I have a schema, where there are 3 elements and these 3 elements still have more sub elements. Lets name 1st element as Header, 2nd one as record, 2rd one as footer.
There is one occurence of header, multiple occurences of record and one occurence of footer again.
so the input to schema looks like
header
record..
record..
...
..
footer
now my problem is . my schema is defined like this
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="HEADER">
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" name="Record">
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="FOOTER">
when a file (with a header 2 records and footer)is parsed through this schema. the parser recognizes recognizes the header and both the records and gives an exception after recognizing the 2nd record and doesn't give the footer. How do we define max and min occurs when there are 2 or more elements and middle element has unbounded as max occurs
EDIT:
thanks for the replies. This is my xsd file.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<xs:schema xmlns:NS="sample.xsd" xmlns="sample.xsd" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="sample.xsd" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:element name="PTRO">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="HEADER">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="header_sub_element">
<xs:simpleType>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" name="Record">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="Record_sub_element">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="11" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="FOOTER">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="footer_sub_element">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="9" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
# marc_s the problem is when an input file (.txt file) which contains a header, 2 records, footer is parsed using this schema, the parser recognizes header and records...and after this it gives an exception since it doesn't recognize the footer. The max occurs of Record is unbounded. Does this have something to do with the exception ??
You have to use < sequence >< /sequence > instead of the < all >< /all > or < choice >< /choice >.
That should solve the problem.
Related
I have a following schema (1.1). I would like to have schema that will check that a sequence of parameters has mendatory parameter of type '1' and optional parameter of type '2'. I did it using alternatives because different types have different list of attributes.
How write an assertion to check that parameter of type 1 is mendatory?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:vc="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-versioning" elementFormDefault="qualified" vc:minVersion="1.1">
<xs:element name="rule">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="conditions" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="condition" maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="1">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="parameter" maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="1">
<xs:alternative test="#type = '1'" type="typeOne"/>
<xs:alternative test="#type = '2'" type="typeTwo" />
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:complexType name="typeOne">
<xs:attribute name="type" type="xs:string" use="required"/>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="typeTwo">
<xs:attribute name="type" type="xs:string" use="required" />
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
I did it using alternatives because different types have different list of attributes.
It would be like this:
<xs:element name="condition" maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="1">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="parameter" maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="1">
<xs:alternative test="#type = '1'" type="typeOne"/>
<xs:alternative test="#type = '2'" type="typeTwo" />
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:assert id="type-1-mandatory" test="parameter[#type eq '1']"></xs:assert>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
this topic is related to xsd: define an element that can be repeated an even number of times. i would like to create a new complex type using complexContent with extension. i tried this:
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" >
<xs:complexType name="evenOccurrence">
<xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:element name="B" maxOccurs="2" minOccurs="2"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="oddOcurrence">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="evenOccurrence">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="B"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
this code generate the following error: cos-nonambig: B and B (or elements from their substitution group) violate "Unique Particle Attribution". During validation against this schema, ambiguity would be created for those two particles.. how i can fix the problem
This are two similar ways of doing it:
1- Without extension:
<xs:complexType name="oddOcurrence">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="B" /> <!-- 1 time -->
<xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<!-- 2n times -->
<xs:element name="B" maxOccurs="2" minOccurs="2" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
2- Similar, with extension
<xs:complexType name="elementOneTime">
<xs:sequence>
<!-- 1 time -->
<xs:element name="B" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="oddOcurrence">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="elementOneTime">
<xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<!-- 2n times -->
<xs:element name="B" maxOccurs="2" minOccurs="2" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
EDIT: ¿Why was it ambiguous?
As evenOccurrence can be empty, when the parser finds the first B element of and oddOccurance, it doesn't know if its parsing the first B of an evenOccurance or the B element that only appears once.
By putting first the element that can only appear once you remove the ambiguity, as the first B element would be analyzed and then the parser would enter in a state in which it would analyze the oddOccurence type (all the other B elements).
Hi again SO community,
got another request regarding how to define an XSD schema correctly.
Given I have an XML file like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<transformation xmlns="http://www.denktmit.de/pdi/ktr" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
./test.xsd">
<info>
<name>TrafoName</name>
<description>TrafoDescription</description>
</info>
<changedby>LastUser</changedby>
<step>
<type>FileInput</type>
<description>FileInput Step description</description>
<FileInputParameterOne>FileInputParam</FileInputParameterOne>
<another>1</another>
</step>
<step>
<type>Select</type>
<description>Select Step description</description>
<SelectParameterOne>SelectParameterOne</SelectParameterOne>
<SelectParameterTwo>SelectParameterTwo</SelectParameterTwo>
<another>2</another>
</step>
</transformation>
This resembles the style of the transformation files as produced by http://community.pentaho.com/projects/data-integration/
As you can see, each step contains several sequence nodes on top
<type>Select</type>
<description>Select Step description</description>
and on bottom:
<another>2</another>
In between, arbitrary complex xml subtrees may occur. But what exactely max occur is determined by the value in "type". The use case is to store specific configurations for concrete Java classes, that all implement an interface, defining getters/setter for "type", "description" and "another" and defining addtional object structure themself. It would also be sufficient to neglect the order, as long as all the elements, needed for a specific class are somehow present.
I already read:
How to group types & subtypes in XSD
xsd: How to extend a type with an unordered list of elements
Use <xs:all> in XML schema's complexType?
xsd: How to extend a type with an unordered list of elements
And I tried something like
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="http://www.denktmit.de/pdi/ktr" elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified" xmlns="http://www.denktmit.de/pdi/ktr">
<xs:element name="transformation">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:element name="step" type="fileInputStep"></xs:element>
<xs:element name="step" type="selectStep"></xs:element>
</xs:choice>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:complexType name="stepComplexType" abstract="true"></xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="fileInputStep">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="stepComplexType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="type" minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string"></xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="description" type="xs:string"
minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"></xs:element>
<xs:element name="FileInputParameterOne" type="xs:string">
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="another" type="xs:int" minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1"></xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="selectStep">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="stepComplexType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="type" minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:pattern value="Select"></xs:pattern>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="description" type="xs:string"
minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"></xs:element>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="SelectParameterOne"
type="xs:string">
</xs:element>
<xs:element minOccurs="1" name="SelectParameterTwo"
type="xs:string">
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="another" type="xs:int" minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1"></xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
But it is not working, telling me:
Multiple annotations found at this line: validation against this
schema, ambiguity would be created for those two particles.
- Start tag of element
- cos-element-consistent: Error for type '#AnonType_transformation'. Multiple elements with name 'step', with different types, appear in
the model group.
Any ideas?
You may use xsd Group. Here's an sample for your reference
XSD:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:element name="transformation">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:element name="step" type="stepType"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:complexType name="stepComplexType" abstract="true"></xs:complexType>
<xs:group name="selectParamGroup">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="SelectParameterOne" type="xs:string" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="SelectParameterTwo" type="xs:string" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1">
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:group>
<xs:group name="paramGroup">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="FileInputParameterOne" type="xs:string">
</xs:element>
<xs:group ref="selectParamGroup">
</xs:group>
</xs:choice>
</xs:group>
<xs:complexType name="stepType">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="stepComplexType">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="type" minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string"></xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="description" type="xs:string"
minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"></xs:element>
<xs:group ref="paramGroup"></xs:group>
<xs:element name="another" type="xs:int" minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="1"></xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
XML:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<transformation>
<step>
<type>FileInput</type>
<description>FileInput Step description</description>
<FileInputParameterOne>FileInputParam</FileInputParameterOne>
<another>1</another>
</step>
<step>
<type>Select</type>
<description>Select Step description</description>
<SelectParameterOne>SelectParameterOne</SelectParameterOne>
<SelectParameterTwo>SelectParameterTwo</SelectParameterTwo>
<another>2</another>
</step>
</transformation>
I would like to write a XSD element that permit something like that :
<CustomFields>
<CustomField id="1">some text data</CustomField>
<CustomField id="2">some text data</CustomField>
</CustomFields>
But I have some restrictions : I have to restrict the text (maxLenght = 36). And I would like to be impossible to have 2 CustomField with the same id.
So far I wrote this, but it not what I want :
<xs:element name="CustomFields" minOccurs="0">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="CustomField" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="20">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:simpleContent>
<xs:extension base="xs:string">
<xs:attribute name="id" type="xs:integer" use="required"></xs:attribute>
</xs:extension>
</xs:simpleContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
Thanks for any help.
Regards.
You could use following attempt
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
<xs:simpleType name="restrictedString">
<!-- Make a new type to be a "descendant" of string-->
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="36"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:element name="CustomFields">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="CustomField" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="20">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:simpleContent>
<!-- reference new type you declared above -->
<xs:extension base="restrictedString">
<xs:attribute name="id" type="xs:integer" use="required"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:simpleContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<!-- Restrict #id to be unique-->
<xs:unique name="id_uq">
<xs:selector xpath="CustomField"/>
<xs:field xpath="#id"/>
</xs:unique>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
I have some complexType element which is parent of some element:
<xs:complexType name="elementParent">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="b" type="xs:String" />
<xs:element name="c" type="xs:String" />
</xs:complexType>
now I want to create anothex complex type which will be extension of my parent. Problem is in order. First element should be a then b and then c. I just know this option where order will be b c a which I dont want:
<xs:complexType name="elementChild">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="elementParent">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="a" type="xs:String" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:extension> creates a type which is a sequence containing first the base type and then the explicit content defined in <xs:extension>. If you only want to add new elements preceding the elements of another type, you could define the common elements as an <xs:group> and then refer to that group in both of the type definitions.
Something like this:
<!-- common elements defined as a group -->
<xs:group name="elementGroup">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="b" type="xs:string" />
<xs:element name="c" type="xs:string" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:group>
<!-- group is referred to in element type definitions -->
<xs:element name="elementParent">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:group ref="elementGroup" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="elementChild">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="a" type="xs:string" />
<xs:group ref="elementGroup" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>