Can anyone suggest a small, simple and free bugtracker? [closed] - bug-tracking

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a book, tool, software library, tutorial or other off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for a small and simple (emphasis on simple) bugtracker for a small project. It should run on Apache/PHP, though I'll consider other alternatives too (no Windows though). Oh, and I don't have any money to spend on it, so it should be free. :P
Any recommendations?
Added: Please, no hosted solutions. I want to host it myself.

Trac. It is free, simple, and runs on Apache.
See the demosite to try it out yourself.

Written in Perl, but Bugzilla is really easy to setup. The installation is mostly done by the setup script.

Pivotal Tracker: http://www.pivotaltracker.com/
It's simple and is great for project management too. It's also hosted and free! No setup. You just need a login.

I really like Mantis: http://www.mantisbt.org/ . You can see it in action at http://bugs.scribus.net , for example.
There is much personal taste involved; this is just mine: I think Mantis is simple, still offers you quite a few features, but it doesn't bang you in the head with them. I find it very comfortable to work with.
TBH, I have never used Mantis as and Admin, just as a User / Reporter, but I do suppose that the ease of use continues into the lower level functionality.

FogBugz has a free, hosted version if you're working alone, or with one other person.

Roundup tracker: http://roundup.sourceforge.net/
It's free
It's open source
It has a built in webserver so can host itself, or do the apache thing
It can run on top of a database, or just files
It's written in Python and is insanely hackable if that's your thing
It has a vibrant community of people writing plugins - e.g wiki like issue editing

Checkout BugTracker.net.
It's easy to use and very much productive.

Check out the happy people in the town of Simplton.

Related

Linux Kernel Rootkit samples [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm working on some new techniques for Linux Kernel Rootkit Detections as my thesis. I need some sample of rootkits to test my method and also do some machine learning tests.
But not the old-dusty ones in packetstorm that could be found in computer history books as well. I've read alot about it and I've seen some new methods of rootkit implementations in phrack and some other resources. It would take a lot of time to just implement PoC rootkits out of them for me and I would just get to the starting point for my project by then.
If anyone could help me with this it would be greatly appreciated.
Any site, ftp, compromised system, unknown rootkit libraries, anything that might be a sample for my work is appreciated. But with this in mind that what I need are Linux kernel Rootkits.
Any type, LKM, System Call Hooking, Object hooking, system.map /dev/mem working stuff
Thanks
p.s by new rootkits I don't mean like non-reported or all-over-the-news rootkit, something that would work on ubuntu 10.04 or newer would be great (Kernel version 2.6.32+)
you can get some kernel rk from the follow link
http://www.ussrback.com/UNIX/penetration/rootkits/
For obvious reasons, you aren't going to find any rootkits available for download on the public internet. Doing so would be a huge liability exposure to anyone hosting them. Your options are: make some friends in the security research or black hat communities, or run some honeypots and capture them yourself.

IIS Log Analyzer [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to analyze the IIS logs for a website for things like hits, keywords, countries accessed from etc.
Has anyone used any (free) tools that were useful from this regard?
There's LogParser. Blog article about how to use it here. You need to be comfortable with SQL to use it, though. There's a GUI for it apparently, too. Don't have any experience with that, though.
Nihuo web log analyzer is very simple, easy to configure and very good in analyzing iis and apache access log files. The reports generated by this tool are also very good.
You can use it freely with full function for 30 days evaluation period.
============================================
updated: The software is developed by myself.
There is a simple answer to this don't..
Log files are next to useless to look at your website traffic, there are massively inaccurate, log file analysis is useful for network engineers looking at traffic management.
If you want to view who has looked at your website from where and with which broswer and what keyword was used to get there, just install goggle analytic although it does have a few downsides its much better for the information you require its also free.
Take a look at http://www.googlelytics.net/awstats-log-file-analysis-vs-google-analytics/ for a view of each.

How can I track issue from multiple different issue-trackers in a single place? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Like a lot of open-source developers I find myself interacting with maybe dozens of different projects' issue trackers - some for work, some as a hobbyist; some frequently, some more rarely; sometimes to report bugs, sometimes to contribute patches, sometimes to follow others' bug reports that affect me, sometimes to organize my own work on my own projects.
The problem is, this activity is scattered across different web apps (github, bitbucket, trac, bugzilla, mantis, jira, ...) on different projects all over the web and there's no one place to check status of issues I'm trying to stay on top of.
I want one dashboard kind of app where I can browse, search, and sort (by updated date, priority, etc) everything assigned to me, or any bugs I've reported, or any bugs I'm watching for updates - across all projects - without having to manually re-enter all those issues into the dashboard: I want to just feed it a URL to an existing issue in some other tracker and it'll track that issue's status for me.
You could almost get there with just an RSS feed reader, except to be really useful the app would need to know more about the relevant metadata so you can sort and filter as needed.
Has anybody built anything like that? Bonus if it provides write capabilities too, at least for common tasks like adding a comment, marking resolved.
I've never heard of any such thing, and I'm constantly wishing for it. If it doesn't exist I might have to take a crack at it.
I'm not sure if this will give you what you are looking for, but "undock" supports multiple issue trackers... wether it supports them all in one interface I'm not sure, but may be worth checking it out.
edit: yes, it does support them in one interface - the next question is whether you want to read them off a mobile device :-)
Anyway, hope it is of some use.

Where can I find the first version of linux operating system? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Can someone tell me where I can find the initial code, Linus Torvalds shared with hackers. I was thinking it will be a great place to learn about operating systems.
It's discussed on KernelTrap. There's a good historical discussion, complete with release notes and mailing list discussions.
The linked article comes complete with this gem, which is undoubtedly what Linus looked like after release:
(source: kerneltrap.org)
For the discussion, see here. For the complete Linux 0.01 release, download this and verify it with this signature.
If you want to look at the history in a "nice" way, you could use Dave Jones's Linux-History Git repository, which includes all versions (at least all the versions that still exist, sadly some of the 0.99 versions have been lost forever) from 0.01 to 2.4.0. There is another history repository from Thomas Gleixner, which covers 2.4.0 to 2.6.12 and of course everything since 2.6.12 is available in Linus's Git repository. Linus also has a repository which contains an import of the CVS export of the BitKeeper repository from 2.5.0 to 2.6.12.
You can use Git's graft feature to glue these repositories together to get a unified view of the entire history. There are also various scripts floating around that try to make these repositories even more accurate, like this one for example.
kernel.org is the repository for the Linux Kernel. Here is the "historic" section with really old code: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic/
I'm not so sure old Linux code is the best way to learn about an OS. For starters, it's not an OS, it's just the kernel. Look into Minix, that would be more interesting, it was created from the ground up for educational purposes.

VoIP and SIP, where to begin [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Recently, a client has asked me to do a custom application to manage intercoms (Barix Annuncicom). After reading the documentation, I can do most of the "managing" part, however I am stuck with the VoIP part.
Are there any documentation, guides, articles, that will help me better understand and code a simple VoIP application?
I am looking for a article that has little expectation of previous knowledge.
voip-info.org, is a nice resource guide if you wanna learn about VoIP platforms and protocols, is mostly open-source oriented and you'll find good articles there.
You could start with w3c's voice browser standards and the IETF SIP working group.
This reasonably high-level tutorial has lots of information, including common VOIP questions and a discussion of SIP functions, and book recommendations.
There are more specific tutorials dealing with introductory software implementations (e.g. using Asterisk) on the SWIK site.
If you want to find details on SIP, one of the best resources is Tech Invite.
Other very useful tool is SIPP which is SIP packets emulator with easy biult in XML scripting language which allows you to test different scenarios.
I would personally go with either Yate http://yate.null.ro
or PjSIP http://pjsip.org
The code is complete, cross-platform and has lots of examples.
PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia stack written in C and it supports audio, video, presence and instant messaging capabilities.It is designed to be very small in footprint, have high performance, and very flexible.
You can go refer other links also as link1, link2, link3, link4.
Are you familiar with Asterisk?

Resources