I experienced a (for me) strange behaviour today: Using QMake with the PkgConfig-options etc. I was able to link the opencv libraries, but then I switched to CMake using PkgConfig. Once I tried to build my software, the linker complained that it was not able to find the library libcvaux, which pkg-config returns asked to deliver the libraries for opencv (pkg-config --libs opencv).
In /usr/lib I found a libcvaux.so.{version}, but no "plain" entry libcvaux.so. So what I did was to create a symlink, and now it works.
Now I wonder why it worked before. Is there something to pass ld an option saying "use the newest version, and you get the version by looking at the numbers behind the so suffix"? Or is it more some kind of bug that the maintainers of the opencv package forgot to add this symlink? Because e.g. libcv or libhighgui have such symbolic links.
Thank you!
From the ldconfig manpage:
ldconfig checks the header and file
names of the libraries it encounters
when determining which versions should
have their links updated.
Maybe an earlier ldconfig run deleted the link.
Related
If you have an answer for this, or further information, I'd welcome it. I'm following advice from here, to offer some unsolicited help by posting this question then an answer I've already found for it.
I have a bare-metal ARM board for which I'm building a cross-toolchain, from sources for GNU binutils, gcc and gdb, and for SourceWare's Newlib. I got those four working and cross-built a DoNothing.c into an ELF file - but I couldn't disassemble it with this:
$ arm-none-eabi-objdump -S DoNothing.elf
The error was:
$ arm-none-eabi-objdump: error while loading shared libraries: libdebuginfod.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I'll follow up with a solution.
The error was correct - my system didn't have libdebuginfod.so.1 installed - but I have another cross-binutils, installed from binary for a different target, and its objdump -S works fine on the same host. Why would one build of objdump complain about missing that shared library, when clearly not all builds of objdump need it?
First I tried rebuilding cross binutils, specifying --without-debuginfod as a configure option. No change, which seems odd: surely that should build tools that not only don't use debuginfod but which don't depend on it in any way. (If someone can answer that, or point out what I've misunderstood, it may help people.)
Next I figured debuginfod was inescapable (for my cross-tools built from source at least), so I'd install it to get rid of the error. It's a component of the elfutils package, but installing the latest elfutils available for my Ubuntu 20.04 system didn't bring libdebuginfod.so.1 with it.
I found a later one, for Arch Linux, whose package contents suggested it would - but its package format doesn't match Ubuntu's and installing it was going to involve a lot of work. Instead I opted to build it from the Arch Linux source package. However, running ./configure on that gave a couple of infuriatingly similar errors:
configure: checking libdebuginfod dependencies, --disable-libdebuginfod or --enable-libdebuginfo=dummy to skip
...
configure: error: dependencies not found, use --disable-libdebuginfod to disable or --enable-libdebuginfod=dummy to build a (bootstrap) dummy library.
No combination of those suggestions would allow configure for elfutils-0.182 to run to completion.
The problem of course was my own lack of understanding. The solution came from the Linux From Scratch project: what worked was to issue configure with both of the suggested options, like this:
$ ./configure --prefix=/usr \
--disable-debuginfod \
--enable-libdebuginfod=dummy \
--libdir=/lib
That gave a clean configure; make worked first time, as did make check and then sudo make install which of course installed libdebuginfod.so.1 as required. I then had an arm-none-eabi-objdump which disassembles cross-compiled ELF files without complaining.
Recently I was trying to install llvm-general-3.5.1.0 package.. for about a week. Basically I am getting this error: link. My situation is identical. Windows 10, ghc 7.10.2, cabal 1.22.4.0. I installed llvm 3.5.2 from sources with cmake and everything went fine. In llvm/lib directory I have *.lib files (eg. LLVMAnalysis.lib).
But somehow cabal can't see those libraries and gives this frustrating error:
Configuring llvm-general-3.5.1.0...
setup.exe: Missing dependencies on foreign libraries:
* Missing C libraries: LLVMLTO, LLVMObjCARCOpts, LLVMLinker, LLVMipo,
LLVMVectorize, LLVMBitWriter, LLVMCppBackendCodeGen, LLVMCppBackendInfo,
LLVMTableGen, LLVMDebugInfo, LLVMOption, LLVMX86Disassembler,
LLVMX86AsmParser, LLVMX86CodeGen, LLVMSelectionDAG, LLVMAsmPrinter,
LLVMX86Desc, LLVMX86Info, LLVMX86AsmPrinter, LLVMX86Utils, LLVMJIT,
LLVMIRReader, LLVMAsmParser, LLVMLineEditor, LLVMMCAnalysis,
LLVMMCDisassembler, LLVMInstrumentation, LLVMInterpreter, LLVMCodeGen,
LLVMScalarOpts, LLVMInstCombine, LLVMTransformUtils, LLVMipa, LLVMAnalysis,
LLVMProfileData, LLVMMCJIT, LLVMTarget, LLVMRuntimeDyld, LLVMObject,
LLVMMCParser, LLVMBitReader, LLVMExecutionEngine, LLVMMC, LLVMCore,
LLVMSupport
This problem can usually be solved by installing the system packages that
provide these libraries (you may need the "-dev" versions). If the libraries
are already installed but in a non-standard location then you can use the
flags --extra-include-dirs= and --extra-lib-dirs= to specify where they are.
I really want to use this package on my Windows, but nothing seems to work (I tried everything like --extra-lib-dirs and compiled also with MinGW and VS - the same problem).
I can't accept the fact that it won't install. I mean, there must be some way to fix Setup.hs from this cabal package or something. Does anyone have an idea what can be wrong with cabal in this case and how can I try to workaround this? I don't know how exactly cabal works, maybe someone with this knowledge will have an idea? Or maybe there is a way to do this without cabal?
Ok, i've managed to build it and, i think, found the root of the issue.
First, steps to build:
Get the MinGW. My installation of MinGW has gcc 4.8.
Get 32-bit MinGHC.
Compile LLVM 3.5 with MinGW's gcc and install it somewhere.
Copy contents of MinGW installation directory into MinGHC Install
Dir\ghc-7.10.2\mingw, replacing conflict files.
In the command line set your PATH so it has haskell toolset from
MinGHC (i recommend using switch .bat scripts) and llvm-config.exe.
Get the llvm-general package source either using cabal fetch or
downloading via browser from hackage.
Replace cc-options: -std=c++11 line of llvm-general.cabal with
cc-options: -std=gnu++11.
Finally, cabal configure and cabal build should work.
I have been changing my build environment many times, so if this doesn't work for you let me know, i probably forgot something.
Now let's go into details.
What we thought is a bug of cabal is not, actually. The problem is that both stack and MinGHC (and Haskell Platform, i guess) use quite old gcc - 4.6. This gcc has even two defects:
It doesn't support -std=c++11 and LLVM 3.5 can't be built using it.
As a consequence, this gcc can't be used by ghc when compiling
llvm-general, because it can't parse LLVM headers properly.
Even if it could, its linker can't link against LLVM libs compiled by
MinGW using gcc 4.8. This is why cabal was telling you it
couldn't find LLVM libs. I've hacked Setup.hs so that it wouldn't
look for these libs, but pass -lLLVMSomething to linker via -pgml
ghc option. This lead to clear error message:
ld.exe: ignoring libLLVMSupport.a ...
ld.exe: can't find -lLLVMSupport
So, the cabal was actually finding these libs, but was dropping them because they couldn't be linked to.
Ideally, the solution would be to update mingw distribution used by stack/MinGHC. But as a workaround you can just replace old gcc with new one.
Finally, -std=gnu++11 is used because current MinGW release is affected by this bug, which prevents compilation of c++ bits of the package. Whew, that was a long way.
I'm attempting to compile a relatively simple Fortran executable so that it can be passed around to other Windows users that don't have Cygwin (or something of the sort) installed, however, I'm unable to get the executable to operate as a standalone. I've tried gfortran -static file.f and gfortran -static-libgfortran file.f, however other users always encounter this error:
The program can’t start because cygwin1.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem.
From what I've read online (e.g. here), the -static option should be sufficient. I have verified that running the executable from my machine (DOS prompt) does work.
I have gcc (gfortran) version 4.7.3. I should also point out this is my first attempt at compiling portable Fortran.
Update
After realizing that this isn't a gfortran-specific issue (thanks to replies here), searches led me to related posts here and here
This is partially explained in the Cygwin FAQ. The solution is to install the mingw64-i686-gcc-fortran package with its dependencies, and cross-compile your code with i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran -static.
Just package the cygwin1.dll along with your binary file (both in the same folder) then it will run just fine.
I am trying to use libfann version 2.0.1 instead of the newest version 2.2.0, but could not figure out how to do so. Any thoughts on how to do that?
normally that works perfectly:
gcc fann_calculator.c -o run_fann_calculator -lfann -lm
where fann_calculator.c contains a program that calls a neural network.
Thanks
It depends upon where the two libraries sit. If they are installed in the same directory (e.g. both installed in /usr/lib/) you'll probably get the youngest one.
I suggest to carefully read the ld.so(8) and ldd(1) man pages. You certainly can trace what library is loaded (with e.g. the LD_DEBUG envirnonment variable). Don't forget to re-run ldconfig appropriately after library installation.
You could also play some LD_LIBRARY_PATH trick; for instance, set it to $HOME/lib:/usr/lib and install appropriate symlinks in your $HOME/lib/ to the precise library you want. For instance, you might do
ln -s /usr/lib/libfann.so.2.0.1 $HOME/lib/libfann.so.2
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$HOME/lib:/usr/lib:/lib
then check with ldd run_fann_calculator that you get the expected [version of the] libfann library.
Don't forget to read the Program Library Howto. You might want to pass appropriate flags to ld such as -rpath. You may need to pass them using gcc, perhaps with Gcc Link Options such as -Wl
I'm trying to compile/link a very old piece of software on a linux system and I can't for some reason link with a shared library that's installed on my system.
I get the following error from the linker:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXaw
However, the lib itself is installed. If I run
ldconfig -v | grep libXaw
I get (among other things) this hit:
libXaw.so.7 -> libXaw7.so.7.0.0
The library and the links to it are in /usr/lib btw. So nothing special.
So the library is there and ldconfig finds it. What could ld cause ld from not finding the library during link-time? As you may have already guessed I'm quite new to the shared library stuff.
Any ideas?
The linker may be looking, literally, for "libXaw.so". Is that in /usr/lib? If not, you could try adding it as another soft link from libXaw7.so.7.0.0.
The reason for the symlink btw is to select the default version to link against in the case of multiple versions, keep in mind the name of the library is integrated into the binary. (which you can see with ldd).
Are the -L library directories being overridden, and it's not looking in /usr/lib?
To link it, you need the .a file, NOT the .so file, which is the runtime library. The shared object is only useful to a program already linked against the non-shared parts of a library. This is typically distributed in a ".a" file.