I get repository where main folder is folder of solution. I want create folders trunk, branches, tags, etc. This repository is on Assembla.
I'm using windows 7 and newest SVN Tortoise. Is it some simple way to reconstruct this repository ?
I'm not quite sure I understand what you want, but why not make the folders and then move the rest of the files where they belong? Sure, it will mess with the history a bit (old deleted files won't show up in the new folders), but that's rarely a problem.
Related
I'm moving my current server contents to a new one, and am currently in the process of setting up SVN. I'm fairly unfamiliar with SVN, typically using it to the extent of commits and updates.
I have two locations that I use SVN on the old server:
PROD location:
/var/www/html/new_dwutils/
and local:
/home/{user_name}/public_html/new_dwutils/
My interaction svn-wise is normally committing and updating at the /new_dwutils/ level.
Note: Running svn --version says I'm at version 1.6.11 for both servers.
I'm now trying to recreate this structure on the new server. My initial thought was to create the svn repo using something like:
svnadmin create /var/www/html/new_dwutils/
This creates the repo dir, but, when I copy my files into the dir, I am unable to do svn commands like status. However, when I go into a sub-dir of the copied data, I can use the svn commands.
This has me thinking that the repo is /new_dwutils/ and the copied data is considered a project? And the sub-dirs are working copies then?
Going off that thought, I deleted the repo, and made the html dir a repo:
svnadmin create /var/www/html/
I then copied my new_dwutils dir, and sure enough, I was able to do svn commands like I use too. What I've noticed is that when creating the repo, a few things are added that were not on the previous server: conf/, db/, format, hooks/, locks/, and README.txt. I get that these are svn files, but I'm not seeing the .svn file. I know that there was an update for svn that "removed" .svn files, but these files are now in /var/www/html/.
Now I want to setup my local working copy.
I've been doing (location /home/{user_name}/public_html/):
svn checkout file:///var/www/html/
Problem is it copies the html/ file, but nothing in it, and I don't want the html/ file I want the html/new_dwutils/ file.
I feel like I'm doing it wrong from the start, and would greatly appreciate some explanation on how to get on the right track. A step by step would be extremely useful, and if further clarification is need for files or directory paths, I would gladly detail.
Thanks!
The Subversion Manual will answer all of your questions.
If you're making a Subversion repository under /var/www.html, I'm assuming you're using Apache httpd as your server. Look at Chapter 6. If you already have a repo, create a dump file, then use that dump file to recreate the repo. Look at Chapter 5 on moving repositories.
If you don't know anything about Subversion, or are confused by the difference between the repository location directory and a working directory, read the on-line manual. It's one of the best pieces of documentation I've seen.
From description of your question it appears that '/var/www/html/new_dwutils/' is your working copy and not a repo.
Go to '/var/www/html/new_dwutils/' on the old server and type "svn info" this should give you location of the old repo. You should simply be able to 'svn co ' into the new location to checkout a copy of all your files from the old server (everything that is checked in - you will not get anything that is not checked in on the old server).
However, if your repo was local on the old server and you want to move it to your new server too. Then you can simply copy the entire folder to the new server and access it directly using its new location in 'svn co' command.
I created a new project in svn svnadmin create /myrepo in my server, with my client I did a checkout and add new files, later a commit, so, if I make a checkout from another computer I get the recently added files, which is perfect, but at my folder /myrepo still is no file, all the new files that were added from my client are not visible there, I know they implement many algoritms to take the version control, my question is, should I be able to see all the new files added from /myrepo in my server, without need to make a checkout with a client or something like that??
I want to know where my files are saved at my server,
Thanks
No. The files are stored in the repository you created, but in a specialized database. If you go to myrepo and look in the db folder, you'll see that there are revision files stored there. Those files contain the structure and data of the repository at specific instances in time. The Subversion book has some information on the structure. You can also look at the documentation in the actual Subversion repository about the structure used to store the data.
I have synchronized a folder with folder in tortoise svn. Now I want to synchronize this folder with another folder in tortoise svn. How to do this. Please guide me
The mechanism in Subversion are a little bit different. You speak here from a checkout, if you work on a local copy. There are two cases here:
You want to work on a different part of the repository:
Checkout that part at a new location locally (so you are able to work in parallel on both).
Switch your current location to the new part of the repository. This will replace all files locally, and you are no longer able to work on both parts in parallel.
The first scenario is normally used. There are some cases where it may be not appropriate:
You have not enough place locally. You should change that first, because you are not able to work anyway.
You are working on a branch, and want to merge some of the changes on the branch on the trunk or another branch. Then a svn switch is the normal way to do that.
Alternatively, you may do a sparse checkout of the common parent of the two folders, and populate only the parts you are interested in.
I am wondering what happens in SVN when a file is updated directly instead of using SVN? The main reason I am asking is that there was a problem updating the SVN on my machine (windows) when the server (linux) had 2 names that were the same, but different case. I resolved this on the server, but didn't do it through SVN since it won't update correct, but I still get the issue. Do I need to run some kind of command to update it?
Thanks.
EDIT:
I deleted the comflicting file in the working direcotry and wanted to know if doing things directory in the working directory get tracked at all or what needs to be done to resync.
When SVN gets blocked because the repository is more "up to date" than the local checkout, one brain dead foolproof solution is:
Move (or remove) the files that are causing the conflict at the command line (don't use SVN tools to do this, and don't use the GUI if you have tortoise installed).
svn update the repository, which will restore the current copy of the files from the subversion server.
Decide what to do with your cached copies of the old files. Either manually merge them back into the repository, discard them, or remake the changes in the new svn managed files (depending on your needs).
Note that if you move the files into a directory using tortoise, make sure that you move it into a directory that's not associated with ANY SVN project. It's not fun trying to undo the helpful changes tortoise does in thinking your wanting a SVN move to accompany the file system move.
There is no need to run any special commands. If you updated the sources, the next time you will run svn update subversion will seamlessly merge the changes and you will get an uptodate working copy.
If you changed some files, they will appear modified or conflicted depending on the changes made by you and other users.
I want to add my project to a subversion repository. The project folder contains a symlink to a folder containing thousands of txt files that I don't need to add to the svn repository. I DO want the symlink-folder to show up when I checkout the code, however.
It looks like I can use svn addprop svn:ignore symlinked-folder to ignore the folder, but then I'll have to add that symlinked folder to every working copy I check out before everything will work.
Is there a proper way to do this?
Perhaps there is no way to deal with this, since a symlink is a filesystem artifact. Is there a better way to handle this situation?
CONCLUSION - EDIT
After all this investigation, I committed the symlink-folder by accident and SVN added it to the repository without adding any of the files within it. Upon checkout, everything works fine. The symlink-folder checked out and works.
I am using assembla to manage my SVN repository, so that might have something to do with this success.
The answers above are right, your symlink won't work if you check out the repository on windows.
But if you're aware of that and you don't care, you can add just the symlink without its contents:
svn add -N your-symlink
man svn add here
I believe you are correct, imagine if a user checked out your repo under Windows - how would SVN create the symlink when the underlying OS doesn't support it?
Is the target folder that you are symlinking to under version control? If so, you can make use of the svn-externals property.
You are right, it doesn't make sense to add a symlink to a repository. What would happen if someone checked out the source on a machine that didn't have access to the folder the symlink points to?
One way is to structure your repository so that you can check out the codebase without having to check out documents. E.g.:
Trunk
Tags
Branches
Documents
So you only check out the trunk or branch that you are working on, and when you require it you can check out the documents.
Alternatively, use a project management tool like Redmine to store your docs. It can integrate with svn as well so you can view your repository and manage permissions through it.