I came across this site called social mention and am curious about how applications like this work, hopefully somebody can offer some glimpses/suggestions on this.
Upon looking at the search results, I realize that they grab results from facebook, twitter, google.... I suppose this is done on the fly, probably through some REST api exposed by the mentioned?
If what I mention in point 1 is probably true, does that means sentiment analysis on the documents/links return is done on the fly too? Wouldn't that be too computationally intensive? I am curious because other than sentiments, they also return the top keywords in the document set.
They have something called the "trends". They looked like the trendingtopics in twitter, but seems like they also include phrases >3 words long. Is this relevant to nlp's entity extraction or more to keyphrase extraction? Is there apis other than that of Twitter that provides this? Is "trends" generally done on search queries submitted by users or do the system actually processes the pages?
A curious man.
sentiment can be fast and on the fly, if it is for example rule-based and the dictionaries are in memory. Curious? Get in touch
Related
I've proposed a title for our thesis, Movie Success Prediction through Social Media comments using Sentiment Analysis, is there a way you can get the comments on social media (twitter, Instagram, Facebook etc.) and use it for your software? like an API or any other way. is that even possible to use your software on different social media to get the comments for prediction or should i change my title and stick to one social media like Facebook or twitter only?
what's the good algorithm for this?
what programming language and framework/IDE should i use?
I've done lots of research on google and still hoping for more info here. Thank you.
Edit: I'll only use YouTube and YouTube API.
From the title of your question, it seems that the method you need to use is distant supervision. You need to retrieve data with labels you think it is proper for your task. For instance, a tweet containing #perfect hashtag would probably be a positive tweet. So, you can define set of hashtags for your task, negative, positive or even for neutral; then you can retrieve tweets by those via Twitter API. For your task, those should be for movies, therefore your data should contain movie related information in first place.
Given that you will deal with text data and you'd like to create your own dataset, it is better to start with Twitter. Its API works for your needs and it is very well-documented. The language and frameworks are upto your choice, since APIs supports many known languages as well. Personally, I'd start with python or java to quickly solve future problems easier with community support.
For a general survey of this area, you may dive into papers and resources from here:
https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?hl=en&q=distant+supervision+sentiment+analysis
Distant supervision could be used to create a sentiment lexicon out of millions English tweets by using sets of negative and positive hashtags as well. You may take a look at Chapter 5 of this thesis ( https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/980377/1/Ozdemir_MCompSc_F2015.pdf ), this may also give a good insight for your thesis, too.
Hope this helps.
Cheers
I am basically working on nlp, collecting interest based data from web pages.
I came across this source http://schema.org/ as being helpful in nlp stuff.
I go through the documentation, from which I can see it adds additional tag properties to identify html tag content.
It may help search engine to get specific data as per user query.
it says : Schema.org provides a collection of shared vocabularies webmasters can use to mark up their pages in ways that can be understood by the major search engines: Google, Microsoft, Yandex and Yahoo!
But I don't understand how it can help me being nlp guy? Generally I parse web page content to process and extract data from it. schema.org may help there, but don't know how to utilize it.
Any example or guidance would be appreciable.
Schema.org uses microdata format for representation. People use microdata for text analytics and extracting curated contents. There can be numerous application.
Suppose you want to create news summarization system. So you can use hNews microformats to extract most relevant content and perform summrization onit
Suppose if you have review based search engine, where you want to list products with most positive review. You can use hReview microfomrat to extract the reviews, now perform sentiment analysis on it to identify product has -ve or +ve review
If you want to create skill based resume classifier then extract content with hResume microformat. Which can give you various details like contact (uses the hCard microformat), experience, achievements , related to this work, education , skills/qualifications, affiliations
, publications , performance/skills for performance etc. You can perform classifier on it to classify CVs with particular skillsets
Thought schema.org does not helps directly to nlp guys, it provides platform to perform text processing in better way.
Check out this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microformat#Specific_microformats to see various mircorformat, same page will give you more details.
Schema.org is something like a vocabulary or ontology to annotate data and here specifically Web pages.
It's a good idea to extract microdata from Web pages but is it really used by Web developper ? I don't think so and I think that the majority of microdata are used by company such as Google or Yahoo.
Finally, you can find data but not a lot and mainly used by a specific type of website.
What do you want to extract and for what type of application ? Because you can probably use another type of data such as DBpedia or Freebase for example.
GoodRelations also supports schema.org. You can annotate your content on the fly from the front-end based on the various domain contexts defined. So, schema.org is very useful for NLP extraction. One can even use it for HATEOS services for hypermedia link relations. Metadata (data about data) for any context is good for content and data in general. Alternatives, include microformats, RDFa, RDFa Lite, etc. The more context you have the better as it will turn your data into smart content and help crawler bots to understand the data. It also leads further into web of data and in helping global queries over resource domains. In long run such approaches will help towards domain adaptation of agents for transfer learning on the web. Pretty much making the web of pages an externalized unit of a massive commonsense knowledge base. They also help advertising agencies understand publisher sites and to better contextualize ad retargeting.
I'm trying to build a local version of the freebase search api using their quad dumps. I'm wondering what algorithm they use to match names? As an example, if you go to freebase.com and type in "Hiking" you get
"Apo Hiking Society"
"Hiking"
"Hiking Georgia"
"Hiking Virginia's national forests"
"Hiking trail"
Wow, a lot of guesses! I hope I don't muddy the waters too much by not guessing too.
The auto-complete box is basically powered by Freebase Suggest which is powered, in turn, by the Freebase Search service. Strings which are indexed by the search service for matching include: 1) the name, 2) all aliases in the given language, 3) link anchor text from the associated Wikipedia articles and 4) identifiers (called keys by Freebase), which includes things like Wikipedia article titles (and redirects).
How the various things are weighted/boosted hasn't been disclosed, but you can get a feel for things by playing with it for while. As you can see from the API, there's also the ability to do filtering/weighting by types and other criteria and this can come into play depending on the context. For example, if you're adding a record label to an album, topics which are typed as record labels will get a boost relative to things which aren't (but you can still get to things of other types to allow for the use case where your target topic doesn't hasn't had the appropriate type applied yet).
So that gives you a little insight into how their service works, but why not build a search service that does what you need since you're starting from scratch anyway?
BTW, pre-Google the Metaweb search implementation was based on top of Lucene, so you could definitely do worse than using that as your starting point. You can read some of the details in the mailing list archive
Probably they use an inverted Index over selected fields, such as the English name, aliases and the Wikipedia snippet displayed. In your application you can achieve that using something like Lucene.
For the algorithm side, I find the following paper a good overview
Zobel and Moffat (2006): "Inverted Files for Text Search Engines".
Most likely it's a trie with lexicographical order.
There are a number of algorithms available: Boyer-Moore, Smith-Waterman-Gotoh, Knuth Morriss-Pratt etc. You might also want to check up on Edit distance algorithms such as Levenshtein. You will need to play around to see which best suits your purpose.
An implementation of such algorithms is the Simmetrics library by the University of Sheffield.
This is my first time dabbling in NLP so please excuse my ignorance. I'm looking for a method to extract interests/likes/hobbies from users' social profiles. Here is an example where all the interests/likes/hobbies are in bold:
"I consider myself a pretty diverse character... I'm a professional
wrestler, but I'd take a bullet for Wall•E. I train like a one-man genocide machine in the gym, but I cried at
"Armageddon." I'll head bang to AC/DC, and I'm seriously
considering getting a Legend of Zelda tattoo. I'm 420-friendly. I
like to party it up with the frat crowd one night, hang out with
my Burning Man friends the next, play Halo and World of
Warcraft the next, and jam with friends that aren't any younger than
40 the next. My youngest friend is 16, my oldest friend is 66. I'll
sing karaoke at the bars, and I'm my friends' collective
psychiatrist/shoulder."
The profiles are plain text. There are no meta tags or ids associated with any of it, it's just a paragraph of text.
My naiive idea was to take each noun and match it against Freebase to see if it's an activity/artist/movie/book etc. The problem is that although most entities mentioned will be things the user likes, she will also mention things she doesn't like and I have no means of distinguishing the 2.
I have 2 questions:
What sub field of NLP should I be looking at? Some googleable algorithms/techniques/authors would be greatly appreciated.
How hard is this problem?
Thanks!
First, unless using NLP to do this is a particular objective for you, check your problem domain to see if you can avoid it completely.
For instance:
do these profiles have tags (supplied either by the Site or by the
user)?
what does the Site's API make available (assuming that's how you are accessing this data; if you are scraping it, then this doesn't of course apply)? A good example, Facebook. if you read a user's posts, you'll see words like "wrestler", "karaoke", etc. but if you look at what fields are exposed via the Graph API, you'll see that these activities nearly always have an associated FB ID.
I am not a specialist in this field, but I can recommend a couple of resources directed to NLP and which are accessible to the non-specialist or novice. The first is a text processing API. This simple web service uses REST and JSON IO. It is free and seems to have a fairly large rate limit.
This API appears to rely heavily on the excellent Natural Language Tooolkit (NLTK) which is a mature stable library in python, that includes modules directed to the problem in your Question, e.g., Sentiment Analysis, Tagging and Chunk Extraction, etc.
Which particular sub-domain is most relevant to solving the Question in the OP? I don't know, but I suspect there's a module somewhere in the NLTK that does what you need. Finding that module is hopefully just a matter of skimming the API Documentation (which is organized by module); reading the Getting Started section which contains an excellent survey of NLTK's modules as well as demos for all of each of them.
I'm wondering if there are any good .NET recommendation algorithms available in open source projects, whether attached to a search engine or not. By recommendation I mean something that accepts a full-text article and recommends other articles from its index based on keyword similarity.
At the high end there are document classification engines like Autonomy; at the low-end spam filters and blog "related posts" widgets. Possibly advertisement-to-article matching, too. I'd like to incorporate one into a project but can't afford the high end and the low end seems to all be LAMP-based.
[Sorry, one answer asked for clarification: What I'm looking for is ideally a standalone library, but I'm willing to adapt good source code as necessary. The end result is that I need to be able to create a C# service that accepts an arbitrary amount of text and returnsa list of similar previously-indexed articles. Basicallly, the exact thing that StackOverflow itself does as you are submitting a question!]
Thanks!
Steve
I think that in StackOverflow they extract all common english words from the text and then compare this words with the remaining words of other posts to get the "Related" posts.
Question is not very clear (algorithm or library???) but only thing that comes to mind is Lucene.NET, the porting of the popular Lucene library on the .Net framework. HTH.