The answer to this must be somewhere but I'm not finding it -- can anyone help me understand why in Gedit, if I have a page of code there is no extra trailing blank line, but then when I do a file comparison for my svn commit it shows an extra line being added at the end of the file?
I have a feeling that Gedit is automatically adding an ending line break. But why, I have no idea...
Reality finally won and it's been fixed, but the broken behavior is still the default; enable the WYSIWYG behavior in a terminal with
gsettings set org.gnome.gedit.preferences.editor ensure-trailing-newline false
It's a feature. I don't think it can easily be disabled.
this is intentional: text files should always be terminated by \n, otherwise
tools like 'cat', 'sed' etc may have problems. However there is no reason to
always show an empty line at the bottom of the text view, that's why we do not
show the last \n
paolo borelli [gedit developer]
Some editors (I'm unfamiliar with Gedit specifically) will try to ensure that a file always ends with a newline character. Other editors, like perhaps the one that you originally created the file with, will allow you to end a file without a final newline character.
Try the Whitespace Remover plugin.
Related
I have written some c code, and the end of my output is '\n', when I check the output text file in vim, I cannot find the last empty line, however, when I open it with another text viewer, I can find the last empty line. How can I configure my vim to show the empty line?
The way Vim shows \n / 0x0a at the end of the file is that it opens the file without complaining about [noeol] when :editing the file (in a kind of "reverse logic" from what you expect). Vim's (and Unix) philosophy is that the trailing newline should be there. This can be confusing when one is used to other editors or predominantly works on MS Windows.
There's a lot of discussion and questions about this (e.g. here); as this is unlikely to change, get used to it.
This is driving me nuts. Similar SO questions don't contain the answer, though, so here it goes again in slightly different form:
Is there a way to:
Make vim show 0x0a at the end of file as a blank line?
Supposing #1 can't be done, how do I delete the eol? There is no line, so there is nothing to delete.
For example:
vim -b myfile (currently no eol)
Add blank line at the end of file, :w :q
vim -b myfile - the blank line is gone, but hexdump shows 0x0a is still there. This is inconsistent behaviour.
I don't know how to see the last blank line, but to remove just open your file, the run:
:set binary noendofline
This will remove the last (invisible) blank line from it.
Warning: because of binary some settings will be modified (for example textwidth)!
You can use set noeol in binary mode:
:help noeol
When writing a file and this option is off and the 'binary' option
is on, no <EOL> will be written for the last line in the file. This
option is automatically set when starting to edit a new file, unless
the file does not have an <EOL> for the last line in the file, in
which case it is reset.
see also: Vim show newline at the end of file
The way Vim shows 0x0a at the end of the file is that it opens the file without complaining about [noeol] when :editing the file (in a kind of "reverse logic" from what you expect). As you've probably read already, Vim's (and Unix) philosophy is that the trailing newline should be there.
Based on this philosophy, I wouldn't recommend intentionally creating files without a trailing newline. However, there are ways to make Vim respect and maintain such existing files. My PreserveNoEOL plugin provides a way to do this effortlessly.
I work with Wordpress a lot, and sometimes I changed Wordpress core files temporarily in order to understand what is going on, especially when debugging. Today I got a little surprise. When I was ready to commit my changes to my git repository, I noticed that git status was marking one of Wordpress files as not staged for commit. I remember I had reverted all the changes I did to that file before closing it, so I decided to use diff to see what had changed. I compared the file on my project with the file on the Wordpress copy that I keep in my downloads directory. It turns out the files differ at the very end. diff indicates that the there is a newline missing at the end of the original file:
1724c1724
< }
\ No newline at end of file
---
> }
I never even touched that line. The changes I made where somewhere in the middle of a large file. This leads me to think that vim added a newline character at the end of the file. Why would that happen?
All the answers I've seen here address the question "how could I prevent Vim from adding a newline character at the end of the file?", while the question was "Why would Vim add a new line at the end of a file?". My browser's search engine brought me here, and I didn't find the answer to that question.
It is related with how the POSIX standard defines a line (see Why should files end with a newline?). So, basically, a line is:
3.206 Line
A sequence of zero or more non- <newline> characters plus a terminating <newline> character.
And, therefore, they all need to end with a newline character. That's why Vim always adds a newline by default (because, according to POSIX, it should always be there).
It is not the only editor doing that. Gedit, the default text editor in GNOME, does the same exact thing.
Edit
Many other tools also expect that newline character. See for example:
How wc expects it.
GCC warns about it.
Also, you may be interested in: Vim show newline at the end of file.
Because vim is a text editor, it can sometimes "clean up" files for you. See http://vimhelp.appspot.com/vim_faq.txt.html#faq-5.4 for details on how to write without the ending newline, paraphrased below:
How do I write a file without the line feed (EOL) at the end of the file?
You can turn off the eol option and turn on the binary option to write a file without the EOL at the end of the file:
:set binary
:set noeol
:w
Alternatively, you can use:
:set noeol
:w ++bin
Adding a newline is the default behavior for Vim. If you don't need it, then use this solution: VIM Disable Automatic Newline At End Of File
To disable, add this to your .vimrc
set fileformats+=dos
You can put the following line into your .vimrc
autocmd FileType php setlocal noeol binary
Which should do the trick, but actually your approach is somewhat wrong. First of all php won't mind that ending at all and secondly if you don't want to save your changes don't press u or worse manually try to recreate the state of the file, but just quit without saving q!. If you left the editor and saved for some reason, try git checkout <file>
3.206 Line
A sequence of zero or more non- characters plus a terminating character.
Interestingly, vim will allow you to open a new file, write the file, and the file will be zero bytes. If you open a new file and append a line using o then write the file it will be two characters long. If you open said file back up and delete the second line dd and write the file it will be one byte long. Open the file back up and delete the only line remaining and write the file it will be zero bytes. So vim will let you write a zero byte file only as long as it is completely empty. Seems to defy the posix definition above. I guess...
^M is the dos carriage return that's left after each line when you move a file from a Windows box to a *NIX box. I know how to remove it. I am curious to know is there any other reason besides aesthetics that it should be removed from a PHP script.
The PHP script runs fine with it in. Normally, I would remove it without hesitation, but don't want to have my name next to each line in an svn blame command. (besides the point).
Question: Is there a reason in regards to functionality of why it should be remove other than aesthetics? It doesn't seem to break anything to keep it in. (Give me a good reason plz)
All in all, it should be fine. Other languages are picky about their line endings; I've seen it cause issues in Perl scripts, for example. But for PHP, i've never seen it matter much.
One occasion where it could conceivably matter is in multi-line strings, where the extra chars would make it through to the output. This might matter if your output is not HTML or XML. But JS shouldn't be particular about extraneous CRs, and HTML and XML will generally treat any whitespace the same as a single space (or in many cases, disregard whitespace altogether). Textareas and <pre> elements and such might end up with extra whitespace in them. That's about the only issue i can think of.
When I open a text file in Notepad, it shows a blank line if there is a carriage return at the end of the last line containing text. However, in Vim it does not show this blank line. Another thing I've noticed is that the Vim editor adds a carriage return to the last line by default (even though it doesn't show it). I can tell, because if I open a file in Notepad that was created in Vim, it shows a blank line at the end of the file.
Anyway, I can live with these two differences, but I'm wondering if there is an option in Vim that allows you to toggle this behaviour.
Thanks
PS - GVim 7.2
[Update]
Would this make sense to be on Server Fault instead?
[Update 2]
I'll rephrase this... I need to know when there is a carriage return at the end of single line file (Notepad shows an extra line with no text, with Vim I cannot tell). This is due to a Progress program that reads a text file (expects a single line, but with a carriage return) and parses the text for some purpose. If there is no carriage return, Progress treats the line as if it is null.
[Workaround Solution]
One way I've found to ensure there is a carriage return (but make sure I don't add a second one) is to make sure I have the end of line write option turned on (:set eol) and then just do a write/save. This will put an end of line in the file if it's not already there. Otherwise, it doesn't add a new one.
:help endofline
explains how you could stop vim from adding an extra newline.
It seems that vim treats newline as a line terminator, while notepad treats it as a line separator: from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newline
There is also some confusion whether
newlines terminate or separate lines.
If a newline is considered a
separator, there will be no newline
after the last line of a file. The
general convention on most systems is
to add a newline even after the last
line, i.e., to treat newline as a line
terminator. Some programs have
problems processing the last line of a
file if it isn't newline terminated.
Conversely, programs that expect
newline to be used as a separator will
interpret a final newline as starting
a new (empty) line. This can result in
a different line count being reported
for the file, but is otherwise
generally harmless.
If I recall correctly, on unix-y systems a text file must be terminated with a newline.
One useful Vim option is
set list
It will help you see all end of lines characters (and possibly other generally invisible chars). So you will be able to view this last endofline directly in Vim and not only in Notepad.
When you open the file in VIM the status line should say [noeol] after the filename. So that's one indication. As Manni said, you can change this by setting both the endofline option off and the binary option on. You can set this as your default settings in a .vimrc file.