I am currently working on a project involving a Lego Mindstorms kit. The brick is the NXT and I was curious about the bluetooth ping rates.
I ran a test of 100 pings on it and got some interesting results. The latencies seemed to fall into bands. I increased to 10,000 pings and it highlighted this trend even more clearly. Does anyone know what could cause this to happen?
In case it is relevant, the distance between the sender and receiver was about 3 metres.
Few reasons :
Buffering and internal timers to flush buffers can cause it.
Also depends on the ping intervals (i.e. time between subsequent pings), as the link might go to power save mode during inactivity and it will take a fine time to come back up.
Size of the ping packets
What bluetooth profile is used here ?
Related
I am trying to build an Android app that interfaces with the ESP32 using BLE. I am using the RxBluetoothKotlin library from Vincent Masselis for the Android side. For the ESP32 side, I am using the default Kolban libraries that are included in the Arduino IDE. My phone is a OnePlus 5T and my ESP32 is a MH ET Live ESP32DevKIT. My Android app can be found here, and my ESP32 program here.
The whole system works pretty much perfectly for me in terms of pure functionality. That is to say, every button does what it's supposed to do, and I get the exact behaviour I had expected to get. However, the communication itself is very slow. Around 200 bytes/second. My test button in the Android app requests a bunch of text data from the ESP32, and displays this in a dialog. It also lists a number which represents the time between request and reception in milliseconds. Using this, I get around 2 seconds for 440 bytes of data. When I send less data, the time decreases approximately linearly with data size. 40 bytes of data will take around 200ms, and 20 bytes or under typically takes less than 100ms.
This seems rather slow to me. From what I understand, I should be able to at least get a few kilobytes per second. I have tried to check the speed using nRF Connect, but I get the same 2 seconds timespan for my data transfer. This suggests that the problem is not in my app, since I also have it with a completely different app. I also put the code in my main loop inside of callbacks instead (which I probably should have done in the first place), but this didn't change things at all. I have tried taking the microcontroller and my phone to a few different locations, hoping to eliminate interference. I have tried to mess with BLEDevice::setPower and BLEDevice::setMTU, as well as setting RxBluetoothGatt.requestMtu(500) on the Android side. Everything so far seems to have had little to no effect. The only thing that did anything, was adding the line "pServer->updatePeerMTU(0,500);" in my loop during the connection phase. This caused the first 23 bytes of data to be repeated whenever I pressed the test button in my app, and made the data transfer take about 3 seconds. If I'm lucky, I can get maybe a bit under 1.8 seconds for 440 bytes, but this is a very small change when I'm expecting an order of magnitude of difference, and might even be down to pure chance rather than anything I did.
Does anyone have an idea of how to increase my transfer speed?
The data transmission speed is mainly influenced by the Bluetooth LE connection interval (between 7.5 ms and 4 seconds) and is negotiated between the master (central unit) and the peripheral device. The master establishes a connection with a parameter set and the peripheral can propose to change this parameter set. In the end, however, the central unit decides which parameter set is to be used.
But the Bluetooth connection interval cannot be changed by an Android applications directly, which normally act as the central role. Instead it can request a connection priority which is known to have an influence on the connection interval.
Some days ago I start to use a BT mouse. Sometimes its work fine and other times have lag.
After try to check what causes this, and ran several monitoring tools and notice if RSSI is 0 its works fine... but when it decreases, the lag got worst, and lower the RSSI value, worst is the lag.
Because I work in office with lots of wireless equipment, probably with Adaptive Frequency Hooping sometimes it get non clean environment, or the frequency hooping is not working as it should, and not changing to a cleaner frequency.
It is possible, in Linux, to the connection with mouse get stuck to a specific channel/frequency when I manually found one clener?
There is any tool which I can get the channel/frequency the connection is using?
Regards,
Filipe
I would like to track a large number of beacons (~500) at once within a 50-100 m radius via an app on an iPhone (5s). I've had a look at the spec and online and I can't see if there is any limit on the number of beacons you can track at once using BLE. Does anyone know if there is limitation on the number of beacons you can track exists or if an iPhone 5s would be up to the task of tracking that many beacons?
You used the word track, but iOS has two different methods: monitoring and ranging.
You can set a maximum of 20 regions to monitor. (Found in documentation for the startMonitoringForRegion: method.) Region limits mostly come into play if your app is in the background. The OS will alert your app when you enter or leave a region that you're monitoring (give or take a few minutes). The OS will even launch your app just to let it know what happened (although only for a short time).
The other method is ranging, which is to find all the beacons within the Bluetooth range of the device (typically around 100 feet give or take). If your beacons are spread out over 100 miles, then you probably won't run into any practical limit here. I have not found any documentation for this, and I have only four beacons that I'm testing with, and four at a time works.
Here's one way to handle your situation. Make all your 500 beacons use the same UUID, and make a beacon region using initWithProximityUUID:identifier: method. (Identifier is just for you -- it doesn't affect anything). Starting monitoring for that beacon region. That way, your app will be notified whenever one of your 500 beacons are found (give or take a few minutes). Once notified, you can use startRangingBeaconsInRegion: to find all the beacons around that area, then use the major and minor values to figure out which beacons the user is near.
I'll add to Tim Tisdall's answer, which sets out the right framework. I can't speak to the specific capabilities of the iPhone 5s, or iOS in general, but I don't see any reason why it wouldn't return every ADV_IND packet (i.e. beacon transmission) that it receives.
The question is, will the 500 beacons be able to transmit their ADV_IND packets without collisions?
It takes about 0.128ms to transmit an ADV_IND packet. The time between advertising transmissions is configurable between 20ms and 10240ms (at intervals of 0.625ms), so the probability of collisions depends on the configuration of the beacons.
Based on the Poisson distribution, the probability of a collision for any given ADV_IND packet is 1-exp(-2*N*(0.128/AI)), where N is the number of beacons within range, AI is the time in milliseconds of the advertising interval (assuming all the beacons are configured the same), and the 0.128 is the time in milliseconds it takes to send the ADV_IND packet. (See http://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~jgao/CSE590-fall09/aloha-analysis.pdf if you want an explanation.)
For 500 beacons with the maximum advertising interval of about 10 seconds, there will be a collision about once every 81 packets (or about 6 out of 500). If you're willing to wait for a couple intervals (i.e. 30 seconds), there's a good chance you'll be able to receive all 500 ADV_IND packets.
On the other hand, if the advertising interval is smaller, say 500ms, you'll have a collision about 23% of the time (or 113 out of 500). You'd have to wait for several more intervals to improve the probability that you'd see the broadcasts from all the beacons.
The other way to look at it is that the more beacons you have, the longer you have to wait to make sure you receive all their packets. (The math to calculate the delay to receive the packets with a certain probability from the number of beacons and the advertising interval is too much for me today.)
One caveat: if you want to connect to these beacons, as opposed to just receiving the ADV_IND packet, that requires an exchange of two more packets on the advertising channels, and the probability of a collision in the advertising channels goes up a bit.
If I am reading your question right, you want to put all 500 iBeacons within 100 meters of each other, meaning their transmissions will overlap. You will probably run into radio congestion problems long before you run into any limitations of iOS7 or your phone.
I have successfully tested 20 iBeacons in close proximity without problems, but 500 iBeacons is an extreme density. this discussion on the hardware issue suggests you may run into trouble.
At a minimum, the collisions of the transmissions of 500 iBEacons will make it take longer for your iOS device to see each iBeacon. Normally, iOS7 provides a ranging update once per second for each iOS device, but you may find that you get updates much less often. It all depends on your application whether or not less frequent updates are acceptable.
Even if delays are acceptable, I would absolutely test this before counting on it working at all. Unfortunately, that means getting your hands on lots of iBeacons.
I don't agree. It is true that ble beacons only transmit advertising data, but the transmission of such data last about 3ms (considering three advertising channels).
Having 500 beacons, WITHOUT considering any collision, the scanner will takes 1.5s to see them all.
But, if all beacons are configured in same way (same advertising interval) it is inevitable to have collisions which lead to have undiscovered beacons. Even if the advertising interval is different between beacons collisions occur. To avoid collision probability one should use longer advertising interval, but this lead to longer discovery latency.
This reasoning is very raw, it doesn't take care of many effects, but is just an order of magnitude calculation.
By the way, the question is not easy, there are many parameters which play role, some are known some are unknown. But I'm working with ble since one year about and, to me, 500 is a huge number and there is the possibility that you don't see the majority of nodes because of collisions.
I was doing some research into iBeacon's because of this question (I had no idea what it was about).
It seems that on the "beacon" side of things all that happens is general advertising packets are sent out. It's similar to how a device advertises that you can connect to it. However, you don't actually connect to iBeacon's, it just reads those advertising packets. There's no built-in limitation on how many advertising packets a device can receive.
So, it wouldn't surprise me if 500 iBeacon's would run with no issues. The advertising packets are small and are spaced out (time wise, they are repeated every X ms). There's no communication going from the phone to the iBeacon, the phone is simply receiving the packets it hears. If there's interference on one packet it'll likely manage to get the next one.
I use a Linksys PAP2 for my fax line and I can toggle modem mode by dialing *99 before the number, however I do not want to have to dial it every time to send a fax. Is there any way to incorporate the modem toggle into the dial plan ? I have googled and haven't found anything, I'm afraid the answer may be no, but I wanted to give this a try.
I know faxing over IP is not reliable, yet, I would still like to entertain it. Are there are other analog adapters that are more suitable?
suppose its the same number you want to use for sending the fax, lets assume its "16131234567" just add the following rule in your dial plan. (|<16131234567:*9916131234567>|)
when you will dial the fax number ATA will automatically add *99 before it.
My pap has the *99 modem code too. I researched this some time ago. *99 does the following: Force dtmf inband, echo cancel off, echo supress off, silence supress off, force g.711/ulaw, and call waiting off. In respect to modems and fax, due to the half duplex nature of fax, there may be a benefit of using echo cancellation. Most any normal dial up is where it's best disable of the echo canceller, not fax. However, some may be using "echo suppress", and/or silence suppression, both of which hurt fax greatly.
In terms of making fax reliable over Voip, the number one best thing you can do is complain, complain, and complain to your ISP and get them to reduce the packet jitter on your line! There is T.38 to experiment with which was designed to work with jittery lines, but not all ata's and providers support it. However, there is no real "better" ata then another ata for fax and modems. Voip uses primarily g.711/ulaw codec, which is what the PSTN uses. It's mainly the high packet jitter on many residential lines that make fax not work. The local nodes can be oversold, but they generally want to deliver high speed (quantity), not low jitter (quality).
Oh! the one biggest myth going around is to disable ECM mode. DON'T! Ecm mode was invented just for improving success rates over noisy and unreliable phone lines. In fact, ECM helps greatly with Voip. Turning off ECM is "I don't care if my faxes are unreadable" mode, going back to the early 80's with fax machines were thermal roll. Turning off ECM will increase the apparent "success" to you because there will be fewer errors given to you by your machine in front of you. However, pages may be missing or cut in the middle, unreadable, etc. but your machine will indicate a "success". I’ve heard from too many people that leaned the hard way when it occurred to them because people were telling them that pages were missing, etc.
One last thing I want to touch on is baud rate, generally many machines have two modes: no ecm 9600, and ECM 14400, and if you have it, super g3 33600. Of course, SG3 is going to give the most problems. Generally reducing the baud rate below 14400 isn’t necessary, since it's not a big jump, and 14400 is more tolerant to noise anyhow. Don’t switch to 9600 if it means disabling ECM mode.
I need to gather some network statistic to test my server application. I've tried many linux tools, but nothing I've found suits my needs.
Basically I want to gather some UDP statistics (bytes/time_interval, packets/time_interval, packets_loss), but regarding only two particular hosts - for example I want to get UDP statistic from traffic going from IP_A:PORT_A to IP_B:PORT_B.
Tools like tcpdump/wireshark can easily dump such traffic but I have problems with getting statistics like temporary speed (too see throughput peeks), and linux system statistics gives me number for all traffic.
It would be better to get text output so it will be possible to parse it.
Anyone has any idea how can I achieve it?
Thanks in advance
Harnen
Here's a tutorial for the libpcap library:
http://www.systhread.net/texts/200805lpcap1.php
To determine packets lost, your program will probably want to work on a pair of logs, and make sure UDP messages on the source are found on the destination. A good method for doing this is to maintain a window of packets equal to the amount of time your timeout is set to, load all the packets into the window, sort them, then search for all the packets in the desired time frame, marking them as found as you go. Once you've exhausted a minute, remove half of that minute from the buffer, and load the next thirty seconds and re-sort.
If you have lots (millions? probably should profile it) of packets, it may be faster to use what's called a Counting Bloom Filter, so you can determine if your packet is "probably" in there very quickly.
If you weren't looking for programming advice, take your question to serverfault.