Quick background - I have a form that offers a handful of optional options to users and a search method on my service that accepts all those fields and attaches the necessary Where() conditions on the master IQueryable list.
One of those filters is a list of strings that must be compared to a combination of three different fields in the IQueryable. here's the code throwing the "could not resolve property" error:
var searchResults = _transactionHeaders.Retrieve();
if (subgroups.Any())
searchResults = searchResults.Where(s => subgroups.Contains(s.CustomerType + s.RusNumber + s.GroupNumber));
return searchResults.ToList()
I've read a few posts that suggest an alias needs to be created for any properties not directly mapped in the NHibernate mapping. I'm not quite sure that is the solution to my problem.
Suggestions? Thanks for any help you can offer.
Linq2Nhibernate can't understand a .Contains method call to. You'll have to change your query so it's compatible with linq2nhibernate.
Related
Is there an api call that will retrieve all possible values for a field via a RESTlet script for Netsuite?
For example, I want to return all of the possible class field values (Class 1, Class 2, ...) for an inventory item.
I have already tried nlapiGetFieldValues('class') but without success. I'm guessing that is a client side only call?
Similar to what Suite Resources said, but use some pre-existing records for the classes you want to evaluate:
switch(true){
case req.type == 'customer':
var x = nlapiLoadRecord('class',1000);
and either
return x; OR return x.getAllFields() OR return JSON.stringify(x);
case req.type == 'salesorder':
...... etc.
}
I'd personally just return the whole record to get subfields and prototype functions.
RESTLets are written in SuiteScript, so look at the supported records.
Class (classification).
You can write up a saved search within the UI, then use nlapiSearchRecord in your RESTLet. Loop through the results of the search and append to an array of objects representing the record. Then use JSON.stringify and return results. Pretty easy.
Try coding it up and post the code if you have issues.
As the question suggests, I need to find out how to access entity data that has been passed into a JavaScript function via a lookup.
JavaScript Code Follows:
// function to generate the correct Weighting Value when these parameters change
function TypeAffectedOrRegionAffected_OnChanged(ExecutionContext, Type, Region, Weighting, Potential) {
var type = Xrm.Page.data.entity.attributes.get(Type).getValue();
var region = Xrm.Page.data.entity.attributes.get(Region).getValue();
// if we have values for both fields
if (type != null && region != null) {
// create the weighting variable
var weighting = type[0].name.substring(4) + "-" + region;
// recreate the Weighting Value
Xrm.Page.data.entity.attributes.get(Weighting).setValue(weighting);
}
}
As you can see with the following line using the name operator I can access my Type entity's Type field.
// create the weighting variable
var weighting = type[0].name.substring(4) + "-" + region;
I am looking for a way now to access the values stored inside my type object. It has the following fields new_type, new_description, new_value and new_kind.
I guess I'm looking for something like this:
// use value of entity to assign to our form field
Xrm.Page.data.entity.attributes.get(Potential).setValue(type[0].getAttribute("new_value"));
Thanks in advance for any help.
Regards,
Comic
REST OData calls are definitely the way to go in this case. You already have the id, and you just need to retrieve some additional values. Here is a sample to get you started. The hardest part with working with Odata IMHO is creating the Request Url's. There are a couple tools, that you can find on codeplex, but my favorite, is actually to use LinqPad. Just connect to your Org Odata URL, and it'll retrieve all of your entities and allow you to write a LINQ statement that will generate the URL for you, which you can test right in the browser.
For your instance, it'll look something like this (it is case sensitive, so double check that if it doesn't work):
"OdataRestURL/TypeSet(guid'" + type[0].Id.replace(/{/gi, "").replace(/}/gi, "") + "'select=new_type,new_description,new_value,new_kind"
Replace OdataRestURL with whatever your odata rest endpoint is, and you should be all set.
Yes Guido Preite is right. You need to retrieve the entity by the id which come form the lookup by Rest Sync or Async. And then get Json object. However for make the object light which is returned, you can mention which fields to be backed as part of the Json. Now you can access those fields which you want.
I have the following helper method that returns the value from a field.
public static string GetValueFrom(SPListItem item, string fieldName)
{
string value = string.Empty;
if (item.Fields.ContainsField(fieldName))
{
SPField field = item.Fields.GetField(fieldName);
if (item[field.InternalName] != null)
{
value = item[field.InternalName].ToString();
}
}
return value;
}
However for one Field (normal Choice Field) I am getting a ArgumentExecption on this line
if (item[field.InternalName] != null)
I am using
SPListItem item = list.GetItemById(itemId);
To get the item.
I cant find why I am getting the exception when I am checking to see if the field exists?
Any ideas as to why I am getting this Exception for only one field.
Update.
When debugging
The call to GetField() returns the correct field object.
Field.InternalName contains the correct Internal name of the field
If I try and access the value using item["internal name of the field"] it still throws and exception for only this one field.
Sometimes strange things happens and we do not have logical answer to those questions. Try by deleting the list and then creating the list again from scratch. DO NOT try to save it as template and DO NOT try to create the list from that template.
One possible reason of such type of ugly messages is that the security/permissions are not allowing to manipulate that field/column.
Another possible reason of such type of unwanted/unexpected messages is that when the field was created for the first time, its data type was different and later on it was changed to choice. Technically there should be no problem in doing so but sometimes we face odd behavior.
Have you tried debugging? Questions you should answer (because we can't):
Is field a valid value, or null, after the call to GetField()?
If field is not null, what does field.InternalName actually return?
If field.InternalName returns a valid value, can you access it by hard-coding that value in the indexer? i.e. item["fieldInternalName"]
Finding that information may help you solve the problem yourself, but if it doesn't add it to your post so the community has a better chance of helping you.
I do experienced this many a times. The reason for this is if you are logged-in as a non Admin Account(System Account) the default List View Lookup Threshold for the User is 8 for the lookup columns. i.e for the default view the user can access upto the 8 lookup fields only. If you change the List Throttling to >8 it will be resolved. But increasing this will degrade the performance.
Go to Central Admin >> Manage Web Applications >> Select the Web Application >> General Settings Dropdown >> Resource Throttling >> Change the "List View Lookup Threshold" to more than 8
Thanks,
-Codename "Santosh"
I'm just getting started with Subsonic 3.0 ActiveRecord and am trying to implement a batch query like the one in the SubSonic docs. I'm using a batch so I can query a User and a list of the users Orders in one shot.
When I call the BatchQuery.Queue() method, adding my "select user" query, SubSonic throws the following exception:
System.InvalidOperationException : Can't decide which property to consider the Key - you can create one called 'ID' or mark one with SubSonicPrimaryKey attribute
The code is as follows:
var db = new MyDB();
var userQuery = from u in db.Users //gets user by uid
where u.uid == 1
select u;
var provider = ProviderFactory.GetProvider();
var batch = new BatchQuery(provider);
batch.Queue(userQuery); //exception here
//create and add "select users orders" query here...
First things first - Why this error? My SubSonic Users object knows it's PK. "uid" is the PK in the database and the generated code reflects this. And I thought SubSonicPrimaryKey attribute was for the SimpleRepository? Is this way of batching not for ActiveRecord?
I could ask a number of other questions, but I'll leave it at that. If anyone can help me figure out what is going on and how to issue 2 batched queries I'd be grateful!
Edit - after further investigation
I ran through the source code with the debugger. Adam is correct - the ToSchemaTable() method in Objects.cs is apparently building out my schema and failing to find a PK. At the very end, it tries to find a column property named "ID" and flags this as the PK, otherwise it throws the exception. I added a check for "UID" and this works!
Still... I'm confused. I'm admittedly a bit lost after peeling back layer after layer of the source, but it seems like this portion of code is trying to build up a schema for my table and completely ignoring my generated User class - which quite nicely identifies which column/property is the PK! It doesn't seem quite right that I'd be required to name all keys "ID" w/ ActiveRecord.
I think the answer you're looking for is that this is a really stupid bug on my part. I'm hoping to push another build next week and if you could put this on the issue list I'd really appreciate it. My apologies...
SubSonic expects your primary key to be called Id so it's getting confused. SubSonicPrimaryKey is for simple repository but I assume where that exception is being thrown is shared between the different templates. If you rename your PK to Id or id or ID your query will work.
I'm having trouble figuring out how to add a custom column type to a list with the object model.
SPFieldCollection.Add() has a parameter SPFieldType, but that must be one of the enumerated values in the Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldType enumeration, thus it cannot be used to create columns of a custom type.
I next attempted using SPFieldCollection.CreateNewField() but when I call SPField.Update() on the returned value I get an exception: "ArgumentException was unhandled. Value does not fall within the expected range.".
I see a reference to SPFieldCollection.AddFieldAsXml() here: How do I add custom column to existing WSS list template but there's hardly any info and I'm not sure that's the right track to take.
UPDATE: I found a post on AddFieldAsXml: http://weblogs.asp.net/bsimser/archive/2005/07/21/420147.aspx and it turns out it's very easy and worked well for me. Posting anyway in hopes it will help someone else.
SPFieldCollection.AddFieldAsXml() is the way to go as far as I can tell. See here for an example: http://weblogs.asp.net/bsimser/archive/2005/07/21/420147.aspx
Try with:
SPField newField = null;
newField= web.Fields.CreateNewField("MyFieldTypeName", fieldName);
web.Fields.Add(newField);
newField = web.Fields[fieldName];
// set some properties
newField.ShowInDisplayForm = false;
newField.ShowInViewForms = true;
newField.Update();