I have an HttpHandler that is run on a client page (cross domain, not on our IIS server, etc) and when they click on our embedded link it fires off the Handler on our server. So far everything is working normally.
I am now trying to use the System.Web.HttpContext.Session object but it is null. I am thinking it is null because we don't have a session until our HttpHandler is invoked? And multiple calls to the handler will create a new session per call? If this is the case did MS just disable the Session object when calling into a HttpHandler? Can anyone confirm this?
If this is the case, what do you do to maintain state between calls? Some sort of SQL based data object? A file?
TIA
Have your HttpHandler implement the IRequiresSessionState interface. It will enable session state use.
IRequiresSessionState can be found in the System.Web.SessionState namespace.
I think you have to implement the empty interface IReadOnlySessionState, so the context will be loaded.
edit to add:
According to Michael Morton's answer, you can also implement IRequiresSessionState, which will give you write access also to the Session object
using System;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.SessionState;
public class DownloadHandler : IHttpHandler, IReadOnlySessionState
{
public bool IsReusable { get { return true; } }
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
{
context.Response.Write(context.Session["kmx"]);
}
}
try using the current context...
System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Session
Related
Assuming there is some service:
public interface IDeviceManagerService
{
ISomeDeviceApi Api { get; }
}
It's purpose is to monitor external environment (USB, network, etc.), instantiate device API when the device detected and make property null when the device is no longer available.
Supposing there is a view model with this service injected, I would like to have change notifications for IDeviceManagerService.Api to make things like below possible (for example, having the button which is only active when the device API is available).
private Boolean OnSomeCommandCanExecute()
{
return _deviceManagerService.Api != null;
}
I wonder if there is a clean way to make this work without manual change notifications handling (with Catel.Fody or PropertyChanged.Fody). So far I have managed to get working result by making service implementation derived from ModelBase, registering it's injected instance as a [Model] inside the view model and exposing it's Api property using [ViewModelToModel] attribute, but this is very dirty way.
Is there some common approach or It would be better to go with implementing INotifyPropertyChanged and use notifications wrapper instead?
In most approaches, services don't implement INotifyPropertyChanged (they are not models), so my recommendation is to add manual events:
public interface IDeviceManagerService
{
ISomeDeviceApi Api { get; }
event EventHandler<DeviceApiEventArgs> ApiChanged;
}
This way you can deal with the stuff you are interested in (subscribe in InitializeAsync, unsubscribe in CloseAsync).
I am trying to work out how to use the Hooks and just can't seem to get the syntax correct.
I have built a site using PirahnaCMS that has a blog component and am extending it to call some social plugins and auto post to FB, Twitter etc.
I just can't seem to get the syntax correct though. My app is MVC and I have looked at this section
1.2 ASP.NET MVC
If you're using ASP.NET MVC hooks should be attached in you Global.asax.cs in the Application_Start method, or any other place where you keep you startup code. You attach you hooks with the followin syntax:
protected void Application_Start() {
Piranha.WebPages.Hooks.Menu.RenderItemLink = (ui, str, title, url) => {
str.Append(String.Format("<span>{1}</span>", url, title)) ;
} ;
}
The Hook I believe I want to use is Piranha.WebPages.Hooks.Manager.PostEditModelAfterSave but for the life of me I can't seem to work it out.
All of the hooks are just static delegates that you can attach methods to. In the above example an anonymous method has been assigned to the hook with the syntax:
delegate += (parameters) => { method body }
You could also assign a previously declared method.
delegate += MyMethod
Example skeletons for attaching hooks should be available in the Docs at the official site. If not you can find the hooks in the file:
~/WebPages/Hooks.cs
And all delegates in:
~/Delegates.cs
I hope these URL:s are correct as I'm typing from memory :)
Regards
I'm wondering if it's possible to have ServiceStack use an AOP-proxied service, instead of the main implementation. I would like to avoid having the class that inherits from ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Service simply be a wrapper, if possible. It looks to me like it will need to be, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to ask, to be sure.
I am looking for a way to achieve this, to proxy the services of a ServiceStack app.
Till now what I have learned is that: The only way we can generate a proxy to a service like
[Route("/reqstars")]
public class AllReqstars : IReturn<List<Reqstar>> { }
public class ReqstarsService : Service
{
public virtual List<Reqstar> Any(AllReqstars request)
{
return Db.Select<Reqstar>();
}
}
Is using a Custom Service Generation Strategy. And generating proxies of IService interface with class target and marking all the method of the service as virtual.
I have not tested this yet and even I do not know (and this is what I am researching for now) if ServiceStack can handle a service generator delegate so I can use Castle's DynamicProxy.
Good luck!
I want to use memory caching in my service but not able to configure it. I already registered it in global.asax as per instructions.
Here is how my service looks:
public class CustomerSerivce: Service
{
public CustomerResponse Any(Customer customer)
{
//code to connect to db here - this code is called regardless of cache entry
return customer;
}
}
I know there is this.RequestContext.ToOptimized or something is there but some how it is not working for me.
Thanks in advance.
Do you have declare:
using ServiceStack.ServiceHost;
for extension methods of
base.RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(...)
?
the step by step is here. You can also look at here for the missing link with http 304 Not Modified handling.
i am adding a new method into CalEventLocalServiceImpl using hook...
my code is ..
public class MyCalendarLocalServiceImpl extends CalEventLocalServiceWrapper {
public MyCalendarLocalServiceImpl(CalEventLocalService calEventLocalService) {
super(calEventLocalService);
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
}
public List getUserData(long userId) throws SystemException{
DynamicQuery query=DynamicQueryFactoryUtil.forClass(CalEvent.class)
.add(PropertyFactoryUtil.forName("userId").eq(userId));
List deatils=CalEventLocalServiceUtil.dynamicQuery(query);
return deatils;
}
}
liferay-hook.xml:
<service>
<service-type>
com.liferay.portlet.calendar.service.CalEventLocalService
</service-type>
<service-impl>
com.liferay.portlet.calendar.service.impl.MyCalendarLocalServiceImpl
</service-impl>
</service>
my question is how to use getUserData from jsp file.
Can anybody help me out....
i think u didn't gt my question...i want list of events based on USERID from Calendar ...to achieve this task what i need to do??
I assume getUserData() is not overridden but a new method (can't look up currently). This is not what you can do when overriding a service. Instead you'd have to add a new Service and make it available to the portal.
Remember that a customized ("hooked") jsp is running in the portal classloader, while your overloaded service is running in the hook's classloader. Thus, if you create a new service and make the service.jar available to Liferay (e.g. on the global classpath) you can call it from JSPs. The interface of Liferay services can not be extended through an overloaded service.
In case getUserData() is already in the interface (as I said I can't look up currently), you just need to call the CalendarLocalServiceUtil from your jsp and it will be delegated to your wrapper.
Just to add to Olaf's answer and comments...
if you you want to extend CalEventLocalService service with just "getUsetData" and use it in one jsp than building your own service might be overkill. Simply put your code from "getUserData" in jsp. Otherwise follow Olaf's suggestions.