I have been trying to get Moq (or rather Castle.Core) to create proxies for my internal types.
The following (when added to my project under test), allows things to work:
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("DynamicProxyGenAssembly2")]
However this (more secure version) does not:
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("DynamicProxyGenAssembly2, PublicKey=002400000480000094000000060200000024000052534131000400000100010077f5e87030dadccce6902c6adab7a987bd69cb5819991531f560785eacfc89b6fcddf6bb2a00743a7194e454c0273447fc6eec36474ba8e5a3823147d214298e4f9a631b1afee1a51ffeae4672d498f14b000e3d321453cdd8ac064de7e1cf4d222b7e81f54d4fd46725370d702a05b48738cc29d09228f1aa722ae1a9ca02fb")]
Note: the public key here differs to that documented here, I re-checked the public key of the Castle.Core.dll that ships with the current Nuget version of Moq.
Do I still have the wrong key?
[EDIT]
I have noticed the full Moq download from the official site (rather than Nuget) contains a NET40-RequiresCastle folder with a smaller dll, which implies that the Castle.Core code has been included in the default Moq.dll I guess.
I was looking at the Castle.Core.dll they provide for Silverlight and assuming they'd have used the same version throughout?
I know this is old, but for anyone who stumbles across this, I was having a versioning issue with Pex and Moq at one point, and wound up finding the most direct and useful approach to be the Strong Name Tool. That is, I found opened a Visual Studio command prompt and used "sn -Tp ThirdPartyAssembly.dll" to query it for the key directly. This proved a lot more efficient than perusing the internet looking for different, documented public keys to try out.
Related
Just noticed that in my list of Nuget packages, that "NLog.Config" is marked as deprecated:
Is it safe to simply delete the package?
This particular application is for Google Calendar API usage.
I should have looked more closely at my code. I removed the package and now my tool won't compile. I have code like:
Imports NLog
Private m_logger As NLog.Logger = LogManager.GetCurrentClassLogger()
And 10 instances of calls like:
m_logger.Error(ex, "RESULT_FAILED_OAUTH")
How to resolve now that NLog is deprecated?
NLog.config-nuget-package is safe to remove, and one is encouraged to remove it. It became obsolete when Microsoft introduced <packagereference>-syntax.
Now the NLog.config-nuget-package actually causes issues because it can reset the NLog.config-file on application-publish (Same story can also seen on the nuget-package-page)
Just replace it with NLog-nuget-package, if you don't have it installed already.
This is just odd.
I'm getting a build error in ServiceStack.Text after just bringing down the latest build from GitHub.
if (endpointUrl.IsNullOrEmpty() || !endpointUrl.StartsWith("http"))
return null;
Error 1 No overload for method 'IsNullOrEmpty' takes 0 arguments
ServiceStack\src\ServiceStack.Common\Messaging\ClientFactory.cs 10 18
ServiceStack.Common
I'm also getting bunch of other build errors:
Error 35 'int' does not contain a definition for 'Times' and no extension method 'Times' accepting a first argument of type 'int' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) ServiceStack.Redis\src\ServiceStack.Redis\Messaging\RedisMqServer.cs 192 37 ServiceStack.Redis
and after downloading the ServiceStack branch, I even tried opening ServiceStack-master\src\ServiceStack.sln and tried to build and it's totally broken:
I don't know what's going on here, there can't possibly be this many build errors if any right? I pray not but it seems as such.
Purpose of this post, what I'm asking about and need help clarifying and resolving (mythz???)
I need input from ServiceStack here on the following:
1) are the builds really this broken? Am I imagining this?
2) The branch stucture on GitHub is all over the place meaning I'm finding dup project folders all over and I do not know what this ServiceStack branch is as in it's src folder has a ton of projects there, different versions, as well as doesn't have projects like ServiceStack.Text, etc. so I don't know what's going on here. I want to use the basic core of service stack but there's like repeated stuff everywhere overall on GitHub. I need ServiceStack to clear all this up for me.
Here is my code, so you can see for yourself, it doesn't build.
This one won't build in terms of the ServiceStack projects - it's my solution in which I'm simply trying to include the ServiceStack projects I need along with my own projects that are using ServiceSTack. All I did was downoad those individual projects from https://github.com/ServiceStack then added them to my solution and made sure that any references to each other were now Project references, no longer binary..I removed the binary refs and readded them as project refs. So for example ServiceStack.Common depends on ServiceStack.Text but it was referencing it via binary so I removed it and readded the reference to ServiceStack.Text as a project ref now because in the end we plan on being able to look at and work with the base Stack code. The errors I posted above are happening in this Solution for ServiceStack related projects.
This one won't build - it's a download of the ServiceStack branch master (originally folder name is ServiceStack-master, I removed the -master)
UPDATE: yes I confirmed it's a bad build checked in on the GitHub site (refering to the ServiceStack branch master right above here). I had to remove unused using statements that were causing the build to fail and one of these was a dup using statement causing part of the build failure. I am surprised at this...this stuff should build and people should be checking in code that BUILDS successfully! common! Yes mythz, any dev trying to consume your API would be pissed that there are so many build erros all the time, I can't even get our protype going because this is not the only solution that won't build. First we had the Examples solution all breaking and now the core. I'm willing to fix these if I can but I honestly can't believe it's been a mountain to try to even use this API because of these checked in builds that are failing.
This one Will build because it was Nuget down, so ServiceStack is referencing other layers via binary references in the lib folder so this builds...probably builds here because someone has a working set of builds across all core projects but the stuff on the site for download is not the same revision and broken when you try to use them as project references (source code)?? Just my conclusion as it's only building IF you are using binary references to the lib folder. We want the source, not the binaries to work inside our solution so this is a brick wall for me
There are a lot of big changes happening on master right now - it will be unstable for a while.
I suggest you branch from the v3-fixes tag or pull the references from nuget.
#CoffeeAddict
Yesterday, the mythz answered about these problems in your previous question
"#CoffeeAddict like I said before, ServiceStack's is undergoing significant re-factoring and master in alpha and not for public use. While everything still builds for me and tests still pass in CI, it will be frequently unstable until its in beta. You're likely mixing v3 with v4 dlls which are technically incompatible. The release on NuGet is off the v3 branches of each project, that's what you should checkout if you want to build from src. Any contribs should be done to v3-fixes only - see Contributing docs for more info. – mythz 9 hours ago"
well looks like when I had downloaded all the stack branches, at the time earlier today contributors had checked in broken builds. Fabulous.
I just got latest early this morning, and appears people must have fixed the build and checked some stuff back in for various core projects. Now it builds.
Suggestion to mythz, get CI in place NOW. Don't wait for v4. This cost me a freakin day of trying various things to get this stuff to build and the problems were across several projects. This shouldn't happen, setup CI please. It's 2am and nobody using this project should have to deal with it.
I will contribute but first I had to get a full build to work! Not too happy as no dev would be wasting an entire day getting ServiceStack to build.
To compile v3:
Would someone with true knowledge post PROPER instructions on compiling v4 or v3? I had no luck with the build.bat files for v3 or v4, and opening solutions will not compile for most.
git clone servicestack, servicestack.text, redis, ormlite
make a new directory and copy from under src so you have these:
ServiceStack
ServiceStack.Client
ServiceStack.Common
ServiceStack.Interfaces
ServiceStack.OrmLite
ServiceStack.Redis
ServiceStack.Server
ServiceStack.Text
open csproj for ServiceStack.Interfaces ... right click properties, go to the signing tab, click the combo, new, type in your own signing pfx, I used servicestackInterfaces.pfx (doesn't matter) and make up a password.
Compiles fine, since it has not much referenced.
saved solution as ServiceStackV3 in folder C:\2015\SSv3compile
add csproj ServiceStack.Text, set signature, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.Common, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.Client, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for client, common, interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.OrmLite, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for common, interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.Redis, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for common, interface, text, compiles ok
add csproj ServiceStack.ServiceStack.Server, set signature, remove references, add references using solution for Servicestack, ServiceStack.Client, ServiceStack.Common, ServiceStack.Interface, ServiceStack.Text, ServiceStack.Ormlite, ServiceStack.Redis
compiles ok
have some more trouble compiling the tests...
and finding so many tweaks and changes which are for me maddening to find
(endless agentransack searching for "namespace ISomethinMissing" in *.cs
... there seems to be namespace ServiceStack with cs code contained in projects other than Servicestack...
isn't that VERY improper? (now you require both DLLs? why not one?)
whatever...its free and works for what I wanted.
looks like there is some code leakage from v4...
after getting my head around v3, not sure I want to buy v4 - I will probably buy it in the future, I expect, and hope someday I can just clone and compile from the solution
ANyway, I love servicestack and have been
replacing old webservices
and the config nightmares of WCF with great happiness...
I say it is well worth the initial hassle.
I put this all in code block because I found the editor wouldn't accept this simple text when it was in a numbered list. whatever.
I am trying to implement validation and in reading:
https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/Validation
I see this method being used. It doesn't seem to be on the Funq container, what am I missing?
//This method scans the assembly for validators
container.RegisterValidators(typeof(UserValidator).Assembly);
If you think a method is missing in ServiceStack it's most likely an extension method. RegisterValidators() is an extension method in the ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Validation namespace.
You should consider using ReSharper as there as it eliminates a whole class of issues with C# development including locating methods, auto including namespaces, auto referencing of dlls, etc.
Otherwise if for some reason you want to continue without ReSharper you can use the T short-cut looking in the ServiceStack GitHub Repo which helps find files, otherwise use Ctrl+Shift+F to do a solution-wide text search in a local fork of ServiceStack.
I have a fairly stable server application version that's been deployed for nearly a year at dozens of customers.
One new customer recently setup the application and is getting the following error:
System.MethodAccessException: Attempt by security transparent method
[SomeMethod] to access security critical method [SomeOtherMethod]
failed.
Both SomeMethod and SomeOtherMethod are methods in assemblies that I wrote, that are built against .NET 4, and that are running inside a Windows Service. If it makes a difference, SomeOtherMethod does reference a type from a 3rd party assembly (EntLib 4.1) built against .NET 2.0. Looking at the code for EntLib 4.1, I do see that they use both SecurityTransparent and APTC attributes, but this has never caused issues at other clients.
These assemblies were upgraded from the .NET 2.0 CLR, but a long time ago. This exact code is running on other customers just fine, and I'm not explicitly using the APTC attribute nor am I using the SecurityCritical attribute anywhere.
This leads me to the conclusion that it's a configuration issue or perhaps .NET Framework patch issue. Has there been a patch released for .NET that would cause this breaking change? Is there a configuration setting some where that enforces this type of check which is off by default but that my customer may have enabled?
One last point. My service utilizes SSRS RDLCs to generate PDFs. Due to some changes in .NET 4, I must force the service to use the legacy security policy via the following config:
<runtime>
<NetFx40_LegacySecurityPolicy enabled="true" />
</runtime>
For more details on why I need to do this, see this stackoverflow post: Very High Memory Usage in .NET 4.0
The important point is that I do this at all my other customers as well. Only this one customer is having issues.
Sigh, the patterns and practices employed by the Microsoft Patterns And Practices team that's responsible for the Enterprise libraries are pretty deplorable. Well, the exception is accurate, you cannot call a method that's decorated as "I'll definitely check security" from code that's decorated with "Meh, I won't check security so don't bother burning the cpu cycles to check it". Which scales about as well as exception specifications as used in Java. CAS is incredibly useful, but diagnosing the exceptions is a major headache and often involves code that you don't own and can't fix. Big reason it got deprecated in .NET 4.
Editorial done. Taking a pot-shot at the problem, you need to find out why CAS is being enforced here. The simplest explanation for that is that the service doesn't run in full trust. The simplest explanation for that is that the client didn't install the service on the local hard drive. Or is generally running code in don't-trust-it mode even on local assemblies, a very paranoid admin could well prefer that. That needs to be configured with Caspol.exe, a tool whose command line options are as mysterious as CAS. Pot-shooting at the non-trusted location explanation, your client needs to run Caspol as shown in this blog post. Or just simply deploy the service locally so the default "I trust thee" applies.
Editing in the real reason as discovered by the OP: beware of the alternate data stream that gets added to a file when it is downloaded from an untrusted Internet or network location. The file will get a stream named "Zone.Identifier" that keeps track of where it came from with the "ZoneId" value. It is that value that overrides the trust derived from the storage location. Usually putting it in the Internet zone. Use Explorer, right-click the file and click "Unblock" to remove that stream. After you're sure you can trust the file :)
I was facing the similar issue while running the downloaded WCF sample from http://www.idesign.net/ while using their ServiceModelEx library.
I commented out the below line in AssemblyInfo.cs in ServiceModelEx project
//[assembly: AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers]
and it worked for me.
In case it helps others i post my solution for this issue:
1) On the AssemblyInfo.cs, removed/commented the [assembly: SecurityTransparent] line.
2) The Class and the Method that does the actual Job was marked as [SecuritySafeCritical], in my case establishing a Network Connection:
[SecuritySafeCritical]
public class NetworkConnection : IDisposable
{
[SecuritySafeCritical]
public NetworkConnection(string networkName, NetworkCredential credentials)
{
.............
}
}
3) The Caller Class and Method was market as [SecurityCritical]:
[SecurityCritical]
public class DBF_DAO : AbstractDAO
{
[SecurityCritical]
public bool DBF_EsAccesoExclusivo(string pTabla, ref ArrayList exepciones)
{
....
using (new NetworkConnection(DBF_PATH, readCredentials))
{
....
}
}
}
In my case it was an issue when I managed a NuGet packages in the solution some package overrides System.Web.Mvc assembly version binding in main web site project. Set back to 4.0.0.0 (I had 5.0 installed). I didn't change notice the change because Mvc v4.0 was installed and accessible via GAC. Set back
I am experimenting with ServiceStack's JSON engine. I grabbed the MonoTouch binary build, v2.20. Works fine from simulator, but from the iOS device (iPad2, iOS5) I get an exception thrown by the type initializer for JsonWriter (and not much other than that). I am using MonoTouch 5, MonoDevelop 2.8.1, and targeting iOS 5. I have disabled library linking because I am getting an error when enabled.
I created a sample and uploaded to https://github.com/t9mike/ServiceStack-JSON1.
I'm trying to determine whether the issue is my compilation options, Service Stack, or MonoTouch. Thanks in advance.
A quick partial answer that might help:
I have disabled library linking because I am getting an error when enabled.
The current (5.0) managed linker can eliminate some unused (from a static analysis point of view) code from your application. This generally occurs when using Link all option, i.e. where user code gets processed by the linker.
One alternative is using the Link SDK assemblies only that won't touch the user code (only the code shipped with MonoTouch itself will be processed by the linker).
Another alternative is adding [Preserve] attributes on your code to ensure the serializer requirements are still met after the linker has processed your code. More information about the linker and [Preserve] attributes can be found here.
The next (5.2) release of MonoTouch will include a bit more sophisticated step in the linker to ensure the basic XML serialization and DataContract requirements are not broken. Not sure if this will solve this specific case (ServiceStack JSON) but I'll have a look into it.
As for the rest of your question I'll try to build this myself and duplicate your issue.
I ended up grabbing the ServiceStack.Text sources from GitHub, version 3.0.3. I created a new MonoTouch library project. I had to tweak ServiceStack.Text/JsConfig.cs slightly to conditionalize away the System.Drawing.Color bits. I'll send a patch and MT csproj to the authors.
After using this new assembly, my sample MT app ran fine on the device. I have updated my sample at https://github.com/t9mike/ServiceStack-JSON1 with the new ServiceStack.Text dll.