Using Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition. I'm linking my application with an import library (.lib) for a DLL that might or might not be present on the target system. Before you ask: I cannot distribute the DLL with my application.
If the DLL is not present, as soon as I call a function from the DLL (but not sooner!), I get a message like
This application has failed to start because SomeLibrary.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem.
What I want to happen instead, is that the application detects that the DLL is not there, and simply disables functionality that depends on it. I could make a call to LoadLibrary and see whether it succeeded, but I'm not sure whether this is sufficient. Maybe the import library does more work behind the scenes?
Is a simple LoadLibrary call sufficient? If not, what else do I need to do? Can this even be done?
Update: Of course I can use LoadLibrary, and then GetProcAddress for each of the functions I want to use. But that's a hassle, and I was hoping to avoid that and simply use the provided import library instead.
This is what the DelayLoad linker option is for, but I don't know whether the Express edition supports it.
No, LoadLibrary() is exactly what you want. The only consequence to using it is the hassle of setting up the function pointers into the DLL when you successfully load the DLL, but the process for that is well-covered elsewhere on the net.
If you go check here (MSDN) you will see that when LoadLibrary fails loading, the function returns a NULL value, and you can even check the specific error (that should be a file not found) using GetLastError function.
Related
I have an existing DLL that is working fine when being called from Inno Script however I need to add a function that calls another third party library (of which I do not have the source code).
Whenever I do that I get a 'could not call proc' error.
In order to compile (in Visual Studio) my DLL with the added function, I have to set SAFESEH to no because of the third party library. Is this likely to be what stops Inno Script from working? Are there any options available to resolve this?
Thanks in advance
Turning off SafeSEH is unlikely to prevent anyone from calling your function.
It is more likely that the 3rd-party library added a dependency to some DLL (MSVC run-time etc.). Use Dependency Walker to check if your imported DLLs change after you add the 3rd-party library.
I need to write a program that uses some COM objects, accessed from the python comtypes package. I use the clsid and/or progid to create and use them. These objects are provided by a third party, and normally they are installed with a normal installer (setup.exe or MSI file).
Let's suppose that these DLL files have a license that allows me to ship them together with my program. Is it possible to load these DLL files into memory, and use them from a portable app without actually registering them? Or alternatively, can I register them from my program?
A related question is this: how to determine the chain of DLL files that are needed to create a given COM object? (Other than trial and error.)
Background: in reality, there are multiple libs and the main problem is that I do not want the users to run 4 different installers before they can start the actual program. That would be too difficult for an average user.
You're asking a lot of questions here. There are a lot of ways to accomplish what you're trying to accomplish, and it's hard to answer such a broad set of questions. If you have specific questions on how to do a specific thing, please start new posts for those.
That said, I will try to give you some information to help you figure out what you need/want to do.
Can you use a COM DLL without registering it?
Yes. There are several ways, depending on the needs of the COM DLL and the platform you're using. However, some options won't always work, and other options are very challenging.
DllGetClassObject - In some cases, depending on the COM object you're trying to load, you can just load the DLL, call the DllGetClassObject function directly, and use the returned IClassFactory to create your object. This is the easiest way -- if it works. If the class you create requires that the DLL be registered (maybe it does a CoCreateInstance internally, or maybe it needs proxy support), this won't work for you. To determine if this will work, it's either trial-and-error, or you have to ask the developer of the COM DLL.
Registration-free COM - This is how it's done in .NET. I'm not sure if you can do anything like this easily in Python.
CoRegisterClassObject - If you are going to create your own registration-free COM implementation, this function is going to be critical. I believe this is a fundamental implementation detail for Microsoft's registration-free COM. However, be aware that this would be a very challenging thing to do, and it would require a very good understanding of COM.
Can you register a COM DLL from your program?
Yes. There are a few ways. However, you are likely to run into security issues here -- typically, COM components register themselves in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, and you typically need admin rights to write here. Some COM components/installers are designed to register themselves in HKEY_CURRENT_USER, which would get around the security thing. However, you may have no control over where a component registers itself, and even if you do, registering in HKEY_CURRENT_USER isn't a perfect solution.
regsvr32.exe - One option is to programmatically invoke regsvr32.exe on the DLL.
DllRegisterServer or DllInstall - If a COM DLL can be registered with regsvr32.exe, then it has at least one of these functions exported. You can load the DLL manually and call these functions just like regsvr32.exe does. DllInstall is less common than DllRegisterServer. If DllInstall is present, it may give you the option of installing in HKEY_CURRENT_USER. If not, you have to just do whatever DllRegisterServer does, since there are no options you can provide to that function.
Write the registry values yourself -- If you can figure out all the registry settings that are needed, there's nothing stopping you from putting them into the registry manually. This would get around the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/HKEY_CURRENT_USER issue -- you can write them wherever you like (but HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE still probably requires admin rights).
regedit.exe - Another way to write the registry values yourself is to store them in a .reg file and call regedit.exe to merge them.
How do you determine dependencies of a DLL?
Ideally, the developer of that DLL knows and can tell you. That's the only way that's truly fool-proof.
For COM dependencies, it may be impossible to figure this out any other way than asking the developer or trial-and-error. This is because a COM dependency may exist simply because some code in the DLL just calls CoCreateInstance to create some third-party COM object, and since this is something that is only expressed in source code, there is no metadata on the DLL that will help you find these dependencies.
The above is also true for any dynamically-loaded dependencies. For example, if some code just calls LoadLibrary directly, there is no way for you to determine the dependency from the outside.
For statically-loaded dependencies, you can use tools like Dependency Walker. Note that a lot of the dependencies you will see are system dependencies -- you don't want to include, for example, user32.dll and kernel32.dll because these are installed with Windows.
How do you install third-party dependencies?
If you know exactly what files to write, where to write them and what registry settings (etc) need to be applied, you can do all of that yourself. For some dependencies, it can be easier to just include the third-party installer in your installer and just execute it silently. Many installers support a silent mode for just this reason. A good example of this is the Visual C++ runtime (msvcrt*.dll) -- many applications need this dependency, and many installers just include Microsoft's installer as a part of their distribution, and the primary installer just calls the secondary installers silently.
I have dll project in Visual Studio 2012, which is compiled with /MT (static multi-threaded runtime library). It also links third-party static lib, also compiled with /MT (library A), no problem so far.
The problem comes with another static lib (library B), which is unfortunatelly compiled with /MD. In my dll, i need to link both and there is no alternative to any of them (and I cannot recompile them with different option). I was able to successfully link everything together, but now I have problems with memory allocation and deletion - sometimes it fails to delete allocated object, sometimes another weird errors occurs. I believe it's caused by mixed memory managment functions, used by different parts of my dll - when new is called, object is created in library B, but when delete is called, it tries to release memory using different set of functions-, but I might be wrong.
So my question is, is this really caused by mixed memory-managment functions? And if so, is there any way to get this work together?
The only solution I think of is to wrap library B in another dll compiled with /MD and then use it from original dll to ensure different memory managment functions will be used. I'm not sure, if this would help and I would like to avoid it.
You already seem to have understood the cause of the problems you're seeing, and it is described on MSDN as follows
If it's really not possible to get all your linked libraries to use the same version of the CRT, then your only possible choice is to avoid passing CRT objects across the boundaries of these modules. Whether or not you can do this with your scenario is entireley dependent on your application. The crucial point in the above article is this sentence:
If you design your DLL so that it passes CRT objects across the boundary or allocates memory and expects it to be freed outside the DLL, you restrict the DLL users to use the same copy of the CRT library as the DLL. The DLL and its users use the same copy of the CRT library only if both are linked with the same version of the CRT DLL.
I know you've stated that it is not possible to obtain or build compatible modules to link to your application but I would recommend that you revisit this exhaustively and avoid mixing different CRT libraries at all costs.
I have a DLL (written in C) that uses static thread local storage (__declspec(thread)), and I want to use this DLL from a Visual Basic graphic interface.
Unfortunately, when running the interface on Windows XP that DLL which use static thread local storage crashes when it try to acess its thread variables.
How can I solve this problem?
Thanks,
Regards
G.B.
PS
I would like to not modify the DLL.
This is a known limitation of static TLS. Although you aren't explicitly calling LoadLibrary(), the VB runtime does so on your behalf.
Note that this limitation has been lifted from Vista. The most comprehensive reference that I know of is on Ken Johnson's blog.
You may be able to get around the problem if you could get the DLL included in the imports table of the generated .exe, which would likely involve some PE hacking and I'm far from certain it's a viable strategy. Otherwise you'll need to change the DLL.
I want to intercept dll's loading so I can use them. My first idea was to hook GetProcAddress. Surprisingly, by hooking it, I can only intercept calls made within the process that owns my library. (I opened another executables that call GetProcAddress and those calls don't get intercepted) (I guess because it is dynamically compiled against my lib)
Example of the output:
C:\Windows\syswow64\kernel32.dll
Module32NextW
C:\Windows\syswow64\kernel32.dll
CreateToolhelp32Snapshot
C:\Windows\system32\DINPUT.dll
DirectInputCreateW
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\ntdll.dll
DirectDrawCreate
Anyway, what I want to know is where I should start to be able to intercept dlls loading so I can then use their functions.
Basically, I want to be able to call GetModuleInformation for any dll loaded.
First, what are you doing that requires a global hook?
If you want to be notified that a DLL has loaded in any process, you can look into PsSetImageLoadNotifyRoutine, which is a kernel-mode routine.
Despite it being kernel mode, it's not very hard to use and writing a basic driver is pretty fun.
Another way would be to force a load of your library in every process. There are a variety of methods, one of the more legit ones would be Windows Message hooks.
Install a system-wide hook on the LoadLibrary function.
(I have no idea how to use that small comment thing underneath the question so)