This question already has answers here:
Closed 11 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
SQL : How can I use sub query in a query with group by section?
Some one help me please . SQL Server cant recognize t1.sen in subquery . Error message : The multi-part identifier "t1.sen" could not be bound.
select
t1.sen,
sum(t1.d_rooz)as d1,
sum(t1.d_shab)as d2,
sum(t1.d_rooz+t1.d_shab) as d_sum,
Round((sum((1000*(t1.d_rooz+t1.d_shab))/(9500-tc.c))),1) as SSS
from
tbl_talafat_dan t1, (
select sum(t2.t_shab+t2.t_rooz) as c
from tbl_talafat_dan t2
where FCode=81 AND DCode=1 AND t2.sen<=t1.sen
) as tc
where
FCode = 81
AND DCode = 1
group by
t1.sen
I think you have a syntax issue here after t1:
from
tbl_talafat_dan t1, (
select sum(t2.t_shab+t2.t_rooz) as c
from tbl_talafat_dan t2
where FCode=81 AND DCode=1 AND t2.sen<=t1.sen
) as tc
It's trying to figure out what's the table to select from. You need to use either t1 or tc and join after that appropriately. Hope this helps.
Related
i have i would like to create a join over several tables.
table login : I would like to retrieve all the data from login
table logging : calculating the Nb_of_sessions for each db & for each a specific event type by user
table meeting : calculating the Nb_of_meetings for each db & for each user
table live : calculating the Nb_of_live for each db & for each user
I have those queries with the right results :
SELECT db.id,_id as userid,firstname,lastname
FROM "logins"."login",
UNNEST(dbs) AS a1 (db)
SELECT dbid,userid,count(distinct(sessionid)) as no_of_visits,
array_join(array_agg(value.from_url),',') as from_url
FROM "loggings"."logging"
where event='url_event'
group by db.id,userid;
SELECT dbid,userid AS userid,count(*) as nb_interviews,
array_join(array_agg(interviewer),',') as interviewer
FROM "meetings"."meeting"
group by dbid,userid;
SELECT dbid,r1.user._id AS userid,count(_id) as nb_chat
FROM "lives"."live",
UNNEST(users) AS r1 (user)
group by dbid,r1.user._id;
But when i begin to try put it all together, it seems i retrieve bad data (i have only on db retrieved) and it seems not efficient.
select a1.db.id,a._id as userid,a.firstname,a.lastname,count(rl._id) as nb_chat
FROM
"logins"."login" a,
"loggings"."logging" b,
"meetings"."meeting" c,
"lives"."live" d,
UNNEST(dbs) AS a1 (db),
UNNEST(users) AS r1 (user)
where a._id = b.userid AND a._id = c.userid AND a._id = r1.user._id
group by 1,2,3,4
Do you have an idea ?
Regards.
The easiest way is to work with with to structure the subquery and then reference them.
with parameter reference:
You can use WITH to flatten nested queries, or to simplify subqueries.
The WITH clause precedes the SELECT list in a query and defines one or
more subqueries for use within the SELECT query.
Each subquery defines a temporary table, similar to a view definition,
which you can reference in the FROM clause. The tables are used only
when the query runs.
Since you already have working sub queries, the following should work:
with logins as
(
SELECT db.id,_id as userid,firstname,lastname
FROM "logins"."login",
UNNEST(dbs) AS a1 (db)
)
,visits as
(
SELECT dbid,userid,count(distinct(sessionid)) as no_of_visits,
array_join(array_agg(value.from_url),',') as from_url
FROM "loggings"."logging"
where event='url_event'
group by db.id,userid
)
,meetings as
(
SELECT dbid,userid AS userid,count(*) as nb_interviews,
array_join(array_agg(interviewer),',') as interviewer
FROM "meetings"."meeting"
group by dbid,userid
)
,chats as
(
SELECT dbid,r1.user._id AS userid,count(_id) as nb_chat
FROM "lives"."live",
UNNEST(users) AS r1 (user)
group by dbid,r1.user._id
)
select *
from logins l
left join visits v
on l.dbid = v.dbid
and l.userid = v.userid
left join meetings m
on l.dbid = m.dbid
and l.userid = m.userid
left join chats c
on l.dbid = c.dbid
and l.userid = c.userid;
I am having a issue getting this Sub-query to run. I am using Toad Data Point -Oracle. I get syntax error. I have tried several different ways with no luck. I am knew to sub-query's
Select *
from FINC.VNDR_ITEM_M as M
where M.ACCT_DOC_NBR = A.ACCT_DOC_NBR
(SELECT A.CLIENT_ID,
A.SRC_SYS_ID,
A.CO_CD,
A.ACCT_NBR,
A.CLR_DT,
A.ASGN_NBR,
A.FISCAL_YR,
A.ACCT_DOC_NBR,
A.LINE_ITEM_NBR,
A.MFR_PART_NBR,
A.POST_DT,
A.DRCR_IND,
A.DOC_CRNCY_AMT,
A.CRNCY_CD,
A.BSL_DT
FROM FINC.VNDR_ITEM_F A
WHERE A.CLR_DT IN (SELECT MAX(B.CLR_DT)
FROM FINC.VNDR_ITEM_F AS B
where (B.ACCT_DOC_NBR = A.ACCT_DOC_NBR and B.FISCAL_YR=A.FISCAL_YR and B.LINE_ITEM_NBR = A.LINE_ITEM_NBR and B.SRC_SYS_ID =A.SRC_SYS_ID and B.POST_DT=A.POST_DT and B.CO_CD=A.CO_CD)
and (B.CO_CD >='1000' and B.CO_CD <= '3000' or B.CO_CD ='7090') and (B.POST_DT Between to_date ('08/01/2018','mm/dd/yyyy')
AND to_date ('08/31/2018', 'mm/dd/yyyy')) and (B.SRC_SYS_ID ='15399') and (B.FISCAL_YR ='2018'))
GROUP BY
A.CLIENT_ID,
A.SRC_SYS_ID,
A.CO_CD,
A.ACCT_NBR,
A.CLR_DT,
A.ASGN_NBR,
A.FISCAL_YR,
A.ACCT_DOC_NBR,
A.LINE_ITEM_NBR,
A.MFR_PART_NBR,
A.POST_DT,
A.DRCR_IND,
A.DOC_CRNCY_AMT,
A.CRNCY_CD,
A.BSL_DT)
Your syntax is broken, you put subquery just at the end. Now it looks like:
select *
from dual as m
where a.dummy = m.dummy
(select dummy from dual)
It is in incorrect place, not joined, not aliased. What you should probably do is:
select *
from dual m
join (select dummy from dual) a on a.dummy = m.dummy
You also have some redundant, unnecessary brackets, but that's minor flaw. Full code (I cannot test it without data access):
select *
from FINC.VNDR_ITEM_M M
join (SELECT A.CLIENT_ID, A.SRC_SYS_ID, A.CO_CD, A.ACCT_NBR, A.CLR_DT, A.ASGN_NBR,
A.FISCAL_YR, A.ACCT_DOC_NBR, A.LINE_ITEM_NBR, A.MFR_PART_NBR, A.POST_DT,
A.DRCR_IND, A.DOC_CRNCY_AMT, A.CRNCY_CD, A.BSL_DT
FROM FINC.VNDR_ITEM_F A
WHERE A.CLR_DT IN (SELECT MAX(B.CLR_DT)
FROM FINC.VNDR_ITEM_F AS B
where B.ACCT_DOC_NBR = A.ACCT_DOC_NBR
and B.FISCAL_YR=A.FISCAL_YR
and B.LINE_ITEM_NBR = A.LINE_ITEM_NBR
and B.SRC_SYS_ID =A.SRC_SYS_ID
and B.POST_DT=A.POST_DT
and B.CO_CD=A.CO_CD
and (('1000'<=B.CO_CD and B.CO_CD<='3000') or B.CO_CD='7090')
and B.POST_DT Between to_date ('08/01/2018', 'mm/dd/yyyy')
AND to_date ('08/31/2018', 'mm/dd/yyyy')
and B.SRC_SYS_ID ='15399' and B.FISCAL_YR ='2018')
GROUP BY A.CLIENT_ID, A.SRC_SYS_ID, A.CO_CD, A.ACCT_NBR, A.CLR_DT, A.ASGN_NBR,
A.FISCAL_YR, A.ACCT_DOC_NBR, A.LINE_ITEM_NBR, A.MFR_PART_NBR, A.POST_DT,
A.DRCR_IND, A.DOC_CRNCY_AMT, A.CRNCY_CD, A.BSL_DT) A
on M.ACCT_DOC_NBR = A.ACCT_DOC_NBR and M.CO_CD=A.CO_CD;
You need to add an alias to the SubSelect (or Derived Table in Standard SQL):
select *
from
( select .......
) AS dt
join ....
I have stumbled across a bit of an issue with U-SQL which for me is a problem I haven't yet found a workaround for.
It seems U-SQL doesnt support anything else but == in joins, so you can't put > or < in the join itself.
For the use case below which I have done in oracle:
create table trf.test_1(
number_col int
);
insert into trf.test_1 VALUES (10);
insert into trf.test_1 VALUES (20);
insert into trf.test_1 VALUES (30);
insert into trf.test_1 VALUES (60);
drop table trf.test_2;
create table trf.test_2(
number_col int
);
insert into trf.test_2 VALUES (20);
insert into trf.test_2 VALUES (30);
SELECT t1.number_col, t2.number_col
FROM trf.test_1 t1
LEFT JOIN trf.test_2 t2 ON t1.number_col < t2.number_col
;
I get the following:
How might I do that in u-sql without the < join?
I tried a cross join, but if you include the < in the where clause it just turns into an inner and you don't get the rows with the nulls.
Any ideas appreciated.
#t1 =
SELECT * FROM
( VALUES
(10),
(20),
(30),
(60)
) AS T(num_col);
#t2 =
SELECT * FROM
( VALUES
(20),
(30)
) AS T(num_col);
#result =
SELECT t1.num_col, t2.num_col AS num_col_2
FROM #t1 AS t1
CROSS JOIN #t2 AS t2
WHERE t1.num_col < t2.num_col;
#result2 =
SELECT t1.num_col, t2.num_col AS num_col_2
FROM #t1 AS t1
LEFT JOIN #result AS t2 ON t1.num_col == t2.num_col;
OUTPUT #result2
TO "/Output/ReferenceGuide/Joins/exampleA.csv"
USING Outputters.Csv();
Edit - I added the left join from the #t1 dataset back to the #result set which seems to work but would be interested if there are any better solutions out there. Seems a bit of a work around.
This is a known feature and discussed extensively in the article "U-SQL SELECT Selecting from joins".
Some quotes from that article:
Join Comparisons
U-SQL, like most scaled out Big Data Query languages
that support joins, restricts the join comparison to equality
comparisons between columns in the rowsets to be joined...
...
If one has a non-equality comparison or a more complex expression (such as a method invocation) in the comparison, one can move the comparison to the SELECT’s WHERE clause. Or the more complex expression can be placed in an earlier SELECT statement’s column and then that alias can be referred to in the join comparison.
Basically they don't scale particularly well on a distributed platform like ADLA.
I have a couple of stored procedures that create different temporary tables.
At the end of the procedure i drop them (know that is not required, but it's good practice).
The stored procedures are executed as a part of a SSIS package. I got 4 different SQL jobs that execute the same SSIS package running in parallel.
When logging into the Azure portal and using the performance recommendation feature, I get a recommendation to fix the schema issues. It states an Sql error code 208. According to documentation that means "object not found".
Temporary tables are valid within the scope of the stored procedure and should get a unique name in the database, so I do not think where are any conflicts.
I have no idea what causes this, and the stored procedures seems to work alright. Anyone know what could be the cause here?
Simplified sample of one of the procedures:
SET NOCOUNT ON;
CREATE TABLE #tmpTransEan
(
Ean_Art_Str_id BIGINT ,
Artikler_id BIGINT
);
INSERT INTO #tmpTransEan
( Ean_Art_Str_id ,
Artikler_id
)
SELECT DISTINCT
eas.Ean_Art_Str_id ,
a.Artikler_id
FROM dbo.Artikkel_Priser ap
JOIN Ean_Art_Str eas ON eas.artikler_id = ap.Artikler_id
JOIN wsKasse_Til_Kasselogg ktk ON eas.Ean_Art_Str_id = ktk.ID_Primary
JOIN dbo.Artikler a ON a.Artikler_id = eas.artikler_id
JOIN dbo.Felles_Butikker b ON b.Butikker_id = ap.butikker_id
WHERE ktk.ID_Table = OBJECT_ID('Ean_Art_Str')
AND LEN(a.Artikkelnr) >= 8
AND ktk.Tidspunkt >= #tidspunkt
AND ( ( ap.butikker_id = #nButikker_id1
AND #Alle_artikler_til_kasse = 'N'
)
OR ( b.Databaser_id = #Databaser_id
AND #Alle_artikler_til_kasse = 'J'
)
)
AND b.Akt_kode = 'A'
AND a.Akt_kode = 'A'
AND a.Databaser_id IN ( -1, #Databaser_id )
SELECT DISTINCT
a.Artikkelnr ,
s.Storrelse ,
eas.* ,
EAN_12 = LEFT(eas.EAN_13, 12)
FROM dbo.Ean_Art_Str eas
JOIN #tmpTransEan t ON t.Artikler_id = eas.artikler_id
JOIN Artikler a ON a.Artikler_id = eas.artikler_id
JOIN dbo.Felles_Storrelser s ON s.Storrelser_id = eas.storrelser_id
DROP TABLE #tmpTransEan;
END;
I'm trying to code "not in" statement in FN, but don't really know what's the best way to make it. Here is some sql statement:
select * from T1
where T1. id not in
(
select distinct T2.fkeyID from T2
)
Should I create mappings with references one-to-many and use a property check? Or is there any other way, e.g. somehow to write QueryOver for resolving issue?
Thanks.
var subquery = QueryOver.Of<T2>()
.Select(Projections.Distinct(Projections.Property("referencedT1.id")))
var results = session.QueryOver<T1>()
.WithSubquery.WhereProperty(t1 => t1.Id).NotIn(subquery)
.List();