i have just unzipped SOLR zip file downloaded from their website. and it says in the tutorial i have to edit the solrconfig.xml file. there are several in different locations.
which one is it? and where should i have this root folder? inside my web space?
LICENSE.txt README.txt client contrib docs lib
CHANGES.txt NOTICE.txt build.xml common-build.xml dist example src
ive got one in example/solr/conf. is it that one?
and about the data-config-xml. should i create one and then type in the path to it in solrconfig.xml? the tutorial isnt that descriptive.
You are correct that's the directory
see here see here http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrInstall#Setup
The 2 files you'll have to edit at some point are:
solr/conf/solrconfig.xml
solr/conf/schema.xml
Which OS are you installing on? If it's windows then i can help you out.. as i've done it many times ;)
CraftyFella
The file you looking for is in this directory: server/solr/new_core/conf/solrconfig.xml (depending on your core name).
After changing it you should probably do bin/solr restart.
For SolR 7.4.0 on CentOS and Red Hat, I found solrconfig.xml in /var/solr/data/[core_name]/conf.
Create a New Core (Solr-8.6.2)
sudo su solr -c '/opt/solr/bin/solr create -c <corename>'
or
sudo su solr -c '/opt/solr-8.6.2/bin/solr create -c <corename>'
Core will be created at
/var/solr/data/<corename>/conf/solrconfig.xml
Edit this XML to change your configuration
Related
I have an app service for my PHP 8.0 application. Azure will only allow me to use Linux which is fine, but I'm having trouble installing composer globally.
Because only files inside of /home are persisted I'm not sure where I can place the resulting composer.phar file, in such a way that it is included in the PATH, and I can't find any relevant documentation, only relevant discussion I could find was this: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/3638/installing-composer-on-azure-app-service.html but it still didn't help.
Could anyone tell me either where to put composer.phar or whether there's a way to edit my path to point towards /home/composer.phar?
Thanks!
I found the right way.
If I echo'ed PATH it told me that /home/site/wwwroot was included in the PATH, so all that's needed is to move the composer file into wwwroot doing something like mv composer.phar /home/site/wwwroot/composer.
I created a binary package with this command:
dpkg-deb --build -z9 -Zlzma $(DEB_SRC_DIR) $(DEB_DEST_DIR)
and install it on my Ubuntu 12.04 with this command:
sudo dpkg -i /path/to/package
The contents of the package I think are irrelevant.
Despite the sudo command the files in the installation directory belong to the current user and not to root as I expected.
How can I fix that?
Try to run the dpkg-deb command with fakeroot:
`fakeroot dpkg-deb ...`
(This will only help if the files in the source directory already have the correct ownership, which they probably dont. The problem you're actually trying to solve here, is to create an archive with files in it that belong to user root, which is where fakeroot theoretically helps.)
Let me say though, that what you are doing is not the best way for creating a binary package (far from it).
Instead, create a debian/ directory with dh_make (from the dh-make package), and edit the control file and changelog accordingly. You also need a file debian/install that lists what files you are installing and where they should go. There are various guides on the net (and on Stack Overflow) that explain this process. For example, look at the Debian New Maintainers' Guide.
You can then use dpkg-buildpackage to create a real, standard-conforming Debian package with your files in a reproducible way.
dpkg-deb is a low-level tool for manipulating existing deb files; it's not meant to be used for package creation.
I'm trying to build an RPM using rpmbuild, which would work for both RHEL 5.7 machines and RHEL 6.1 machines, and I'm having some trouble understanding how to structure my rpmbuild/SOURCE directory.
According to what I understood, if my package name is XXX, than I need to prepare rpmbuild/SOURCE/XXX.tar.gz, a tarball which contains:
1. A directory named XXX;
2. In it, all the directories and files I'm installing should be ordered as if their paths are relative to the root directory (i.e. /)
For instance, if I want to install a file called foo.sh to /tmp/XXXdir/, I need to have rpmbuild/SOURCE/XXX.tar.gz contain XXX/tpm/xxxdir/foo.sh
This is what I understood and this is what works when I install my RPM on my RHEL 5.7 machine (i.e. in the example above the file is installaed to /tmp/XXXdir/foo.sh).
However, on an RHEL 6.1 machine I get the undesired behaviour of having my files installed to a newly created /XXX directory, and from there I get the same tree structure I wanted for / (i.e. in the example above I get the file at /XXX/tmp/XXXdir/foo.sh).
Any idea why this happenes? Perhaps I've got it wrong and my rpmbuild/SOURCE structure is not as it should be? Any insights would be very helpful.
Thanks a lot in advance,
Lior
I've just been setting up a Ubuntu workstation and wanted to add some settings to eclipse.ini. When I searched for the file I found:
/etc/eclipse.ini
/usr/lib/eclipse.ini
My questions are:
Does Eclipse actually use both files?
If so, in what order does it read them?
How does it merge them?
Both of the files I found are system wide, is there a location in my home directory I could put one that would effect only my instances?
Here's how to determine which eclipse.ini file you should use (joomla.org):
If you downloaded Eclipse IDE manually from internet the "eclipse.ini" file is just inside the unpacked folder
If you installed Eclipse via terminal or software center the location of the file is "/etc/eclipse.ini"
In some Linux versions the file can be found at "/usr/share/eclipse/eclipse.ini". Do not use this file if you found a config file at "/etc/eclipse.ini".
To be sure where your Eclipse folder is, check $ECLIPSE_HOME, and if not specified (these directions at least work for Juno):
Open Eclipse as you normally do.
Click Help -> About Eclipse SDK
Click Installation Details
Go to the Configuration tab
Find "eclipse.home.location=file:PATH". PATH is where eclipse is installed.
sources:
http://docs.joomla.org/Configuring_Eclipse_IDE_for_PHP_development/Linux:
There is only one file.
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Aug 8 2012 /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse.ini -> /etc/eclipse.ini
You probably have already found this out, chances are when you installed Eclipse the installation created (or you did manually) a file /usr/bin/eclipse which if you check it probably looks like the following:
#!/bin/sh
export ECLIPSE_HOME="/opt/eclipse"
$ECLIPSE_HOME/eclipse $*
especially if you followed instructions similar to the ones like these on If-not-true-then-false
On the other hand if you have installed from a package, I suspect you will find that eclipse ends up in /usr/bin, most likely a symbolic link to /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse (or at least I found it on my Fedora system after using yum to install eclipse).
I have Ubuntu 18 and eclipse installation is squashed in a file
/var/lib/snapd/snaps/eclipse_40.snap
which is mount on /snap/eclipse/40 as read only. Just run
mount | grep eclipse*.snap
This eclipse.ini file is really read only, that means, you cannot modify it, even with sudo. However, I also have a eclipse.ini.ignored file in HOME/.eclipse/some number/configuration. This is being by default ignored, but you can change the "launcher.ini" in the eclipse launcher command.
According to https://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse.ini
Eclipse startup is controlled by the options in
$ECLIPSE_HOME/eclipse.ini. If $ECLIPSE_HOME is not defined, the
default eclipse.ini in your Eclipse installation directory (or in the
case of Mac, the Eclipse.app/Contents/MacOS directory) is used.
The certain way to make sure is to run strace on eclipse. In the output you'll see where is eclipse actually trying to pull the file from.
I am trying to install mod_java on ubuntu.
I have installed the latest java(1.6).
I have configured freeswitch with mod_java module enabled in module.conf.xml
then when i run the make file, it says:
freeswitch_java.h:5:17: error: jni.h: No such file or directory
I have searched through the java installtion folders, but did not find any include folder or jni.h.
Can anyone help, what is being the problem here.
Thanks for reading this question.
I had the same problem. The solution was to run configure with the option --with-java:
./configure --with-java=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk/include/
I don't know if it makes any difference but I added mod_java after building freeswitch without it. It was disabled in my initial build in module.conf.xml but afterwards I ran the above command plus:
make mod_java-install
It worked for me on ubuntu with openjdk. Are you using the Sun JDK? Maybe in the version you have dont have the include folder which has the source files. Try installing the other JDK. Or try and see of ther are some other related packages in apt that will get you the include folder.
Type this linux command to locate your jni.h file on your filesystem.
locate jni.h
you should be able to get it somewhere
in /usr/lib/java directory or some other directory
depending upon your java home.
copy paste the jni.h in src/include folder of your freeswitch src.
It will throw you some more errors for different .h files
just copy all of them to your src/include folder.
in latest freeswitch, installing through Makefile, its not possible to configure as the Makefile downloads and installs. Its possible by modifying the Makefile.in file to add the include path
mod_java_la_CPPFLAGS
-I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include \