I have report in Excel that I user gave me and wants the same exact format in the new SSRS report. So if I have a column in excel of the width 14.14 (103 pixels) what should that be for the width of that column in SSRS ( in, mm, cm, pt, or pc)?
I can't get the correct factor because it seems to differ based on size?
Excel Width Pixels Ratio
0.08 1 0.08
0.83 10 0.083
13.57 100 0.1357 ??
142.14 1000 0.14214
254.71 1788 0.142455257
I understand pixels per inch is dpi dependent, but what I am looking for is a printable equivalent.
Here is what I found out about the relationship between excel and ssrs. It seems excel uses 96 pixels per inch. I also found using units of PT in ssrs translates much more accurately into excel and is actually mentioned somewhere in the MSDN documentaiton.
In excel a column of 10 = 75 pixels, 20 = 145 pixels, etc.
Basically the units are 70 plus an additional 5 pixels.
So to set the column in ssrs I used:
[Width in PT] = ([width in excel] / 10 * 70 + 5) / 96 * 72)
For example:
Width 10 in excel = 75 pixels = 56.25 pts = .78125"
Excel (and many other MS related apps) default to 96 pixels per inch.
So your 103 pixel wide Excel column should be:
103 / 96 = 1.073 inches (Rounded to thousands.)
Of course many printing options will change this, such as "Fit on one page."
I used RhodeHummels answer, however I had to change it because there is a missing parenthesis in the answer, I believe it should read:
[Width in PT] = (([Width in excel]/10 * 70 + 5)/ 96 * 72)
e.g. =((10/10*70+5)/96*72) gets the desired answer in excel
Related
I'm using MS Excel 2019 and I'm trying to copy only coordinates of specific selected data points in a scatter plot. Does anyone know whether this is possible. Any possible workaround if possible? My input to the Excel scatter plot are basically x and y coordinates in all 4 quadrants.
Data used:
x
y
-2
-10
39
-8
56
10
34
8
-89
-8
43
5
-9
4
45
3
67
-16
-87
-19
Scatter plot:
What I need is basically select specific points in the first quadrant as mentioned in the red circle from the Excel plot itself and export the selected data points value to separate table. The mouse pointer hover on each point shows its value, but I can't capture multiple data points value using mouse.
What about creating a helper column, which only allows coordinates in the first quadrant? You can achieve this, using following formulas:
in C2 : =IF(AND(A2>=0;B2>=0);A2;0)
in D2 : =IF(AND(A2>=0;B2>=0);B2;0)
I am trying to get the percentage correct in excel giving the following example. For example, you have 2 errors, and 20 documents. 2/20 is like .05 or %5 were errors. I want how many wasn’t errors which is 95%. How do I get 95% using an equation or formula in excel. I will rate high oh for whoever can answer this!
Of course you can do your simple maths this way:
(20 - 2) / 20 = 18 / 20 which is then for a %
18 / 20 * 100 = 90%
Of course, 2 is 1/10th of 20 and therefore 10%, not 5%. Percent means "per 100" Therefore, to be formally correct, you should multiply both sides of your equation with 10, making for (2*10)/(20*10) = 0.1 = 10%
Since 2/20 = 10%, (20-2)/20 must be 90%. Alternatively, 1-(2/20) also inverts the result.
I have a gauge graph that goes from 0 to 100.
I have divided out my justification points as how they would show on the 0 - 100 graph. -2STDev, -1STDev, Avg, +1STDev. +2 STDev. How would I go about transferring incoming values to a 0 - 100 scale to match the graph?
On the graph of 0 - 100:
16 represents -2STDev
33 represents -1STDev
50 represents Average
66 represents +1 STDEV
83 represents +2 STDEV
My current values that I want to format to a scale of 100 to fit the graph are:
-2STDev = 63.9
-1STDev = 66.8
AVG = 69.6
+1STDev = 72.5
+2STDev = 75.4
How would I go about creating a formula to adjust these to a 0 - 100 scale? Of course my incoming value, will have to also follow this formula to be graphed upon these.
You can use the following long formula:
=IF(E6<C1,E6/C1*B1,IF(E6<C2,(E6-C1)/(C2-C1)*(B2-B1)+B1,IF(E6<C3,(E6-C2)/(C3-C2)*(B3-B2)+B2,IF(E6<C4,(E6-C3)/(C4-C3)*(B4-B3)+B3,IF(E6<C5,(E6-C4)/(C5-C4)*(B5-B4)+B4,(E6-C5)/(100-C5)*(100-B5)+B5)))))
See the location of the data so you can replace for other if required.
Keep in mind this formula does a linear conversion for values inbetween each one of the values you have.
I am trying to overlay patient data on top of an optical image. I need to assign X,Y coordinates for each patient file in a bunch of designated boxes in the optical image.
I am currently doing this by hand but I wanted to try and do this automatically by giving Excel the starting coordinate (for the upper left corner pixel of each box), the number of rows and columns for the box as well as the spacing between each pixel. I would need the X and Y coordinates in separate cells.
For instance, for a box with 3 rows, 4 columns, pixel spacing of 20 and starting coordinates of (20,50), the output should look like:
X Y
20 50
40 50
60 50
80 50
20 70
40 70
60 70
80 70
20 90
40 90
60 90
80 90
According to your description maybe:
Formulas:
A8:
=IF(ROW(1:1)<=$B$1*$B$2,$B$4+MOD(ROW(1:1)-1,$B$2)*$B$3)
B8:
=IF(A8,$B$5+$B$3*INT((ROW(1:1)-1)/$B$2))
Both formulas copied downwards as needed.
Transposed version:
Formulas:
B7:
=IF(COLUMN(A:A)<=$B$1*$B$2,$B$4+MOD(COLUMN(A:A)-1,$B$2)*$B$3)
B8:
=IF(B7,$B$5+$B$3*INT((COLUMN(A:A)-1)/$B$2))
Both formulas copied sidewards as needed.
I want to round values to its nearest 50.
For e.g.
121 should get rounded to 100
129 should get rounded to 150
178 should get rounded to 200
165 should get rounded to 150
I have tried the following functions...
=FLOOR(C629,50)
=FLOOR((C629+50),50)
=CEILING(C631,50)
But I am still not getting the results as expected.
From the examples you have provided, it appears that you want to move each number to the nearest multiple of 50.
This function should accomplish this:
=ROUND(C629 / 50 , 0) * 50
This works in the following manner for 129:
129 / 50 = 2.58
ROUND(2.58 , 0) = 3
3 * 50 = 150
EDIT: The OP's comment to use the in-built MROUND is a much better idea.
For clarity, the simplest answer is MROUND, e.g.:
=MROUND(589,50)
This solution was submitted in a comment by shantanuo.