I see a lot of complete for gvim such as php, c , css, but I can't find any complete form aspvbs
Are you talking about auto completion? Do you know about ctags? (http://ctags.sourceforge.net/).
Anyway, here's an OK solution. Well actually i haven't tested it too much yet but it seems to work fairly well. Assuming you are using ctags, add
--langmap=Asp:*.vbs
to your ~/.ctags file and it will tell ctags to generate tags for your *.vbs files (as Asp, whatever that is =D). I'm don't know much about asp / vbs and their relationship (not sure i want to, hehe), so once again I'm telling you I don't know how well this works. Perhaps someone can fill in on this?
I guess even better... Add your own language (and share with me) : )
http://ctags.sourceforge.net/EXTENDING.html
I don't use Vim much, but 5 seconds of googling turned up this: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=993 - is that what you're looking for, or something different?
Related
I have the awesome vim-sexp and vim-sexp-mappings-for-regular-people plugins installed, and I've come across a situation I'm not sure how to solve.
Suppose I have the following form:
(alimony barbara (code determinant) eclair final-countdown)
How can I transform that to:
(alimony
barbara
(code determinant)
eclair
final-countdown)
I can go ahead and insert a newline before every inner-form/element, but that is a bit tedious. There should be a way with or without the sexp plugin
This is an old question, but maybe an updated answer will help someone who comes here in the future.
You don't have to write the program mentioned by Kaz. Others have already done it. I have not tried them, but here are a few:
fipp,
cljfmt,
cljstyle,
zprint,
joker. (The last one does more than code formatting.)
As Kaz suggests, once installed, you can pipe code to a formatter using !. You can even bind this operation to a key combination. Some of the formatters offer suggestions about how to do this sort of thing.
In addition, some vim IDE plugins, such as vim-iced provide support for using an external formatter.
A productive way to get this behavior would be, rather than fighting with Vim modules and extensions, to write a Lisp program which reads S-expressions and outputs them reformatted in the desired way. To use that program out of Vim, just pipe a range of lines into it using the ! command.
I'm a long time Emacs user, but partially switched to MacVim 2 years ago, and have been using it for all my programming work (still using Emacs for other stuff). I decided to switch back to Emacs now, mainly because of the awesome evil-mode. I'm quite happy, but I still haven't found something as good and simple as the Vim Command-T plugin.
The main problem with the Emacs alternatives is that they are either too complicated and or slow.
The closest thing to Command-T is helm/helm-cmd-t, but it doesn't quite work like it.
Let's say you have two paths:
app/controllers/admin/feedback_controller.rb
app/controllers/fee_controller.rb
In Vim's Command-T, you can write:
app/controllers/fe
And it will match both paths.
With helm-cmd-t, if I write app/controllers/fee, it will only match fee_controller. If I want to match both, I have to use a regexp, as in app/controllers/.*, which is not that bad, but requires more keystrokes.
Any suggestions appreciated!
Any Emacs package that uses ido can do this, provided that ido-flex-match is non-nil. Helm-cmd-t deliberately doesn't support this kind of flexible matching.
You can get the behaviour you describe using find-file-in-repository with ido-flex-match set to 't.
I've recently started using flx with ido-mode and projectile it has exceptionally good, ranked fuzzy matching and has a very similar feel to CtrlP and CmdT for Vim.
It can be installed via MELPA.
M-x package-install
flx
For more info see the flx project.
Here's a screengrab to illustrate...
Here it is, but required helm to be installed first: https://github.com/emacs-helm/helm-cmd-t
EDIT: See my Helm guide. Read why it is powerful. See helm with projectile in action in that section.
With fuzzy searcher like Ido + flx or the like in Vim, you have to type thing in order.
With Helm, you can perform out of order matching.I called it out of order because whether I enter "main.c x86" or "x86 main.c", I get the same set of results for the either query. But it also makes sense to call it multi-steps search. Without having to enter the search strings (called "patterns", which are actually regexp) in an orderly fashion, Helm gives me greater freedom: I can enter the thing I wanted first in my mind without having to remember its complex path; if there are many candidates from the target I wanted, I narrow it down further with more details (patterns).
The above example to illustrate the two cases from the advantage above:
If my desire target is not unique, fine I can narrow further.
If my desire target is unique, I can immediately get it.
As you can see, the Linux kernel source tree contains more than 40kfiles, and I narrowed it down to a few files immediately.
Visual Studio also implements this mechanism in their project search, but it's not generic as Helm. In Helm, you can reuse the same Helm interface for many other things; for example, see helm-semantic-or-imenu. You have something like an outline tree, but you can interactively and incrementally narrow to the candidates you want with a few simple patterns.
Finally, fyi, flx author - Le Wang - is using Helm.
Did you try LustyExplorer? It's based on the Vim plugin with the same name.
Also, it looks like you are not using Command-T to the best of its capabilities: acfe should be enough for it to match those two files. What you do is not particularly better than :e app/con*/**/fe<Tab>.
I've once run across gpicker which advertises speed as one of its advantages over Ido and other "native" elisp packages. Never got to try it out on real-world projects though, but it might work for you.
Long story short - there's nothing quite like command-T for Emacs. Best options are gpicker or Peepcode's peepopen, but they are external applications, and I find them to be distracting after using command-T for so long. I'll stick to MacVim for now, only because of command-T, but might look into implementing something that behaves just like command-T as an exercise.
Thank you all for the answers and comments!
Give textmate.el a try :)
https://github.com/defunkt/textmate.el
You'll just have to use "Command+T" instead of "Ctrl+P" :)
https://github.com/bling/fzf.el
This is the best solution out there in my opinion. Here's why:
Uses projectile to determine project root if you're in a project.
Otherwise it very quickly indexes the file in the current directory.
Fuzzy matching.
Can be customized (top or bottom placement, number of records, etc.)
Maybe is a often repeated question here, but i can't find anything similar with the search.
The point is that i like to use Emacs for my personal projects, usually very small applications using C or python, but i was wondering how to use it also for my work, in which we have project with about 10k files of source code, so is veeeery big (actually i am using source insight, that is very nice tool, but only for windows), questions are:
Searching: Which is the most convenient way to search a string within the whole project?
Navigating throught the function: I mean something like putting the cursor over a function, define, var, and going to the definition
Refactoring
Also if you have any experience with this and want to share your thoughts i will consider it highly interesting.
Br
The "traditional" way of navigating C source files is to use "etags" to make a file called TAGS, then use ALT-. to go to functions across files.
For searching for strings in files, I usually use "grep". You could make a shell script with all the directories you want to search or something if you get tired of typing them in each time.
My projects typically live in git, so I put this together to quickly search them:
;; There's something similar (but fancier) in vc-git.el: vc-git-grep
;; -I means don't search through binary files
(defcustom git-grep-switches "--extended-regexp -I -n --ignore-case"
"Switches to pass to `git grep'."
:type 'string)
(defun git-grep (command-args)
(interactive
(list (read-shell-command "Run git-grep (like this): "
(format "git grep %s -e "
git-grep-switches)
'git-grep-history)))
(let ((grep-use-null-device nil))
(grep command-args)))
There is also the Emacs Code Browser. It makes exploring projects a lot simpler. See here and here for more information.
Regarding searches in the whole project, I find extremely useful the rgrep command.
Also, imenu is quite handy to jump to a function definition in the same file.
These are my 2p.
look to EDE from CEDET - it provide base support for projects...
ECB is too heavyweight for my taste. I have had good results with xcscope. Needless to say it doesn't help too much with Python.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/CScopeAndEmacs
In addition to using TAGS as others have mentioned, I find igrep and igrep-find very useful. There is also Emacs' built in grep and grep-find, but I find their interface more clumsy.
My standard search is:
M-x igrep-find some_regexp RET ~/work_area/*.cxx
Which will look for all *.cxx files under ~/work/area, and show results matching some_regexp. Like all the search utilities, it populates a compilation-like buffer you can navigate using C-x ` (aka M-x next-error).
There are many ways that Icicles can help with projects. Likewise, Bookmark+ and even Dired+.
These libraries can help you create, organize, and manage projects, wherever their files and directories might reside. And they can help you navigate and search in various ways.
Some of the features are unique -- quite different from other approaches. I could list some of the project support here, but this is the best place to start.
If someone sends me a document (.pdf,.doc,.xls, ppt, .ogg, mp3, png, etc) without the extension, how can I determine the file type? The /usr/bin/file command doesn't always guess right or it simply says that I have a Microsoft Office document. I would like to know exactly so I can add the extension to the file name.
You can come up with your own rules by adding them to /etc/magic
man file for more details. It is tricky to always get these correct however, I have had reasonable success.
Try mimetype(1).
For Perl, look at File::MimeInfo.
Some of the other posters thus far appear to neglect a few things.
File::MimeInfo uses the same MimeInfo database used by 'file' to identify files. So That's unlikely to do anything different.
File::Type is likely to be interesting though, as it relies only on itself, but this leads to a comically long script full of 'if' statements. But this is, by its very nature, unlikely to cover things 'file' already doesn't cover.
The best you can do with unknown filetypes is try cracking them open with a hex-editor, or running them through 'strings' and seeing if you recognise anything. If you manage how to Identify a file, you may wish to go for File::Type as your solution because as far as I can make out, its at least easy to extend.
You can use the Perl module: File::Type
So I was hoping that some old school Vim'ers could help me out. These are all separate questions and normally I would put them up each on their own but I'm not sure if that qualifies as question whoring here.
Plus I think if you know enough to be asking any of these questions they will all be coming up in the near future:
I have a library I'm writing and a series of applications that use that library. There doesn't seem to be an easy way(from what I can tell) to build a ctags file for the library and build one for each of my applications and make sure one references the other when I'm in vim.
Using gf to open files from command mode is awesome, but a lot of my include files
don't contain the full path. They refer to an include directory I set in the IDE. How can I set this directory as another point for Vim to start looking for files?
Is there a way to compile a file inside Vim and send the output to a buffer? I'm currently using MSVS 2k3 but I'll be porting over to Linux in a few weeks so if this is possible on either system I'd appreciate it.
Re 3)
If you put a makefile in your root dir, you can simply write
:make
This will run make and (iirc) put any errors into a seperate buffer, and make vim goto the first compile error. From there you can navigate all erroring lines using :next-error
Also, see this page
http://wiki.beyondunreal.com/Legacy:Vim
and
http://linux.byexamples.com/archives/287/perform-grep-and-make-in-vim/
for details on how to show the result in a seperate console.
1- tags files are independent, and can be used together. See :h 'tags'
I can't tell what is the easy way to build tags files. I have one that consists in using two plugins of mine:
one (draft) plugin that knows how to update C++ tags files (it should be easy to adapt it to other filetypes),
and another (local_vimrc) that helps me define directories-local .vimrc. Thus for any files within a given directory hierarchy, I can adapt the &tags options to use the relevant tag files, and the current tag file that will be rebuilt automatically (or when a keybinding is triggered). (Plugins like project should do the trick as well)
2- :h 'path'
3- :h :make
HTH.
2)
:cd {path}
For help:
:he cd
A few others like :lcd might be better suited. Just scroll down that help page.
This is rather off topic, but might still be useful: if you're using Visual Studio a lot and like Vim, you might want to look at ViEmu. It's the best Vim-emulation for any IDE I've yet seen, and the cost is really low. :) And no, I'm not getting a commission. :P
It's not obvious, but if you open a directory instead of a file, it's nicely browseable.
e.g.
:e . (colon-e-dot)
:e .. (colon-e-dot-dot)
will let you browse from your current directory or its parent.
(understanding that you were probably hoping for a capability to have vim accept e.g.
:e abc.txt
and have it look in several directories, which I don't know how to do.)