I'm currently working on the user exit CONFPP05 (T-code co11n)
and I'm facing a problem, when i give error message with type E.
When the program execute that error, the program succesfully run the error message, but after that, when I press ENTER or SAVE button, it gives me a runtime error
here I catch some error
Exception condition "DUPREC" raised.
Error analysis
A RAISE statement in the program "SAPLCORB" raised the exception
condition "DUPREC".
Since the exception was not intercepted by a superior
program, processing was terminated.
Short description of exception condition:
For detailed documentation of the exception condition, use
Transaction SE37 (Function Library). You can take the called
function module from the display of active calls.
-
Trigger Location of Runtime Error
Program SAPLCORB
Include LCORBU08
Row 100
Module type (FUNCTION)
Module Name CO_RU_DI_AFRU_INSERT
It would be easier to confirm if we had access to your code.
However, the export parameters for the user exit are CAUVD_TAB (table of orders) and AFRUD_TAB (table of confirmations). I think that when you are showing your error message, you are not exiting the function properly and are still appending either or both of these tables. This means that when the database tries to update, it ends up with a duplicate key which results in the runtime error.
Related
I have a node within my kogito workflow with a boundary error for a specific type of exception (e.g. BusinessException), and a separate catch all subprocess that should deal with all other exception types that are thrown. (currently configured to catch Throwable).
I would like to handle BusinessExceptions, e.g. CreditCardBlacklisted via Boundary errors.
However, when the node throws the CreditCardBlacklistedException, the boundary error is ignored and the catch all event subprocess is initiated.
Picture Of Workflow
How can I get this scenario to work so that when CreditCardBlacklistedException is thrown it goes to the Handle Blacklisted node and not the catch all sub process?
Fixed in the JIRA issue KOGITO-8191 to be released in version 1.31.0.Final.
I am working with a huge code base, there is a function that I am throwing an Error in, However the error is caught somewhere before reaching the top level.
How do I know where the error is getting caught?
I have a question, in the PDO manuial somewhere I read that errors reveal the db connect with username and password (due to a flaw in the zend engine). I see several examples of catching the pdo like this:
catch(PDOException $exception){
return $exception;
}
if the exception is returned, doesn't the user see the error?
Is it better to have disabled the error reporting in the php.ini file, or even do something like
setAttribute(PDO::ERRMODE_SILENT)
instead of the catch statement, or is it better to do a combination of above and redo the catch statement so it doesn't return the error to the user.
This is referring to the pink paragraph on the manual page that says: Warning: If your application does not catch the exception thrown from the PDO constructor, the default action taken by the zend engine is to terminate the script and display a back trace. This back trace will likely reveal the full database connection details, including the username and password. It is your responsibility to catch this exception, either explicitly (via a catch statement) or implicitly via set_exception_handler(). php.net/manual/en/pdo.connections.php.
The user "YOUR COMMON SENSE" marked this as duplicate which is not correct. I don't have an issue with using PDO, Its just a question of dealing with error responses, and correct methodology of error handling.
I encountered one exception during stepping, I clicked Ok and set next stage to a previously executed stage. In these kind of scenarios blueprism mostly give below error :
"Internal : stack imbalance has reached"
Why am I getting this error?
Please help.
Stack imbalance errors can happen in Blue Prism if:
You step over too fast in Debug Mode (step over before the current stage ends)
The process or business object is in Exception mode and a new Exception is thrown(for instance if an Action stage throws an Exception after a Recover stage but before a Resume stage).
To recover from a Stack Imbalance error you can:
Reset
Or just run a Resume stage and continue debugging
Stack imbalance is caused by moving too fast forward while in debug mode. I can't know exactly how it works but I suspect the behavior is as follows:
When you press F10(Jump over), you will execute the process and system will push a return adress to the stack. If you then press F10 again before exiting the first process you will push new things onto of the stack and now you have created an imballance on the stack and the return adress will be false when the first process tries to pop from the stack.
To know more about the stack in general see wiki link: Wiki Call Stack
This error is thrown when you are in recover mode (an exception has already occurred but has not cleared by a resume stage) and manually set to run another stage and and another exception occur again.
It is most likely that you didn't handle the exception properly by passing the exception through Resume and Recover. If the an exception broke it must go through Recover and Resume to be resolved or else it will throw Stack imbalance Error
I started working on BluePrism just few months back, and believe me I have got this error a lot of times. According to what I have noticed, this error occurs in debug mode. That is when you are running your code by "Stepping In".
If you have run a Stage, and stepped in while the current Stage is still running you'll get this error.
To get your code back running, you can try the below:
Reset the page
Reset the Process/Object entirely
If you are getting this error while running a page that is being called from another page. Then - Run the page in debug mode again from where it is being called. In this case you will not have to reset your Code.
I think that you must hit the RESET buton.
If we have a function any way we can identify which call back is throwing an error
Async.parallel({
function one:(){
},function two(){}
},function(err,results){
//any way we can identify which call back is throwing an error
});
It is needed because for some calls i need to show a n error page for some i just need to show the page irrespective of the error.
An error value is returned back from whichever async operation returned an error. You just need to make sure that each operation returns an indentifiable error value. If it's an error object (which is recommended), you can add any custom properties you want to it. Then, in your final error handler, you can look at the properties on the error object and see what properties are on it, what values they have and therefore which path caused the error.
If you want more specific help than that, you will need to show us your actual code for the async operations so we can make more specific code recommendations.