssertConfiguration... which means if I've borked my mapping I'll get the exception at launch instead of whenever my code gets around to using the problematic mapping.
Mapper.Initialize(configuration =>
{
configuration.CreateProfile("Profile1", CreateProfile1);
configuration.CreateProfile("Profile2", CreateProfile2);
});
Mapper.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
in the same class with that initialization method:
public void CreateProfile1(IProfileExpression profile)
{
// this.CreateMap (not Mapper.CreateMap) statements that do the "normal" thing here
// equivalent to Mapper.CreateMap( ... ).WithProfile("Profile1");
}
public void CreateProfile2(IProfileExpression profile)
{
profile.SourceMemberNamingConvention = new PascalCaseNamingConvention();
profile.DestinationMemberNamingConvention = new LowerUnderscoreNamingConvention();
// this.CreateMap (not Mapper.CreateMap) statements that need your special conventions here
// equivalent to Mapper.CreateMap( ... ).WithProfile("Profile2");
}
if you do it this way, and don't define the same mapping in both profiles, I don't think you need anything to "fill in the blank" from the original question, it should already be setup to do the right thing.
What about
public class DATAMODELProfile : Profile
{
protected override void Configure()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<DATAMODEL, DATAMODEL>();
Mapper.CreateMap<DATAMODEL, SOMETHINGELSE>();
Mapper.CreateMap<DATAMODEL, DataModelDto>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.Id, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.ID))
.ForMember(dest => dest.FirstName, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.FIRST_NAME))
.ForMember(dest => dest.ChildDataModels, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.CHILD_DATAMODELS));
}
}

Resources