We've just started to used bugzilla and I found the web interface quite slow and not user-friendly.
I'm wondering if anyone have a suggestion for a client desktop or a browser add-on running under windows.
I found the following page: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Addons
Which one of these clients (or any other) is the best ? Any other suggestions ?
I already tried Deskzilla Lite, which seem pretty good. However, there is a lot of field (edit bug) that we don't use (i.e. hardware, os, url, depends on, etc). Is there a desktop client that allow to remove and customize the field used in the bug entry form? On this one, please do not answer I can customize the bugzilla templates, we don't want to use the web interface anyway.
Well it depends on your Bugzilla Version. Since I updated to 4.0 I've got no alternative to Deskzilla since MyZilla is not running anymore. LiveProject looks pretty neat but I never tested it, so... Deskzilla lite. :/
Related
I want to implement a browser based on Xilium.CefGlue that works on Windows and on Linux
I found a solution with Chromely. I implemented the Browser according to this Chromely tutorial and it works fine on Windows and on Linux.
Now I want to have more than one tabs. It seems to be possible, but chromely have to be extended as mentioned here.
I tried to use Avalonia and Chromely, but the are not compatible.
I found this question talking about a "Chromely.CefGlue.Gtk.Linux.Demo"-Project but no code of that project.
Can someone help me please?
I'm sure like most developers, you have gotten your code perfect only to test it on IE7 and it doesn't look right.
My analytics say that IE7 is one of the lower ranking versions of IE being used to view my website. My question is why do people still use IE7? Isn't it easier to update to a better version of IE than to still be on 7?
I'm not sure why you would be on such an old version of IE unless you are not computer literate and only use it for basic tasks.
I tried researching on the web but no such luck. Any thoughts?
Some people simply don't have a choice if their IT department has not upgraded them. If you're building your application for a specific client, build it to the lowest version they have to support. If you're just doing this on your own to publish, then just support 'modern' browser versions.
I know that there are even some web-resources exist which allow you to get a preview of a web-site 'as it looks in a certain browser'.
I only need view from any browser as an image. Is it possible to get that image without people involvement? Can I get it without system programming, just by means of pure java/python/asp.net?
UPD: http://browsershots.org/ is an example of described web-resources.
The tools I know of that does this - really "just" launches a browser (programatically of course) and takes a screenshot of the contents of the browser and saves this in an image.
I think no matter what you do, you will have to find a way of doing something like this. If you by system programming are refering to OS API calls, then I think you will be out of luck. You might be able to get a third party library that can do this for you, but then that library will simply be making those system calls instead.
I see now others have posted links to places that might prove themself useful to you as well. Without having looked at the links, that would probably be the easiest and best way to go.
Good luck
I believe what you're looking for is browsershots
There are some websites that let you do this.
Try BrowserShots
PageGlimpse is a service
providing developers with programatic
access to thumbnails of any web page.
It has API based on REST protocol and some documentation.
You have a lot of things doing this for you. Take a look at stw for instance.
If you're using .NET, it is possible to do this using the DrawToBitmap method of the WebBrowser control (example here). However, as you'll see by the last comment on that example page, it doesn't work with Flash, and it's a bit 'temperamental' with sites that use complex Javascript for rendering.
I think your best bet is to do as others have said and use a third party thumbnail provider. I haven't used it, but http://www.thumbshots.com/ looks good.
I'm trying to determine which open source (or at least free) bug tracker works the best with Mylyn. My hope is to find something that "just works" with good Mylyn support. I want to avoid lots of configuration and maintenance to get it going or keep it working with Mylyn. Also, I'd like the interaction to support as many types of fields and data exchange as possible.
I've heard that Jira is the best one to use, but the project I'm working on is a private closed source venture, and the funds aren't there to pay for Jira. Same for FogBugz. I need a free solution for closed-source code. Possible options that I've heard of so far are Bugzilla, Mantis, Redmine, and Trac. Is there a strong preference between these? Are there other better solutions?
At this time, we're using SVN for source control, but may transition to GIT in the future. Not sure if that matters, but if it does, I wanted to mention it.
The bug tracker will be installed and run on a linux VPS server with Apache and MySQL installed. But it can be customized to run other software if necessary.
Bugzilla, Mantis or Trac all work just fine with Mylyn. I would say that the best one supported is and probably will be Bugzilla, since eclipse people use it for their own bug tracking, and Bugzilla connector is developed by core Mylyn developers.
I have installed Redmine at home. I have it up at running with Mylyn in Eclipse too. I have used Bugzilla previously, but I think Redmine's interface is much cleaner and I especially like the roadmap feature.
I want to display a message to users with unsupported browsers, as opposed to having the site fail in an ugly manner.
What's the best way to do that?
GWT also provides browser detection using the .gwt.xml file. Have a look at this:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5/wiki/DevGuideDeferredBindingReplacement
It's an interesting solution, but I'm not sure if it's the best solution in your case. It could be very useful for creating a simplified version of your application which would automatically be loaded in unsupported browsers.
The GWT team does not provide a list of unsupported browsers, only supported browsers, and it's a vague list at that "most recent versions of Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari. (Opera, too, most of the time.)".
If you have a good idea yourself of what browser/version won't work you can use this code:
public static native String getUserAgent() /*-{
return navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();
}-*/
to learn what browser is being used and perhaps cook up a work-around.
On the other hand, browser rendering of web pages can fail in many subtle ways ranging from mildly annoying to catastrophic, and there is often no way to know where your page falls on that scale. One of the major reasons for GWT is that you can stop worrying about this sort of thing. At least until it happens.
If you want to make it simple and stupid, check with some javascript code in your main html file, before GWT is loaded. Novertheless, I would rather trust GWT to handle things more or less quirky. You could also just recommend chrome or firefox.
I realise this is an old question, but I had the same problem, and wanted to share a new solution for it.
Today with GWT2.7 "obsolete" browsers try to download undefined.cache.js. This obviously fails and the client is stuck forever.
You could patch GWT itself setting fallback compile steps, but the easy solution is to simply provide a (manually crafted) undefined.cache.js and place it where the other generated files are.
Inside you put this one line:
xxxxxxx.onScriptDownloaded(alert('This browser is not supported anymore.\nPlease upgrade to a more recent browser.'));
where xxxxxxx is your module basename (from xxxxxxxx.gwt.xml).