It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 10 years ago.
I need to create a workflow for a list.
The list accepts:
- Location (dropdown)
- linked to location choices in the locations list
- Division (dropdown)
- linked to division choices in the divisions list
- other non related information
I need to send e-mails to the location contact for approval
I want to create a workflow that reads what location was selected and pulls the location contact (located in the locations list)for that location and sends an approval email.
After that is done, I need an accept or decline option that the person who received the email can check.
If it is accepted, I need to send an email to the division contact (located in the division list). If it is denied, the list item gets deleted.
After that is done, I need an accept or decline option that the person who received the second email can check.
If he accepts it, then the request will be filed, if not then I want to delete the request.
I know that this is long and difficult, but if anyone has an idea as to any part of this it would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Tim
You should be able to do what you want to do using SharePoint designer for your workflow. Take a look at the following article. If you are using SharePoint Workflow 2010 then you can customize the approval workflow out of the box. Check out this article. Pretty cool!
Related
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 10 years ago.
I use client JS to collect some data and want to use these data as data source of some common xpages controls, any suggestion?
I assume you mean a data source for a ViewPanel, DataTable, or Repeat?
Put the data in a hidden field with client js.
Execute a server side action. (Within the server side action you can place the data from the hidden field into a scope variable, if desired)
Execute a partial refresh from the server side action and make sure you are refreshing the control that needs to use the client side data as a data source.
Point the data source of the control to the hidden field (or scope variable if that's what you used)
Manipulate the data as necessary. For example, if your field contains "one,two,three" as a value you need to turn that into an array with string.split().
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 10 years ago.
We need to find out how many records (rows) for a particular entity in CRM 2011 have write privileges using the AccessRightsMask column in the PrincipalObjectAccess (POA) table in SQL.
In the enumerator for AccessRights in CrmSdk the mask value for WriteAccess is given as 2, but when we search for a value of 2 on POA table there are no records found for this AccessRightsMask value.
What query should we be using to return the rows where a user or team has write access to the object?
You almost certainly won't find many objects where principals only have write access, since read access would almost always be required to go with it and a whole bunch of other stuff.
You are treating this as a mask aren't you? ie not looking for values = 2 but second-to-last bit = 1 ?
Your query wants to be something like:
select foo from <POA table> where AccessRightsMask & 2 =2
And the POA table, as far as I know, only records access rights which are outside the normal security model ie records which have been explicitly shared, or where rights have been cascaded on re-parenting. 'Normal' access is figured out on the fly according to security roles, team membership, BU of the principal relative to the object and so on.
I do feel a need to ask the big question - "why do you need to try and get this information, and why this approach?"
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 10 years ago.
Background :
Site domains such as bit.ly, ow.ly instagr.am, and gowal.la are shorteners which forward elsewhere . Since most of thes url's actually forward to other, third party sites, Im assuming they can handle a pretty heavy load.
Question :
Is there a different politeness metric when crawling 301 redirects from a single domain (i.e. ow.ly) , compared with crawling "real" content pages (i.e. blogger.com/) ?
More concretely : How many times a day would we expect to be able to hit a site which issues 301 redirects, compared with a normal site which streams real content.
Some initial thoughts :
My initial guess would be (10E6 = 1,000,000), given that what i see online suggests that hitting a mature site at the order of 10E3-10E5 times a day is not a huge issue, considering that large site like tumbler receives around (10E7 = 10,000,000+) views per day, with sites like google are on the order of 10E8 (billions) of view per day.
In any case, I hope this very raw bit of fact-finding that I've done will spur some thoughts on defining the difference in "politeness" metrics when we are discussing 301 redirects versus "true" page crawls (which are bandwidth intensive).
When in doubt, check robots.txt. There's a non-standard extension called Crawl-delay, which as you may be able to imagine, specifies how many seconds to wait between requests.
You mentioned bit.ly; their robots.txt has no such restrictions, and a human-friendly comment saying "robots welcome". As long as you are not abusive, you probably won't have a problem with them. There are also comments in there stating that they have an API. Using that API may be more useful than crawling.
As for defining abusive... well, unfortunately that's a very subjective thing, and there's not going to be any one right answer. You'd probably need to ask each specific vendor what their recommendations and limits are, if they don't provide this information through documentation on their site, robots.txt, or through an actual API, which itself may have well-defined access limits.
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 10 years ago.
I am trying to find out if there is a way to detect the IMSI # of a phone that is calling you. So say for example, caller A calls person B- person B wants to know A's imsi #. I thought I read this information is transmitted to the MSC- is there a way to ask the MSC for that information?
I'm not 100% agree with previous answer.
Yes, it is impossible to obtain IMSI of the phone calling you. Pairs IMSI - MSISDN (phone number) pair are stored in the HLR.
But it isn't illegal to obtain IMSI by normal procedures. If you have physical access to the card you can just read EF IMSI. It isn't protected at all. Probably prev. author mentioned that it would be illegal to obtain IMSI of remote phone. If so, yes, it would be illegal because you'll need to have an access to MNO's servers.
An IMSI number (International Mobile Subscriber Identity) is a unique number that is private.
It is not sent to other phones, a randomly generated TMSI is sent instead.
This is because the IMSI number could be used in forging SIM cards and eavesdropping on phone calls. It is not possible to obtain the IMSI by any normal procedures and doing so would be illegal.
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.
Closed 12 years ago.
how to make our site viewable in top ten of the Google search...
I want my website to be available for the user who Google with search name social networking or something like ssit How to do that?
GET to know SEO(Search Engine Optimization).
1) Use proper relevant meta tag's keywords and description
2) Include title tag, get more important keyword in heading tags
3) Use proper title and alt for images
4) Have a page for site-map in your website
5) Have more back-links to your site by submitting articles, press release and news
6) Cross linking between pages of the same website to provide more links to most important pages may improve its visibility
But before anything one should know about the type of users they want for their site and search for the relevant keywords for their site, Google analytic definitely helps for this purpose.
And most important don't expect you site to be on the top soon, it will take some time like 6 month at least to get on the top of search engine. As soon as users of your site increase rank will increase. So BEST OF LUCK
The algorithm used by Google gives a rank based on the number of other sites linking your site in association to specific keywords.
This has been spoofed to do so-called "google bombing": if a lot of people spread a link to a specific site using a specific word, they connect that word to that site and have the top rank (e.g., it has been used to associate insults to politics). The same technique has been used by spammers to rise the rank of garbage sites: they flood forums and blog comments with links to their sites. Although the algorithm has been improved to try to avoid this issue, it is still a viable way to raise the site rank.
It is clear that using such methods to improve visibility of your site will give a very bad reputation to your site.
I suggest instead to pay Google to advertise on it (so you will get top in a legitimate way).
Of course, you are supposed to get the top ten if your site is really the top for the specific argument.
Slip google a fiver (cough) I mean, uh, get other well known websites to link to you. Google's Pagerank works out a pages final rank or priority by determining how many other sites link to it, with links that come from already high ranks sites being weighted more then links form a 'unknown' site.