A website is built in Asp.Net. I need to migrate it to Drupal,i.e, build it in Drupal. It has got a lot of content and demands many 'blocks' on the front page. It would be very tedious to have those many blocks in drupal as it would take a lot of time to load the content whenever the page reloads.
Is there a way out to manage such huge data while building that website in Drupal.
I don't see any features on that page that couldn't be accomplished with Drupal. The "time to load" issue you mention could be alleviated by using one of the variety of cache methods available in Drupal, such as the Boost module. If you're concerned about performance, I'd recommend checking out the Pressflow project, especially coupled with Varnish, a reverse proxy cache.
Related
Good day, I've been using ServiceStack for many years, I currently designing and planning a rewrite of an ASP MVC (Razor) project. #Script seems to be an almost perfect fit, without hands-on experience of the technology I have some doubts and questions.
My question is how relevant is #Script today and what is the future plans of this technology. I ask these questions because when I looked at GitHub example I noticed that there is not a lot of activity, and searching the internet I am also not finding a community around it.
As #Script's author I would say that #Script is a complete library for what it's designed for as an embeddable sandboxed .NET scripting and templating language that's ideal for exploratory programming with seamless integration into .NET APIs (including Win32 APIs) that includes a vast built-in library (1000+) of filters that's easily and highly extensible to the point that it's even able to natively support multiple languages (inc. built-in LISP Repl) within the same page that's been a joy to develop with thanks to its built-in Hot Reloading support where changes are instantly visible upon save - so technology-wise IMO it's pretty great.
If we were to compare it to comparable libraries in other languages like the Ruby's Liquid it should be pretty clear that #Script is vastly more capable where it scales from a user-friendly templating language to a powerful scripting language where it's capable of developing entire Windows Desktop Apps that fits in a Gist.
On the activity front, Liquid is also an established library with low activity with only a handful of commits in 2021, the difference is that it's vastly more popular and used in popular products like Jekyll as used in GitHub Pages which ensures it will always have a rich, vibrant ecosystem which is the most important indicator for assessing a technology's longevity.
Technology not as important as ecosystem
However in the end the technology doesn't matter nearly as much as its user base, community and ecosystem behind it which is where #Script is sorely lacking. Unfortunately this is the reality of libraries that compete Microsoft's defaults like Razor which are exclusively promoted for .NET and will always retain the majority of adoption in .NET.
#Script is a "complete" library in that I've added all the features I planned for it and there's basically nothing I can think of to add to it to make it more appealing, but facing the realization of its indefinite lack of adoption I wouldn't recommend using it for large living (i.e. multi-year) Websites, given it will never have the community and adoption enjoyed by other ecosystems since the benefits of a community and ecosystem are ultimately the most important attributes in order to continue investing in a technology.
Continue to be actively supported
Like all of ServiceStack, #Script is still an actively supported library with no outstanding issues so it's safe to use in that any issues will be promptly resolved should you wish to.
Website Development Recommendations
I'd say it's still a fine option for smaller definitively-scoped projects since its compile-time-free and Hot-Reload makes for a very productive Dev UX for server-generated dynamic pages. However even then I'd first evaluate if a static generated framework like Jekyll, Hugo or other popular static generators would be more appropriate since they enjoy a vibrant community and a statically generated site results in a more performant, resilient and cheaper to host and deploy website.
Static Site Generators
Having recently redeveloped the servicestack.net website to split it out into using Jekyll for static content and ServiceStack.Razor for dynamic content, my recommendation for large websites with large static and dynamic components is to use a static site generator for its static content which yields several benefits:
Although it does require a fair bit of overhead to setup as you're effectively maintaining 2 different websites however it greatly benefits if the static content is actively updated as there's a lot less friction to change and update content on a static generated site then a dynamic one and it results in a superior end user UX thanks to CDN Edge caches that's also cheaper to host from free sites like GitHub Pages and Netlify.
In order to preserve existing URLs we needed extra functionality not possible from a static host so our static content is deployed to a S3 bucket where we use CloudFront for CDN edge caching, CF Behaviors for proxying "external static" routes to our .NET5 dynamic website and a CF Function for supporting pretty URLs. For internally deployed websites you'll be able to accomplish similar functionality with reverse proxy and redirect rules.
SPA or Razor
For small websites or mostly dynamic websites that wont benefit from a content site split I'd recommend either an SPA Project Template if you prefer TypeScript and an established SPA FX like Vue, React, Svelte or Angular or Razor or MVC if you instead prefer C# server generated websites.
Progressive Enhancement
My personal preference is for read-heavy dynamic sites to use ServiceStack Razor utilizing API First Development approach so that all writes are made to the same clean ServiceStack APIs that Mobile and Desktop Apps would also call. This typically involves using some kind of progressive enhancement like our Client TypeScript Validation example which utilizes the Form & Validation Binding in #servicestack/client to take over <form> submissions to perform TypeScript API calls and apply any validation errors back to the Form's UI.
The Client jQuery example accomplishes the same thing without the tsc -w watched build step whose form & validation binding utilizes the older jQuery ss-utils.js library but it does mean you'd need to author logic in an older broadly ECMAScript 5 supported version of JS.
Future of #Script
As I don't expect #Script Pages will ever achieve any meaningful adoption required for self-sustained active development, it's unlikely we'll continue in investing in further development for usage in dynamic websites (i.e. the script project template), it's a complete and extensible library so further development isn't strictly necessary as it can be easily extended with your own local Plugins, Methods, Transformers and Blocks. But it does mean we're unlikely to be creating and including new methods/plugins designed for dynamic websites in the library OOB.
Still a critical ServiceStack component
#Script is still a critical component of ServiceStack where it's used to provide integrated SPA templates since it's able to render dynamic websites from static *.html pages in npm dev hot-reload servers which can't use Razor's *.cshtml pages. It's also what makes ServiceStack's Declarative Validation possible where validation rules can be defined on dependency-free DTOs as it allows defining binary-decoupled logic in dep-free attributes. It's also what makes vuedesktop.com Desktop Apps like ServiceStack Studio possible as well as command tools like Post Command - HTTP API Command Line Utils and cross-platform dotnet scripts which makes usage of its internal functionality, so it's going to continue on as a actively developed & supported library.
Good future use-cases of #Script
However I'd limit any #Script usage to where it excels, e.g. as an embeddable scripting .NET sandbox given it's more versatile & flexible than Razor for tasks like Rendering Emails, authoring & rendering Live Documents (e.g. if needing to maintain live user-generated reports in an RDBMS) or as an embeddable Template, JS or LISP DSL or for evaluating adhoc JS/LISP Expressions or .NET logic.
Future replacement project templates
For developing server-generated websites with ServiceStack we're looking at shipping a couple of new templates which encompasses our latest recommendations (e.g. embracing an API First Development style), if they result in a great Dev UX we're looking at:
An Integrated Static generated (e.g. Hugo/Jekyll) + Dynamic Project template
An API First MVC Pages + ServiceStack template with integrated progressive enhancement
Please follow #ServiceStack to get notified as soon as they become available.
I'm currently running and installation of Joomla v3.3.3 on a server. It says that there's an update available for v3.5.1. I'd like to know if it's a good idea to update to this version. There are several additional modules used by the website and I'm afraid that the whole frontend will be broken after updating. Are there any security issues? Or am I fine if I'm staying on this version?
its always best to stay up to date as the updates frequently address various security concerns. Its not difficult for a potential attacker to know when a website is built on the various popular frameworks. I can spot a joomla or wordpress site every time.
It is also best practice to backup your website before performing updates.
Myself, I like to create a copy of the entire site and database in another directory or sub domain and test update on that. if all seems good i then create a backup of the live site before installing the update as updates can fail for random reasons.
joomla updating guide
It's a best practice in web development to stay up to date, with updates we have improvements in security, functionality, performance or design.
Some extensions are not compatible with the latest joomla! versions, so you also need check the news for each extension in their websites, also you can check the updates in:
Extensions > Manage > Update > Find Updates Button
If for some reason you have an extension that should not be updated and you see the notification in the back-end, you can disable it in:
Extensions > Manage > Update > Update Sites
Note: Before any change in your site, create a backup. One popular extension to automate your backup process is Akeeba Backup.
I built a node.js social networking web site for noders but I get some serious problems to improve my SEO factors. How can I make it SEO friendly? And yes, given that it is a single page app, it is a little harder!
There are two ways to make sure a single page application is SEO friendly: dynamic rendering and server-side rendering.
Dynamic rendering is the easiest way. In this case, requests coming from bots are forwarded via a service that can execute JavaScript and render your SPA into a plain HTML page readable by any search engine bot. This can be done using a headless browser. An example of such a service is Rendertron that uses headless Chrome. These days it's probably the best option, and you can easily install it on your server along with your web server (Apache, Nginx, or whatever you use).
Server-side rendering (SSR) may appear to be a bit more complicated. In this case, the pre-rendered SPA is also a plain HTML for search engines, but on the other hand, it's a fully functional application that can continue running once it's loaded into a browser. SSR probably brings no advantages for SEO compared to dynamic rendering. Still, a pre-rendered SPA may load faster for users, especially on a slow mobile device, because the device will not have to execute all JavaScript before the user sees the first page.
Here is an article with a bit more details https://trackabi.com/blog/single-page-application-seo
I've toyed around with this before. A good place to start is…
http://backbonetutorials.com/seo-for-single-page-apps/
There are also services and libraries for node that will render your app server side in phantom (or the like) and serve it to the bots.
I am doing an angularjs app with a nodejs-expressjs server.
I want to do an app that it's similar to a business directory.
I have doubts about if it's possible doing it SEO friendly to the all items at the directory, either by his name or his features (tags). Always having in mind that all pages are created with AngularJS.
If it is possible, how to do that dinamically.
I implemented an example that uses prerender server (this https://github.com/prerender/prerender) and the prerender-node library at the app server.
My example's pages, created by angularjs, does work (are SEO friendly, it appears at google's search)..but the pages are "static", and the directory it's going to add always new bussines to the directory that I want to appear in googles searching.
Besize, I want my app to be multi-language, and also have doubts about how to do all of that be multi-language, and if it is possible.
I hope you can help me.
If you're hosting your own Prerender server, it will serve the page "on the fly" every time Google accesses it, so it will always have the latest, dynamic content from your pages. If you're using a Prerender plugin to cache your pages, you'll need to make sure you recache them... or use our Prerender.io SaaS and we'll take care of all of the recaching for you.
It sounds like you just want Google to crawl your pages more often because of how dynamic your content might be. In order to have Google crawl your pages more often, make sure to quality inbound links from other sites to increase your PageRank.
Here is lots of advice from Google about multi language sites: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/182192?hl=en
I'm looking for a free, simple and efficient CMS for building website for a small company.
Prerequisites are:
The website is nothing more than a presentation - with informative content and gallery. The website should contain a nice-looking gallery with js/ajax flavour. Nothing more is planned for now, but it would be nice if CMS would feature some more generic modules/extensions in case I would like to use them in future.
Design templates should be easy to adopt and change.
Coding as little as possible.
I thought about Drupal, but is there any other CMS which would better fit to these requirements?
Please don't list available CMS-es here. Give it a reason!
Wordpress is nice too :p It has a big community behind...
I say Drupal.
Drupal is really good in content management. You can create different content types, and assign them fields (in Drupal 6, you will need the CCK contrib module). You can create a gallery with Views and it's output plugins. There are dozens of them, using different layout and JavaScript effects (mostly different jQuery plugins, but there are plugins for lightbox and thickbox also).
Drupal has a group of themes called "starter themes". These themes are half-ready, and it is very easy to create your own custom themes with them. All you need is to create a subtheme. (Basically making an info file and copy some other files. There are really a lot of howtos out there.) There are also starter themes for 960 (CSS framework), so you can make the site layout really fast. The most famous starter theme is called Zen. You might want to use that.
Except for the theme, I don't think that you have to write any code. Writing a theme for Drupal is not hard, since it uses PHP to render the themes.
Still in beta (0.5) phase but looking very promising: Orchard, a new ASP.NET MVC based CMS created by the people from Microsoft.
Orchard will create shared components for building ASP.NET applications and extensions, and specific applications that leverage these components to meet the needs of end-users, scripters, and developers. Additionally, we seek to create partnerships with existing application authors to help them achieve their goals. Orchard is delivered as part of the ASP.NET Open Source Gallery under the CodePlex Foundation. It is licensed under a New BSD license, which is approved by the OSI.
The intended output of the Orchard project is three-fold:
Individual .NET-based applications that appeal to end-users , scripters, and developers
A set of re-usable components that makes it easy to build such applications
A vibrant community to help define these applications and extensions
In the near term, the Orchard project is focused on delivering a .NET-based CMS application that will allow users to rapidly create content-driven Websites, and an extensibility framework that will allow developers and customizers to provide additional functionality through module extensions and themes.
It depends on what kind of CMS you are after
pity you don't like programming otherwise i would suggest django, an awsome CMS framework
if you are after something simple like a few static pages and a news feed or something like that then wordpress might suit your needs well, except i have found i don't like how it handles gallery's
if you need anything more, like more advanced custom content types for products, i would recommend Joomla or Drupal, and have plug-ins that has good support for photo galleys
Joomla! will probably be a better choice. It is very easy to use and is highly extensible.
Have a look at:
CMS Made Simple
CMS Made Simple provides a fast and
easy way to create a professional web
site and manage its content, whether
it's for a small business or a
multinational corporation!
Features
General Features
SEO Friendly URLs
Integrated and online help
Modular and extensible
Easy user and group management
Group-based permission system
Full template support, for unlimited looks without changing a line of content
Easy wizard based install and upgrade procedures
Minimal server requirements
Admin panel with multiple language support
Content hierarchy with unlimited depth and size
Integrated file manager w/ upload capabilities
Integrated audit log
Friendly support in forums and irc
Small footprint
Design Features
Accessibility WAI, WCGA, Section 508
XHTML and CSS compliant
Auto-generated menu
Every page can have different theme
Design protected from content editors
Multiple content areas on one page
If you have a little C# experience then you can try Umbraco.
It is a very powerfull CMS written in C# for ASP.NET
It is one of the most powerfull both free and commercial CMS out there.
i recommend to check out the Feature Matrix so you can see if it fulfills your needs.
As an example http://asp.net uses Umbraco
have you tried DotNetNuke ?