I'm trying to search and replace $data['user'] for $data['sessionUser'].
However, no matter what search string I use, I always get a "pattern not found" as the result of it.
So, what would be the correct search string? Do I need to escape any of these characters?
:%s/$data['user']/$data['sessionUser']/g
:%s/\$data\[\'user\'\]/$data['sessionUser']/g
I did not test this, but I guess it should work.
Here's a list of all special search characters you need to escape in Vim: `^$.*[~)+/
There's nothing wrong with with the answers given, but you can do this:
:%s/$data\['\zsuser\ze']/sessionUser/g
\zs and \ze can be used to delimit the part of the match that is affected by the replacement.
You don't need to escape the $ since it's the at the start of the pattern and can't match an EOL here. And you don't need to escape the ] since it doesn't have a matching starting [. However there's certainly no harm in escaping these characters if you can't remember all the rules. See :help pattern.txt for the full details, but don't try to digest it all in one go!
If you want to get fancy, you can do:
:%s/$data\['\zsuser\ze']/session\u&/g
& refers to the entire matched text (delimited by \zs and \ze if present), so it becomes 'user' in this case. The \u when used in a replacement string makes the next character upper-case. I hope this helps.
Search and replace in vim is almost identical to sed, so use the same escapes as you would with that:
:%s/\$data\['user'\]/$data['session']/g
Note that you only really need to escape special characters in the search part (the part between the first set of //s). The only character you need to escape in the replace part is the escape character \ itself (which you're not using here).
The [ char has a meaning in regex. It stands for character ranges. The $ char has a meaning too. It stands for end-line anchor. So you have to escape a lot of things. I suggest you to try a little plugin like this or this one and use a visual search.
Related
For instance, if I wanted to a find and replace with strings containing backward or forward slashes, how would this be accomplished in vim?
Examples
Find & Replace is: :%s/foo/bar/g
what if I wanted to find all occurrences of <dog/> and replace it with <cat\>
Same way you escape characters most anywhere else in linuxy programs, with a backslash:
:%s/<dog\/>/<cat\\>
But note that you can select a different delimiter instead:
:%s#<doc/>#<cat\\>#
This saves you all typing all those time-consuming, confusing backslashes in patterns with a ton of slashes.
From the documentation:
Instead of the / which surrounds the pattern and replacement string, you
can use any other single-byte character, but not an alphanumeric character,
\, " or |. This is useful if you want to include a / in the search
pattern or replacement string.
%s:<dog/>:<cat>
You can replace the / delimiters if they become annoying for certain patterns.
Quote them with a backslash. Also, it often helps to use another delimiter besides slash.
:%s#<dog/>#<cat\\>#
or if you have to use slash as the substitute command delimiter
:%s/<dog\/>/<cat\\>/
I was looking for something similar, to search for register values containing the / character (to record a macro). The solution was to search using the ? token instead of the /.
The syntax is:
:%s/<dog\/>/<cat\\>/g
backslash slash backslash star
/(<- the prompt)\/\*
so after you type it looks like
/\/\*
In vi (from cygwin), when I do searching:
:%s/something
It just replaces the something with empty string like
:%s/something// .
I've googled for a while but nothing really mentions this. Is there anything I should add to the .vimrc or .exrc to make this work?
Thanks!
In vi and vim, when you search for a pattern, you can search it again by simply typing /. It is understood that the previous pattern has to be used when no pattern is specified for searching.
(Though, you can press n for finding next occurence)
Same way, when you give a source (pattern) and leave the replacement in substitute command, it assumes that the replacement is empty and hence the given pattern is replaced with no characters (in other words, the pattern is removed)
In your case, you should understand that % stand for whole file(buffer) and s for substitute. To search, you can simply use /, followed by a pattern. To substitute , you will use :s. You need not confuse searching and substituting. Hence, no need for such settings in ~/.exrc. Also, remember that / is enough to search the whole buffer and % isnt necessary with /. / searches the entire buffer implicitly.
You may also want to look at :g/Pattern/. Learn more about it by searching :help global or :help :g in command line.
The format of a substitution in vim is as follows:
:[range]s[ubstitute]/{pattern}/{string}/[flags] [count]
In your case you have omitted the string from the substitution command and here what vim documentation stated about it:
If the {string} is omitted the substitute is done as if it's empty.
Thus the matched pattern is deleted. The separator after {pattern}
can also be left out then. Example: >
:%s/TESTING This deletes "TESTING" from all lines, but only one per line.
For compatibility with Vi these two exceptions are allowed:
"/{string}/" and "\?{string}?" do the same as "//{string}/r".
"\&{string}&" does the same as "//{string}/".
E146
Instead of the '/' which surrounds the pattern and replacement string, you can
use any other single-byte character, but not an alphanumeric
character, '\', '"' or '|'. This is useful if you want to include a
'/' in the search pattern or replacement string. Example: >
:s+/+//+
In other words :%s/something and :%s;something or :%s,something have all the same behavior because the / ; and , in the last examples are considered only as SIMPLE SEPARATOR
I have several functions that start with get_ in my code:
get_num(...) , get_str(...)
I want to change them to get_*_struct(...).
Can I somehow match the get_* regex and then replace according to the pattern so that:
get_num(...) becomes get_num_struct(...),
get_str(...) becomes get_str_struct(...)
Can you also explain some logic behind it, because the theoretical regex aren't like the ones used in UNIX (or vi, are they different?) and I'm always struggling to figure them out.
This has to be done in the vi editor as this is main work tool.
Thanks!
To transform get_num(...) to get_num_struct(...), you need to capture the correct text in the input. And, you can't put the parentheses in the regular expression because you may need to match pointers to functions too, as in &get_distance, and uses in comments. However, and this depends partially on the fact that you are using vim and partially on how you need to keep the entire input together, I have checked that this works:
%s/get_\w\+/&_struct/g
On every line, find every expression starting with get_ and continuing with at least one letter, number, or underscore, and replace it with the entire matched string followed by _struct.
Darn it; I shouldn't answer these things on spec. Note that other regex engines might use \& instead of &. This depends on having magic set, which is default in vim.
For an alternate way to do it:
%s/get_\(\w*\)(/get_\1_struct(/g
What this does:
\w matches to any "word character"; \w* matches 0 or more word characters.
\(...\) tells vim to remember whatever matches .... So, \(w*\) means "match any number of word characters, and remember what you matched. You can then access it in the replacement with \1 (or \2 for the second, etc.)
So, the overall pattern get_\(\w*\)( looks for get_, followed by any number of word chars, followed by (.
The replacement then just does exactly what you want.
(Sorry if that was too verbose - not sure how comfortable you are with vim regex.)
I have a file containing string like this one :
print $hash_xml->{'div'}{'div'}{'div'}[1]...
I want to replace {'div'}{'div'}{'div'}[1] by something else.
So I tried
%s/{'div'}{'div'}{'div'}[1]/by something else/gc
The strings were not found. I though I had to escape the {,},[ and ]
Still string not found.
So I tried to search a single { and it found them.
Then I tried to search {'div'}{'div'}{'div'} and it found it again.
Then {'div'}{'div'}{'div'}[1 was still found.
To find {'div'}{'div'}{'div'}[1]
I had to use %s/{'div'}{'div'}{'div'}[1\]
Why ?
vim 7.3 on Linux
The [] are used in regular expressions to wrap a range of acceptable characters.
When both are supplied unescaped, vim is treating the search string as a regex.
So when you leave it out, or escape the final character, vim cannot interpret a single bracket in a regex context, so does a literal search (basically the best it can do given the search string).
Personally, I would escape the opening and closing square brace to ensure that the meaning is clear.
That's because the [ and ] characters are used to build the search pattern.
See :h pattern and use the help file pattern.txt to try the following experiment:
Searching for the "[9-0]" pattern (without quotes) using /[0-9] will match every digit from 0 to 9 individually (see :h \[)
Now, if you try /\[0-9] or /[0-9\] you will match the whole pattern: a zero, an hyphen and a nine inside square brackets. That's because when you escape one of [ or ] the operator [*] ceases to exist.
Using your search pattern, /{'div'}{'div'}{'div'}[1\] and /{'div'}{'div'}{'div'}\[1] should match the same pattern which is the one you want, while /{'div'}{'div'}{'div'}[1] matches the string {'div'}{'div'}{'div'}1.
In order to avoid being caught by these special characters in regular expressions, you can try using the very magic flag.
E.g.:
:%s/\V{'div'}[1]/replacement/
Notice the \V flag at the beginning of the line.
Because the square brackets mean that vim thinks you're looking for any of the characters inside. This is known as a 'character class'. By escaping either of the square brackets it lets vim know that you're looking for the literal square string ending with '[1]'.
Ideally you should write your expression as:
%s/{'div'}{'div'}{'div'}\[1\]/replacement string/
to ensure that the meaning is completely clear.
I know for searching a whole word I should use /\<mypattern\>. But this is not true for dash (+U002d) character and /\<-\> always fails. I also try /\<\%d45\> and it fails too. anyone know the reason?
Edit2: As #bobbogo mentioned dash is not in 'iskeyword' so I add :set isk+=- and /\<-\> works!
Edit1: I think in Vim /\<word\> only is valid for alphanumeric characters and we shouldn't use it for punctuation characters (see Edit2). I should change my question and ask how we can search punctuation character as a whole world for example I want my search found the question mark in "a ? b" and patterns like "??" and "abc?" shouldn't be valid.
\< matches the zero-width boundary between a non-word character and a word character. What is a word character? It's specified by the isk option (:help isk).
Since - is not in your isk option, then - can never start a word, thus \<- will never match.
I don't know what you want, but /\>-\< will match the dash in hello-word.
Could always search for the regex \byourwordhere\b
As OP said. In order to include dash - into search just execute:
:set isk+=-
Thats all.
Example: When you press * over letter c of color-primary it will search for entire variable name not just for color.