This is my Shellscript
echo "IsInteractive"
read IsInteractive
if [ "$IsInteractive" == "true" ]; then
echo "Name"
read name
echo "Password"
read password
if [ "$name" == "abcd" & "$password" == "pwd" ]; then
echo "correct username and password"
else
echo "wrong username or password"
fi
elif [ "$IsInteractive" == "false" ]; then
echo "Everything working fine.But no logic given yet"
else
echo "Give proper input"
fi
Is there something wrong in the 2nd if-condition?I tried putting && in the condition,but didn't work
You don't use multiple condition inside square brackets as &, you use -a. Or you use multiple brackets if [ $a = "a" ] && [ $b = "c" ]
You can also use the case/esac construct , eg
case "$name$password" in
"abcdpwd" ) echo "correct" ;;
*) echo "not correct";;
esac
This is much cleaner than if/else IMO.
Inside square brackets -a is the equivalent to &&
Also, you should probably be using = not ==. Read the manpage for your shell.
if [ "$name" == "abcd" -a "$password" == "pwd" ]; then echo true; else echo false; fi
This and MANY more "basic" questions can be answered quickly and without the need for a forum-post with the command man bash on most systems; and if it's not there just google "man bash" and pick the one which seems closest to your system... they're all "pretty much the same", especially at the basic level.
Cheers. Keith.
EDIT: FWW: the [ ] construct is a short-cut for "test", a function which is built-into all the the "standard" shells (sh, csh, ksh, and bash)... so the following code is EXACTLY equivalent:
$ a=a
$ b=c
$ if test "$a" = "a" && test "$b" = "c"; then echo true; else echo false; fi
true
The if then construct just evaluates the return value from the test function. You can display the return value of your last shell command with $?... but beware, echo also sets $?:
$ true
$ echo $?
0
$ false
$ echo $?
1
$ echo $?
0
The really interesting ramification of that is that the if then construct can evaluate anything which returns success=0=true or failure=anything BUT 0 (typically 1=false)... be that a shell built-in function, a user-defined function, a unix utility or a program you wrote yourself. Hence the following code is roughly equivalent:
$ if echo "$a:$b" | fgrep -s "a:c"; then echo true; else echo false; fi
a:c
true
NOTE: looks like my system's fgrep doesn't accept the -s for silent switch. Sigh.
Note that in above example, where the output from echo is being piped to the standard fgrep utility, it is the return value of fgrep (the LAST command to be invoked) which is evaluated by if then.
Good luck, and may root be with you. Cheers again. Keith.
A minor change will resolve this scripting error [: missing `]'.
At line 8 replace '&' with '-a'
-a, the logical AND. If both the operands are true then condition would be true otherwise it would be false
Working code below
echo "IsInteractive"
read IsInteractive
if [ "$IsInteractive" == "true" ]; then
echo "Name"
read name
echo "Password"
read password
if [ "$name" == "abcd" -a "$password" == "pwd" ]; then
echo "correct username and password"
else
echo "wrong username or password"
fi
elif [ "$IsInteractive" == "false" ]; then
echo "Everything working fine.But no logic given yet"
else
echo "Give proper input"
fi
Related
So I am learning bash and wanted to make a script to 'automate' a collection of kali tools. Basically I do not understand why the if statement code is being triggered regardless if condition is true or false.
#!/bin/bash
#requires root or sudo priv
#check for a successful ping
target_ip=$1
nmap_opt = " "
#nmap options variables --
nmap_os="-O"
nmap_version="-sV"
nmap_udp="-sU"
nmap_stealth="-sS"
nmap_aggr="-A"
nmap_option_input_temp=""
ping $target_ip -c 5
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "successful ping on" $target_ip
else
echo "ping unsuccessful, check VPN connection or host may be down"
exit 1
fi
read -p "enter pathway for nmap output: " nmap_file
read -p "detect os? (y/n) " nmap_option_input_temp
#add loops for y/n user input
if [[ ${nmap_option_input_temp} -eq "y" ]];
then
nmap_opt="${nmap_opt} ${nmap_os}"
elif [[ ${nmap_option_input_temp} -eq "n" ]];
then
nmap_opt=$nmap_opt
else
echo "invalid option"
fi
read -p "detect version? (y/n) " nmap_option_input_temp
#add loops for y/n user input
if [[ ${nmap_option_input_temp} -eq "y" ]];
then
nmap_opt="${nmap_opt} ${nmap_version}"
elif [[ ${nmap_option_input_temp} -eq "n" ]];
then
nmap_opt=$nmap_opt
else
echo "invalid option"
fi
echo "nmap selected option/s:" $nmap_opt
echo $nmap_option_input_temp
#starting nmap..
sudo nmap $nmap_opt -oN $nmap_file $target_ip
this is the nmap_opt variable echo out even when both inputs are 'n'
nmap selected option/s: -O -sV
Let me know if there is anything I missed in the explanation!
-eq is for integer comparisons. Use ==:
if [[ "${nmap_option_input_temp}" == y ]];
And fix your quotes. Fixed strings like y don't need to be quoted. Inside [[, variables don't need to be quoted, but IMO you should quote them anyway for consistency.
This error would be more easily spotted if you used the more conventional:
if [ "${nmap_option_input_temp}" -eq y ]; # Still incorrect!!
since you would get a nice error message.
Note that the fix with [ is slightly different, and you should use a single =:
if [ "${nmap_option_input_temp}" = y ];
The == operator is a bashism which does not really add any value. But really, you should not be using if/elif at all here. This is the perfect place for a case statement:
case "${nmap_option_input_temp}" in
y) nmap_opt="${nmap_opt} ${nmap_os}";;
n) ;;
*) echo "invalid option" >&2 ;;
esac
I wrote this shell code, but it doesn't get the good output.
Even though the $csoport gets the "...: No such user" output, id doesn't echoes the following line I wrote there.
read felhasznalo
while [ "$felhasznalo" != "exit" ]
do
csoport=`groups $felhasznalo`
echo "$csoport"
if [[ "$csoport" == *": No such user"* ]] ; then
echo -n "Nincs ilyen felhasznalo a rendszerben"
else
echo "$csoport"
fi
echo -n "Felhasznalo: "
read felhasznalo
done
You shouldn't try to match the error messsage since you only care if groups fails. You ought to do:
if ! csoport=$(groups "$felhasznalo"); then
printf "Nincs ilyen felhasznalo a rendszerben"
else
echo "$csoport"
fi
May be a novice question but anyways in my intro to linux/unix class were touching on bash scripting and in one of the problems I got the it tasked me with making a script so if the user searched to a name in a file that wasn't there it would output a messaged saying 'your_input is not in the directory'
It says to use if statements and the exit status $?.
So far I got the input portion but I'm not sure how to properly use the $? in a if statement if its possible.
#!/bin/bash
name=$1
if [ "$name" = "" ]
then echo -n "Enter a name to search for: "
read name
fi
grep -i $name ~uli101/2014c/phonebook
if [ "$?" < "0" ]
then echo "error"
fi
I get the error:
./phone4: line 14: 0: No such file or directory
My question is: How can I use the $? with and if statement, and If I can't, can you explain me how to use the $? in this problem?
Note: I did use echo $? to see how $? gave a 0 if grep worked and a 1 if it didn't.
There's two bugs in it. The one you already see is that in the [] expression, the < is interpreted not as "less than" but as stream redirection operator. The reason is that [ is just another program (an alias for test), so [ "$?" < "0" ] is similar to cat < filename. The other error is that you don't want to check for "less than" but for "not equal". In sum:
if [ "$?" < "0" ]
should be
if [ "$?" -ne "0" ]
Or you could write
if ! grep "$name" ~uli101/2014c/phonebook
...because if interprets a return code of zero as true and everything else as false.
never mind one of my friends pushed me in the right direction:
all I had to do is:
if [ "$?" = "1" ]
then echo "error"
fi
pretty much I was over thinking it, I just needed to say if $? = 1 then error, because in the readings it said $? can be greater then 1 I was trying to compensate for that.
It should be
if [ "$?" -gt 0 ]
The symbol '<' is a redirection operator, and it's not a Python or C - everything in a shell script is a command, including the text after 'if', and you are executing a command named '[' here, you may find it at the location /usr/bin/[, and this command uses -gt and -lt parameters to compare numbers, instead of '>' and '<', which are special shell operators.
You can rewrite this code like this:
if grep -i "$name" ~uli101/2014c/phonebook
then true # 'true' is also a command, which does nothing and returns success
else echo "Error"
fi
or even like this, using '||' operator, which will execute following command only if previous command returned an error:
grep -i "$name" ~uli101/2014c/phonebook || echo "Error"
The "$?" doesn't need quotes, as it is a number really. If you want better script, check on existance of the Phonebook file, and exit before asking the Name input if the file is missing. Also, if you reply nothing (enter only) on the READ command, you may need to do something.
#!/bin/bash
name=$1
phonebook=~/phonebook
if [ "$name" = "" ]
then
echo -n "Enter a name to search for: "
read name
fi
grep -i "$name" $phonebook
if [ $? -gt 0 ]
then
echo "error, no \"$name\" in $phonebook"
fi
I am trying to write a script in bash that check the validity of a user input.
I want to match the input (say variable x) to a list of valid values.
what I have come up with at the moment is:
for item in $list
do
if [ "$x" == "$item" ]; then
echo "In the list"
exit
fi
done
My question is if there is a simpler way to do this,
something like a list.contains(x) for most programming languages.
Say list is:
list="11 22 33"
my code will echo the message only for those values since list is treated as an array and not a string,
all the string manipulations will validate 1 while I would want it to fail.
[[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])$x($|[[:space:]]) ]] && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
or create a function:
contains() {
[[ $1 =~ (^|[[:space:]])$2($|[[:space:]]) ]] && exit(0) || exit(1)
}
to use it:
contains aList anItem
echo $? # 0： match, 1: failed
how about
echo $list | grep -w -q $x
you could either check the output or $? of above line to make the decision.
grep -w checks on whole word patterns. Adding -q prevents echoing the list.
Matvey is right, but you should quote $x and consider any kind of "spaces" (e.g. new line) with
[[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])"$x"($|[[:space:]]) ]] && echo 'yes' || echo 'no'
so, i.e.
# list_include_item "10 11 12" "2"
function list_include_item {
local list="$1"
local item="$2"
if [[ $list =~ (^|[[:space:]])"$item"($|[[:space:]]) ]] ; then
# yes, list include item
result=0
else
result=1
fi
return $result
}
end then
`list_include_item "10 11 12" "12"` && echo "yes" || echo "no"
or
if `list_include_item "10 11 12" "1"` ; then
echo "yes"
else
echo "no"
fi
Note that you must use "" in case of variables:
`list_include_item "$my_list" "$my_item"` && echo "yes" || echo "no"
IMHO easiest solution is to prepend and append the original string with a space and check against a regex with [[ ]]
haystack='foo bar'
needle='bar'
if [[ " $haystack " =~ .*\ $needle\ .* ]]; then
...
fi
this will not be false positive on values with values containing the needle as a substring, e.g. with a haystack foo barbaz.
(The concept is shamelessly stolen form JQuery's hasClass()-Method)
You can use (* wildcards) outside a case statement, too, if you use double brackets:
string='My string';
if [[ $string == *My* ]]
then
echo "It's there!";
fi
If it isn't too long; you can just string them between equality along a logical OR comparison like so.
if [ $ITEM == "item1" -o $ITEM == "item2" -o $ITEM == "item3" ]; then
echo In the list
fi
I had this exact problem and while the above is ugly it is more obvious what is going on than the other generalized solutions.
If your list of values is to be hard-coded in the script, it's fairly simple to test using case. Here's a short example, which you can adapt to your requirements:
for item in $list
do
case "$x" in
item1|item2)
echo "In the list"
;;
not_an_item)
echo "Error" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
If the list is an array variable at runtime, one of the other answers is probably a better fit.
There's a cleaner way to check if string is in the list:
if [[ $my_str = #(str1|str2|str3) ]]; then
echo "string found"
fi
Consider exploiting the keys of associative arrays. I would presume this outperforms both regex/pattern matching and looping, although I haven't profiled it.
declare -A list=( [one]=1 [two]=two [three]='any non-empty value' )
for value in one two three four
do
echo -n "$value is "
# a missing key expands to the null string,
# and we've set each interesting key to a non-empty value
[[ -z "${list[$value]}" ]] && echo -n '*not* '
echo "a member of ( ${!list[*]} )"
done
Output:
one is a member of ( one two three )
two is a member of ( one two three )
three is a member of ( one two three )
four is *not* a member of ( one two three )
If the list is fixed in the script, I like the following the best:
validate() {
grep -F -q -x "$1" <<EOF
item 1
item 2
item 3
EOF
}
Then use validate "$x" to test if $x is allowed.
If you want a one-liner, and don't care about whitespace in item names, you can use this (notice -w instead of -x):
validate() { echo "11 22 33" | grep -F -q -w "$1"; }
Notes:
This is POSIX sh compliant.
validate does not accept substrings (remove the -x option to grep if you want that).
validate interprets its argument as a fixed string, not a regular
expression (remove the -F option to grep if you want that).
Sample code to exercise the function:
for x in "item 1" "item2" "item 3" "3" "*"; do
echo -n "'$x' is "
validate "$x" && echo "valid" || echo "invalid"
done
I find it's easier to use the form echo $LIST | xargs -n1 echo | grep $VALUE as illustrated below:
LIST="ITEM1 ITEM2"
VALUE="ITEM1"
if [ -n "`echo $LIST | xargs -n1 echo | grep -e \"^$VALUE`$\" ]; then
...
fi
This works for a space-separated list, but you could adapt it to any other delimiter (like :) by doing the following:
LIST="ITEM1:ITEM2"
VALUE="ITEM1"
if [ -n "`echo $LIST | sed 's|:|\\n|g' | grep -e \"^$VALUE`$\"`" ]; then
...
fi
Note that the " are required for the test to work.
Thought I'd add my solution to the list.
# Checks if element "$1" is in array "$2"
# #NOTE:
# Be sure that array is passed in the form:
# "${ARR[#]}"
elementIn () {
# shopt -s nocasematch # Can be useful to disable case-matching
local e
for e in "${#:2}"; do [[ "$e" == "$1" ]] && return 0; done
return 1
}
# Usage:
list=(11 22 33)
item=22
if elementIn "$item" "${list[#]}"; then
echo TRUE;
else
echo FALSE
fi
# TRUE
item=44
elementIn $item "${list[#]}" && echo TRUE || echo FALSE
# FALSE
The shell built-in compgen can help here. It can take a list with the -W flag and return any of the potential matches it finds.
# My list can contain spaces so I want to set the internal
# file separator to newline to preserve the original strings.
IFS=$'\n'
# Create a list of acceptable strings.
accept=( 'foo' 'bar' 'foo bar' )
# The string we will check
word='foo'
# compgen will return a list of possible matches of the
# variable 'word' with the best match being first.
compgen -W "${accept[*]}" "$word"
# Returns:
# foo
# foo bar
We can write a function to test if a string equals the best match of acceptable strings. This allows you to return a 0 or 1 for a pass or fail respectively.
function validate {
local IFS=$'\n'
local accept=( 'foo' 'bar' 'foo bar' )
if [ "$1" == "$(compgen -W "${accept[*]}" "$1" | head -1)" ] ; then
return 0
else
return 1
fi
}
Now you can write very clean tests to validate if a string is acceptable.
validate "blah" || echo unacceptable
if validate "foo" ; then
echo acceptable
else
echo unacceptable
fi
Prior answers don't use tr which I found to be useful with grep. Assuming that the items in the list are space delimited, to check for an exact match:
echo $mylist | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -F -x -q "$myitem"
This will return exit code 0 if the item is in the list, or exit code 1 if it isn't.
It's best to use it as a function:
_contains () { # Check if space-separated list $1 contains line $2
echo "$1" | tr ' ' '\n' | grep -F -x -q "$2"
}
mylist="aa bb cc"
# Positive check
if _contains "${mylist}" "${myitem}"; then
echo "in list"
fi
# Negative check
if ! _contains "${mylist}" "${myitem}"; then
echo "not in list"
fi
Late to the show? Following very easy variant was not clearly mentioned yet. I use case for checking simple lists, which is a general Bourne Shell idiom not relying on anything external nor extended:
haystack='a b c'
needle='b'
case " $haystack " in (*" $needle "*) :;; (*) false;; esac
Please note the use of the separator (here: SPC) to correcyly delimit the pattern: At the beginning and end of " $haystack " and likewise in the test of " $needle ".
This statement returns true ($?=0) in case $needle is in $haystack, false otherwise.
Also you can test for more than one $needle very easily. When there are several similar cases like
if (haystack.contains(needle1)) { run1() } elif (haystack.contains(needle2)) { run2() } else { run3() }
you can wrap this into the case, too:
case " $haystack " in (*" $needle1 "*) run1;; (*" $needle2 "*) run2;; (*) run3;; esac
and so on
This also works for all lists with values which do not include the separator itself, like comma:
haystack=' a , b , c '
needle=' b '
case ",$haystack," in (*",$needle,"*) :;; (*) false;; esac
Note that if values can contain anything including the separator sequence (except NUL, as shells do not suport NUL in variables as you cannot pass arguments containing NUL to commands) then you need to use arrays. Arrays are ksh/bashisms and not supported by "ordinary" POSIX/Bourne shells. (You can work around this limitation using $# in POSIX-Shells, but this is something completely different than what was aked here.)
Can the (*) false part be left away?
No, as this is the critical return value. By default case returns true.
Yes if you do not need the return value and put your processing at the location of the :
Why the :;;
We could also write true;;, but I am used to use : instead of true because it is shorter and faster to type
Also I consider not writing anything bad practice, as it is not obvious to everybody that the default return value of case is true.
Also "leaving out" the command usually indicates "something was forgotten here". So putting a redundant ":" there clearly indicates "it is intended to do nothing else than return true here".
In bash you can also use ksh/bashisms like ;& (fallthroug) or ;;& (test other patterns) to express if (haystack.contains(needle1)) { run1(); }; if (haystack.contains(needle2)) { run2(); }
Hence usually case is much more maintainable than other regex constructs. Also it does not use regex, it only use shell patterns, which might even be faster.
Reusable function:
: Needle "list" Seperator_opt
NeedleListSep()
{
if [ 3 -gt $# ];
then NeedleListSep "$1" "$2" " ";
else case "$3$2$3" in (*"$3$1$3"*) return 0;; esac; return 1;
fi;
}
In bash you can simplify this to
: Needle "list" Seperator_opt
NeedleListSep()
{
local s="${3-" "}";
case "$s$2$s" in (*"$s$1$s"*) return 0;; esac; return 1;
}
Use like this
Test() {
NeedleListSep "$1" "a b c" && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "a,b,c" ',' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "a # b # c" ' # ' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
NeedleListSep "$1" "abc" '' && echo found $1 || echo no $1;
}
Test a
Test z
As shown above, this also works for degerated cases where the separator is the empty string (so each character of the list is a needle). Example:
Test
returns
no
no
no
found
As the empty string is cleary part of abc in case your separator is the empty string, right?
Note that this function is Public Domain as there is absolutely nothing to it which can be genuinely copyrighted.
An alternative solution inspired by the accepted response, but that uses an inverted logic:
MODE="${1}"
echo "<${MODE}>"
[[ "${MODE}" =~ ^(preview|live|both)$ ]] && echo "OK" || echo "Uh?"
Here, the input ($MODE) must be one of the options in the regular expression ('preview', 'live', or 'both'), contrary to matching the whole options list to the user input. Of course, you do not expect the regular expression to change.
Examples
$ in_list super test me out
NO
$ in_list "super dude" test me out
NO
$ in_list "super dude" test me "super dude"
YES
# How to use in another script
if [ $(in_list $1 OPTION1 OPTION2) == "NO" ]
then
echo "UNKNOWN type for param 1: Should be OPTION1 or OPTION2"
exit;
fi
in_list
function show_help()
{
IT=$(CAT <<EOF
usage: SEARCH_FOR {ITEM1} {ITEM2} {ITEM3} ...
e.g.
a b c d -> NO
a b a d -> YES
"test me" how "test me" -> YES
)
echo "$IT"
exit
}
if [ "$1" == "help" ]
then
show_help
fi
if [ "$#" -eq 0 ]; then
show_help
fi
SEARCH_FOR=$1
shift;
for ITEM in "$#"
do
if [ "$SEARCH_FOR" == "$ITEM" ]
then
echo "YES"
exit;
fi
done
echo "NO"
Assuming TARGET variable can be only 'binomial' or 'regression', then following would do:
# Check for modeling types known to this script
if [ $( echo "${TARGET}" | egrep -c "^(binomial|regression)$" ) -eq 0 ]; then
echo "This scoring program can only handle 'binomial' and 'regression' methods now." >&2
usage
fi
You could add more strings into the list by separating them with a | (pipe) character.
Advantage of using egrep, is that you could easily add case insensitivity (-i), or check more complex scenarios with a regular expression.
This is almost your original proposal but almost a 1-liner. Not that complicated as other valid answers, and not so depending on bash versions (can work with old bashes).
OK=0 ; MP_FLAVOURS="vanilla lemon hazelnut straciatella"
for FLAV in $MP_FLAVOURS ; do [ $FLAV == $FLAVOR ] && { OK=1 ; break; } ; done
[ $OK -eq 0 ] && { echo "$FLAVOR not a valid value ($MP_FLAVOURS)" ; exit 1 ; }
I guess my proposal can still be improved, both in length and style.
Simple oneliner...
if [[ " 11 22 33 " == *" ${x} "* ]]; then echo "${x} is in the list"; fi;
Add before fi: else echo "${x} is NOT in the list";
The script below implements contains function for a list.
function contains {
local target=$1
shift
printf '%s\n' "$#" | grep -x -q "$target"
out=$?
(( out = 1 - out ))
return $out
}
If you convert a string based on white space into a list and use it, it seems to be solved as follows.
list="11 22 33"
IFS=" " read -ra parsed_list <<< "$list"
# parsed_list would be ("11" "22" "33")
contains "11" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 1
contains "22" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 1
contains "1" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 0
contains "11 22" "${parsed_list[#]}"
echo $? # 0
I would like to check if a string begins with "node" e.g. "node001". Something like
if [ $HOST == user* ]
then
echo yes
fi
How can I do it correctly?
I further need to combine expressions to check if HOST is either "user1" or begins with "node"
if [ [[ $HOST == user1 ]] -o [[ $HOST == node* ]] ];
then
echo yes
fi
> > > -bash: [: too many arguments
How can I do it correctly?
This snippet on the Advanced Bash Scripting Guide says:
# The == comparison operator behaves differently within a double-brackets
# test than within single brackets.
[[ $a == z* ]] # True if $a starts with a "z" (wildcard matching).
[[ $a == "z*" ]] # True if $a is equal to z* (literal matching).
So you had it nearly correct; you needed double brackets, not single brackets.
With regards to your second question, you can write it this way:
HOST=user1
if [[ $HOST == user1 ]] || [[ $HOST == node* ]] ;
then
echo yes1
fi
HOST=node001
if [[ $HOST == user1 ]] || [[ $HOST == node* ]] ;
then
echo yes2
fi
Which will echo
yes1
yes2
Bash's if syntax is hard to get used to (IMO).
If you're using a recent version of Bash (v3+), I suggest the Bash regex comparison operator =~, for example,
if [[ "$HOST" =~ ^user.* ]]; then
echo "yes"
fi
To match this or that in a regex, use |, for example,
if [[ "$HOST" =~ ^user.*|^host1 ]]; then
echo "yes"
fi
Note - this is 'proper' regular expression syntax.
user* means use and zero-or-more occurrences of r, so use and userrrr will match.
user.* means user and zero-or-more occurrences of any character, so user1, userX will match.
^user.* means match the pattern user.* at the begin of $HOST.
If you're not familiar with regular expression syntax, try referring to this resource.
Note that the Bash =~ operator only does regular expression matching when the right hand side is UNQUOTED. If you do quote the right hand side, "any part of the pattern may be quoted to force it to be matched as a string.". You should not quote the right hand side even when doing parameter expansion.
I always try to stick with POSIX sh instead of using Bash extensions, since one of the major points of scripting is portability (besides connecting programs, not replacing them).
In sh, there is an easy way to check for an "is-prefix" condition.
case $HOST in node*)
# Your code here
esac
Given how old, arcane and crufty sh is (and Bash is not the cure: It's more complicated, less consistent and less portable), I'd like to point out a very nice functional aspect: While some syntax elements like case are built-in, the resulting constructs are no different than any other job. They can be composed in the same way:
if case $HOST in node*) true;; *) false;; esac; then
# Your code here
fi
Or even shorter
if case $HOST in node*) ;; *) false;; esac; then
# Your code here
fi
Or even shorter (just to present ! as a language element -- but this is bad style now)
if ! case $HOST in node*) false;; esac; then
# Your code here
fi
If you like being explicit, build your own language element:
beginswith() { case $2 in "$1"*) true;; *) false;; esac; }
Isn't this actually quite nice?
if beginswith node "$HOST"; then
# Your code here
fi
And since sh is basically only jobs and string-lists (and internally processes, out of which jobs are composed), we can now even do some light functional programming:
beginswith() { case $2 in "$1"*) true;; *) false;; esac; }
checkresult() { if [ $? = 0 ]; then echo TRUE; else echo FALSE; fi; }
all() {
test=$1; shift
for i in "$#"; do
$test "$i" || return
done
}
all "beginswith x" x xy xyz ; checkresult # Prints TRUE
all "beginswith x" x xy abc ; checkresult # Prints FALSE
This is elegant. Not that I'd advocate using sh for anything serious -- it breaks all too quickly on real world requirements (no lambdas, so we must use strings. But nesting function calls with strings is not possible, pipes are not possible, etc.)
You can select just the part of the string you want to check:
if [ "${HOST:0:4}" = user ]
For your follow-up question, you could use an OR:
if [[ "$HOST" == user1 || "$HOST" == node* ]]
I prefer the other methods already posted, but some people like to use:
case "$HOST" in
user1|node*)
echo "yes";;
*)
echo "no";;
esac
Edit:
I've added your alternates to the case statement above
In your edited version you have too many brackets. It should look like this:
if [[ $HOST == user1 || $HOST == node* ]];
While I find most answers here quite correct, many of them contain unnecessary Bashisms. POSIX parameter expansion gives you all you need:
[ "${host#user}" != "${host}" ]
and
[ "${host#node}" != "${host}" ]
${var#expr} strips the smallest prefix matching expr from ${var} and returns that. Hence if ${host} does not start with user (node), ${host#user} (${host#node}) is the same as ${host}.
expr allows fnmatch() wildcards, thus ${host#node??} and friends also work.
Since # has a meaning in Bash, I got to the following solution.
In addition I like better to pack strings with "" to overcome spaces, etc.
A="#sdfs"
if [[ "$A" == "#"* ]];then
echo "Skip comment line"
fi
Adding a tiny bit more syntax detail to Mark Rushakoff's highest rank answer.
The expression
$HOST == node*
Can also be written as
$HOST == "node"*
The effect is the same. Just make sure the wildcard is outside the quoted text. If the wildcard is inside the quotes it will be interpreted literally (i.e. not as a wildcard).
#OP, for both your questions you can use case/esac:
string="node001"
case "$string" in
node*) echo "found";;
* ) echo "no node";;
esac
Second question
case "$HOST" in
node*) echo "ok";;
user) echo "ok";;
esac
case "$HOST" in
node*|user) echo "ok";;
esac
Or Bash 4.0
case "$HOST" in
user) ;&
node*) echo "ok";;
esac
if [ [[ $HOST == user1 ]] -o [[ $HOST == node* ]] ];
then
echo yes
fi
doesn't work, because all of [, [[, and test recognize the same nonrecursive grammar. See section CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS on your Bash man page.
As an aside, the SUSv3 says
The KornShell-derived conditional command (double bracket [[]]) was removed from the shell command language description in an early proposal. Objections were raised that the real problem is misuse of the test command ([), and putting it into the shell is the wrong way to fix the problem. Instead, proper documentation and a new shell reserved word (!) are sufficient.
Tests that require multiple test operations can be done at the shell level using individual invocations of the test command and shell logicals, rather than using the error-prone -o flag of test.
You'd need to write it this way, but test doesn't support it:
if [ $HOST == user1 -o $HOST == node* ];
then
echo yes
fi
test uses = for string equality, and more importantly it doesn't support pattern matching.
case / esac has good support for pattern matching:
case $HOST in
user1|node*) echo yes ;;
esac
It has the added benefit that it doesn't depend on Bash, and the syntax is portable. From the Single Unix Specification, The Shell Command Language:
case word in
[(]pattern1) compound-list;;
[[(]pattern[ | pattern] ... ) compound-list;;] ...
[[(]pattern[ | pattern] ... ) compound-list]
esac
grep
Forgetting performance, this is POSIX and looks nicer than case solutions:
mystr="abcd"
if printf '%s' "$mystr" | grep -Eq '^ab'; then
echo matches
fi
Explanation:
printf '%s' to prevent printf from expanding backslash escapes: Bash printf literal verbatim string
grep -q prevents echo of matches to stdout: How to check if a file contains a specific string using Bash
grep -E enables extended regular expressions, which we need for the ^
Keep it simple
word="appel"
if [[ $word = a* ]]
then
echo "Starts with a"
else
echo "No match"
fi
I tweaked #markrushakoff's answer to make it a callable function:
function yesNo {
# Prompts user with $1, returns true if response starts with y or Y or is empty string
read -e -p "
$1 [Y/n] " YN
[[ "$YN" == y* || "$YN" == Y* || "$YN" == "" ]]
}
Use it like this:
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] y
true
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] Y
true
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] yes
true
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n]
true
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] n
false
$ if yesNo "asfd"; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] ddddd
false
Here is a more complex version that provides for a specified default value:
function toLowerCase {
echo "$1" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]'
}
function yesNo {
# $1: user prompt
# $2: default value (assumed to be Y if not specified)
# Prompts user with $1, using default value of $2, returns true if response starts with y or Y or is empty string
local DEFAULT=yes
if [ "$2" ]; then local DEFAULT="$( toLowerCase "$2" )"; fi
if [[ "$DEFAULT" == y* ]]; then
local PROMPT="[Y/n]"
else
local PROMPT="[y/N]"
fi
read -e -p "
$1 $PROMPT " YN
YN="$( toLowerCase "$YN" )"
{ [ "$YN" == "" ] && [[ "$PROMPT" = *Y* ]]; } || [[ "$YN" = y* ]]
}
Use it like this:
$ if yesNo "asfd" n; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [y/N]
false
$ if yesNo "asfd" n; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [y/N] y
true
$ if yesNo "asfd" y; then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
asfd [Y/n] n
false