Following the instructions in this IBM article, I have included a link to a record in an comm template. My link looks like this http://:HOSTNAME/maximo/ui/maximo.jsp?event=loadapp&value=:APP&uniqueid=:OWNERID.
This link from the IBM article only gets to the default, i.e "List" tab for most applications. Can I somehow add a specific tab (standard or custom) of named application when implementing this as a link in Comm Template?
Thank you both, Dex, and Maximo.Wiki for your contributions>
Your comments actually led me to figure out all that I needed to solve my issue
Oh, woe how many times I was actually phrasing my problem incorrectly because corporate english is not primary variant of it and hence having to end up digging SO for answers
Thanks again!
Based on this blog post by Bruno Portaluri, and comments from others on that post, it looks like you should be able to add changetab=yourtabid to the URL.
Based on your question, the whole URL would then be http://:HOSTNAME/maximo/ui/maximo.jsp?event=loadapp&value=:APP&uniqueid=:OWNERID&changetab=plans if the app your link was to had a tab with ID plans, or XML <tab id="plans" ..., in it.
Am I the only missing the viewer info to see all attributes in GATT and GAP? A simple and quick lookup of for instance this one (doesn't work anymore) seems to indicate it is easy to find the required info (in my case the UUID's and descriptors):
https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/gatt/viewer?attributeXmlFile=org.bluetooth.characteristic.cycling_power_feature.xml
I have clicked on quite some menus and I am sure I just overlook something. But I just cannot believe the BT organization makes a website with so little links to the actual info.
Any guidance?
There doesn't appear to be any links from the site, but it does look like you can look at the document directly:
https://www.bluetooth.com/wp-content/uploads/Sitecore-Media-Library/Gatt/Xml/Characteristics/org.bluetooth.characteristic.cycling_power_feature.xml
Tried searching around but not finding anything. Hoping someone will know the answer. Is it possible to add more than the 3 feeds that come with OpenVAS? Looking to add feeds from NVD so I can scan with them. Doesn't seem to be possible via the WebGUI.
Feeds from e.g. the NVD probably won't help you. They would need to provide scripts written in NASL if you would like to use them. One of the following blogposts might give you some background knowledge on this topic:
https://avleonov.com/2017/06/30/adding-third-party-nasl-plugins-to-openvas/
https://avleonov.com/2017/10/04/vulners-nasl-plugin-feeds-for-openvas-9/
Does anyone know of a good tutorial or YouTube video that explains how to set up and use the Navigator in the IBM Xpages Extension Library?
It is a bit confusing with all the options, types of nodes, and Select & Submit Values. Hope to find something that shows the simple way to use this tool along with some of the Advanced capabilities.
I did a quick youtube video where I show just the simplest use of it. enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adtyIAo3bZE
Is there anything specific you want to know?
Hopefully a good tutorial is the XPages Extension Library book. It goes into detail on all the various node types.
I have a list of URLs and am trying to collect their "descriptions." By description I mean what comes up, for example, if you Googled the link. For example, http://stackoverflow.com">Google: http://stackoverflow.com shows the description as
A language-independent collaboratively
edited question and answer site for
programmers. Questions and answers
displayed by user votes and tags.
This the data I'm trying to accumulate for the URLs I have.
I tried parsing the URL's meta-descriptions, however most of them are lacking a meta-description (yet Google and other search engines manage to get a description somehow).
Any ideas? Should I just "google" each link and scrape the data? I have a feeling Google wouldn't like this...
Thanks guys.
Different search engines have different algorithms to get the description out of the page if/when they are lacking the description meta tag. Some ignore the tag even it it's there.
If you want the description Google has, the most accurate way to get it would be to scrape it. Otherwise, you could write your own or look around on the web for code that does it.
These are called snippets.
Google use proprietary (and possibly patented) methods to garner this information, so there is no simple answer.
As you suggest, they will use meta-description information if it is there. (How to set the meta-information to help Google.)
They will also honour requests from the page authors to NOT include snippets. (How to prevent Google from displaying snippets) You should probably respect this too (as well as robots.txt, of course.)
You may have some luck with existing auto-summary packages, such as OTS.
You may want to check AboutUs.org (i.e. http://www.aboutus.org/StackOverflow.com).
But, there's little chance that the site will have an aboutus page and not have a meta description.
Some info that might explain how google does this:
Webmasters/Site owners Help
Adding a URL to google
I am not familiar with Google APIs, but perhaps there is an official way to get such information.
Interesting. some sources are better than others.
For "audiotuts.com" google has a worse description than AboutUs.com.
Google
Nov 18th in General by Joel Falconer ·
1. Recently, an AUDIOTUTS reader asked me about creative process. While this
is a topic that can’t be made into a
...
AboutUs.com:
AUDIOTUTS is a blog/tutorial site for
musicians, producers and audio
junkies! It is the sister site of the
popular PSDTUTS, VECTORTUTS and
NETTUTS.
I hate problems like these... they should be trivial but they aren't!
If you can assume English content, you can first look for Meta Description, and if that doesn't work, you can look for the first two or three sentence-like word sequences.
A product I worked on looked for the first P or DIV that contained more than one sequence of > n "words" delimited by periods. It would use the two or three sentence-like sequences, up to x total words, as a summary paragraph. It wasn't 100% accurate, but good enough for the average case. The number of words was adjusted a few times to eliminate things like navigation elements.