I am trying to install kaldi on a windows computer using cygwin.
When I run ./tools/check_dependencies.sh (as requested in the INSTALL file)
I get "zlib is not installed", so I go to the cygwin package list and try to install.
The thing is - there is no "zlib" per say see snapshot
there are all kinds of packages but their execution name is not "zlib" (except one which is irrelevant), it's always something-zlib-somthing.
And so I end up getting the same message even after I install them.
The code in check_dependencies.sh that does that is:
if ! echo "#include " | $CXX -E - >&/dev/null; then
echo "$0: zlib is not installed."
add_packages zlib-devel zlib1g-dev zlib-devel
fi
I understood there is no (relevant) way of installing zlib directly with cygwin - so that's a dead end.
Anyway I tried to make it work but no success - your help is very much appreciated.
Using Kaldi in cygwin is originally a bad idea. Its kind of supported but you will have many problems here and there. Simply install Linux either on a separate server or in a virtual machine.
I'm using vagrant shell provisioning here.
I've installed on my vm Node.js along with many other packages.
I want to avoid running parts in my provisioning script when I don't need them.
For example - I already successfully installed via my script Node.js & nginx, so when I want to add additional packages like mysql or redis, I want to add it to the script, I want to run the script to test that it runs properly, but I DO NOT want to re-install Node.js or nginx again...
I need a simple conditional statement that would detect if a package is already installed, and install it only if it is not already installed.
Is there a generic check or will it be different from package to package?
Thanks
Ajar
dpkg -s <pkg-name> 2>/dev/null >/dev/null || sudo apt-get -y install <pkg-name>
This should be what you're looking for.
What's going on here:
This is a conditional assignment of the form <condition> && <value if true> || <value if false>
The first part of the expression uses dpkg to check to if the package is installed, suppressing the output. The second part is evaluated if the condition returns false. The "true" case is omitted.
This dependes on the Linux distribution you are using. Usually, a package manager comes with some kind of mechanism to skipp already installed packages.
For Ubuntu, this is built in - running apt-get install nodejs with Node.js already installed will not reinstall it; it will skip the target (unless there is new version available)
For ArchLinux, you can add run pacman -Sy node --needed to skip already installed packages.
A platform-independent mechanism would be to check if the executable (or any other known file for that package) exists. In Bash, you can do:
which node > /dev/null && echo "Yup, this is installed"
(the > /dev/null part supresses which's output - it prints the path where the found executable resides; we do not care about that, we only want to know if it is installed)
If you want to avoid writing custom Bash scripts for such basic checks I can recommend that you configure your boxes with tools dedicated for exactly what you are trying to achieve. The usual suspects here are:
Ansible
Puppet
Chef
CFEngine
All of these are supported by Vagrant so integrating them should not be a problem. You can find detailed guides on integrating these into your existing Vagrant recipe here.
PS. For a simple exapmle you can check out my Ansible provisioning recipe for Banana Pi machine running ArchLinux (note: it does not really follow best practices, but it might be a good starting point). There are many examples available online, check them out, too.
I tried to upgrade Perl and put my computer into a complete mess
I am currently running RHEL6.5, 64bits, and this is the thing:
I had perl-5.10.1 installed, and working nice. this came installed,
and I could see it from yum
I wanted to install Padre, an Perl IDE, but that required at least v5.11 [I was so close! :( ]
There were no newer version for Perl in the repos that I have access to (and I have a limitation that I can't add new repos)
I got approval from my boss to download perl-5.20 .0 from www.perl.org and tried to install it
... and the mess begins!
First I installed the new perl with my own id, and that pushed perl to somewhere under my home dir
I tested with 'perl -v' and could see that my env was pointing to the newer install, however, yum never recognized it (not really a problem)
When I tried to install Padre, seems somehow it had the hardcoded the original perl (from /usr/bin) and still claiming for something as newer as 5.11.
Trying to fix it, I did installed the new perl again, now using root, to make it push perl under /usr tree ... it installed, but pushed perl to /usr/local/bin, instead of /usr/bin
So again, I had one more perl install but Padre still looking for the one on /usr/bin
I give up about Padre, and deleted the files related to it, as well as the perl installed on my home dir, however a couple of perl scripts that I had already coded now are throwing errors like:
perl -cw "xmltest.pl" (in directory: /home/myid/scripts/xmltest.pl)
perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Data/Dumper/Dumper.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Istack_sp_ptr
Compilation failed.
... and Data::Dumper in not the only one ... every time I disable one of the modules, another one hangs in the same, or similar way
From what I read about this, seems that this issue is related to modules that were originally installed for one perl version, and are being called by another, however, I already forced the modules that I use to be reinstalled directly from CPAN, and they still failing
Question: How can I, safely, get free from this current perl installs, and perform a new clean install be able to use it w/o these versions conflicts?
My major concern are about the numerous apps that I have that depends on Perl, and I my not broke then on a uninstall
Any help will be much appreciate.
You should:
cleanup
clean (comment out) your ~/.profile from any unwanted paths, and so on
clean any new perl installation from your $HOME (move to safe place for sure)
in short, try return your environment into previous working state
relog, (logout, login)
repair your system perl. Thats mean,
read #Sam Varshavchik's answer
reinstall it from your distribution, using your package manager (5.10).
this step should overwrite the mess you caused.
test it !
don't continue until youre ensured, everything working right as before.
Lesson learned: never overwrite your system perl
learning
read thru perlbrew.pl
repeat previous step once again, especially with the
the homepage
http://perlbrew.pl/Perlbrew-and-Friends.html
https://metacpan.org/pod/App::perlbrew
https://metacpan.org/pod/perlbrew
installing perlbrew
run the installation command \wget -O - http://install.perlbrew.pl | bash
should finished without errors
follow the instructions how to modify your startup file e.g. ~/.profile or such... (you need to add one line to the end)
check your ~/perl5/perlbrew/bin should contain prelbrew and patchperl
relog
setup new perl, run
perlbrew init #init environment
perlbrew available #show what perl you can install
perlbrew install 5.20.0 #will take few minutes - depends on your system speed
perlbrew install-cpanm
perlbrew list #check
perlbrew switch perl-5.20.0 #activate newly installed perl 5.20
Check your installation
in the ~/perl5/perlbrew/bin you should have 3 scripts: prelbrew , patchperl , cpanm
perl -v should return 5.20
type cpanm - should return ~/perl5/perlbrew/bin/cpanm
You're done.
CPAN modules
You can install new modules with cpanm, like:
applications
cpanm cpan-outdated
cpanm App::Ack
cpanm Unicode::Tussle
cpanm Perl::Tidy
cpanm Perl::Critic
collections
cpanm Task::Moose
cpanm Task::Plack
cpanm Task::Unicode
modules
cpanm Path::Tiny
cpanm Try::Tiny
cpanm JSON
cpanm YAML
etc...
Check the ~/perl5/perlbrew/perls/perl-5.20.0/bin/ for new commands
You will need update your own perl script's shebang line to
#!/usr/bin/env perl
I hope don't forget anything, maybe other more experienced perl-gurus will add/edit/correct more.
Anyway, in the reality the steps 5,6,7 are much easier as sounds (by reading this) and could be done in few minutes.
On rpm-based Linux distributions, you should never install system software manually, like this, by trying to compile and build it yourself. RHEL's package management tool, rpm, performs an important function of keeping track of dependencies between packages, and prevent package conflicts.
The errors you showed are precisely the symptoms of a corrupted system Perl installation, and rpm exists precisely to avoid this sort of thing happening. Manually building and installing random tarballs completely bypasses the safety net that rpm provides.
There's no cookie-cutter recipe for recovering from a corrupted system install of a critical system rpm like perl, but in general:
1) run "rpm -q" perl, this will show you the exact version of the perl rpm package that rpm thinks should be installed.
2) go to the RHEL installation media/directory, verify that it contains the same perl-.x86_64.rpm package. If you previously installed RHEL updates, it's possible that you already updated perl, so look for the version that rpm tells you have installed in the RHEL update directory, and verify that you have the correct rpm package.
3) Execute:
rpm -ivh --force perl-<version>.x86_64.rpm
This will reinstall the original perl RPM package that was previously installed. Your problem is not only that you have extra versions of perl installed, but that it's likely that some of your custom perl builds have clobbered the system perl package, and uninstalling them won't help, you have to reinstall the system perl.
4) In RHEL, many perl modules are installed as separate packages. The above process should be used to reinstall every perl rpm package that you have installed. Execute:
rpm -q -a | grep '^perl'
This will give you a list of all Perl packages you have installed. You will need to repeat this procedure for every Perl rpm package.
It's not a 100% guarantee that this will fix everything, there could be other things wrong too, but this is a good first step towards recovery.
What I have done:
From #Sam-Varshavchik answer:
Found the previous perl rpm in my yum cache, and installed ...
rpm -ivh --force perl-<version>.x86_64.rpm
Checked for others "perl*" previously installed packages ... there were +260 so saved it in a file rpm -qa "perl*" > /tmp/perl.pkgs
With +260 packages to install, I realized that do it manually would take too much time, so it was time to put some ksh skills in practice ...
I checked at my yum cache and found ~130 of the +260 packages, so
took out from the list the base perl package (that I already have installed);
for those in the cache, I decided to install then with rpm, in the same way as the base package;
for those that I did not have handy, I used yum, which would download and do the same
of rpm, so ...
CACHE="/var/cache/yum/x86_64"
for perlpkg in $(cat /tmp/perl.pkgs)
do
FILE=$(find $CACHE -name "${perlpkg}.rpm")
if [[ ${FILE} != "" ]] ; then
rpm -ivh --force ${FILE}
else
yum -y reinstall ${perlpkg}
fi
done
From #jm666:
Installed perlbrew (was able to got it from my auth repos, so got it using yum) and using perlbrew, installed 5.20.0 localy
TODO: Didn't got any additional modules and neither Padre yet ... need to learn more about the way perlbrew works and isolate the installed version away from the system perl
Once again, thanks #Sam-Varshavchik and #jm666 for your support ang guidance
I have a machine with Red Hat AS5. On it are installed two versions of a linux application called xmlsec. One is supposedly built for AS3 and the other, AS5. Is there any way to verify which is which? The file names provide this information but is there a way to look into the signature of the installed package to ensure accuracy?
In general, is there a way to determine the build architecture (OS) of a completed installation?
Let me know if I need to provide more information.
I'm still new to building and maintaining packages. Please direct me to some books or websites if my question doesn't make sense or I just need to gain more understanding.
Thanks.
How about it?
$rpm -q -a --queryformat='%{N}-%{V}-%{R}.%{arch}\n'
vsftpd-2.0.1-5.EL4.5.x86_64
hal-0.4.2-6.EL4.x86_64
Or Try this one
$rpm -q -a --queryformat '%{NAME}%{VERSION}%{RELEASE}\n'
xorg-x11-twm6.8.21.EL.18
hwbrowser0.190.EL4.4
Buildarch tag
$rpm -q --queryformat='%{N}-%{V}-%{R}.%{arch}.%{BUILDARCHS}\n' rpm
rpm-4.4.2.3-18.el5.x86_64.(none)
List of tags
$rpm --querytags
BUILDHOST
OS
POSTIN
POSTUN
FILELINKTOS
BUILDTIME
BUILDHOST
BUILDARCHS
I'm complete noobs in shell script what i want is shell script that determine a list of library/package currently installed if not install them without user permission
What I want is to determine the library/package is currently installed or not in system
I'm aware of aptitude search command but I looking for a better solution
e.g I have define(in shell script) check for readline library/package now how can I from inside the shell script (I want to create) know that readline package is currently installed or not.
Any idea or suggestion would certainly help
What I want is to determine the library/package is currently installed or not in system
dpkg -s does not require root permission, and will display package status details.
Example shell script:
#!/bin/sh
for P; do
dpkg -s "$P" >/dev/null 2>&1 && {
echo "$P is installed."
} || {
echo "$P is not installed."
}
done
Usage is:
script.sh package1 package2 .... packageN
For simply doing the test, it would seem that you could grep the output of a command such as ldconfig -p for your library of interest.
Or you could supply a tiny test program linked against the desired library, try running it, and test for non-failure.
If you are trying to set up a dependency check, the proper solution is to create a dummy package which Depends: on the packages you need to have installed. There is a tool called equivs which somewhat helps with this. (However, it has been criticized as being "over-engineered"; certainly, if you are familiar with the format of Debian packages, you might not need a separate tool if your requirements are this simple.) Then you just install this package and it will pull in the packages which are specified as dependencies.
You still have to know that the library which provides libreadline.so is libreadline5-dev. Debian package search can help find the package names you need to put in Depends:
You can probably do what you want with dpkg