I am not running Mike's latest code because it does not build and he didn't update the templates to generate code for the new Load with columns he added. So I am one revision back in the source.
My database has tables in multiple schemas and they would not update properly.
In SubSonic.Query Update.cs I needed to change the constructor. I include some lines for context but I had to change line 122 to add tbl.SchemaName so that the correct DatabaseTable constructor was called and the schema name was carried through.
From this:
public Update(ITable table)
{
_query = new SqlQuery(table.Provider);
_provider = table.Provider;
_query.QueryCommandType = QueryType.Update;
ITable tbl = table;
DatabaseTable dbTable = new DatabaseTable(tbl.Name, _provider, tbl.ClassName);
dbTable.Columns = tbl.Columns;
_query.FromTables.Add(dbTable);
}
To this:
public Update(ITable table)
{
_query = new SqlQuery(table.Provider);
_provider = table.Provider;
_query.QueryCommandType = QueryType.Update;
ITable tbl = table;
DatabaseTable dbTable = new DatabaseTable(tbl.SchemaName, tbl.Name, _provider, tbl.ClassName);
dbTable.Columns = tbl.Columns;
_query.FromTables.Add(dbTable);
}
Is there a question here? This sounds like it needs to go on SubSonic's mailing list or as an issue in SubSonic's github page: http://github.com/subsonic/SubSonic-3.0
Related
I am trying to update some custom fields in a DAC extension via code, it is not saving the changes to the DB. The code works fine to retrieve the extension and data. What am I missing - do i have to somehow update the myLS with the extension (i thought it did that automatically)?
myLS = LineItemSerial.Select();
INItemLotSerialExt myext = myLS.GetExtension<INItemLotSerialExt>();
myext.UsrFrame1 = "xyz";
myext.UsrFrame2 = "zzz";
myext.UsrFrame3 = "yyy";
LineItemSerial.Update(myLS);
graph.Actions.PressSave();
You should say to cache of Acumatica that you want to update value:
LineItemSerial.Cache.SetValueExt(myLS , "UsrFrame1", "xyz");
LineItemSerial.Cache.SetValueExt(myLS , "UsrFrame2 ", "zzz");
LineItemSerial.Cache.SetStatus(myLS , PXEntryStatus.Modified);
LineItemSerial.Cache.Update(myLS);
LineItemSerial.Cache.IsDirty = true;
NB. LineItemSerial.Cache.IsDirty = true; for some cases can be omitted but in my experience it was often helpful.
INItemLotSerialExt myext = LineItemSerial.GetExtension<INItemLotSerialExt>(myLS); //if LineItemSerial is a view related to the DAC. I hope LineItemSerial is a public view defined in the graph as you are trying to save the changes when u press the save of graph.
OR
INItemLotSerialExt myext = PXCache<INItemLotSerial>.GetExtension<INItemLotSerialExt>(myLS);
Is'nt this the rite way to get the extension?
From documentation
GetExtension(object)
InventoryItem item = cache.Current as InventoryItem;
InventoryItemExtension itemExt =
cache.GetExtension<InventoryItemExtension>(item);
OR
GetExtension(Table)
The code below gets an extension data record corresponding to the given instance of the base data record.
InventoryItem item = cache.Current as InventoryItem;
InventoryItemExtension itemExt =
PXCache<InventoryItem>.GetExtension<InventoryItemExtension>(item);
Try something like this...
ContractExtension cExt = PXCache<PMProject>.GetExtension<ContractExtension>(project);
ARInvoiceEntry graph = PXGraph.CreateInstance<ARInvoiceEntry>();
graph.Document.Current = graph.Document.Search<ARInvoice.projectID, ARInvoice.docDate>(projectID.Value, invoiceDate.Value);
if(graph.Document.Current !=null)
{
ARInvoice i = graph.Document.Current;
i.InvoiceNbr = cExt.CustomerPO;
graph.Document.Update(i);
graph.Actions.PressSave();
}
I am creating a custom module in Orchard , I would like to create a query programmatically.
string queryName= "Product";
var item = _orchardServices.ContentManager.New("Query");
item.As<TitlePart>().Title =queryName;
_orchardServices.ContentManager.Create(item, VersionOptions.Draft);
if (!item.Has<IPublishingControlAspect>() && !item.TypeDefinition.Settings.GetModel<ContentTypeSettings>().Draftable)
_orchardServices.ContentManager.Publish(item);
var queryPart = item.As<QueryPart>();
queryPart.ContentItem.ContentType = queryName;
string desc =" filter for the query";
string contentType = "CommonPart.ChannelID.";
var filterGroupRecord = new FilterGroupRecord();
var filterRecord = new FilterRecord()
{
Category = "CommonPartContentFields",
Type = contentType,
Position = 0,
};
filterRecord.State = "<Form><Description>" + desc + "</Description><Operator>Equals</Operator><Value>ChannelId</Value></Form>";
filterGroupRecord.Filters.Add(filterRecord);
queryPart.FilterGroups.Insert(0, filterGroupRecord);
the problem is that：I want set a filters of the query,not a filters group.
could you tell me how to improve my code?
Database structure and class declarations make it impossible. Why do you need it?
Update:
I means that you must use FilterGroupRecord at least one.
But when Query published that Filter Group will be created automatically if query have not yet Filter Group (see at QueryPartHandler). You should add your filters to this group. And not needed to create new group.
var existingFilterGroup = queryPart.FilterGroups[0];
existingFilterGroup.Filters.Add(filterRecord);
Update 2:
To avoid problems with draftable query (and several other potential problems Orchard CMS: Adding default data to fields and then querying them) it is better to move the calling Publish method to the end of your code and other part of your code should be left unchanged. And in your case would be better if you will always publish your query without checking IPublishingControlAspect and Draftable.
How can I add a filter condition to the linked entity (for example email in this case)?
Added filter condition to the link criteria which is giving me the duplicate rows.
The equivalent sql query should look like this.
select distinct OpportunityId
from Opportunity o
left join Email e on e.RegardingObjectId = o.OpportunityId
where o.StateCode = 1 and o.StatusCode = 3
and e.RegardingObjectId is null
But the QueryExpression class is doing the following way.
select distinct opportunityid
from Opportunity o
left join Email e
on e.RegardingObjectId = o.OpportunityId
and e.RegardingObjectId is null
where o.StateCode = 1 and o.StatusCode = 3
The code:
ClientCredentials Credentials = new ClientCredentials();
Credentials.Windows.ClientCredential
= System.Net.CredentialCache.DefaultNetworkCredentials;
Uri OrganizationUri = ""
Uri HomeRealmUri = null;
OrganizationServiceProxy orgService
= new OrganizationServiceProxy(OrganizationUri, HomeRealmUri, Credentials, null);
IOrganizationService _service = (IOrganizationService)orgService;
QueryExpression query = new QueryExpression();
query.Distinct = true;
query.EntityName = "opportunity";
query.ColumnSet = new ColumnSet(true);
FilterExpression filter1 = new FilterExpression();
filter1.FilterOperator = LogicalOperator.And;
filter1.AddCondition("statuscode", ConditionOperator.Equal,3);
filter1.AddCondition("statecode", ConditionOperator.Equal, 1);
query.Criteria = filter1;
LinkEntity linkEntity1 = new LinkEntity();
linkEntity1.JoinOperator = JoinOperator.LeftOuter;
linkEntity1.LinkFromEntityName = "opportunity";
LinkEntity1.LinkFromAttributeName = "opportunityid";
linkEntity1.LinkToEntityName = "email";
linkEntity1.LinkToAttributeName = "regardingobjectid";
query.LinkEntities.Add(linkEntity1);
FilterExpression filter2 = new FilterExpression();
The issue is here at this condition. I could use filter on the LinkCriteria but not on the query since it is linked entity.
filter2.AddCondition("regardingobjectid", ConditionOperator.Null);
query.LinkEntities[0].LinkCriteria = filter2;
EntityCollection result = _service.RetrieveMultiple(query);
Console.WriteLine(result.Entities.Count());
Console.ReadKey();
I'm not sure if the query posted is what you are looking for...
If it is, then you should be able to remove filter 2 and add to filter 1
filter1.AddCondition("opportunityid", ConditionOperator.Null);
But comparing the RegardingObjectId to both NULL and the OpportunityID with an AND operation shouldn't ever be true.
I had similar problems adding conditions to linked entities. I found that i could do it using the dynamics 2013 sdk, but you would have to see if you could use the 2013 sdk against a 2011 dynamics. Please see Microsoft Dynamics Crm Sdk - Is this query possible?
The basic difference with the 2013 SDK is you can add a condition to the filter but give it an entity name which is for a linked entity. This means you don't actually add the condition to the link entity itself.
I also show in that link how to use the Linq provider to write the query which is another alternative you may want to try.
I am not sure if I am going about this the correct way but I have a c# method which loads an excel sheet into a 2 dimentional object array. In this array item 1,1 - 1,16 contain headers, then 2-1 - 2-16 contain data that match up with those headers as do x-1 - x-16 from there on in. I would like to turn this array into a data table so ultimately I can have it in a format I will then import into an access or SQL server db depending on a clients needs. I have tried using the following code to no avail, but I have a feeling I am way off. Any help on this would be very much appreciated.
private void ProcessObjects(object[,] valueArray)
{
DataTable holdingTable = new DataTable();
DataRow holdingRow;
holdingTable.BeginLoadData();
foreach(int row in valueArray)
{
holdingRow = holdingTable.LoadDataRow(valueArray[row], true);
}
}
Any chance you're using a repository pattern (like subsonic or EF) or using LinqToSql?
You could do this (LinqToSql for simplicity):
List<SomeType> myList = valueArray.ToList().Skip([your header rows]).ConvertAll(f => Property1 = f[0] [the rest of your convert statement])
DataContext dc = new DataContext();
dc.SomeType.InsertAllOnSubmit(myList);
dc.SubmitChanges();
I am Unit Testing one of my functions. Here is my code:
public void TestLabels()
{
//Step 1: Creating a mock table with columns exactly like in the real table.
DataTable table = new DataTable();
DataRow mydatarow;
mydatarow = table.NewRow();
//Step 2: Adding the row as same as the Real Data!
mydatarow["Name"] = "Test";
mydatarow["Address"] = "00000 ST.";
mydatarow["ZipCode"] = "77665";
mydatarow["Tracking#"] = "";
table.Rows.Add(mydatarow);
foreach (DataColumn column in table.Columns)
Console.WriteLine(column.ColumnName);
//Step 3: Call method we are testing.
var updateTable = IceTechUPSClient.Instance.CreateLabels(table);
foreach (DataRow row in updateTable.Rows)
{
var trackingNumber = row["Tracking#"].ToString();
Assert.IsFalse(String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(trackingNumber), "Expecting tracking number generated for every row!");
Assert.IsTrue(File.Exists(trackingNumber + ".gif"));
}
}
Now I am getting an error: Column 'Name' does not belong to table. As you can see I have specified column name "Name" here and also added that particular row. Then why I am getting this error? Any help?
Thanks!
You haven't set up your columns (unless you've missed out some code in your example).
You need to create the columns with the required names before you can access them like this:
var columnSpec = new DataColumn
{
DataType = typeof(string),
ColumnName = "Name"
};
this.table.Columns.Add(columnSpec);
When you read data from the database if you've set AutoGenerateColumns to true (the default) you don't need to do this explicitly as it's done for you behind the scenes.