I read on the MS site that SQL Azure does not support SQL Profiler. What are people using to profile queries running on this platform?
I haven't got too far playing around with SQL Azure as yet, but from what I understand there isn't anything you can use at the moment.
From MS (probably the article you read):
Because SQL Azure performs the
physical administration, any
statements and options that attempt to
directly manipulate physical resources
will be blocked, such as Resource
Governor, file group references, and
some physical server DDL statements.
It is also not possible to set server
options and SQL trace flags or use the
SQL Server Profiler or the Database
Tuning Advisor utilities.
If there were to be an alernative, I'd imagine it would require the ability to set trace flags which you can't do, hence I don't think there is an option at the moment.
Solution? I can only suggest you have a local development copy of the db so you can run profiler locally on it. I know that won't help with "live" issues/debugging/monitoring but it depends on what you need it for.
Edit:
Quote from MSDN forum:
Q: Is SQL Profiler supported in SQL
Azure?
A: We do not support SQL Profiler in
v1 of SQL Azure.
Now, you could interpret that as a hint that Profiler will be supported in future versions. I think it will be a big requirement to get a lot of people on board, using SQL Azure seriously.
Update as of 9/17/2015:
Microsoft just announced a new feature called Index Advisor:
How does Index Advisor work? Index Advisor continuously monitors your
database workload, performs the analysis and recommends new indexes
that can further improve the DB performance.
Recommendations are always kept up-to-date: As the DB workload and
schema evolves, Index Advisor will monitor the changes and adjust the
recommendations accordingly. Each recommendation comes with the
estimated impact to DB workload performance: You can use this
information to prioritize the most impactful recommendations first. In
addition, Index Advisor provides a very easy and powerful way of
creating the recommended indexes.
Creating new indexes only takes a couple of clicks. Index Advisor
measures the impact of newly created indexes and provides a report on
index impact to users. You can get started with Index Advisor and
improve your database performance with the following simple steps. It
literally takes five minutes to get accustomed with Index Advisor’s
simple and intuitive user interface. Let’s get started!
Original Answer:
SQL Azure now has some native profiling. See http://blogs.msdn.com/b/benko/archive/2012/05/19/cloudtip-14-how-do-i-get-sql-profiler-info-from-sql-azure.aspx for details.
Microsoft's stated position SQL Server Profiler is deprecated. As much as this is a bad idea, that's what they have said.
SQL Profile is already deprecated in SQL Server, and that’s part of
the reason that it doesn’t make sense to bring to SQL DB.
What this means is you are going back 20+ years in database performance monitoring and everyone is going to have to write their own perf monitoring scripts instead of having a standard factory delivered tool that's on every server you will go to. It's tantamount to deprecating "sp_help" and making every DBA write their own. Hope you know all your DMVs inside and out... INNER JOIN, OUTER JOIN, and CROSS APPLY syntax really well.
Update as of 2017/04/14:
Microsoft's Scott Guthrie today announced a lot of new features in SQLAzure(this is called sqlazure managed instance,which is currently in preview),which are expected to be present in SQLAzure in coming months..below are them
1.SQLAgent
2.SQLProfiler
3.SQLCLR
4.Service Broker
5.Logshipping,Transactional Replication
6.Native/Backup restore
7.Additional DMV's and Xevents
8.cross database querying
References:
https://youtu.be/0uT46lpjeQE?t=1415
I have tried today a new tool suggested by Microsoft that is called Azure Data Studio.
In this tool you can download an extension called Profiler and it seems to be working just as expected.
You can use Query store feature, look here for more details: http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2015/06/08/query-store-a-flight-data-recorder-for-your-database/
The most close to SQL profiler, that I found working in Azure SQL, is SQL Workload Profiler
However note, that it’s beta version of a tool, created but a single person, and it is not too convinient to use.
SQL Azure offers following features to tune performance, profile queries in its own way, identity long running queries and much more
Intelligent Performance
Performance overview
Performance recommendations
Query Performance Insight
Automatic tuning
Related
We are looking into options to monitor our Acumatica instance to identify performance issues on the application level as well as the SQL server level. We have experience with newrelic and a few others, but also read about Retrace (https://stackify.com/retrace/) which looks worth trying.
I'm curious to know if it's possible/recommended to install such tools within Acumatica?
Does anyone have any experience or feedback on the topic?
Acumatica includes a built-in request profiler that can be used to monitor requests, performance and SQL. Probably not as sophisticated as New Relic, but powerful enough when you have performance issues to resolve. Read more here: https://help-2017r2.acumatica.com/(W(2))/Wiki/ShowWiki.aspx?wikiname=HelpRoot_User&PageID=e7612f3f-fc6f-494d-8532-cc2ceef7147b
I'm migrating from SQL Server to Azure SQL and I'd like to ask you who have more experience in Azure(I have basically none) some questions just to understand what I need to do to have the best migration.
Today I do a lot of cross database queries in some of my tasks that runs once a week. I execute SPs, run selects, inserts and updates cross the dbs. I solved the executions of SPs by using external data sources and sp_execute_remote. But as far as I can see it's only possible to select from an external database, meaning I won't be able to do any inserts or updates cross the dbs. Is that correct? If so, what's the best way to solve this problem?
I also read about cross db calls are slow. Does this mean it's slower that in SQL Server? I want to know if I'll face a slower process comparing to what I have today.
What I really need is some good guidelines on how to do the best migration without spending loads of time with trial and error. I appreciate any help in this matter.
Cross database transactions are not supported in Azure SQL DB. You connect to a specific database, and can't use 3 part names or use the USE syntax.
You could open up two different connections from your program, one to each database. It doesn't allow any kind of transactional consistency, but would allow you to retrieve data from one Azure SQL DB and insert it in another.
So, at least now, if you want your database in Azure and you can't avoid cross-database transactions, you'll be using an Azure VM to host SQL Server.
is that true that SQL Azure rebuilds / reorganizes index automatically?
We have a database on Sql Azure and experiencing performance degradation and I suppose this is a urban-legend.
Can you help me?
Thanks,
Marco
SQL Azure does not rebuild indexes automatically while the statistics are updated automatically.
If you have a specific reason to force the rebuild it, you have to directly issue the command.
This nice post helps you create a script to dynamically rebuild all indexes in a SQL Azure db.
Sql Azure offers few nice amenities with it, as follows:
Intelligent Performance
Performance overview
Performance recommendations
Query Performance Insight
Automatic tuning
Keep an eye on the statistics, You can also allow azure to automatically tune your database indexes, add, remove them to tune database performance.
Hope it helps.
I want to host my WCF services in the Azure clouds for scalability reasons. For example there will be some read data action. And it will be under High Load (1000+ user/sec).
(Like in my previous question)
Also I have a limitation in 1 sec timeout for any request.
My service will be connected with SQL Azure. I chosing it because of small latency (not more than 7ms according to microsoft's benchmark)
How many concurrent connections can hold SQL Azure per instance/database?
Is there any ability to scale SQL Azure when i will reach the limit of connections per instance?
Other solutions, options for my scenario?
Thanks.
One thing to keep in mind is that you will need to make sure you are leveraging connection pooling to its maximum. Using a service account instead of different logins is an important step to ensure proper connection pooling.
Another consideration is the use of MARS. If you have many requests coming through, you may want to pool them together into a single request, hence a single connection, and return multiple resultsets. In this post I discuss how to implement one-way queuing of SQL statements; this may not work for you as-is because you may be expecting a response, but it may give you some ideas on how to implement a batch of requests to minimize the number of connections and minimize wait time.
Finally you can take a look at this tool I wrote last year to test connection/statements against SQL Azure. The tool automatically turns off connection pooling to measure the effects of concurrency. You can download it here.
Finally, I also wrote the Enzo Shard Library on codeplex. Let me know if you have any questions if you decide to investigate the library for your project. Note that the library will evolve to support the future capabilities of SQL Azure Data Federation as well.
It appears there is no direct limit to the number of connections available per SQL Azure instance, but Microsoft state that they reserve the right to throttle connections in situations where resource use is regarded as "excessive".
There's some information on this here, also details on what may happen in this situation here.
A good work-around is to consider "sharding", where you partition your data on some easily-definable criteria and have multiple databases. This does, of course, incur additional cost. A neat implementation of that is here: http://enzosqlshard.codeplex.com/
Also: Azurescope have had some interesting benchmarks here: http://azurescope.cloudapp.net/BestPractices/#ed6a21ed-ad51-4b47-b69c-72de21776f6a (unfortunately, removed early 2012)
Is there any ability to scale SQL Azure when i will reach the limit of connections per instance?
In addition to the Enzo sql sharding suggestion, there are a couple of Microsoft products/features under construction to assist with scaling SQL Azure. These are CTP (at best) but may provide some scalability options for you by allowing you to spread the load across multiple SQL Azure databases:
SQL Azure federations - http://convective.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/sql-azure-federations/
SQL Azure datasync http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/sqlazure/datasync/
Im writing a 'proof of concept' application to investigate the possibility of moving a bespoke ASP.NET ecommerce system over to Windows Azure during a necessary re-write of the entire application.
Im tempted to look at using Azure Table Storage as an alternative to SQL Azure as the entities being stored are likely to change their schema (properties) over time as the application matures further, and I wont need to make endless database schema changes. In addition we can build refferential integrity into the applicaiton code - so the case for considering Azure Table Storage is a strong one.
The only potential issue I can see at this time is that we do a small amount of simple reporting - i.e. value of sales between two dates, number of items sold for a particular product etc.
I know that Table Storage doesnt support aggregate type functions, and I believe we can achieve what we want with clever use of partitions, multiple entity types to store subsets of the same data and possibly pre-aggregation but Im not 100% sure about how to go about it.
Does anyone know of any in-depth documents about Azure Table Storage design principles so that we make proper and efficient use of Tables, PartitionKeys and entity design etc.
there's a few simplistic documents around, and the current books available tend not to go into this subject in much depth.
FYI - the ecommerce site has about 25,000 customers and takes about 100,000 orders per year.
Have you seen this post ?
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazurestorage/archive/2010/11/06/how-to-get-most-out-of-windows-azure-tables.aspx
Pretty thorough coverage of tables
I think there are three potential issues I think in porting your app to Table Storage.
The lack of reporting - including aggregate functions - which you've already identified
The limited availability of transaction support - with 100,000 orders per year I think you'll end up missing this support.
Some problems with costs - $1 per million operations is only a small cost, but you can need to factor this in if you get a lot of page views.
Honestly, I think a hybrid approach - perhaps EF or NH to SQL Azure for critical data, with large objects stored in Table/Blob?
Enough of my opinion! For "in depth":
try the storage team's blog http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazurestorage/ - I've found this very good
try the PDC sessions from Jai Haridas (couldn't spot a link - but I'm sure its there still)
try articles inside Eric's book - http://geekswithblogs.net/iupdateable/archive/2010/06/23/free-96-page-book---windows-azure-platform-articles-from.aspx
there's some very good best practice based advice on - http://azurescope.cloudapp.net/ - but this is somewhat performance orientated
If you have start looking at Azure storage such as table, it would do no harm in looking at other NOSQL offerings in the market (especially around document databases). This would give you insight into NOSQL space and how solution around such storages are designed.
You can also think about a hybrid approach of SQL DB + NOSQL solution. Parts of the system may lend themselves very well to Azure table storage model.
NOSQL solutions such as Azure table have their own challenges such as
Schema changes for data. Check here and here
Transactional support
ACID constraints. Check here
All table design papers I have seen are pretty much exclusively focused on the topics of scalability and search performance. I have not seen anything related to design considerations for reporting or BI.
Now, azure tables are accessible through rest APIs and via the azure SDK. Depending on what reporting you need, you might be able to pull out the information you require with minimal effort. If your reporting requirements are very sophisticated, then perhaps SQL azure together with Windows Azure SQL Reporting services might be a better option to consider?