I'm trying to make something in Linux, but it complains that it can't find iostream.h. What do I need to install to get this file?
The correct name of this standard header is just iostream without an extension.
If your compiler still cannot find it, try the following:
find /usr/include -name iostream -type f -print
...and add it to your include path, following your compiler's documentation.
The header <iostream.h> is an antiquated header from before C++ became standardized as ISO C++ 1998 (it is from the C++ Annotated Reference Manual). The standard C++ header is <iostream>. There are some minor differences between the two, with the biggest difference being that <iostream> puts the included contents in namespace std, so you have to qualify cin, cout, endl, istream, etc. with "std::". As somewhat of a hack (it is a hack because header files should never contain "using" directives as they completely defeat the purpose of namespaces), you could define "iostream.h" as follows:
#ifndef HEADER_IOSTREAM_H
#define HEADER_IOSTREAM_H
#include <iostream>
using namespace std; // Beware, this completely defeats the whole point of
// having namespaces and could lead to name clashes; on the
// other hand, code that still includes <iostream.h> was
// probably created before namespaces, anyway.
#endif
While this is not exactly identical to the original antiquated header, this should be close enough for most purposes (i.e. there should be either nothing or very few things that you will have to fix).
I needed to compile partport on Debian and had problems (CentOS 4.5 worked fine). I did this without any success:
ln -s /usr/include/c++/4.5/iostream /usr/include/c++/4.5/iostream.h
I discovered that iostream.h was provided from C++, and I found it on CentOS 4.5.
So I copied the file iostream.h from CentOS 4.5 to Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal), and it worked:
scp root#ip.centos-4.5:/usr/include/c++/3.3.4/backward/iostream.h /usr/include/c++/4.5/iostream.h
Related
I'm trying to write a wrapper for a C++ function I've written, making use of the Point Clouds Library (PCL). This is my first try interfacing R and C++, so I apologise if any solution is too trivial. My goal is to make a few functions available for myself and my colleagues directly in R, on mac and windows. My example function cloudSize is included at the bottom of the text. I will try to be as clear as possible.
I've installed PCL with the vcpkg package manager for winx64 at C:\src\vcpkg\vcpkg.
This is added to my Environmental Variable Path for my user.
I created an empty R-package with Rcpp.package.skeleton():
C:/User/csvi0001/Desktop/GitHub/RPCLpackage/PCLR
PCL is a massive library, but thankfully modular,and so I only #include the headers that are needed to compile the executable: pcl/io/pcd_io.h, pcl/point_types.h, pcl/registration/icp.h.
Now, since I'd like this to work on more than one OS - and therefore compile on install (?) - I should use a dynamic library? I'll presume that the person installing my package already has a compiled copy of pcl. However, I do not know how to find a flag showing that pcl is installed - how do I find these for inclusion in Makevars(?). CMake must find them when testing the C++ function in VSCode after adding an include path. In lieu of this:
I copy the pcl folder installed by vcpkg to ./src . When I tried copying all the .h files, they seemed to lose track of one another as they refer to eachother through which module they are placed in, e.g. <pcl/memory.h> cannot be found if memory.h is placed directly in ./src. However, flattening the structure of the modules means that every single dependency and #include must be manually changed, in some cases there are also files with the same name in different folders. e.g. pcl/kdtree.h and pcl/search/kdtree.h. After this, it must be done again when replacing < > with " " for each header.
Is there any way of telling Rcpp that the library included in /src is structured?
I'm working on Win 10 winx64.
Since I'm making use of the depends RcppEigen and BH; and I must have C++14 or higher (choice: C++17) I add to my DESCRIPTION file:
LinkingTo: Rcpp, RcppEigen, BH
SystemRequirements: C++17
My actual C++ function:
//PCL requires at least C++14
//[[Rcpp::plugins(cpp17)]]
//[[Rcpp::depends(RcppEigen)]]
//[[Rcpp::depends(BH)]]
#include <Rcpp.h>
#include <iostream>
#include "pcl/io/pcd_io.h"
#include "pcl/point_types.h"
#include "pcl/registration/icp.h"
//[[Rcpp::export]]
int cloudSize(Rcpp::DataFrame x)
{
pcl::PointCloud<pcl::PointXYZ> sourceCloud;
for(int i=0;i<x.nrows();i++)
{
sourceCloud.push_back(pcl::PointXYZ(x[0][i],x[1][i],x[2][i])); //This way of referring to elements in a Rcpp::DataFrame may be erroneous.
}
int cloudSize = sourceCloud->size();
return (cloudSize);
}
That is a non-trivial question. In the simplest case, use a 'hook' offered by configure and configure.win to pre-build a (static) library you ship in your sources and then link your package to that.
That said, the Writing R Extensions manual and/or the CRAN Repository Policy (both of which are the references here) expressed more of a preference for an external library -- which may not be an option here if PCL is too exotic.
As the topic comes up with Rcpp, I wrote a short paper about it (at arXiv here) which is also included as a vignette in the package. It requires a few pages to cover the common cases but even then it cannot cover all.
Your main source of reference may be CRAN. The are lots of packages in this space. A few of mine use external libraries, I contributed to package nloptr which uses a hybrid approach ("use system library if found, else build") and some like httpuv always build (a small-ish library).
I followed all the procedures explained so far about this matter either in this website or published notes by Dirk, Hadley or others. However, I still have problems in building my package due to the issue regarding cpp11 plugin.
I used RcppArmadillo.package.skeleton() function. I put my cpp file in the src directory. The NAMESPACE file looks as it should which contains importFrom(Rcpp, sourceCpp) line. I also edited DESCRIPTION file and in the LinkingTo section, I added RcppEigen and other packages I use. I finally ran the compileAttributes(verbose=TRUE) function in R and everything looked OK. Therefore, I think I have done everything as I should. I have to also mention that when I compile my code in R using sourceCpp(), it works perfect and is compiled with no errors!
To illustrate better what my dependencies are, I put the first block of my code here:
#include <RcppArmadillo.h>
#include <RcppNumerical.h>
#include <RcppArmadilloExtensions/sample.h>
#include <Eigen/LU>
#include <algorithm>
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppArmadillo)]]
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppEigen)]]
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppNumerical)]]
// [[Rcpp::plugins(cpp11)]]
The problem is when I build my package and I get errors and warnings for the lines I have auto type which relates to cpp11 plugin.
After searching similar posts on this website, I concluded that I have to force my R compiler to use c++11 and there fore I edited my Makvars file located at ~/.R/Makevars and since I use MAC I added this line:
CXX=clang++ -std=c++11 to that file. However, when I do that those 3 errors go away but 50 new errors are generated as all of the Armadillo variable types, such as mat, uvec, etc are not recognized any more. So I don't know how to fix this.
I think basically putting // [[Rcpp::plugins(cpp11)]] should take care of it as the new version of Rcpp supports this plug in and probably that's why when I run sourceCpp in R I get no errors and everything looks fine. But I don't know what happens when building my package. My Rcpp version is 0.12.8 .
Thank you in advance for any sorts of help.
Plugins for both dependencies (ie other headers) and compiler options are for use by sourceCpp().
Packages do this with LinkingTo: and, for the C++11 directive, either src/Makevars or SystemRequirements. See Writing R Extensions which documents this.
What is the purpose of the features.h header? Why and when can it be used in my code?
Does it define source features supported by the system?
Or does it define some additional things which must be defined depending on other defines?
The features.h header file provides various macro definitions that indicate standard conformance to other header files, i.e. which features (hence the name) should be turned on or off depending on which standard the user wishes to use.
Most C/C++ compilers have command line options to handle standards conformance. Let's take GCC as an example: when you pass the -std=gnu9x option, you ask for the GNU dialect of the C99 standard. The features.h header makes sure that all other headers that include it will turn exactly those features on or off that are needed to support this particular dialect. This is achieved by #define -ing or #undef - ing some "intermediate" macros.
As a bonus, features.h also provides the glibc version information macros as well, and various other bits & bobs.
I have grepped POSIX 7 as explained at: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/340285/install-the-latest-posix-man-pages/483198#483198 and there are no hits for features.h, so it must be a glibc extension only.
In glibc 2.28, it is present at include/features.h.
One of the interesting things that it defines are version macros:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <features.h>
int main(void) {
printf("__GLIBC__ %u\n", __GLIBC__);
printf("__GLIBC_MINOR__ %u\n", __GLIBC_MINOR__);
return 0;
}
Ubuntu 16.04, which has glibc 2.23, this outputs:
__GLIBC__ 2
__GLIBC_MINOR__ 23
See also: Check glibc version for a particular gcc compiler
Also, this header seems to get included in most / all glibc headers, which might allow you to check if glibc is being used: How to tell if glibc is used but TODO I couldn't find a documentation for that.
From features.h File Reference
Defines on whether to include algorithm variants.
Less variants reduce executable size and compile time. This file is a GNU parallel extension to the Standard C++ Library.
So this file will include some algorithm listed in the reference page.
In general if you need to use any of the variables or functions defined in a header file, you need to include it in your program. This rule is valid for features.h also. You can see a URL for features.h for your reference below:
http://repo-genesis3.cbi.utsa.edu/crossref/heccer/usr/include/features.h.html
I'm using bison & flex (downloaded via cygwin) with vc++. When I compile the program I got an error:
...: fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'unistd.h': No such file or directory
The corresponding code in the flex-generated file is:
#ifndef YY_NO_UNISTD_H
/* Special case for "unistd.h", since it is non-ANSI. We include it way
* down here because we want the user's section 1 to have been scanned first.
* The user has a chance to override it with an option.
*/
/* %if-c-only */
#include <unistd.h>
/* %endif */
/* %if-c++-only */
/* %endif */
#endif
If I define YY_NO_UNISTD_H in the flex file(.l) this error will disappear, but I get several other errors:
...: error C2447: '{' : missing function header (old-style formal list?)
...: warning C4018: '<' : signed/unsigned mismatch
...: error C3861: 'isatty': identifier not found
How can I fix this problem?
All these errors occur in the flex-generated scanner.
I know it's because unistd.h doesn't exist in windows. Do I have to write my own unistd.h? If so how to write it in order to eliminate those errors?
isatty is used by the lexer to determine if the input stream is a terminal or a pipe/file. The lexer uses this information to change its caching behavior (the lexer reads large chunks of the input when it is not a terminal). If you know that your program will never be used in an interactive kind, you can add %option never-interactive to you lexer. When the program is run with user input, use %option interactive. When both uses are desired, you can either generate an interactive lexer, which gives a performance loss when used in batch mode, or provide your own isatty function.
Use %option nounistd in your .l file to remove the dependence on unistd.h.
just in case somebody's still this problem, Flex comes with unistd.h within its devel files. I found this here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=931222&group_id=23617&atid=379173
to put it short, just make sure your compiler can reach it. in my case it's just adding "C:\GnuWin32\include" to the additional inclusion directories
use win_flex.exe with option --wincompat and you dont need to hack your lex file
unistd.h is a UNIX header, so it's not present in VC++; your best bet is probably to compile it using g++ in Cygwin (or mingw/msys). You could also look at this question for other suggestions.
I'm using flex 2.5.4 that comes from the GnuWin32 project, which doesn't check for YY_NO_UNISTD_H.
In my version, Flex looks for unistd.h only when being compiled as C++, so you can save yourself all this trouble if your yylval doesn't use any C++ constructs.
I had to use the STL in yylval (using a pointer to make it a POD type), so in order to make flex compile in C++ I created this simple unistd.h:
#include <io.h>
That's all it takes (actually, I could copy the unistd.h file that comes with GnuWin32, like flyontheweb suggests).
P.S. To wrap things up: in Bison I put yylval's required STL header files in %code requires {} and added the current directory to the INCLUDE paths in my makefile.
I am too late but anyway I will share my findings to save someone still looking for answer.
In my case having an empty unistd.h file in the location where compiler looks for headers works for me.
Well this post is old but I face the same problem and here is something that should work.
WinFlexBison
I ran into this problem recently after upgrading to Angular 14.
npm install -g latest-version
resolved my issue.
While migrating a program from windows in linux I encountered a problem using the c++ standard template library. I am trying to typedef a template and I am getting the error 'expected initializer before '<' token on this line
typedef std::list< std::pair< int,double> > PairList;
Any ideas why this would work using mvc++ and not using g++ and how I can fix it?
I think this is about #includes.
The following really minimal piece of code compiles perfectly here with g++ on Linux
#include <utility>
#include <list>
typedef std::list< std::pair< int,double> > PairList;
PairList x;
One thing to remember about standard include files is that they are allowed but not required to call each other. (It's not like they're potentially polluting the namespace by this, since they all use namespace std, which you aren't supposed to mess with.)
It is possible that, in MSVC++, includes , or vice versa, but this is not the case in the g++ headers. Therefore, a program might compile in MSVC++ and not in g++, with a required header missing in the source.
Make sure all of your required headers are actually included, and you should be fine.
Did you #include <utility> for pair?
I have had no problems with the code in G++, and generally found its STL support to be superb. Do you have all the #include directives there? Sometimes those differ from platform to platform (even when they shouldn't).