I have 4 UART devices and I want to watch their output concurrently. I use the following script to do this job:
# first kill the cat process from last run
killall -v cat
for i in `seq 0 3`; do
cat /dev/crbif0rb0c$(i}ttyS0 | grep . --line-buffered &
# cat /dev/crbif0rb0c$(i)ttyS0 &
done
But I get no output from this script, except many empty lines. When I remove the grep stuff and use the second line in the for loop, I get a lot of outputs, but not readable since all outputs are messed up.
So my question is why there is no output (except empty lines) when I use grep? Or anyone can provide a better (and workable) solutions for my scenario?
Thanks in advance!
[UPDATE] I suddenly found that cat /dev/crbif0rb0c${i}ttyS0 | grep ^ --line-buffered & will work. Don't know why...
How about tail -f /dev/crbif0rb0c{0,1,2,3} ?
Related
Is that possible to use grep on a continuous stream?
What I mean is sort of a tail -f <file> command, but with grep on the output in order to keep only the lines that interest me.
I've tried tail -f <file> | grep pattern but it seems that grep can only be executed once tail finishes, that is to say never.
Turn on grep's line buffering mode when using BSD grep (FreeBSD, Mac OS X etc.)
tail -f file | grep --line-buffered my_pattern
It looks like a while ago --line-buffered didn't matter for GNU grep (used on pretty much any Linux) as it flushed by default (YMMV for other Unix-likes such as SmartOS, AIX or QNX). However, as of November 2020, --line-buffered is needed (at least with GNU grep 3.5 in openSUSE, but it seems generally needed based on comments below).
I use the tail -f <file> | grep <pattern> all the time.
It will wait till grep flushes, not till it finishes (I'm using Ubuntu).
I think that your problem is that grep uses some output buffering. Try
tail -f file | stdbuf -o0 grep my_pattern
it will set output buffering mode of grep to unbuffered.
If you want to find matches in the entire file (not just the tail), and you want it to sit and wait for any new matches, this works nicely:
tail -c +0 -f <file> | grep --line-buffered <pattern>
The -c +0 flag says that the output should start 0 bytes (-c) from the beginning (+) of the file.
In most cases, you can tail -f /var/log/some.log |grep foo and it will work just fine.
If you need to use multiple greps on a running log file and you find that you get no output, you may need to stick the --line-buffered switch into your middle grep(s), like so:
tail -f /var/log/some.log | grep --line-buffered foo | grep bar
you may consider this answer as enhancement .. usually I am using
tail -F <fileName> | grep --line-buffered <pattern> -A 3 -B 5
-F is better in case of file rotate (-f will not work properly if file rotated)
-A and -B is useful to get lines just before and after the pattern occurrence .. these blocks will appeared between dashed line separators
But For me I prefer doing the following
tail -F <file> | less
this is very useful if you want to search inside streamed logs. I mean go back and forward and look deeply
Didn't see anyone offer my usual go-to for this:
less +F <file>
ctrl + c
/<search term>
<enter>
shift + f
I prefer this, because you can use ctrl + c to stop and navigate through the file whenever, and then just hit shift + f to return to the live, streaming search.
sed would be a better choice (stream editor)
tail -n0 -f <file> | sed -n '/search string/p'
and then if you wanted the tail command to exit once you found a particular string:
tail --pid=$(($BASHPID+1)) -n0 -f <file> | sed -n '/search string/{p; q}'
Obviously a bashism: $BASHPID will be the process id of the tail command. The sed command is next after tail in the pipe, so the sed process id will be $BASHPID+1.
Yes, this will actually work just fine. Grep and most Unix commands operate on streams one line at a time. Each line that comes out of tail will be analyzed and passed on if it matches.
This one command workes for me (Suse):
mail-srv:/var/log # tail -f /var/log/mail.info |grep --line-buffered LOGIN >> logins_to_mail
collecting logins to mail service
Coming some late on this question, considering this kind of work as an important part of monitoring job, here is my (not so short) answer...
Following logs using bash
1. Command tail
This command is a little more porewfull than read on already published answer
Difference between follow option tail -f and tail -F, from manpage:
-f, --follow[={name|descriptor}]
output appended data as the file grows;
...
-F same as --follow=name --retry
...
--retry
keep trying to open a file if it is inaccessible
This mean: by using -F instead of -f, tail will re-open file(s) when removed (on log rotation, for sample).
This is usefull for watching logfile over many days.
Ability of following more than one file simultaneously
I've already used:
tail -F /var/www/clients/client*/web*/log/{error,access}.log /var/log/{mail,auth}.log \
/var/log/apache2/{,ssl_,other_vhosts_}access.log \
/var/log/pure-ftpd/transfer.log
For following events through hundreds of files... (consider rest of this answer to understand how to make it readable... ;)
Using switches -n (Don't use -c for line buffering!).By default tail will show 10 last lines. This can be tunned:
tail -n 0 -F file
Will follow file, but only new lines will be printed
tail -n +0 -F file
Will print whole file before following his progression.
2. Buffer issues when piping:
If you plan to filter ouptuts, consider buffering! See -u option for sed, --line-buffered for grep, or stdbuf command:
tail -F /some/files | sed -une '/Regular Expression/p'
Is (a lot more efficient than using grep) a lot more reactive than if you does'nt use -u switch in sed command.
tail -F /some/files |
sed -une '/Regular Expression/p' |
stdbuf -i0 -o0 tee /some/resultfile
3. Recent journaling system
On recent system, instead of tail -f /var/log/syslog you have to run journalctl -xf, in near same way...
journalctl -axf | sed -une '/Regular Expression/p'
But read man page, this tool was built for log analyses!
4. Integrating this in a bash script
Colored output of two files (or more)
Here is a sample of script watching for many files, coloring ouptut differently for 1st file than others:
#!/bin/bash
tail -F "$#" |
sed -une "
/^==> /{h;};
//!{
G;
s/^\\(.*\\)\\n==>.*${1//\//\\\/}.*<==/\\o33[47m\\1\\o33[0m/;
s/^\\(.*\\)\\n==> .* <==/\\o33[47;31m\\1\\o33[0m/;
p;}"
They work fine on my host, running:
sudo ./myColoredTail /var/log/{kern.,sys}log
Interactive script
You may be watching logs for reacting on events?
Here is a little script playing some sound when some USB device appear or disappear, but same script could send mail, or any other interaction, like powering on coffe machine...
#!/bin/bash
exec {tailF}< <(tail -F /var/log/kern.log)
tailPid=$!
while :;do
read -rsn 1 -t .3 keyboard
[ "${keyboard,}" = "q" ] && break
if read -ru $tailF -t 0 _ ;then
read -ru $tailF line
case $line in
*New\ USB\ device\ found* ) play /some/sound.ogg ;;
*USB\ disconnect* ) play /some/othersound.ogg ;;
esac
printf "\r%s\e[K" "$line"
fi
done
echo
exec {tailF}<&-
kill $tailPid
You could quit by pressing Q key.
you certainly won't succeed with
tail -f /var/log/foo.log |grep --line-buffered string2search
when you use "colortail" as an alias for tail, eg. in bash
alias tail='colortail -n 30'
you can check by
type alias
if this outputs something like
tail isan alias of colortail -n 30.
then you have your culprit :)
Solution:
remove the alias with
unalias tail
ensure that you're using the 'real' tail binary by this command
type tail
which should output something like:
tail is /usr/bin/tail
and then you can run your command
tail -f foo.log |grep --line-buffered something
Good luck.
Use awk(another great bash utility) instead of grep where you dont have the line buffered option! It will continuously stream your data from tail.
this is how you use grep
tail -f <file> | grep pattern
This is how you would use awk
tail -f <file> | awk '/pattern/{print $0}'
I have the following commands saved in a .sh file
prog=$1
ps axf | grep $prog | grep -v grep | awk '{print "kill -9 " $1}'
I get the following output when I execute it
kill -9 3184
kill -9 20359
But I just need the first line of it as that is the only valid pid. How can I remove the 2nd line from the output.
There are a few issues with what you want to do:
You're building a chain of 4 commands for something relatively simple
You're going to get as a result only the first line of a list of processes containing $prog (excluding the grep $prog which you filtered out); how can you be sure that's the process you want?
The correct command to use is
pkill $prog`
as suggested in the comments, which probably will do what you want.
Just for information, and to answer your question, you can pipe an output to head -n 1 to return only the first line:
<list of commands> | head -n 1
However, in your case this would add a fifth command to the chain, so I recommend you don't do it this way.
Why read -t doesn't time out when reading from pipe on RHEL5 or RHEL6?
Here is my example which doesn't timeout on my RHEL boxes wile reading from the pipe:
tail -f logfile.log | grep 'something' | read -t 3 variable
If I'm correct read -t 3 should timeout after 3 seconds?
Many thanks in advance.
Chris
GNU bash, version 4.1.2(1)-release (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
The solution given by chepner should work.
An explanation why your version doesn't is simple: When you construct a pipe like yours, the data flows through the pipe from the left to the right. When your read times out however, the programs on the left side will keep running until they notice that the pipe is broken, and that happens only when they try to write to the pipe.
A simple example is this:
cat | sleep 5
After five seconds the pipe will be broken because sleep will exit, but cat will nevertheless keep running until you press return.
In your case that means, until grep produces a result, your command will keep running despite the timeout.
While not a direct answer to your specific question, you will need to run something like
read -t 3 variable < <( tail -f logfile.log | grep "something" )
in order for the newly set value of variable to be visible after the pipeline completes. See if this times out as expected.
Since you are simply using read as a way of exiting the pipeline after a fixed amount of time, you don't have to worry about the scope of variable. However, grep may find a match without printing it within your timeout due to its own internal buffering. You can disable that (with GNU grep, at least), using the --line-buffered option:
tail -f logfile.log | grep --line-buffered "something" | read -t 3
Another option, if available, is the timeout command as a replacement for the read:
timeout 3 tail -f logfile.log | grep -q --line-buffered "something"
Here, we kill tail after 3 seconds, and use the exit status of grep in the usual way.
I dont have a RHEL server to test your script right now but I could bet than read is exiting on timeout and working as it should. Try run:
grep 'something' | strace bash -c "read -t 3 variable"
and you can confirm that.
I have a Linux driver running in the background that is able to return the current system data/stats. I view the data by running a console utility (let's call it dump-data) in a console. All data is dumped every time I run dump-data. The output of the utility is like below
Output:
- A=reading1
- B=reading2
- C=reading3
- D=reading4
- E=reading5
...
- variableX=readingX
...
The list of readings returned by the utility can be really long. Depending on the scenario, certain readings would be useful while everything else would be useless.
I need a way to grep only the useful readings whose names might have have nothing in common (via a bash script). I.e. Sometimes I'll need to collect A,D,E; and other times I'll need C,D,E.
I'm attempting to graph the readings over time to look for trends, so I can't run something like this:
# forgive my pseudocode
Loop
dump-data | grep A
dump-data | grep D
dump-data | grep E
End Loop
to collect A,D,E as that would actually give me readings from 3 separate calls of dump-data as that would not be accurate.
If you want to save all result of grep in the same file, you can just join all expressions in one:
grep -E 'expr1|expr2|expr3'
But if you want to have results (for expr1, expr2 and expr3) in separate files, things are getting more interesting.
You can do this using tee >(command).
For example, here I process the same pipe with thre different commands:
$ echo abc | tee >(sed s/a/_a_/ > file1) | tee >(sed s/b/_b_/ > file2) | sed s/c/_c_/ > file3
$ grep "" file[123]
file1:_a_bc
file2:a_b_c
file3:ab_c_
But the command seems to be too complex.
I would better save dump-data results to a file and then grep it.
TEMP=$(mktemp /tmp/dump-data-XXXXXXXX)
dump-data > ${TEMP}
grep A ${TEMP}
grep B ${TEMP}
grep C ${TEMP}
You can use dump-data | grep -E "A|D|E". Note the -E option of grep. Alternatively you could use egrep without the -E option.
you can simply use:
dump-data | grep -E 'A|D|E'
awk '/MY PATTERN/{print > "matches-"FILENAME;}' myfile{1,3}
thx Guru at Stack Exchange
Basically I'm wondering why this doesn't output anything:
tail --follow=name file.txt | grep something | grep something_else
You can assume that it should produce output I have run another line to confirm
cat file.txt | grep something | grep something_else
It seems like you can't pipe the output of tail more than once!? Anyone know what the deal is and is there a solution?
EDIT:
To answer the questions so far, the file definitely has contents that should be displayed by the grep. As evidence if the grep is done like so:
tail --follow=name file.txt | grep something
Output shows up correctly, but if this is used instead:
tail --follow=name file.txt | grep something | grep something
No output is shown.
If at all helpful I am running ubuntu 10.04
You might also run into a problem with grep buffering when inside a pipe.
ie, you don't see the output from
tail --follow=name file.txt | grep something > output.txt
since grep will buffer its own output.
Use the --line-buffered switch for grep to work around this:
tail --follow=name file.txt | grep --line-buffered something > output.txt
This is useful if you want to get the results of the follow into the output.txt file as rapidly as possible.
Figured out what was going on here. It turns out that the command is working it's just that the output takes a long time to reach the console (approx 120 seconds in my case). This is because the buffer on the standard out is not written each line but rather each block. So instead of getting every line from the file as it was being written I would get a giant block every 2 minutes or so.
It should be noted that this works correctly:
tail file.txt | grep something | grep something
It is the following of the file with --follow=name that is problematic.
For my purposes I found a way around it, what I was intending to do was capture the output of the first grep to a file, so the command would be:
tail --follow=name file.txt | grep something > output.txt
A way around this is to use the script command like so:
script -c 'tail --follow=name file.txt | grep something' output.txt
Script captures the output of the command and writes it to file, thus avoiding the second pipe.
This has effectively worked around the issue for me, and I have explained why the command wasn't working as I expected, problem solved.
FYI, These other stackoverflow questions are related:
Trick an application into thinking its stdin is interactive, not a pipe
Force another program's standard output to be unbuffered using Python
You do know that tail starts by default with the last ten lines of the file? My guess is everything the cat version found is well into the past. Try tail -n+1 --follow=name file.txt to start from the beginning of the file.
works for me on Mac without --follow=name
bash-3.2$ tail delme.txt | grep po
position.bin
position.lrn
bash-3.2$ tail delme.txt | grep po | grep lr
position.lrn
grep pattern filename | grep pattern | grep pattern | grep pattern ......