I am trying to use FIX::Application along with SessionSettings.
The Fix server I am trying to connect to does not see any incoming connection. From my side I see a Logon Message being formulated in toAdmin() callback(which I print out and add certain fields to.
The Question is
1. Do I need to call some form of sendTarget in toAdmin?(I tried that but get a Session not found error)
2. Is there anyway I can increase logging(start logging whats going on under the hood).
Thanks
Firstly the sendTOTarget need not be called in the toAdmin.
As far as logging goes, what i hear is passing th in FIX::LogFactory should be enough.
Related
Please don't ask me not to use eval, this isn't going to be public anyways.
I've made a chatting website, and I have implemented a "!eval" command (admin only), whatever is after it is run. I can use "!eval '2'+'2'" (Strings added), but not "!eval 2+2." The error returned is .
I've console.logged the input to the eval, and it returned exactly what I wanted: "1+1." I've looked around for this, but it seems like no one else had this problem before. A solution (more like a debugging one) is that I tried "eval('1+1')" and returned the same error. Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.
(I forgot to add what I was expecting)
I was expecting this.
VLAZ pointed out in the comments that it must be another piece of code, which he is correct. I was encrypting the messages so it can be sent securely to the client, and it only takes a string. I added
if (typeof(results) != 'string'){
results = String(results)
}
and it seemed to work, Thanks!
I'm using Node as webserver and I want to log every request to it into a database. I also want the user to receive the response as quickly as possible, so I came up with this code:
// ... putting together the response_data
res.send(response_data);
// ... now log the request into the DB and maybe do additional stuff
It works and I like the idea of putting some of the (time) expensive stuff behind the send. But as I'm new to Node I'm asking if this is a common pattern?
On Stackoverflow I just find people having problems bc they try to send additional data after res.send - but I never heard anybody saying "yeah this is a great feature for your responsiveness" so I'm not sure if there's a major flaw with this solution I just don't see yet...
As long as you don't need to send anything back to the user as a result of the "additional" stuff then your approach is fine.
The problem most people come across is trying to send data down the response after the response has already been sent e.g.
res.send(response_data);
// do additional stuff
res.send(additional_data); // KABOOM!
I am writing a client side code in Visual C++ 2012 using C++ Rest SDK (codename "Casablanca").
I have a client created and wish to POST a text string to the server. However, when I send the following code, it is compiling but not sending sending the request.
When I remove everything after "methods::POST" and send a blank post request, then it is sent and received by the server.
Can you please guide me where the problem is. The documentation related to this function is available on Casablanca Documentation.
pplx::task<http_response>resp = client.request(methods::POST,L"",L"This is the random text that I wish to send", L"text/plain");
I think the usage you give here looks correct.
Is your Casablanca the latest version ? Please check that out from here : http://casablanca.codeplex.com/
If you are sure your measurement is accurate, you may want to create a minimal repro and file a bug here : http://casablanca.codeplex.com/workitem/list/basic
I was having a similar problem, all my POSTs was arriving in blank on server , after a few hours work above it, i found a possible solution.
I changed the default content type to application/x-www-form-urlencoded and I started to pass the values like this Example data=text1&data2=text2
client.request(methods::POST,L"",L"data=text1&data2=text2", L"application/x-www-form-urlencoded");
The body parameter must be a json::value.
I cannot comment yet so I have to put my thoughts in an answer. I solved this problem like this: There is an overload of the request method that takes as a parameter the content type so that you do not have to change the code.
m_client->request(methods::POST, L"/statuses/update.json?" + url_encode(data),L"",L"application/x-www-form-urlencoded");
Obviously you would have to implement the url_encode method but that is not difficult. There is a pretty good implementation in "Cassablanca". A search on this site will alos turn up some good examples.
Netty-Gurus,
I've been wondering if there is a shortcut/Netty-Utility/smart-trick
for connecting the input of one Channel to the output of
an other channel. In more details consider the following:
Set-Up a Netty (http) server
For an incoming MessageEvent get its ChannelBuffer
and pipe its input to a NettyClient-ChannelBuffer
(which is to be set up along the lines of the NettyServer).
I'm interested in how to achieve bullet-point 3. since my first
thoughts along the lines
// mock messageReceived(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, MessageEvent e):
ChannelBuffer bufIn = (ChannelBuffer) e.getMessage();
ChannelBuffer bufOut = getClientChannelBuffer();// Set-up somewhere else
bufOut.write(bufIn);
seem to me awkward because
A. I have to determine for each and every messageReceived-Event
the target ChannelBuffer
B. To much Low-Level tinkering
My wish/vision would be to connect
--> the input of one Channel
--> to the output of an other channel
and let them do their I/O without any additional coding.
Many thanks in advance!,
Traude
P.S: Issue has arisen as I'm trying to dispatch the various HTTP-requests to the
server (one entry point) to several other servers, depending on
the input content (mapping based on the first HTTP request line).
Obviously, I also need to do the inverse trick -- pipeing back client
to server -- but I guess it'll be similar to the solution of
the question before.
Looks like you need to use a multiplexer in you business handler. The business handler could have a map. With key as "first http request line" and value as the output channel for the server. Once you do a lookup you just do a channel.write(channelBuffer);
Also take a look at bruno de carvalho's tcp tunnel, which may give you more ideas on how to deal with these kind of requirements.
Hello
I am using mgtwitterengine in iphone to call twitter API. I want to retrive followers name
in my iphone.
I used textfield.text=[_engine getFollowersIncludingCurrentStatus:YES]; but it is not showing correct result. it only show some alphabets...
could anyone tell me how to do this.
you are using
NSLog(#"%#",[_engine getFollowersIncludingCurrentStatus:YES]);
getFollowersIncludingCurrentStatus not responding the result, it returns connection identifier which is DF387EE5-05CE-40E3-A12D-4D016C581233 in your case
your API response will come in this method
- (void)userInfoReceived:(NSArray *)userInfo forRequest:(NSString *)identifier
this is delegate method you have to add this in your class.
[_engine getFollowersIncludingCurrentStatus:YES];
use like this it may help you, i got the values and printing on console