I have a recurrent problem when using R with a Linux console. I sometimes suspend it with [Ctrl+Z], then put it to the background with bg, (execute some other commands), then put it to the foreground again with fg.
R resumes correctly with all the workspace intact, but when I type, the characters are invisible (just like when we type passwords).
I still can execute commands though, and I see the response. Moreover, when I type [enter], the prompt doesn't go to the next line, but does something like this: > > >.
Then I need to quit R using q(), in order that everything returns to normal. I didn't manage to find any reference to this problem on internet.
Would you have an idea? Thanks a lot for your help.
No direct answer but via
"Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this."
"Then just don't do this."
I would suggest that if you must have an R console open, place it inside screen --- or if you have it, byobu a fancier extensions, or even tmux.
Or even inside the One True Editor (TM) using ESS. For what it is worth, I always run emacs --daemon and then connect to the same R session either via emacsclient -nw on the terminal or under X11 via emacsclient -c (both of which I aliased to emt and emx). I also run byobu sessions for command-line work where I often use littler for command-line tasks and tests.
Unix is a multitasking system. There is no need to limit yourself to one prompt, especially if you suffer side-effects as a consequence.
Related
The script should treat 'enter' as sending the users string but instead it just prints '^M' to the terminal.
I'm not sure why this is happening suddenly, it wasn't happening yesterday. Something has changed about this particular terminal session because if I open a new terminal window it works as expected in that.
Any ideas?
I'm using iterm on Mac (xterm?)
TL;DR: just type the reset command on the OS shell whenever the terminal starts acting funny.
Terminal emulator programs (as iterm) feature complicated internal states in order to provide literally decades of features to allow prettier programs on the terminal.
Terminals started as keyboards that would physically print the typed text into paper, back in mainframe era - and "stdin" and "stdout" concepts: a single stream going forward with all data that is typed and another with all data that is printed out, are up to today, more than 50 years later, the default way to interact with the text terminal.
Internal state changes by programs that deal with the terminal in different ways (like being able to read a keypress without waiting for "enter"), should be reverted when the programs terminate. But due to errors and bugs that is not always the case.
I don't know which possible state would change "ˆM" to be displayed instead of a CR code being applied to the terminal. There are tens or hundreds of other possible misbehaviors, including completely messing up all characters. The reset command in modern *nixes (MacOS, Linux, BSDs) will fix everything.
Although, of course, if "enter" is not being applied, it won't be possible to issue the command at all from the os shell. You will have to start a new terminal session then. From within a Python program, if you happen to make a call to some code that will always break the terminal, you might run "reset" as a subprocess by calling os.system('reset').
In particular, "ˆM" represents "ctrl + M", which is a control character with value "13" (0x0d in hex). It is the value for the "Carriage Return" control code (AKA. "return", "enter", "CR"). If you never did this: try pressing "ctrl+M", and see that it behaves the same as "enter". It is being displayed in "human readable form" instead of acting as a control character in your case.
(regarding xterm and iterm: all they have in common is that they are both "terminal emulator" programs, xterm being one of the oldest existing such programs, which probably pioneered a lot of adaptations from text-only video modes to a graphic environment. "iterm" is just a normal modern app which implements terminal functionality)
In IDLE, there's no clear screen, and after reading the forums the best method is plainly to print a ton of "\n"s. However, after playing with IDLE, I made a discovery. When my game was waiting for an input after printing out instructions using print statements, instead of inputting any useful character, I entered 'control-z,' and IDLE began to remove the text that was display by the print statements, one by one.
My main question is, how do I manually in the code itself enter 'control-z', so I can utilize this functionality?
If you're confused by my story, here's some example code and try it yourself by hitting control-z.
print("Some Text")
print("More Text")
input("The Input (Hit Control - Z Here):")
^Z is a bit of a mess. The ascii control char ^D is usually interpreted as EOT, end of transmission, which on Unix and many other systems means end of file, close the application. Ascii ^Z is meant to be interpreted as SUB, substitute, whatever that means. Editors ofter use it as UNDO (meaning undo a ^X cut). Microsoft (and a few other old systems) at least sometimes interprets ^Z as end of file, with the same effect as ^D on *nix.
The Windows console closes a text app after ^Z . ^D is passes on to the app. IDLE, as a cross-platform app, closes on ^D. IDLE used to close on ^Z on Windows, but now, for me, it only erases the prompt. (I don't know if this alternative is intended.) I do not see the progressive deletion you report. What OS and what Python version are you running?
To answer your main question: you can't. input is usually used in assignment statements: string = input('prompt'). The way to imitate input statements is to directly assign 'user input': s = 'simulated user input'. However, this does not work for characters that get intercepted by the programs managing the input window and never sent to the python program.
IDLE's Shell generally imitates Python's interactive console. The latter (at least on Windows) makes everything, except the current input, read-only. Shell follows suite. Imitation is especially strict as regards executing user code. It is intended that user code tested in IDLE should run in Python without IDLE. It would be wrong for IDLE to clear the interactive shell in response to user code when Python cannot.
For editor and output windows, ^A (select all) followed by Backspace (delete), Delete, or ^X (cut) do clear the window.
Shell does, however, has more editing commands than many (most? all?) consoles and a menu system. These additions are allowed since they are interactive only and not accessible from user code. There have been various proposals and patches to enable clearing part or all of the shell window. https://bugs.python.org/issue6143 has some of the discussions and proposals.
I am on windows machine, when I temporarily change to console using :sh then back to vim with exit command and then again back to console and it starts over. this causes me to lose my previous directory. Is there other way returning back to vim won't start the shell over?
Not really
https://stackoverflow.com/a/12089631/1427295
GVIM does not retain a "handle" to the shell that launched it in a way
that allows it to send commands back to it. Because of they
synchronous execution, you also cannot launch a shell from GVIM, keep
feeding it commands while also continue working in GVIM.
I'm afraid you have to use the functionality of your window manager to
launch (and then later re-activate) a shell window, and send the
commands as keystrokes to it. On Windows, this can be done (e.g. in
VBScript) via WshShell's Run(), AppActivate() and SendKeys() methods;
there are probably similar mechanisms for window control on Linux,
too.
If you don't mind having that shell inside your GVIM (emulated, with
all its drawbacks), though, there are plugins that enable that.
https://serverfault.com/a/95405
The Windows command interpreter ("cmd.exe") doesn't provide any
support for saving/exporting/keeping history, of, if it does,
Microsoft didn't document it and nobody was ever able to find it. You
can of course try to work around that, like Sean suggested, but
there's (or does appear to be) no built-in support for this
You may be able to output your command history using echo %cd% > prev_dir.txt then create a script that cds to the directory in prev_dir.txt, but you'd still have to remember to save your directory to the file before you exit the shell each time.
Some programs return immediately when launched from the command line, Firefox for example. Most utilities (and all the programs I've written) are tied to the shell that created them. If you control-c the command line, the program's dead.
What do you have to add to a program or a shell script to get the return-immediately behavior? I guess I'm asking two questions there, one for shell scripts and one for general, if they're different. I would be particularly interested to know if there's a way to get an executable jar to do it.
I'm almost embarrassed to ask that one but I can't find the answer myself.
Thanks!
start cmd
on Windows,
cmd &
on *nux
Here substitute
cmd = java -jar JarFile.jar
On *nux the fg and bg commands are your friends as well ...
You need to basically need to fork a process or create a new thread (or pretend to)
in *nux you can do this with an & after the command like this /long/script & or in windows you can create a BATCH file that executes your processes then exits (it does this naturally).
NOTE: there's no particularly good way to reference this process after you're forked it, basically only ps for the process list. if you want to be able to see what the process is doing, check out using screen (another linux command) that will start a session for you and let you "re-attach" to the screen.
to do this, install screen (sudo apt-get install screen or yum install screen). then type screen to create a new session (note, it will look like you didn't do anything). then, run your /long/command (without the &), then press CTRL + A + D (at the same time) to detach from it (it's still running!). then, when you want to re-attach, type screen -r.
Additionally, look for flags in any help message that allow you do this without using the above options (for instance in synergy you can say synergy --background)
A wrapper script consisting of nothing but:
your_prog_or_script &
Will launch the target and exit immediately. You can add nohup to the beginning of that line so it will continue running if the shell is exited.
For an executable program (as opposed to a shell script), on Linux/Unix use fork() and exec() and then exit the parent process, which will return to the shell. For details see the man pages, or some page like http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/ForkExecProcesses.html.
I am using Putty to connect to a remote server. What I want to know is if there is any way to write my commands and allow them to keep running after I close the session with Putty. The reason for this is that I do not want to keep the computer ON all the time. Is there any way to do this?.
Update with the solution
For my question as it is presented the best solution is use one of the commands provided such as nohup, because you do not have to install any additional software. But if you are in the same problem use screen, install it and use it. It is amazing.
I have selected the answer of Norman Ramsey as favourite because propose several solutions using commands and screen. But please check the other answers specially the one of PEZ, then you get an insight of what screen is able todo.
screen! It's the best thing since sliced bread. (Yeah, I know others have already suggested it, but it's so good the whole world should join in and suggest it too.)
screen is like, like, ummmm ... like using VNC or the like to connect to a GUI destop, but for command shell windows. You can have several shell "windows" open at once in the same screen session. You can do stuff like:
Start a screens session using "screen -dR" (get used to using -dR)
run some commands in one window
press CTRL-A,C to create a new window open a file there in vim
press CTRL-A,0 to go back to the first window and issue some command on the file you just edited
CTRL-A, 1 to go back to your vim session
CTRL-A, C for yet another window and maybe do "sudo - su" (because you just happen to need a full root shell)
CTRL-A, 0 and start a background process
CTRL-A, C to create yet a new window, "tail -f" the log for that background process
CTRL-A, d to disconnect your screen then CTRL-D to disconnect from the server
Go on vacation for three weeks
Log on to the server again and issue "screen -dR" to connect to your existing screen session
check the log in the the fourth window with CTRL-A, 3 (it's like you've been there watching it all the time)
CTRL-A, 1 to pick up that vim session again
I guess you're starting to get the picture now? =)
It's like magic. I've been using screen for longer than I can remember and I'm still totally amazed with how bloody great it is.
EDIT: Just want to mention there's now also tmux. Very much like screen, but has some unique features, splitting the windows being the most prominent one.
nohup, disown, and screen are all good but screen is the best because unlike the other two, screen allows you to disconnect from the remote server, keep everything running, and then reconnect later to see what is happening. With nohup and disown you can't resume interacting.
Try using GNU Screen. It allows you to have several shells open at once. And you can disconnect from those running shells (i.e. close session with Putty) and they will keep doing their thing.
What you are looking for is nohup.
See the wiki link for how to use it.
screen is the best.
Try:
screen -dmS "MyTail" tail -f /var/log/syslog
This start command in background.
Use screen -r to list, and or screen -r Mytail to enter session.
If more users need access same session, use: screen -rx MyTail, and both or more users share the session.
If you can't use screen (because, for instance, your SSH session is being programmatically driven), you can also use daemonize to run the program as a daemon.
One way that works well for me is at.
at works like cron, but for a one-time job. I used it today to download a large file without having to keep my session alive.
for example:
$ at 23:55
at> wget http://file.to.download.com/bigfile.iso
at> ^D
You pass at a time (in the future) and it gives you a prompt. You enter the commands you want to run at that time and hit ctrl+d. You can exit out of your session and it will run the commands at the specified time.
Wikipedia has more info on at.
./command & disown
ssh localhost && ./command && exit