My goal is to create something like the arrow from car that indicates the speed of the car. My problem is that I do not know what is the best practice for moving the green arrow. I have an image arrow.png and I guess I need to manipulate with the place that the picture is shown and with the rotation of the image.
Can someone point to me some guidelines ?
My basic idea is to have a relative layout for the background and to have one image view that will change the position, but the part changing position is little unclear to me. And I do not think that is good idea to play with layout params and margins...
I would probably extend ImageView then override your onDraw method and use canvas.rotate() to rotate the arrow depending on your app state.
Related
So I have an instanced scene that is supposed to be the child of a colour rect in my tree. I want to randomly generate the nodes, but I also want parts of the view to be cut off if the texture no longer is above the main section. I know you can render nodes below their parents, but I don't know if stopping part of them from rendering is physically possible.
In this image I want the bottom circle to remain the same, but the top circle to not show anything above the dark purple box
This is the node tree in the editor
Is there any way to do this directly, or am I gonna have to use a viewport of some variety?
I believe what you want is to set rect_clip_content to true on the ColorRect (or whatever Control). Making invisible any part of its children outside of it.
From Godot's documentation:
bool rect_clip_content
Enables whether rendering of CanvasItem based children should be clipped to this control's rectangle. If true, parts of a child which would be visibly outside of this control's rectangle will not be rendered.
If what you want is the opposite, perhaps you can use z_index to have something render on top, occluding the parts you don't want visible.
There is also a trick you can use with lights (including 2D lights):
Make a light that matches the area you want things to be visible.
Set a custom material that will be transparent by default, but visible on the light pass. The simpler way to do this is to set the light_mode of the material to "Light Only". You could also do it with a custom shader instead.
Making something disappear with light, in 2D, is impossible. In 3D, you can use flags_use_shadow_to_opacity. That is how you make a shadow catcher.
But, there is one more trick: you can use a mask. This should give you full control of when to show or hide things. So, if none of the above solutions works for you, use a mask. I have an explanation in a different answer. See also: How to crop sprite in a non-rectangular form?.
Mighty Mochi Games recently (2022-03-30) made a compilation of the different approaches in video form: Mask Methods Collection - Godot 3.x - 2D
.
Scratch allows selection of the color using the set pen color. Does anyone know if its possible to program to set the color to transparent so that what ever is drawn can effectively be erased? What would the color number be for that?
Update
The idea was to cover a picture (background) with a colour drawn over the top. Now give the player a little creature that erases the colour on top, they have a certain amount of moves or time to guess what the picture is. The less moves/time they use the more points the player will be awarded.
But the problem seems to be that in the paint a sprite part of scratch erase is an option, but not in the pen programming.
If I cant solve it using erase apprach, my alternative is to make a lot of sprites covering the picture and hide them when the creature touches them. But it seems less fun for the player as the uncovered patterns will be more predictable.
Unfortunately, this isn't really possible. If you have a backdrop that's all one color, you could set the pen color to be the same as the backdrop and color over what you already have (giving the illusion of erasing), but other than that there really isn't a good way.
Your only other option is to use the clear block and then re-draw everything except the piece you want to erase.
If you want to give more context about your specific project, I might be able to help you work out a solution (I've done quite a lot with pen blocks over the years).
Like PullJosh said, it isn't really possible but you can make a sprite called Cover and make it a circle of any color you want. Then, it can clone it's sprite over the sprite you want to hide. Then you can attach a script to the clones:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/S6h4c.png (ctrl + click)
I'm trying to create slidingup animation in android application to change between two view of layout.
I've tried from this tutorial
but the second screen didn't come like what I want.
I want the second layout to come like a wipe animation, like the following picture at the bottom
Refer this:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/ab51002847ea3dcdc0ba14eb330ab9ec292a9789/packages/SystemUI/src/com/android/systemui/statusbar/phone/PhoneStatusBar.java
In the above code, focus on the animateCollapsePanels method
I was able to implement a similar transition by using a clipping Path. Because I didn't want my transition to rule out the use of Layouts in the clipped view, I implemented the clipping at the Layout level following this answer: Custom Layout that rounds the corners of its content
The clipping is no anti-aliased and you would need to do use instead PorterDuff and XferMode based solutions otherwise, but for a linear wipe animation like you're describing, clipping in the layout will achieve what you want. Basically you're doing a linear reveal whereas the accepted answer I linked does a circular clip.
I'm new to MFC. I know how to draw a line and how to scribble in MFC. I use CDC and some functions such as LineTo() and MoveTo() to do this. Moreover, I've got FillRect() and Rectangle().Now I want to drag my rectangle or any polygon in the view.It's like you drag a icon on your desktop.
I think the first step is to get the region.Then erase the old polygon and when the mouse move draw a same polygon which depends on the point where the mouse go.
So I search region in MSDN and I got Region class and CRgn class.But before I look into these two class I want to know whether I'm in the right direction.
I need more suggestions on how to learn MFC. Actually,all I need is to finish my homework which is mainly about draw polygons and drag them and link them by line. And I hope I can finish this homework all by myself and MSDN. Can MSDN help me do that?
The CDC::Polyline function will draw a polygon much faster than using LineTo and MoveTo.
You do not need region and do not need to erase the old polygon. Instead, you need to draw everything in the view OnDraw. Any change you want to make with the mouse should change the array of coordinates that represent the polygon and then call Invalidate. In other words, do not draw in the mouse message handlers. Calling Invalidate in the mouse message handlers will cause OnDraw to be called later and it should repaint the entire view.
I'm building a Container using code and now I want to set the Styleusing one UnselectedStyle from the Resource Editor.
I'm doing this because, I don't find the way to add a LinearBackground color and a RoundBorder to my Container. When I put the two properties to the Style, the background color has gone.
So I finally add this Style using the UIManager.getInstance().addThemeProps(String name ThemeFromResource); and later the setUIID(String nameStyle). Is working fine...my Containergets the Style, but the app lose the navigation, the back Commandhas gone.
How can do this? I would like to do with my first way...creating the lineargradient and the border and adding it to the style, but I don't find the way.
I would strongly suggest against doing that.
Border's override other forms of background, round border tries to respect some of them but is REALLY inefficient about that. It effectively draws the background on a mutable image then draws the round border on another mutable image, gets the RGB for both and performs a NOT operation to crop the background into a round image. This (as you might understand) is REALLY expensive in terms of performance, while the image is then cached it is still expensive in the longer term.
You should use image borders which are MUCH faster.