Let's say, there is a website for an online diary. Users upload their secrets to the web server and stored in the database. Normally, a user without the password can't see the diary items. However the web admin or DB admin could still can connect to the DB and see everything.
Is there a solution to prevent this? I mean a solution for the whole web application, not only for a single user.
Client-side javascript can encrypt the content, using a key known only to the client and never sent to the server, prior to saving.
However, the server can at any time start serving up malicious JS that would send the keys back down to the server. The only way to make this impossible is to make your application an installable client-side app (via an extension or whatever - but nothing that auto-updates). Additionally, all of this paranoia is pointless unless the user can verify what the app is doing, so it would need to be open-source.
At this point you're basically writing GnuPG, so you might as well just use that.
Related
The gist of it all is that I'm trying to fetch audio metadata from a user's google drive files to store them into firebase.
At first I intended to do this locally, entirely client-sided, because my front-facing web/iOS/Android app is in flutter;
but as it turns out, there's almost no library handling audio metadata properly, and after dabbling with it, I realized I could probably get some formats (say, .wav & most RIFF-type audio files) to work, but doing an entire library to handle all kinds of audio metadata was a task significantly bigger than my original plans. Another option would be to create interfaces between C++ code and/or JS code into my Flutter application, but I'd have almost no control over that, it's not the easiest of process, and there would be possible inconsistencies between platforms.
I might make that library eventually, but in order to facilitate my work, I decided to use a server as a middleman that'd run with node and handle the file requests and metadata treatment, & also facilitate the interactions with firebase for me by making them handled by a service account.
Now, this makes me run into one issue : how to handle the google Auth.
When my user logs into my app, I get all the required auth scopes (google drive files access and write, contacts, email, etc) for my app; it goes through the consent screen and I get authenticated.
I'm still a little confused with the recommendations from google and best practices in this case, since my app, in itself, did not require an auth system outside of getting access to the google drive files through google identification, and I therefore do not have Firebase/Firestore users; I can simply store them in my (firestore) database for identification purposes (or maybe tie in the frontend flow to my firestore app to also create a user when logging in through google if that is possible. I'm currently using the google sign in
flutter package.)
To come back to my actual problem now that the situation is laid out :
Should I just transfer the auth tokens (and maybe reverify them in some ways to avoid impersonation) from my frontend app to the server through a HTTPS post request or through headers, and use them to directly query the Google Drive API (I wouldn't even need to store them outside of memory, which would be relatively safe against any attacks on the server itself), handle the files and the possibly expired token ?
Should I modify my frontend workflow so it directly grants access to my server who would handle the session rather than getting the tokens locally ?
In the first case, I would most likely simply use the users UID as identifiers for the firestore data (none of it is sensitive anyway, it would simply be playlists and some metadata). In the second case, I could probably implement a stronger security on firestore using the firestore rules,but it'd require a significant amount of refactoring and logic changes in my frontend.
In case that wasn't clear, I wish my server to make all the Drive related requests (after getting the proper authorizations from the user of course) and handle these without having to request the files locally in frontend. Both solutions (and others if available) should work, but I'm wondering what the best practice would be in the context of the Oauth2 system used by google and the fact that the authorization is transitioning between client and server and could be subject to security issues.
I'll add code/visual representations if this isn't clear enough. It is to me, but I obviously designed the mess.
I'm working on a windows app which is reading a "authorized" domains list from a txt file with a web request from "domain.com/sub/txtfile"
I don't want people to see the content of the file when entering it directly in the browser. Is it possible to achieve this with some .htaccess hacks or something else?
As your app is a client-side native Windows application, it's not possible to store any secret in the app itself that could be used for authentication. As the user has everything the Windows app may have, it impossible to authenticate the client as discussed many times here.
It also doesn't make much sense. Imagine it was somehow possible and file contents were only visible to your app. What would be the purpose? What if an attacker changed the hosts file on Windows to download the file from a rogue server? What if he used an intermediate proxy to inspect, change or replace contents? The latter is also possible with https, because the user has full control of the client, and can trust whatever certificate he wants.
You could authenticate the user though. An attacker can still see and modify downloaded file contents, but at least not anybody could download the file, only your authenticated users. But this means having a user database where the file is downloaded from, and implementing proper authentication. And it still doesn't solve the other problems.
In short, you can't protect a client-side application from a user that controls the whole client.
Here I will describe the requirement for my project.
Basically I want to build a chat application which I can embed to different websites for example , site build using wordpress, magento, drupal, custom frameworks ... etc . What I actually need is to embed JavaScript for handling socket chat using (socket.io) on some of the website(wordpress, magento, drupal ....), so what I finally have is a set of javascript code (client side), and a server running in nodejs (with socket.io)
The problem I faced is to manage session for registered users after login. Since my code is embedded on different websites and the node server resides on other server , On each page refresh I faced difficult to validate user session session. Could you please help me how I can manage session in a best way for this application.
If you feel difficulty to understand my need , I can explain in detail with examples
Thanking You
If I understand your problem, you just need to handle user sessions? More specifically on the client side?
Based on the information you give, I will just assume you either return a unique string representing the session on the server to the client. The format of this can either be a cookie, a normal string/token, etc.
For cookies, you shouldn't have much problems, since the browser deals with this. Although you might need to set it up correctly on the server.
For tokens/strings that needs to be returned to the server for each request requiring authentication, you should store it in the session-storage/local storage of the browser, depending on your need. Then you should embed it in every requests back to the server and authenticate it.
I am getting to the point in my Google App Engine development where I am signing users up. I collect the signup info, do some initial validation to make sure that things are the correct length/format, then send that info to the App Engine for server side validation and ultimately signup and login. I understand that I can think of the App Engine as extremely secure (it's Google anyway) and my client side is a Cordova application, which is also secure because it is wrapped in an app package. The only insecure part of the interaction is the HTTP POST request that I send containing the password. I see really only one option for making this more secure. I may be right, I may be wrong. I honestly have no idea.
I'm thinking that I could encrypt the password locally and decrypt it once it hits the app engine. The problem with this is that anyone monitoring my requests can read this decrypted value and they don't even need to decrypt it. They can just send it encrypted as it is. I can adjust this by making the encryption dependent on other variables that only the app engine knows about, but I'm not sure if that is a good way either.
I know next to nothing about web security, and very little about encryption techniques. What is the best way to send and store passwords with Google App Engine?
Don't reinvent the wheel and (as already mentioned in the comment) just use SSL.
It works out of the box for *.appspot.com domains (example) but if you want to enable it for your custom domain you will have to go through documentation.
Send over HTTPS - App Engine provides SSL for free - USE IT! Then at the server encrypt for storage. Never save passwords in plain text. If your using Python, check out the webapp auth api, which takes care of everything for you -> https://webapp-improved.appspot.com/api/webapp2_extras/auth.html
I'm currently searching the best way for developing my next webapplication. I'm thinking about using Backbone.js and build a single page application. But I really can't imagine how to secure my app since nearly everything is done on client side. Of course I just could prevent the users from accessing my RESTful Api so they would not have access to my data. But all the view/model/collection/template js files are still accessible.
Or is there a known way to serve the js files with php (laravel), which would allow me to only serve the files I need for the respective user.
I just couldn't find a solution by searching the Web. But I just don't think that I am the lonely person who needs a clean and secure authentication method including different user rights.
Thank you in advance!
Your backend application will fetch data from a backend (= API), and probably send back some changes.
This code can't have "security holes / leaks" as long as your backend is secured.
If you are afraid of people stealing your code, you can always minify the JS (check grunt.js and almond.js for this)
To secure your backend you can make use of Laravel's auth class, and the auth filter as mentioned before.
Besides normal auth, you could implement roles, that you can assign to specific users, giving them more or less access to certain resources in your backend.
Here's the method I would try :
Separate the application in two parts.
One part - login via regular Laravel Auth on a separate page, and then when the user is logged in serve the single page app in a different view.
Wouldn't this work?
Web Services are no different than any other web application you build. At the end of the day you are exposing functionality to the client (which is also the attacker). It doesn't matter what the client is implemented in, if you expose dangerous functionality you will be hacked.
Have a session state, keep track of the user id and make sure that the user is only accessing resources they have been allowed to access.
I do not think that what JS/template files are exposed really matters. Essentially, you should only be allowing data interaction to authenticated users. Think of this as two separate applications.
The front-end application logs in, and a cookie is stored (or some other persistence is used).
The back-end application then uses the persistent authentication to validate every single user request for data, and every user action.
This way you don't have to worry about the security, the client can only fetch the data that the server allows it to, and, likewise, it can only interact with the data insofar as the server allows it. You shouldn't be relying on the client side for security anyway, even logged in, otherwise some malicious user could, conceivably, save all your frontend code and use it against you without authentication.