I have CruiseControl.NET version 1.4.4.83, and I am wondering if there it provides a url where the only control is the lastest build # of a project, so that I can access that data using curl or something?
Something like http://buildserver/ccnet/server/VMSDEV2/project/MyProject/LatestBuild.aspx
All that it would have is:
0.0.0.31
Update:
Fixed the IPlugin issue with an attribute for the class:
[Exortech.NetReflector.ReflectorType("latestBuildNumberProjectPlugin")]
public class LatestBuildNumberProjectPlugin : ICruiseAction, IPlugin
{
public static readonly string ACTION_NAME;
private readonly IFarmService farmService;
private readonly ILinkFactory linkFactory;
static LatestBuildNumberProjectPlugin()
{
ACTION_NAME = "LatestBuildNumber";
}
public LatestBuildNumberProjectPlugin(IFarmService farmService, ILinkFactory linkFactory)
{
this.farmService = farmService;
this.linkFactory = linkFactory;
}
public IResponse Execute(ICruiseRequest cruiseRequest)
{
IProjectSpecifier projectSpecifier = cruiseRequest.ProjectSpecifier;
IBuildSpecifier[] mostRecentBuildSpecifiers = this.farmService.GetMostRecentBuildSpecifiers(projectSpecifier, 1);
if (mostRecentBuildSpecifiers.Length == 1)
{
var build = mostRecentBuildSpecifiers[0].BuildName;
var response = new HtmlFragmentResponse(build);
return response;
}
return new HtmlFragmentResponse("There are no complete builds for this project");
}
public INamedAction[] NamedActions
{
get
{
return new INamedAction[] { new ImmutableNamedAction(ACTION_NAME, this) };
}
}
public string LinkDescription
{
get { return "Latest Build Number"; }
}
}
And I've named my assembly:
ccnet.latestBuildNumberProjectPlugin.plugin.dll
And in the dashboard.config file, I've added the plugin ref:
<projectPlugins>
...
<latestBuildReportProjectPlugin />
...
</projectPlugins>
But apparently, var build = mostRecentBuildSpecifiers[0].BuildName; is not what I am looking for.
I believe it is possible to create packages to extend the CC.NET Dashboard (i.e. the website) and completely change the interface.
To help you get started, check the CC.NET documentation.
A few links that could be of help.
- Developing Web Dashboard Plugins
- Building Packages
- Configuring the Web Dashboard
HTH,
The link to the latest build is:
http://myserver.com/cc_net/server/local/project/myproject/ViewLatestBuildReport.aspx
it will expand in :
http://myserver.com/cc_net/server/local/project/myproject/build/log20100618165244Lbuild.45.xml/ViewBuildReport.aspx
Inside the html page, you have your build number.
Related
I'm using the slf4net.log4net nuget package to handle logging in a project. Because it must be possible for the loglevel to change at runtime, I made the configuration in code. The issue is that this code works fine in slf4net.log4net version 0.1.32.1 but when I upgrade it to version 1.0.0, the logfile is created, but the logs are not present on the logfile. I've created a dummy project to show this issue. I do not see how I can add a zip file here, so I'll just post the code here. It is a console app in net framework 4.7.2;
class Program
{
private static string GetLoggingPath()
{
var path = Path.Combine(
Environment.GetFolderPath(Environment.SpecialFolder.CommonApplicationData,
Environment.SpecialFolderOption.DoNotVerify), "LoggingTesting");
Directory.CreateDirectory(path);
return path;
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var layout = new PatternLayout
{
ConversionPattern = "%d{ABSOLUTE}: %message %newline"
};
layout.ActivateOptions();
var fileAppender = new RollingFileAppender();
fileAppender.RollingStyle = log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender.RollingMode.Date;
fileAppender.Layout = layout;
var path = GetLoggingPath();
fileAppender.File = path + System.IO.Path.DirectorySeparatorChar + "LISlogging_.txt";
fileAppender.AppendToFile = true;
fileAppender.PreserveLogFileNameExtension = true;
fileAppender.StaticLogFileName = false;
fileAppender.DatePattern = "yyyy-MM-dd";
fileAppender.MaxSizeRollBackups = 10;
fileAppender.ActivateOptions();
ILoggerRepository repository = log4net.LogManager.GetRepository(Assembly.GetCallingAssembly());
BasicConfigurator.Configure(repository, fileAppender);
var root = (repository as Hierarchy)?.Root;
if (root == null) return;
root.Level = log4net.Core.Level.All;
// Create log4net ILoggerFactory and set the resolver
var factory = new slf4net.log4net.Log4netLoggerFactory();
var resolver = new SimpleFactoryResolver(factory);
slf4net.LoggerFactory.SetFactoryResolver(resolver);
// trigger logging
var log = slf4net.LoggerFactory.GetLogger(typeof(Program));
log.Info("log this line");
}
}
public class SimpleFactoryResolver : IFactoryResolver
{
private readonly slf4net.ILoggerFactory _factory;
public SimpleFactoryResolver(slf4net.ILoggerFactory factory)
{
_factory = factory;
}
public slf4net.ILoggerFactory GetFactory()
{
return _factory;
}
}
This dummy project was created in .net framework, but I need this in a .net core project. That is why I need to version 1.0.0 .
I've also post this issue on the github page of slf4net (because it looks like a bug) : https://github.com/ef-labs/slf4net/issues/6
My main question for here on stack overflow is if there is a workaround so this can work with slf4net.log4net version 1.0.0
I've found a workaround for this. Maybe not the cleanest solution but it works. If anyone knows a cleaner solution please add it here.
When looking at the slf4net.log4net code I found out that when it tries to configure log4net it uses xml files or config files, which is a nightmare if you want to set the loglevel at runtime. You can pass a customconfigurator as parameter of the Log4netLoggerFactory . This customconfigurator needs to implement IXmlConfigurator.
The CustomConfigurator I've made accepts an IAppender and a loglevel (log4net.Core.Level). In the implementation of the Configure(ICollection(ILoggerRepository repository) method. I've set the root log level and Configured with the BasicConfigurator.
The CustomConfigurator looks like this:
public class CustomConfigurator: IXmlConfigurator
{
private readonly IAppender _appender;
private readonly log4net.Core.Level _logLevel;
public CustomConfigurator(IAppender appender, log4net.Core.Level logLevel)
{
_appender = appender;
_logLevel = logLevel;
}
public ICollection Configure(ILoggerRepository repository)
{
var root = (repository as Hierarchy)?.Root;
if (root != null)
{
root.Level = _logLevel;
}
return BasicConfigurator.Configure(repository, _appender);
}
public ICollection Configure(ILoggerRepository repository, XmlElement element)
{
return XmlConfigurator.Configure(repository, element);
}
public ICollection Configure(ILoggerRepository repository, FileInfo configFile)
{
return XmlConfigurator.Configure(repository, configFile);
}
public ICollection ConfigureAndWatch(ILoggerRepository repository, FileInfo configFile)
{
return XmlConfigurator.ConfigureAndWatch(repository, configFile);
}
}
Now you can create an appender in code like shown in the question (until fileappender.ActivateOptions) Then when constructing the log4netLoggerFactory you pass an instance of CustomConfigurator which takes the fileAppender and a loglevel as parameter.
var factory = new slf4net.log4net.Log4netLoggerFactory(new CustomConfigurator(fileAppender, Level.All));
var resolver = new SimpleFactoryResolver(factory);
slf4net.LoggerFactory.SetFactoryResolver(resolver);
This should work.
I am toying with Swashbuckle.Examples package (3.10.0) in an ASP.NET MVC project. However, I cannot make request examples appear within the UI.
Configuration (SwaggerConfig.cs)
public static void Register()
{
var thisAssembly = typeof(SwaggerConfig).Assembly;
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration
.EnableSwagger(c => {
c.SingleApiVersion("v1", "TestApp.Web");
c.IncludeXmlComments(string.Format(#"{0}\bin\TestApp.Web.xml", System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory));
c.OperationFilter<ExamplesOperationFilter>();
c.OperationFilter<DescriptionOperationFilter>();
c.OperationFilter<AppendAuthorizeToSummaryOperationFilter>();
})
.EnableSwaggerUi(c => { });
}
Request example classes
public class EchoRequestExample : IExamplesProvider
{
public object GetExamples()
{
return new EchoInput { Value = 7 } ;
}
}
public class EchoInput
{
public int Value { get; set; }
}
Action
[HttpGet]
[Route("Echo")]
[CustomApiAuthorize]
[SwaggerRequestExample(typeof(EchoInput), typeof(EchoRequestExample))]
[ResponseType(typeof(EchoServiceModel))]
public HttpResponseMessage Echo([FromUri] EchoInput model)
{
var ret = new EchoServiceModel
{
Username = RequestContext.Principal.Identity.Name,
Value = value
};
return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, ret);
}
Swagger UI shows xml comments and output metadata (model and an example containing default values), but shows no request example. I attached to process and EchoRequestExample.GetExamples is not hit.
Question: How to make SwaggerRequestExample attribute work in ASP.NET MVC 5?
Note: Windows identity is used for authorization.
I received an answer from library owner here:
Swagger request examples can only set on [HttpPost] actions
It is not clear if this is a design choice or just a limitation, as I find [HttpGet] examples also relevant.
I know the feeling, lot's of overhead just for an example, I struggle with this for a while, so I created my own fork of swashbuckle, and after unsuccessful attempts to merge my ideas I ended up detaching and renaming my project and pushed to nuget, here it is: Swagger-Net
An example like that will be:
[SwaggerExample("id", "123456")]
public IHttpActionResult GetById(int id)
{
Here the full code for that: Swagger_Test/Controllers/IHttpActionResultController.cs#L26
Wondering how that looks like on the Swagger-UI, here it is:
http://swagger-net-test.azurewebsites.net/swagger/ui/index?filter=IHttpActionResult#/IHttpActionResult/IHttpActionResult_GetById
I've encountered a problem while upgrading from AutoMapper's static API.
I'm following the example on this page, which states that
Typical usage from 4.1 and before was:
Mapper.Initialize(cfg => {
cfg.AddProfile<AppProfile>();
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>(); });
var dest = Mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(new Source());
In 4.2 and later, this would look like:
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => {
cfg.AddProfile<AppProfile>();
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>();
});
var mapper = config.CreateMapper();
var dest = mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(new Source());
However, while using v4.2.1 via NuGet I can't see this 'CreateMapper' method.
What am I supposed to use?
I've realised what was causing my problem.
In order to use the MapperConfiguration application-wide I was storing it as a static property:
public static IMapperConfiguration { get; private set; }
public static void Init()
{
MapperConfiguration = new MapperConfiguration(...);
...
MapperConfiguration. // CreateMapper() not available
}
The problem here is that the CreateMapper method is only available on the MapperConfiguration class, not the IMapperConfiguration interface.
I am writing a custom module that retrieves and pushes data directly from the Orchard DB using an injected IRepository.
This works fine until i need to update a content part. I add an update in my migrations class and the update runs through (DB schema updated with default values), however I can't update any of the new values through IRepository. I have to drop down into the NHibernate.ISession to flush the changes through.
This all works fine on a newly created recipe, it's only when i alter a part. Here are the key code snippets:
public class TranslationsPartRecord : ContentPartRecord
{
internal const string DefaultProductName = "Product";
public TranslationsPartRecord()
{
ProductName = DefaultProductName;
}
public virtual string ProductName { get; set; }
}
public class TranslationsPart : ContentPart<TranslationsPartRecord>
{
public string ProductName
{
get { return Record.ProductName; }
set { Record.ProductName = value; }
}
}
public class TranslationsHandler : ContentHandler
{
public TranslationsHandler(IRepository<TranslationsPartRecord> repository)
{
Filters.Add(StorageFilter.For(repository));
}
}
public class Migrations : DataMigrationImpl
{
public int Create()
{
SchemaBuilder.CreateTable("TranslationsPartRecord", table => table
.Column<int>("Id", column => column.PrimaryKey().Identity())
.Column("ProductName", DbType.String, column => column.NotNull().WithDefault(TranslationsPartRecord.DefaultProductName))
);
return 1;
}
public int UpdateFrom1()
{
SchemaBuilder.AlterTable("TranslationsPartRecord", table => table.AddColumn("ProductDescription", DbType.String, column => column.NotNull().WithDefault(TranslationsPartRecord.DefaultProductDescription)));
return 2;
}
}
When i add the second property "ProductDescription" in this example, after the update is run the columns appear in the DB but i cannot update them until i recreate the Orchard recipe (blat App_Data and start again).
here's how I am trying to update:
// ctor
public AdminController(IRepository<TranslationsPartRecord> translationsRepository)
{
_translationsRepository = translationsRepository;
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Translations(TranslationsViewModel translationsViewModel)
{
var translations = _translationsRepository.Table.SingleOrDefault();
translations.ProductName = translationsViewModel.ProductName;
translations.ProductDescription = translationsViewModel.ProductDescription;
_translationsRepository.Update(translations);
_translationsRepository.Flush();
}
and here's the NHibernate "fix":
var session = _sessionLocator.For(typeof(TranslationsPartRecord));
var translations = _translationsRepository.Table.SingleOrDefault();
// is translations.Id always 1?
var dbTranslations = session.Get<TranslationsPartRecord>(translations.Id);
dbTranslations.ProductName = translationsViewModel.ProductName;
dbTranslations.ProductDescription = translationsViewModel.ProductDescription;
session.Update(dbTranslations);
session.Flush();
which seems a bit kludgey...
Cheers.
ps i'm still running Orchard 1.3.9
pps after more testing, the NHibernate fix has stopped working now, so perhaps my initial findings were a red herring. It seems as though new properties on the content part are totally ignored by NHibernate when updating/retrieving - as though the object definition is cached somewhere...
If your mappings aren't being updated that is strange. You can try to force it by deleting the mappings.bin in the app_data folder, and restarting the application. Orchard should recreate the nhibernate mappings and save as mappings.bin.
I have ran into the same issue, and the only way around it that I can find is to delete mappings.bin (I don't need to disable and re-enable the module). In fact, this is the answer that I got from Bertrand when I asked why this was happening.
I have logged this as an issue at http://orchard.codeplex.com/workitem/19306. If you could vote this up, then we may get it looked at quicker.
This seems like a similar issue to what I am seeing... I am seeing that when you enable a module, it runs the NHibernate mappings BEFORE running the Migrations..
https://orchard.codeplex.com/workitem/19603
Josh
Update the hash value in the ComputingHash method in the PersistenceConfiguration Class,
updating the hash value may recreate the mappings.bin file.
public class PersistenceConfiguration : ISessionConfigurationEvents
{
public void Created(FluentConfiguration cfg, AutoPersistenceModel defaultModel)
{
DoModelMapping(cfg, defaultModel);
}
public void ComputingHash(Hash hash)
{
hash.AddString("Some_strings_to_update_hash");
}
private void DoModelMapping(FluentConfiguration cfg, AutoPersistenceModel defaultModel)
{
// mappings here....
}
public void Prepared(FluentConfiguration cfg) { }
public void Building(Configuration cfg) { }
public void Finished(Configuration cfg) { }
}
I wrote about this topic in another question.
However, I've since refactored my code to get rid of configuration access, thus allowing the specs to pass. Or so I thought. They run fine from within Visual Studio using TestDriven.Net. However, when I run them during rake using the mspec.exe tool, they still fail with a serialization exception. So I've created a completely self-contained example that does basically nothing except setup fake security credentials on the thread. This test passes just fine in TD.Net, but blows up in mspec.exe. Does anybody have any suggestions?
Update: I've discovered a work-around. After researching the issue, it seems the cause is that the assembly containing my principal object is not in the same folder as the mspec.exe. When mspec creates a new AppDomain to run my specs, that new AppDomain has to load the assembly with the principal object in order to deserialize it. That assembly is not in the same folder as the mspec EXE, so it fails. If I copied my assembly into the same folder as mspec, it works fine.
What I still don't understand is why ReSharper and TD.Net can run the test just fine? Do they not use mspec.exe to actually run the tests?
using System;
using System.Security.Principal;
using System.Threading;
using Machine.Specifications;
namespace MSpecTest
{
[Subject(typeof(MyViewModel))]
public class When_security_credentials_are_faked
{
static MyViewModel SUT;
Establish context = SetupFakeSecurityCredentials;
Because of = () =>
SUT = new MyViewModel();
It should_be_initialized = () =>
SUT.Initialized.ShouldBeTrue();
static void SetupFakeSecurityCredentials()
{
Thread.CurrentPrincipal = CreatePrincipal(CreateIdentity());
}
static MyIdentity CreateIdentity()
{
return new MyIdentity(Environment.UserName, "None", true);
}
static MyPrincipal CreatePrincipal(MyIdentity identity)
{
return new MyPrincipal(identity);
}
}
public class MyViewModel
{
public MyViewModel()
{
Initialized = true;
}
public bool Initialized { get; set; }
}
[Serializable]
public class MyPrincipal : IPrincipal
{
private readonly MyIdentity _identity;
public MyPrincipal(MyIdentity identity)
{
_identity = identity;
}
public bool IsInRole(string role)
{
return true;
}
public IIdentity Identity
{
get { return _identity; }
}
}
[Serializable]
public class MyIdentity : IIdentity
{
private readonly string _name;
private readonly string _authenticationType;
private readonly bool _isAuthenticated;
public MyIdentity(string name, string authenticationType, bool isAuthenticated)
{
_name = name;
_isAuthenticated = isAuthenticated;
_authenticationType = authenticationType;
}
public string Name
{
get { return _name; }
}
public string AuthenticationType
{
get { return _authenticationType; }
}
public bool IsAuthenticated
{
get { return _isAuthenticated; }
}
}
}
Dan,
thank you for providing a reproduction.
First off, the console runner works differently than the TestDriven.NET and ReSharper runners. Basically, the console runner has to perform a lot more setup work in that it creates a new AppDomain (plus configuration) for every assembly that is run. This is required to load the .dll.config file for your spec assembly.
Per spec assembly, two AppDomains are created:
The first AppDomain (Console) is created
implicitly when mspec.exe is
executed,
a second AppDomain is created by mspec.exe for the assembly containing the specs (Spec).
Both AppDomains communicate with each other through .NET Remoting: For example, when a spec is executed in the Spec AppDomain, it notifies the Console AppDomain of that fact. When Console receives the notification it acts accordingly by writing the spec information to the console.
This communiciation between Spec and Console is realized transparently through .NET Remoting. One property of .NET Remoting is that some properties of the calling AppDomain (Spec) are automatically included when sending notifications to the target AppDomain (Console). Thread.CurrentPrincipal is such a property. You can read more about that here: http://sontek.vox.com/library/post/re-iprincipal-iidentity-ihttpmodule-serializable.html
The context you provide will run in the Spec AppDomain. You set Thread.CurrentPrincipal in the Because. After Because ran, a notification will be issued to the Console AppDomain. The notification will include your custom MyPrincipal that the receiving Console AppDomain tries to deserialize. It cannot do that since it doesn't know about your spec assembly (as it is not included in its private bin path).
This is why you had to put your spec assembly in the same folder as mspec.exe.
There are two possible workarounds:
Derive MyPrincipal and MyIdentity from MarshalByRefObject so that they can take part in cross-AppDomain communication through a proxy (instead of being serialized)
Set Thread.CurrentPrincipal transiently in the Because
(Text is required for formatting to work -- please ignore)
Because of = () =>
{
var previousPrincipal = Thread.CurrentPrincipal;
try
{
Thread.CurrentPrincipal = new MyPrincipal(...);
SUT = new MyViewModel();
}
finally
{
Thread.CurrentPrincipal = previousPrincipal;
}
}
ReSharper, for example, handles all the communication work for us. MSpec's ReSharper Runner can hook into the existing infrastructure (that, AFAIK, does not use .NET Remoting).