I want to create recursive directories ( for example : Connector.open("file:///Phone:/folder_1/folder_2/", Connector.READ_WRITE); ). The problem is that the two folders , here folder_1 and folder_2, are not mentioned explicitly but instead there is only one String parameter provided from a method. For example :
private void myMethod(String path)
{
fcDir = (FileConnection) Connector.open("file:///Phone:/"+path+"/", Connector.READ_WRITE);
...
}
And in runtime the two folders are not created ! So I must create separately two FileConnection in order to create the two folders ! So why J2ME is not able to make a recursive directory creation ?
you may also try thing new way. you can make your method recursive, now pass one vector & integer parameter, vector's element will be the list of directories you want to create and integer will specify the number of time method should call it self.
i.e. for folder_1 & folder_2 you can pass parameter as method_name ( folderVector, 2 ). here folderVector variable contains two String element as folder_1 & folder_2. Now you need to call your method recursively such that , each time second parameter decrements it's value with one down. Run this method till it is greater than zero.
This is the one way you can do it recursively.
Related
Code:
std::map<CString, S_DISCUSSION_HIST_ITEM> mapHistory;
// History list is in ascending date order
for (auto& sHistItem : m_listDiscussionItemHist)
{
if (m_bFullHistoryMode)
mapHistory.emplace(sHistItem.strName, sHistItem);
else if (sHistItem.eSchool == m_eActiveSchool)
mapHistory.emplace(sHistItem.strName, sHistItem);
}
// The map is sorted by Name (so reset by date later)
// The map has the latest assignment info for each Name now
Observation:
I now understand that std::emplace behaves like this:
The insertion only takes place if no other element in the container has a key equivalent to the one being emplaced (keys in a map container are unique).
Therefore my code is flawed. What I was hoping to acheive (in pseudo code) is:
For Each History Item
Is the name in the map?
No, so add to map with sHitItem
Yes, so replace the sHistItem with this one
End Loop
By the end of this loop iteration I want to have the most recent sHitItem, for each person. But as it is, it is only adding an entry into the map if the name does not exist.
What is the simplest way to get around this?
Use insert_or_assign method if the item is assignable. It will be assigned if it already exists. Or use [] operator followed by assignment, it will default-construct item if it does not exist.
For non-assignable types I'm afraid there's no convenient way.
Is there a way to determine the Object type, when passing a reference to a function?
I'm using a security permissions function, which determines if the user has permission to view/edit the Form passed to it by reference. I'd like to expand this to include reports as well.
To keep the function generic, I'd like to pass a ref for either a Form or a Report as an Object, eg:
function gfSecurity_Permission(obj as Object)
However, I'd need to determine the type of the object within the function.
Does anyone know of a way to do that?
MTIA
Take a look at
typeOf and typeName
Generic object variables (that is, variables you declare as Object)
can hold objects from any class. When using variables of type Object,
you may need to take different actions based on the class of the
object; for example, some objects might not support a particular
property or method. Visual Basic provides two means of determining
which type of object is stored in an object variable: the TypeName
function and the TypeOf...Is operator.
TypeName and TypeOf…Is
The
TypeName function returns a string and is the best choice when you
need to store or display the class name of an object, as shown in the
following code fragment:
Dim Ctrl As Control = New TextBox
MsgBox(TypeName(Ctrl))
The TypeOf...Is operator is the best choice for testing an object's
type, because it is much faster than an equivalent string comparison
using TypeName. The following code fragment uses TypeOf...Is within an
If...Then...Else statement:
If TypeOf Ctrl Is Button Then
MsgBox("The control is a button.")
End If
Simplest way to determine the access type in access is to do an object lookup within the Access' system tables.
Here would be the lookup:
DLookup("Type","MSysObjects","NAME = '" & strObject & "'")
strObject is the name of the object within Access
The result is one of the number below OR NULL if the object does not exist in Access
1 = Access Table
4 = OBDB-Linked Table / View
5 = Access Query
6 = Attached (Linked) File (such as Excel, another Access Table or query, text file, etc.)
-32768 = Access Form
-32764 = Access Report
-32761 = Access Module
so, the dlookup would provide "-32768" for a Form or "-32764" for a Report
Hope that helps
I'm quite new to progamming. So here's my function to select a random image in my drawable folder.
fun generateimage(index:Int)
{var images=arrayOf(R.drawable.img1,....)
main_imageView.setImageResource(images[index])
This works as an image is shown randomly every time I start the application. But I would like to be able to know which image was selected. Preferably from retrieving the image name to string.
Possible duplicate of
How to get drawable name from imageView
However, a better implementation would be to have the value in a list of int and put your R.drawable items inside it. That was you can access which element is being shown.
You can do something like this:
fun main() {
val arrayImages = arrayOf("image1", "image2", "image3", "image4", "image5")
// in your case actual images.
val randomIndex = (0..arrayImages.size).random()
val randomImage = arrayImages[randomIndex]
println(randomImage) // in your case: main_imageView.setImageResource(randomImage)
}
Note that you need to assign the variable of randomImage so you can access it later on. I don't know what type "R.drawable.img1" is, but the object you set inside this array has to store the name of the file, so you can retrieve it that way.
I'm writing a puppet code and need to point to a variable with the information of others.... to make it clear here is the example:
These are the variables with the information:
Array $users_ap1_dev = ['userdev1,userdev2'],
Array $users_ap2_prd = ['userprd1,userprd2'],
but ap1 and ap2 values are store in a fact calles main_app and dev and prd values are store in a fact called env.
I want to retrieve the info and create the user based on the fact information, something like
$dmz_users.each | String $user |{
user { $user:
ensure => 'present',
}
So, how can i put the content of $users_ap1_dev into dmz_users, replacing ap1 and dev with the one store in the fact?
something like?:
Array $dmz_user = "${users_${main_app}_${env}}"
Thanks a lot in advance for the help!
I found the answer, the function: getvar()
It allows you to create a variable and put his content into another...
How to use it:
$dmz_users = getvar("users_${main_app}_${env}")
So let's says $main_app = web and '$env = prod', it will take this two values and will make '$dmz_users = $users_web_prod`
I have the following c# code:
private XElement BuildXmlBlob(string id, Part part, out int counter)
{
// return some unique xml particular to the parameters passed
// remember to increment the counter also before returning.
}
Which is called by:
var counter = 0;
result.AddRange(from rec in listOfRecordings
from par in rec.Parts
let id = GetId("mods", rec.CKey + par.UniqueId)
select BuildXmlBlob(id, par, counter));
Above code samples are symbolic of what I am trying to achieve.
According to the Eric Lippert, the out keyword and linq does not mix. OK fair enough but can someone help me refactor the above so it does work? A colleague at work mentioned accumulator and aggregate functions but I am novice to Linq and my google searches were bearing any real fruit so I thought I would ask here :).
To Clarify:
I am counting the number of parts I might have which could be any number of them each time the code is called. So every time the BuildXmlBlob() method is called, the resulting xml produced will have a unique element in there denoting the 'partNumber'.
So if the counter is currently on 7, that means we are processing 7th part so far!! That means XML returned from BuildXmlBlob() will have the counter value embedded in there somewhere. That's why I need it somehow to be passed and incremented every time the BuildXmlBlob() is called per run through.
If you want to keep this purely in LINQ and you need to maintain a running count for use within your queries, the cleanest way to do so would be to make use of the Select() overloads that includes the index in the query to get the current index.
In this case, it would be cleaner to do a query which collects the inputs first, then use the overload to do the projection.
var inputs =
from recording in listOfRecordings
from part in recording.Parts
select new
{
Id = GetId("mods", recording.CKey + part.UniqueId),
Part = part,
};
result.AddRange(inputs.Select((x, i) => BuildXmlBlob(x.Id, x.Part, i)));
Then you wouldn't need to use the out/ref parameter.
XElement BuildXmlBlob(string id, Part part, int counter)
{
// implementation
}
Below is what I managed to figure out on my own:.
result.AddRange(listOfRecordings.SelectMany(rec => rec.Parts, (rec, par) => new {rec, par})
.Select(#t => new
{
#t,
Id = GetStructMapItemId("mods", #t.rec.CKey + #t.par.UniqueId)
})
.Select((#t, i) => BuildPartsDmdSec(#t.Id, #t.#t.par, i)));
I used resharper to convert it into a method chain which constructed the basics for what I needed and then i simply tacked on the select statement right at the end.