JSF Converter implementation - jsf

I have implemented Autoconverter (with forceSelection=false) in maintainance screen.
To edit existing record, User will select ID from Autocomplete list.
To add new record, user will enter new ID in same box.
In converter, Application will try to search record in DB using ID.
If not found, New empty object is created with supplied ID and to avoid duplications, this object is added to array list maintained in Converter.
This works as expected on single browser session. but while testing with multiple browser, I found that Array list is shared across all instances.
I am not sure whether approach I have taken is right? if not can you please suggest me an alternative approach.
private List<SchoolMasterDetails> schoolMasterDetailsDB = new ArrayList<SchoolMasterDetails>();
#Override
public Object getAsObject(FacesContext facesContext, UIComponent component, String submittedValue) {
SchoolMasterDetails selectedObject = null;
System.out.println("getAsObject ==> Entering.");
System.out.println("getAsObject ==> '" + submittedValue + "'");
if (!submittedValue.trim().equals("")) {
selectedObject = (SchoolMasterDetails) getMasterService().getSchoolbyCode(submittedValue);
if (selectedObject == null) {
// search Object on localDB
for (SchoolMasterDetails p : schoolMasterDetailsDB) {
if (p.getSchoolCode().equalsIgnoreCase(submittedValue.trim())) {
System.out.println("getAsObject from ArrayList ==> " + p);
return p; // return selectedObject from list of created objects
}
}
System.out.println("getAsObject ==> selectedObject is null, Hence Creating new Object");
selectedObject = new SchoolMasterDetails();
selectedObject.setSchoolCode(submittedValue.trim());
selectedObject.setSchoolName("TEST TEST TEST");
schoolMasterDetailsDB.add(selectedObject);
}
else {
System.out.println("getAsObject from Database ==> " + selectedObject);
}
}
System.out.println("getAsObject ==> " + selectedObject);
}
System.out.println("getAsObject ==> Exiting.");
return selectedObject;
}
Regards,
Shirish

As far as I understand this (still learning myself), a converter fulfills exactly one purpose: It prepares your custom objects to be used in the views (getAsString) and translates Strings back into objects (getAsObject). It will be used whenever an input (a radio list, textfield, autocomplete) is tied to a variable in a backing bean that is of the type of your custom object. It is in your freedom to decide what String should be used to represent your object and how you use this String in return to look up objects.
With this in mind I would not use a converter to store a local list of objects, nor let it handle the creation process itself. Instead, I'd assume there is a backing bean somewhere, which holds your data objects and takes care of all your logic. This bean can have a list of, say, schoolMasters that can be queried for the objects it contains (similar to what your doing). You could then either implement the lookup there in a way that it handles the not-found case and always returns a valid object (which may be a new one), or you could catch the not-found-case in the converter and then trigger a createNew() from the bean to get a new instance.
IMHO this separates the management of the instances more clearly from the translating purpose of your converter. Also, from your code, it seems like you have two places to look up objects - via getMasterService() (a local method?) and inside your stored ArrayList. I don't quite get this...
As for your problem with the browsers sharing an instance: This sounds like a scope issue. If your backing bean, which is supposed to store and manage your data, is in application scope then the same set of data will be available as long as the application runs. This data will be available across browsers and also across users.
On the other hand, if you put the bean in session scope, each session will create its own instance of the bean and store unique data. Similarly, view scoped beans live as long as a single view and request beans are trashed and regenerate for each http request. You can read more here: How to choose the right scope
The answers there talk about beans (which is where your data usually lives). I'm not sure about converters, I see them as classes that are available application wide, so that each session and view can use them for translation - if you maintain a list there, it may well be globally available.

Related

Properties files to control form inputs based on roles

The requirements of the application that I'm building demands that user roles are to be dynamic, they will be stored in the database, and they will also be mapped to functionalities (forms) of the application, also stored in the database.
Restricting a role from accessing a specific page won't be difficult, but the requirements also states that form inputs must be customized based on roles, which means, an input can be mandatory or not, visible or not, read-only or not based on the role.
My approach to control these restrictions is based on creating a property file for each role, which will store all the inputs of all the forms in the application, as keys, and a long string as value in which we define the state of the input, like the following:
user-inputs.properties
# form.input=mandatory:visibility
searchBooks.bookName=true:true
searchBooks.bookCategory=false:true
searchBooks.authorName=false:false
admin-inputs.properties
searchBooks.bookName=true:true
searchBooks.bookCategory=false:true
searchBooks.authorName=false:true
And then do some magic Java code, whenever a form is accessed, read its inputs properties from the file of the specific user role, and parse the values so I could provide the right value for the rendered="" and required="" attribute of an <h:inputText/>.
This could be a solution, but the inputs of the application are much more than a book name and category, means I will be putting lots of required and rendered attributes which will make JSF pages look ugly with huge amount of variables in the managed bean.
Is there a better approach/framework/solution to my issue?
I think that you are in the right way, and i will continue using your approach which consists of creating multiple property files, one for each user, except that we will not use a any "huge amount of variables
in the managed bean".
So, the first step consists on managing multiple resource properties using a single resource bundle prefix ( the <var></var> in <resource-bundle>), in the second step we will see how to switch between those files, and in the last step we will read from property file using JSTL.
Managing multiple property files:
We start by defining our ResourceBundle in the faces-config file:
<application>
<resource-bundle>
<base-name>UserMessages</base-name>
<var>msgs</var>
</resource-bundle>
</application>
UserMessages is a ResourceBundle where we will implement the logic that allow us to switch between our property files (assuming that yourpackage.user-inputs is the fully qualified name of your user-inputs.properties):
import java.util.Enumeration;
import java.util.MissingResourceException;
import java.util.ResourceBundle;
import javax.faces.context.FacesContext;
public class UserMessages extends ResourceBundle {
public UserMessages() {
// we are loading user-inputs.properties as the default properties file
setParent(getBundle("yourpackage.user-inputs", FacesContext.getCurrentInstance()
.getViewRoot().getLocale()));
}
#Override
protected Object handleGetObject(String key) {
// we could just return parent.getObject(key) but we want to respect JSF recommandations
try {
return parent.getObject(key);
} catch (MissingResourceException e) {
return "???" + key + "???";
}
}
#Override
public Enumeration<String> getKeys() {
return parent.getKeys();
}
// this is the method that will allow us to switch between our .properties
public void setResourceBundle(String basename) {
setParent(getBundle(basename, FacesContext.getCurrentInstance()
.getViewRoot().getLocale()));
}
}
Switching between property files:
In order to switch from a property file to another we will need to use the method setResourceBundle(String basename) that we just declared in our class above, So in the managed bean where you are declaring your business logic and where you are intending to switch files depending on the user's role, you need to inject the bundle, like:
//don't forget adding getters and setters or you end with NullPointerException
#ManagedProperty("#{msgs}")
private UserMessages userMesssages;
Then, to switch to another file (admin-inputs.properties), just use it like this:
//yourpackage.admin-inputs is the fully qualified name
userMesssages.setResourceBundle("yourpackage.admin-inputs");
NB: You can inject the bundle in that way (above) only in request scoped beans, to use it in broader scopes please see: Read i18n variables from properties file in a Bean
Now, as we can switch easily from the user-inputs to the admin-inputs, the last step is the easiest one.
Parsing the property file:
The bad news, is that when using this approach you will need to add rendered="" and required="" attribute to every input you are willing to manage (but don't forget that the good ones was that you will not need to manage variables in managed beans ;) ).
First, you need to add JSTL namespaces declaration on the top of your xhtml file:
xmlns:fn="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/functions"
you can find more about JSTL functions in the javadocs, regarding the function substringAfter:
Returns a subset of a string following a specific substring.
Example:
P.O. Box: ${fn:substringAfter(zip, "-")}
The function substringBefore:
Returns a subset of a string before a specific substring.
Example:
Zip (without P.O. Box): ${fn:substringBefore(zip, "-")}
Second, as the first part of your String represents the required attribute:
//Returns the substring of msgs['searchBooks.authorName'] before the first occurrence of the separator ':'
required="${fn:substringBefore(msgs['searchBooks.authorName'], ':')}"
and the second part:
//Returns the substring of msgs['searchBooks.authorName'] after the first occurrence of the separator ':'.
rendered="${fn:substringAfter(msgs['searchBooks.authorName'], ':')}"
See also:
JSF Internationalization f:loadbundle or through faces-config:
Performance point
Difference between by Application#getResourceBundle() and ResourceBundle#getBundle() in JSF 2.0
How to remove the surrounding ??? when message is not found in
bundle
Context Sensitive Resource Bundle entries in JavaServer Faces
applications – going beyond plain language, region & variant
locales

Haxe Property - getters and setters versus #:isVar

My question is regarding properties in haxe.
If I understand it correctly, if I make property like this
var propertyInt(get, set):Int; according to haxe documentation it's not really a variable. But I can make it a variable by modifying it this way
#:isVar var propertyInt(get, set):Int;. Otherwise I need to make two methods:
function get_propertyInt()
return propertyInt;
function set_properyInt(i)
return propertyInt = i;
So my question is: does it matter if I'm using exclusively #:isVar var propertyInt(get, set):Int; ? For example I have more than 5 properties in my class and as you can imagine making this methods for every property could be huge pain in the rear. So what is the best approach?
Here's what the documentation has to say about physical properties (also known as backing fields):
A field is considered to be physical if it is either
variable
a property with the read-access or write-access identifier being default or null
a property with :isVar metadata
So you can set up a property that fully consists of calculated values. Think a read-only property giving you the area of a rectangle as a function of width and height, or think of a property that is backed by some other property and just returns/sets width and height in a different unit. Or maybe you just want to name your backing fields differently, say m_width and m_height.
The :isVar is helpful in situations where the property access rules etc. laid out above would let the compiler think that there is no backing field needed. In that case, the code would fail (from the docs again):
// This field cannot be accessed because it
// is not a real variable
public var x(get, set):Int;
function get_x() {
return x;
}
function set_x(x) {
return this.x = x;
}
By adding :isVar you basically tell the compiler that you absolutely want the backing field. The other option for your particular case would be to use default,default, in which case the compiler knows there is an automatic backing field required and access should be restricted according to the access level of the property (public or private):
public var propertyInt(default, default):Int;
In that case you might also use a variable directly, because the net effect is in essence the same:
public var propertyInt : Int;

spring-ldap and #attributes annotation with spring-ldap 2.x ODM interface

There seems be some things missing in the Spring-LDAP ODM annotations. This is a question by way of a feature request, if there is a better way to contribute such requests, please say so.
I'd like to mark an #Attribute as read-only, so it will populate the bean from LDAP for reference, but not persist it back to ldap. I'd suggest adding an attribute read-only to #Attribute, defaulting to false, for the usual case. The default attributes of * misses all the operational attributes, some of which are very useful, and transfers more data than is required, slowing down the ldap query with attributes which will never be used.
An example of this; it would be very useful, for literally read only, such as entryUUID, etag, etc., which you cannot use if you wish to persist only some fields back to ldap, as the bean fails to persist to ldap with an exception when you save the bean. But also would be usefule for general fields which you want to structurally prevent the user from ever updating.
You can get around this by not annotating read-only fields, and then manually populating the read only fields with a separate call. Very messy and kills the query speed.
Also on a related topic, query() coudl have a default list of attributes, which you have already annotated in your classes, something like :
public static String[] getBeanAttributes(Class<?> beanClass) {
ArrayList<String> attrsObj = new ArrayList<>();
for (Field field : beanClass.getDeclaredFields()) {
if (field.isAnnotationPresent(Attribute.class)) {
Attribute attr = field.getAnnotation(Attribute.class);
attrsObj.add(attr.name());
}
}
String[] attrs = attrsObj.toArray(new String[attrsObj.size()]);
return attrs;
}
Above just returns a simple String[] of your declared attributes, to pass to query.attributes() - now i realize that as a static member, query() is built before the bean class is known, but at least there could be a helper function like the above, or a method signature for query attributes() that took a bean Class signature as an argument.
I created LDAP-312 on Jira. Thanks.

How to use ObjectContext with Model Builder?

Is there a way we can use ObjectContext with DbContext's ModelBuilder? We don't want to use POCO because we have customized property code that does not modify entire object in update, but only update modified properties. Also we have lots of serialisation and auditing code that uses EntityObject.
Since poco does create a proxy with EntityObject, we want our classes to be derived from EntityObject. We don't want proxy. We also heavily use CreateSourceQuery. The only problem is EDMX file and its big connection string syntax web.config.
Is there any way I can get rid of EDMX file? It will be useful as we can dynamically compile new class based on reverse engineering database.
I would also like to use DbContext with EntityObject instead of poco.
Internal Logic
Access Modified Properties in Save Changes which is available in ObjectStateEntry and Save them onto Audit with Old and New Values
Most of times we need to only check for Any condition on Navigation Property for example
User.EmailAddresses.CreateSourceQuery()
.Any( x=> x.EmailAddress == givenAddress);
Access Property Attributes, such as XmlIgnore etc, we rely heavily on attributes defined on the properties.
A proxy for a POCO is a dynamically created class which derives from (inherits) a POCO. It adds functionality previously found in EntityObject, namely lazy loading and change tracking, as long as a POCO meets requirements. A POCO or its proxy does not contain an EntityObject as the question suggests, but rather a proxy contains functionality of EntityObject. You cannot (AFAIK) use ModelBuilder with EntityObject derivatives and you cannot get to an underlying EntityObject from a POCO or a proxy, since there isn't one as such.
I don't know what features of ObjectContext does your existing serialisation and auditing code use, but you can get to ObjectContext from a DbContext by casting a DbContext to a IObjectContextAdapter and accessing IObjectContextAdapter.ObjectContext property.
EDIT:
1. Access Modified Properties in Save Changes which is available in ObjectStateEntry and Save them onto Audit with Old and New Values
You can achieve this with POCOs by using DbContext.ChangeTracker. First you call DbContext.ChangeTracker.DetectChanges to detect the changes (if you use proxies this is not needed, but can't hurt) and then you use DbCotnext.Entries.Where(e => e.State != EntityState.Unchanged && e.State != EntityState.Detached) to get DbEntityEntry list of changed entities for auditing. Each DbEntityEntry has OriginalValues and CurrentValues and the actual Entity is in property Entity.
You also have access to ObjectStateEntry, see below.
2. Most of times we need to only check for Any condition on Navigation Property for example:
User.EmailAddresses.CreateSourceQuery().Any( x=> x.EmailAddress == givenAddress);
You can use CreateSourceQuery() with DbContext by utilizing IObjectContextAdapter as described previously. When you have ObjectContext you can get to the source query for a related end like this:
public static class DbContextUtils
{
public static ObjectQuery<TMember> CreateSourceQuery<TEntity, TMember>(this IObjectContextAdapter adapter, TEntity entity, Expression<Func<TEntity, ICollection<TMember>>> memberSelector) where TMember : class
{
var objectStateManager = adapter.ObjectContext.ObjectStateManager;
var objectStateEntry = objectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntry(entity);
var relationshipManager = objectStateManager.GetRelationshipManager(entity);
var entityType = (EntityType)objectStateEntry.EntitySet.ElementType;
var navigationProperty = entityType.NavigationProperties[(memberSelector.Body as MemberExpression).Member.Name];
var relatedEnd = relationshipManager.GetRelatedEnd(navigationProperty.RelationshipType.FullName, navigationProperty.ToEndMember.Name);
return ((EntityCollection<TMember>)relatedEnd).CreateSourceQuery();
}
}
This method uses no dynamic code and is strongly typed since it uses expressions. You use it like this:
myDbContext.CreateSourceQuery(invoice, i => i.details);

How can I add a JSON object to a scoped variable in Java?

I have used many JSON object in applicationScope, sessionScope, and viewScope to track related data. Writing and reading these in SSJS is very simple:`
//Create a app scope variable
applicationScope.put("myvarname", {p1:"part 1", p2:"part2"});
// read and use the app scope variable ...
var myvar = applicationScope.get("myvarname");
//Work with parts as myvar.p1, myvar.p2, etc...
In the Java code I have been writing I have learned to read these variables which were written using SSJS using the com.ibm.jscript.std.ObjectObject package with code like this:
ObjectObject myvar = (ObjectObject) ExtLibUtil
.getApplicationScope().get(dbkey);
FBSValue localFBS = myvar.get("p1");
String myp1 = localFBS.stringValue();
localFBS = myvar.get("p2");
String myp2 = localFBS.stringValue();
Now, of course, I want to write a new entry using the Java Bean that can then be read by SSJS and other Java Beans in the same manner. I managed to write to the scope using a Map and a Hashtable, but these crash the logic when trying to read using the ObjectObject.
So, how would I go about building a new entry in the scope using the ObjectObject and/or FBSValue packages? I cannot find how to create a new FBSValue that can then be added to an ObjectObject. I am sure it is a simple thing a Newbs like me has missed.
/Newbs
You can construct an empty ObjectObject, populate it with FBSValues, and just put it directly into the scope Map:
ObjectObject myvar = new ObjectObject();
try {
myvar.put("p1", FBSUtility.wrap("part 1"));
myvar.put("p2", FBSUtility.wrap("part 2"));
} catch (InterpretException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Map<String, Object> applicationScope = ExtLibUtil.getApplicationScope();
applicationScope.put("myvarname", myvar);
When retrieving it later (as in the examples you provided), SSJS will see it as JSON, Java will see it exactly as it was stored.
If you need to store deeper hierarchies, you can put instances of ArrayObject and ObjectObject inside an ObjectObject in addition to primitives, so, just like JSON itself, you can nest these as deep as you need.
Just be sure to only include true JSON (strings, numbers, booleans, arrays, objects) if you'll be storing it anywhere higher than the requestScope; specifically, FunctionObject does not implement Serializable, so JSON is safe to store, JavaScript is not. Strictly speaking, this only becomes toxic when stored in the viewScope in 8.5.2 and 8.5.3 (and even then, only when the application's persistence option is not set to keep all pages in memory). But if IBM ever implements cluster support, then all objects stored in sessionScope and applicationScope will need to be serializable to allow for inter-server state transport... so, in the interest of future-proofing the design, it's wise to hold to this principle for anything stored longer than the duration of a single request.

Resources