Dbus on Kernel to user space - linux

I have a question regardind dbus on the current(2.6.35) kernel. Is dbus a way of communication between kernel and user space? I can figure it out by myself. For exemple if you make use of the usb driver(inserting something like a usb flash pen) and monitoring the activity of the dbus(dbus-monitor) the answer might be yes. But in the source code(usb-skeleton.c and the driver for gadgets there's no sign of dbus). Dbus.h is not to be found in the kernel tree.
Thank you very much. Sorry if i've got this wrong but i am kind of a noob on device drivers and dbus!

D-Bus is for user space applications to communicate with one another.
If you want to communicate with a device driver you want to use either IOCTLs, netlink or create a new syscall. I've created netlink code in the past to speak to a special networking card, and it was relatively easy to do. Using the ioctl is also quite easy but you are limited by how much information you can/should pass via it.
If you are curious how dbus relates to a USB device being inserted, I think it is something like this:

D-Bus (or "daemon bus") is a means of communication between processes (inter-process communication or IPC for short) on Linux/Unix based systems.
It lets processes expose a "D-Bus service" with methods that clients can call. These methods usually map to real methods written in some programming language. D-Bus is language-independent, but most toolkits have some library to make it easier to use - e.g. QtDbus.
It is in no way related to the kernel or drivers, but of course no one prevents a driver from also having a D-Bus service if they want to. (This could be useful in some cases.)

Related

Hardware communication with Python

Is it possible to write an API with Python so you can connect a physical ON and OFF switch via USB to a PC and when user presses the switch to ON or OFF, the python program detects it and send a signal to a web app and shows ON or OFF message on the website?
I am sorry if what I am asking its not clear enough!
Yes, it is possible. Reading USB devices can be done with Python. In linux USB device inputs can be found in some files(e.g. /dev/ttyUSB0). By reading those files you can get the information that you need. Putting here link that will be helpful
similar post
Firstly, you can't write an API to interact with hardware in python. You would have to use the pre-existing windows API(or the API provided by the Operating system that you are using) in order to interact with hardware in such a high-level language.
If you want to interact with hardware in python, and detect switch presses, releases etc, I would recommend you used a microcontroller such as a raspberry pi(for python) or an arduino(for C++). The respberry pi provides a very easy way to interact with hardware in python. If you still want to interact with a USB stick in python(but not acting as a switch) you can use the pyusb library.

Getting WIFI signal strength- seeking the best way (IOCTL, iwlist (iw) etc.)

I want to scan the signal strength received from 3 AP.
I would be happy if that could happen every 300ms (max.500ms). I flashed OpenWRT on the routers.
I was seeking for a good tool to do that.
First I found iwconfig which worked, but only with networks that I was connected to. So I used iwlist (iw didn't work- maybe I need to update it?). Do you know how accurate is the output of it? Can I trust it?
After that, I came across the IOCTL. It looks really powerful* and professional. But is the output from getting the signal stregnth from a WIFI more reliable than the simple method like iwlist/iw?
*even too much powerful as I failed to compile any program I wrote using it
If you want to determine the signal strength of WLAN access points to which you are not connected, scanning is the right way.
The scanning is performed by the wireless network card with much or little "help" from the driver, depending on the design of the wireless card. There are cards (chipsets, to be more specific) that have their own processor and run their own firmware code independently from the host computer. On the other end, there are "stupid" cards where the driver on the host computer does most of the work.
Between the driver and the rest of the operating system, there is an interface (API) for sending commands to the driver and reading back information in a standardized way. With Linux, there are at least two different APIs. The older one is named Wireless Extensions, and the newer one is named cfg80211. Normally, a driver supports only one of the APIs. Most current drivers use cfg80211, but there may be older drivers that still use Wireless Extensions.
For each of the two APIs, there's a user-space tool (or family of tools) to use it. For Wireless Extensions, there is iwconfig (and iwlist, iwpriv etc.) For cfg80211, there is just iw.
So, the questions about the right tool depends on what API the wireless driver uses. To add confusion ;-), cfg80211 does some emulation which allows you to perform some Wireless Extension calls to drivers that use the newer cfg80211 API.
Regarding your questions about ioctl(): This is a generic method for communication between user-space and kernel-space in Unix operating systems. The old Wireless Extensions API uses ioctl(). The newer cfg80211 API does not use an ioctl()-based interface, but uses nl80211 instead.
To sum it up: whether to use iw/cfg80211/nl80211 or iwconfig/Wireless Extensions/ioctl depends on the driver or your wireless card.
Regarding your desired scanning interval, I would say that 300ms is rather short. This is because for a useful scan, the client needs to leave its current channel for a short time, switch to another channel and listen to signals from other access points on this channel. Since leaving its channel interrupts communication, these off-channel times are usually kept short and are carried out infrequently.
Calling iw <dev> scan or iwlist <dev> scan, respectively, will not necessarily cause a new scan, but may return an old (cached) list of access points. Depending on your wireless card/driver it may be (im)possible to enforce a new scan.

Linux user space PCI driver

I'm trying to write a PCI device driver that runs in user space. Not my idea, what the client wants. Target is an embedded Linux board that will never have more than a single user. I'm an experienced C programmer and know Linux, just not familiar with Linux driver development.
Is this really a device driver or just a library? Do I need to use the typical calls pci_register_driver, etc. or can I just access the device using fopen, and using mmap and ioperm to get to it?
Interrupts will be done using the MSI model. Also need to handle DMA transfers. The device will be streaming lots of data to the user.
There's not much info out there on this subject, LDD3 only devotes a couple of pages to it, and there's nothing else that I could find here on SO.
Thanks in advance!
If there is no driver handling the PCI card it would be possible to access it using ioperm (or iopl - depending on the address) if only port accesses are required.
Using DMA and interrupts is definitely impossible without a kernel-mode driver.
By googleing I found some text about something like a "generic kernel-mode driver" that allows writing user-mode drivers (including DMA and interrupts).
You should ask your customer which kind of kernel-mode drivers for accessing PCI cards is installed on the Linux board.
There is now a proper way to do high performance userspace PCI drivers, called vfio. There is not much documentation, but see the kernel docs http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/vfio.txt and the header file /usr/include/linux.vfio.h. It is available since Linux 3.6.

Is it possible to make a computer behave as a bluetooth HID device?

Is it possible to make a computer behave as a bluetooth HID device? That is, given a local machine with a standard USB keyboard plugged into it, other devices could discover this machine and use it as a bluetooth keyboard.
I'd like to create a linux or OS X application (or use an existing one, though I've found none) which can behave as described above, but I'm not sure where to start, or if it's even possible.
So:
Is what I'm describing possible?
Are there any existing applications that do what I describe?
If no application already exists (I'm assuming not), are there bluetooth libraries or bindings that will help? (I'm pretty comfortable using most of today's popular languages, so I'd prefer a library most directly suited to the task, so long as it's available in linux or OS X.)
Failing any of the above, the bluetooth spec looks pretty dense. Are there specific guides or other starting points applicable to the problem at hand that I can read?
I realize that such an application would most likely need to steal the normal keyboard input, possibly providing some KVM-like hotkey for switching between providing input to the host operating system and sending the input over bluetooth to the connected device, but I'm considering that problem to be outside the scope of this question.
It is definitely possible on Linux. Some time ago I found this project:
http://nohands.sourceforge.net/index.html
They emulate a full-blown headset with audio and keyboard controls on the Linux bluetooth stack. If they can emulate something like that, you would probably be able to emulate something simpler like a keyboard.
It is possible, however I don't think I'll be able explain it very well and I don't know the entire answer. A BT HID device works as a server and waits for connections to come to it. In linux, using the bluez stack, first you would have to advertise the HID service for other devices to see. I think you do that using the sdp.h and sdp-lib.h header files(the second header maybe called something else, I'm on a windows computer and can't check). So you would have to add the HID service record to you computer for other devices to see it. You would have to create a program that first adds this service to the record, then waits for other devices to connect, then handle the pairing process, Bluez might handle this for you, or you might have to do some things to it, I'm not quite sure. You should also read the Bluetooth HID Spec found at the http://www.bluetooth.com/English/Technology/Building/Pages/Specification.aspx site. This document contains the details of the SDP record relevant to HID. Also the book Bluetooth essentials for programmers is pretty good to introduce you into bluetooth programming
I would like to have given a more concise answer, with more detail, but that's all I know ATM. I am also trying do something similar, but spare time is so hard to find ;) I'm also not on my Linux box and can't check all the details. If your are still interested, let me know and i'll try to expand my answer.
I don't know if this is helpful, nor if it is still alive and working, but perhaps you could try this link.
Another one that might or might not be helpful in some way is remuco, but I don't know if they are using a Bluetooth HID profile.
It is indeed entirely possible with Linux and Bluez. See: https://github.com/lkundrak/virtkbd/blob/master/btkbdd.pod
Try Across, unfortuantly for me my phone was lacking support.

Netlink user-space and kernel-space communication

I am learning programming in embedded systems using Linux as my main platform. And I want to create a Device Event Management Service. This service is a user-space application/daemon that will detect if a connected hardware module triggered an event. But my problem is I don't know where should I start.
I read about Netlink implementation for userspace-kernelspace communication and it seems its a good idea but not sure if it is the best solution. But I read that the UDEV device manager uses Netlink to wait a "uevent" from the kernel space but it is not clear for me how to do that.
I read about polling sysfs but it seems it is not a good idea to poll filesystem.
What do you think the implementation that should I use in my service? Should I use netlink(hard/no clue how to) or just polling the sysfs(not sure if it works)?
Thanks
Yes, polling is ill-advised. These resources: LJ article on Netlink, "Understanding and Programming with Netlink Sockets" make it seem not so hard to do netlink. Here's an example of netlink sockets in python.
udevtrigger is a great utility for reacting to udev changes.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7356
http://smacked.org/docs/netlink.pdf
http://guichaz.free.fr/misc/iotop.py
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/gutsy/man8/udevtrigger.8.html
If all you do is wait for an event you can use sysfs, which will be a lot simpler than netlink. An example is the GPIO system's edge file.

Resources