I'm trying to install secure module in playframework, I tried with http://www.playframework.org/documentation/1.2.2/secure but Secure.class isn't found
import models.Task;
import play.mvc.Controller;
import play.mvc.With;
public class Application extends Controller {
#With(Secure.class)
public static void index() {
Please any help please
You have to add the module in the conf/dependencies.yml
It should look lie that :
# Application dependencies
require:
- play
- secure
Then you have to type the following command
play dependencies your_play_app
I have the following in dependencies.yml:
require:
- play -> secure
And I believe you have to protect the whole controller, using #With(Secure.class) before the class definition:
#With(Secure.class)
public class Application extends Controller {
...
}
As above, and if you're using Eclipse make sure you run play eclipsify to bring the Secure module (and it's classes) into your project.
Add the following dependency in your conf/dependencies.yml
require:
- play -> secure
Then, use the commands to install secure module
play dpes
If you use eclipse, remember the use the command after "play deps" command
play ec
This command will make the module visible in your eclipse
Related
I have an existing groovy micronaut app I'm trying to change where it loads its config from. I don't understand what code to write so I can set the location of the micronaut configuration. I know you can use micronaut.config.files system variable or MICRONAUT_CONFIG_FILES environment variable, but this is a terrible idea because micronaut is built into grails and therefore every grails app you have running in tomcat will pick up the same config and crash.
Nor do I know where in the code to set the config file. There's an Application class with a run() method, but I don't know if this is only called during development, or whether it gets called when deploying in Tomcat. When setting the config in a Grails app, there is an Application class extending EnvironmentAware, and you can override setEnvironment, and load external configs there, but there is no hint of that for micronaut apps.
The micronaut doco says it can load a configuration from "application.{extension}", but it doesn't say what "application" is, or what directory it expects that in, or whether you can change the directory. Is "application" the value of micronaut.application.name in one's application.yml? I couldn't seem to get it to load based on that.
Then the documentation talks about loading from a PropertySource, which is fine and all, but doesn't tell you where you can put that code to load from a PropertySource. There is mention you can pass the PropertySource to ApplicationContext.run(xx), but in this app I inherited, there is no mention of ApplicationContext, and the micronaut documentation isn't very clear what I'm supposed to do with ApplicationContext. This app I've inherited has an Application class with a main() calling Micronaut.run() which apparently returns an ApplicationContext, but it's not clear if main() is called when running in Tomcat, or whether I should be calling run() on that, when it works as is, and I'm just trying to change where it loads its config.
The question is, how do I get my micronaut app to load its config from
where I tell it to, and not from micronaut.config.file system variable
location.
I don't think we have a specific feature in the framework that allows you to tell the framework to ignore micronaut.config.files. If you would like such a feature you can request it at https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/issues. If that is of interest I suggest you open it up for discussion at https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/discussions first.
You can load external config files, from a path not set as micronaut.config.files, in the main method of the Application class before running the application. Take a look at below class which accepts a config folder location as a system property demo.config.path(can be something else) and loads yaml config files from that folder:
import java.io.IOException;
import java.nio.file.Files;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import io.micronaut.context.env.PropertySource;
import io.micronaut.context.env.yaml.YamlPropertySourceLoader;
import io.micronaut.core.io.ResourceLoader;
import io.micronaut.core.io.file.DefaultFileSystemResourceLoader;
import io.micronaut.runtime.Micronaut;
public class Application {
private static final String PROP_CONFIG_LOCATION = "demo.config.path";
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
if (System.getProperty(PROP_CONFIG_LOCATION) != null) {
List<PropertySource> propertySources = new ArrayList<>();
YamlPropertySourceLoader propertySourceLoader = new YamlPropertySourceLoader();
ResourceLoader resourceLoader = new DefaultFileSystemResourceLoader();
Files.newDirectoryStream(Paths.get(System.getProperty(PROP_CONFIG_LOCATION))).forEach(file -> {
String fileName = file.toString();
String fileNameWithoutExtension = fileName.substring(0, fileName.lastIndexOf('.'));
propertySourceLoader.load(fileNameWithoutExtension, resourceLoader).ifPresent(propertySources::add);
});
Micronaut.build(args)
.classes(Application.class)
.propertySources(propertySources.toArray(new PropertySource[1]))
.start();
} else {
Micronaut.run(Application.class, args);
}
}
}
As is, this code works for yaml config files(with snakeyaml in classpath). With minor changes, it can be made to work for properties files and to read config location from environment variable instead of system property. Full sample application present in github
Hey everyone I have been building an Angular app that is using Universal with SSR for a while not and every so often I would include a module that would cause the server to fail silently and never knew why, last night I figured out it was because the module I tried to include (ngx-editor) does not support Universal.
Is there a way for me to include a module such as ngx-editor that does not support Universal in my application? Or do I have to find one that supports Universal?
Thanks a lot in advance.
You could try not calling this module's components depending on the platform, e.g. by checking the platform dynamically in your code ( https://angular.io/api/common/isPlatformBrowser)
import {isPlatformBrowser} from "#angular/common";
//...
constructor(#Inject(PLATFORM_ID) private platformId: Object)
{
if(isPlatformBrowser(this.platformId))
{
//call module's methods/components...
}
else { /*server side*/ }
}
You may also need to modify your server module (app.server.module.ts) to not include modules that do not support angular-universal
The following code is snipped from the examples at docs.asp.net.
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// Setup options with DI
services.AddOptions();
// Configure MyOptions using config
services.Configure<MyOptions>(Configuration);
// Configure MyOptions using code
services.Configure<MyOptions>(myOptions =>
{
myOptions.Option1 = "value1_from_action";
});
The call to services.Configure<MyOptions>(Configuration);
causes a compilation error:
cannot convert from 'Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.IConfigurationRoot' to 'System.Action'
Manually setting up the options works fine. Am I missing something really obvious here?
I had the same problem and I found out you need to add this extension to your project :
Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions
You need to add the following nuget package to your ASP Core Project if you want to configure the strongly typed config in that way.
Microsoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions
The extension methods contained in the package will allow you to configure the strongly typed configuration the way you want to and the way most tutorials show.
services.Configure<MyOptions>(Configuration);
Alternatively, you could add another binder package:
Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder
Configuration would then look something like this:
services.AddOptions();
services.Configure<MyOptions>(x => Configuration.Bind(x));
This is the downside of having so many modular packaged up extensions. It gets easy to lose track of where functionality exists.
I am trying to create a web setup for my web site, and I want to use an installer class to do some custom stuff. I am using VS 2010, and the web site and installer is .NET 3.5.
I have added reference to the installer class project output in the Install section under Custom Actions:
I have also set /targetdir="[TARGETDIR]/" on the CustomActionData for this action.
The InstallScript project is a standard class library (dll).
There is a public class that inherits from Installer class. It overrides the Install method as I have seen been done in several online examples:
using System.Collections;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace InstallScript
{
public class MyWebInstaller : System.Configuration.Install.Installer
{
public override void Install(IDictionary stateSaver)
{
base.Install(stateSaver);
var targetDir = Context.Parameters["targetdir"];
if(targetDir==null) targetDir = "No TARGETDIR!";
MessageBox.Show("TARGETDIR:\t" + targetDir);
}
}
}
I would think there should be shown a message box here som time during the install, but it seems like it is never called. No error is shown either. The setup just runs through as if this code was never called.
Anyone have idea of what is wrong?
OK, I found out what was missing.
You need to specify the class with the class attribute RunInstaller(true) for the setup to pick up and actually run the code.
So the class needs to be declared like this:
[System.ComponentModel.RunInstaller(true)]
public class MyWebInstaller : System.Configuration.Install.Installer
{
...
I'm very new to Orchard CMS and I have started writing my first module. I've been looking for a way to detect when my module has been initialized from the root website but have had no luck!
A colleague suggested using WebActivator and the PreApplicationStartMethod attribute to configure a method to be called on start up but this did not work.
Has anybody managed to accomplish this, is there an interface provided by orchard like IModule that will allow me to hook into module initialization?
There are two event handlers that might interest you. IFeatureEventHandler and IOrchardShellEvents. The IFeatureEventHandler interface gives you hooks for modules enabling, disabling, installing, and uninstalling. The IOrchardShellEvents interface provides hooks for the activation and termination of the Orchard Shell. Something in there should do the trick for you!
You shouldn't mix up Autofac's and Orchard's modules.
To execute some code when Orchard's module starts you need to implement IOrchardShellEvents interface (Activated method). Also don't forget to register your implementation in Autofac:
public class MyModule : Module
{
protected override void Load(ContainerBuilder builder)
{
builder.RegisterType<Bootstrapper>().As<IOrchardShellEvents>().InstancePerLifetimeScope();
}
}
Solved! Implement an Autofac.Module and override the Load(ContainerBuilder) method!
using Autofac;
public class MyModule : Module
{
protected override void Load(ContainerBuilder builder)
{
// Module initialization here!
}
}