How do I query for all trac tickets related to a user. i.e. all tickets for which the tickets were once assigned, assigned now, created , etc etc
Create custom queries to the ticket_change table. Some SQL required. For assigned once/now, look for rows where field='owner', newvalue column contains the user name the ticket was assigned to. For created tickets, just query by reporter in the ticket table.
Example:
SELECT p.value AS __color__,
id AS ticket, summary, component, version, milestone,
t.type AS type, priority, t.time AS created,
changetime AS _changetime, description AS _description,
reporter AS _reporter
FROM ticket t, enum p, ticket_change c
WHERE p.name = t.priority AND p.type = 'priority'
AND c.field = 'owner'
AND c.newvalue = '$USER'
AND c.ticket = t.id
ORDER BY p.value, milestone, t.type, t.time
You can express this with a TraqQuery expression. E.g. if you want the columns id, summary and status to show up and query all the tickets for the currently logged in user ($USER) then use the following query.
query:?col=id
&
col=summary
&
col=status
&
owner=$USER
However this query assumes that the owner hasn't been the same during the lifetime of a ticket (since ownership can be changed).
If you want a specific user then replace $USER with the actual username. Also if you're using the Agilo plugin you can easily create new queries on the fly via the web-UI. This is done by looking at a report and adding filters to the report.
Related
I am trying to create a formula to obtain a list of items that have no open transactions.
I cant just filter out by status as this filters out transactions that are open, as opposed to showing me only items with nothing open.
So basically if an item has anything open then i dont want it on the search. I do need it on the search if it has all closed or it has no transactions at all.
Hoping someone can help put me in the right direction.
I am a little bit stuck at where to start with the formulas and tried a case formula.
You can use item saved search adding under criteria as "Transaction Fields-status-anyOf-select all closed/rejected/declined statuses" not in filter reason of saved search.
Thanks.
To get the value of non transaction items as well, You need to check the check box use expression under criteria in standard subtab use parens() with OR expression.
And add one more condition as "Transaction Fields-Internal Id-anyOf-none with
"Transaction Fields-status-anyOf-select all closed/rejected/declined statuses".
Add both condition with OR logic.
It will work for both items condition if it has transaction status with closed or with none of transaction internal ids.
Thanks.
I think this is possible in a saved search, and requires a change in the way the filtering is done. Rather than filtering on the "Filters", using grouping and summary calculations to determine if an item qualifies, basically :
Create the item saved search as you would normally, but don't include a "Standard" filter for the openness of the transaction.
In the results, group by item name (or internalid), and another fields you want to include in the top-level results.
In the Criteria - Summary list, add a Formula (Number) condition :
Summary Type= Sum (Count won't work here)
Formula = case when {transaction.status} = 'Open' then 1 else 0 end
Equal to 0
Whether this is more or less elegant than bknight's answer is debatable.
I don't think this is the sort of thing you can do with a single saved search.
It would be fairly easy to do with SuiteQL though.
The script below runs in the console and finds items that are not on any Pending Billing Sales Orders. It's adapted from a script with a different purpose but illustrates the concept.
You can get a list of the status values to use by creating a saved search that finds all the transactions with open statuses you want to exclude , take note of that saved search's id and running the second script in the console
require(['N/query'], query => {
const sqlStr = `
select item.id, itemid, count(po.tranid) as po, count(bill.tranId) as bill, max(bill.tranDate) as lastBilled, count(sale.tranId) as sales, count(tran.tranId) as trans
from item
left outer join transactionLine as line
on line.item = item.id
left outer join transaction as tran on line.transaction = tran.id
left outer join transaction as po on line.transaction = po.id and po.type = 'PurchOrd'
left outer join transaction as bill on line.transaction = bill.id and bill.type = 'VendBill'
left outer join transaction as sale on line.transaction = sale.id and sale.type in ('CustInvc', 'CashSale')
where item.id not in (select otl.item from transactionLine otl, transaction ot where
otl.transaction = ot.id and ot.status in ('SalesOrd:F'))
group by item.id, item.itemid
`;
console.log(sqlStr);
console.log(query.runSuiteQL({
query: sqlStr
}).asMappedResults().map((r, idx)=>{
if(!idx) console.log(JSON.stringify(r));
return `${r.id}\t${r.itemid}\t${r.po}\t${r.bill}\t${r.lastBilled}\t${r.sales}\t${r.trans}`;
}).join('\n'));
});
require(['N/search'], search=>{
const filters = search.load({id:304}).filters;
console.log(JSON.stringify(filters.find(f=>f.name == 'status'), null, ' '));
});
In terms of doing something with this you could run this in a saved search and email someone the results, show the results in a workbook in SuiteAnalytics or build a portlet to display the results - for this last Tim Dietrich has a nice write up on portlets and SuiteQL
I'm trying to get some information about an item, including the item's subsidiary's logo, which naturally requires joining the item to the subsidiary.
The documentation for search.lookupFields says:
You can use joined-field lookups with this method, with the following syntax:
join_id.field_name
So, I duly request the fields I want, including a join on subsidiary:
require(['N/search'], function(search) {
var item = search.lookupFields({
type: search.Type.ITEM,
id: 2086,
columns: ['itemid', 'displayname', 'subsidiary.logo'],
});
log.debug(item);
});
itemid and displayname are fine, but when I try to join another record I get this error:
{
"type":"error.SuiteScriptError",
"name":"SSS_INVALID_SRCH_COLUMN_JOIN",
"message":"An nlobjSearchColumn contains an invalid column join ID, or is not in proper syntax: logo.",
"stack":["doLookupFields(N/search/searchUtil.js)","<anonymous>(adhoc$-1$debugger.user:2)","<anonymous>(adhoc$-1$debugger.user:1)"],
"cause":{
"type":"internal error",
"code":"SSS_INVALID_SRCH_COLUMN_JOIN",
"details":"An nlobjSearchColumn contains an invalid column join ID, or is not in proper syntax: logo.",
"userEvent":null,
"stackTrace":["doLookupFields(N/search/searchUtil.js)","<anonymous>(adhoc$-1$debugger.user:2)","<anonymous>(adhoc$-1$debugger.user:1)"],
"notifyOff":false
},
"id":"",
"notifyOff":false,
"userFacing":false
}
This seems to happen no matter which record and field I try to join. What am I missing?
Although you can return results from multi-select fields, you cannot join to fields on records referenced by multi-select fields (which the subsidiary field on the item record is). Also, you cannot search the logo field on the subsidiary record (not listed in Search Columns under Subsidiary in the NetSuite Records Browser).
This means you have to load the Subsidiary record to get the logo field. In other words:
require(['N/record', 'N/search'], function(record, search) {
var item = search.lookupFields({
type: search.Type.ITEM,
id: 2086,
columns: ['itemid', 'displayname', 'subsidiary'],
});
var subID = item.subsidiary[0].value; //internal id of *first* subsidiary
var subRec = record.load({
type: record.Type.SUBSIDIARY,
id: subID
});
var logo = subRec.getText('logo'); //gets the file name - use getValue to get its ID instead
});
Note that if multiple subsidiaries are set on the item, this only gets the values for the first one. You could iterate through the item.subsidiary result to handle values for multiple subsidiaries if required.
I believe you can't access to the subsidiary record from a lookupfield, you should do a proper search.
https://system.netsuite.com/help/helpcenter/en_US/srbrowser/Browser2018_2/script/record/item.html
You can only join to tables allowed in the Item search object. Try looking for "Subsidiary..." in the Search Results tab within the UI. It's not there. Use the Schema Browser to determine what fields and joins are available.
You cannot think of a NetSuite search as you would any regular SQL search. You have to be cognizant of which fields and which joins can be utilized via the search object.
As people have mentioned, the subsidiary is not a join field available from the item record, one way to achieve what you are trying to do is:
Make a lookup to get the internal id of the subsidiary belonging to the desired item.
Then make a lookup to get the internal id of the logo image (file cabinet image) belonging to the previous subsidiary.
Make another lookup/load the image file to get the URL of the image/logo
You can try to combine the above steps in a single saved search but I think you might need to load the image file to get the URL.
This won't answer your question, but this may help out in the future. The records browser shows everything that you can search and join on, columns and filters, and field IDs. Very useful when building out searches.
NetSuite Records Browser - 2018.2
I'm using CRM 2011 and I have a 1-n relationship between EntityA(master) and EntityB(detail).
I need to get the list of EntityA records that are not related to any EntityB records. How can I accomplish this inside a plugin using query expression?
I believe this should work (See the EDIT, it doesn't work):
var qe = new QueryExpression("entitya");
var entityBLink = qe.AddLink("entityb", "entityaid", "entityaid", JoinOperator.LeftOuter);
entityBLink.LinkCriteria.AddCondition("entitybid", ConditionOperator.Null);
It should create a SQL Statement that looks something like this:
SELECT
FROM entitya
LEFT OUTER JOIN entityb on entitya.entityaid = entityb.entityaid
AND ( entityb.entitybid IS NULL )
EDIT - Working version
var qe = new QueryExpression("entitya");
var entityBLink = qe.AddLink("entityb", "entityaid", "entityaid", JoinOperator.LeftOuter);
entityBLink.Columns.AddColumn("entitybid");
var entities = service.RetrieveMultiple(qe).Entities.
Where(e => !e.Attributes.Keys.Any(k => k.EndsWith(".entitybid"))).
Select(e => e.ToEntity<entitya>());
The SQL statement for the first query does get generated as is, but since the null check is on the join and it is a left join, all EnityA entities get returned.
The bad news is in CRM there is no way to perform a sub query, or specify in the where clause, a linked entity's properties. I really hope Microsoft spends some time with the next major release adding this type of functionality.
You can however perform the filter on the client side, which is what the C# code is doing above.
I need some help sorting out some syntax for an update to a list item in sharepoint from an application. Here's a rundown on the situation :
There are two lists within this sp site. One list is a products list, and the second list is a pricing. The way these lists are setup however are a 1 to many scheme. One product can have many pricing records. The product then has a column against it that is a look up field that supports multiple values.
Using REST and oData I can query and get the pricing information easily enough now, but my problem is when I need to update the products record to add a price.
with regular lookup fields I normally just set the ID property for the object, then call the update and savechanges methods for that list. With the pricing column however supporting multiple records there is no ID to set, and the field is an array of sorts. Adding the pricing object (list item) and updating and savechanges doesn't actually save. No errors are thrown but the then when viewing the list it isn't actually saving.
How can I add a price lookup to my Product?
I wrote a small method to query through each price and add it's initial price to the product below for testing :
InventoryCatalogDataContext dc = new InventoryCatalogDataContext(_pushinTinSvc);
dc.Credentials = CredentialCache.DefaultCredentials;
List<PricingItem> pricing = (from q in dc.Pricing
select q).ToList<PricingItem>();
foreach (PricingItem price in pricing)
{
var query = (DataServiceQuery<ProductsItem>)
dc.Products
.Expand("Pricing")
.Where(p => p.Id.Equals(price.StockCodeId));
List<ProductsItem> prods = query.ToList<ProductsItem>();
ProductsItem product = prods[0];
product.Pricing.Add(price);
dc.UpdateObject(product);
}
try
{
dc.SaveChanges();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
string stopHere = ex.Message;
}
I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or if this is a bug. If I inspect the item after the SaveChanges, the item still has the pricing item lookup attached, showing a count of 1. At the end of the code block, if I re-query for the product, at that point it even still has the pricing attached. But once the method finishes and returns to the UI, the pricing is no longer attached, the fields are empty when you look at the list in sharepoint, but the version does increment. So I'm a little lost...
So I'm working with sales_order_grid_collection_load_before observer event at the moment, where I can get the collection being used through $collection = $observer->getEvent()->getOrderGridCollection();, I'm just wondering, if it is possible to filter this collection by a product from the order attribute.
What I mean with that is the order grid collection has sub products related to that order, I need to only show orders if at least one of the products match a specific criteria (in my case, I've given the products an admin_id attribute, which is set to the administrator who added the product).
Thanks!
I've done a very similar thing by doing the following:
Override the sales order grid block. To do this you will need to set up your own extension (it looks like you might already be doing this, but just in case, there is some handy doco in the Magento wiki)
<config>
<modules>
<Company_Module>
<version>0.1.0</version>
</Company_Module>
</modules>
<global>
<blocks>
<company_module>
<class>Company_Module_Block</class>
</company_module>
<adminhtml>
<rewrite>
<sales_order_grid>Company_Module_Block_Sales_Order_Grid</sales_order_grid>
</rewrite>
</adminhtml>
</blocks>
</global>
</config>
I then copied the /app/code/core/Mage/Adminhtml/Block/Sales/Order/Grid.php into my extensions folder at /app/code/local/Company/Module/Block/Sales/Order
In the copied file I changed the class name to class Company_Module_Block_Sales_Order_Grid extends Mage_Adminhtml_Block_Widget_Grid
I then changed the _prepareCollection function. In this case I was interested in grabbing the customer_group_id and customer_email from the sales_flat_order table
protected function _prepareCollection() {
$collection = Mage::getResourceModel($this->_getCollectionClass());
// left join onto the sales_flat_order table, retrieving the customer_group_id and customer_email columns -< this can be expanded
$collection->getSelect()->join('sales_flat_order', 'main_table.entity_id=sales_flat_order.entity_id', array('customer_group_id'=>'customer_group_id', 'customer_email'=>'customer_email'), null, 'left');
// grab the current user and get their associated customer groups (additional coding required to associate the customer groups to an admin user
$user = Mage::getSingleton('admin/session')->getUser();
$roleId = implode('', $user->getRoles());
$customerGroupIds = Mage::getModel('admin/roles')->load($roleId)->getCustomerGroupIds();
$orders = Mage::getResourceModel('sales/order_collection');
// if the admin user has associated customer group ids then find the orders associated with those
// this would be where you would do your filtering of the products
if (count($customerGroupIds)) {
$orders->addAttributeToFilter('customer_group_id', array('in' => $customerGroupIds));
}
$orderIds = $orders->getAllIds();
$collection->addAttributeToFilter('entity_id', array('in' => $orderIds));
$this->setCollection($collection);
return parent::_prepareCollection();
}
You may not need the join to the sales_flat_order table...you might be able to do it just by doing the filtering in the second part of the _prepareCollection function shown above. In my case, I was displaying the customer_group_id and the customer_email in the grid so that the user could manually filter, if required.
I am not sure if you can access directly the product from the order_grid_collection (I don't think so) but you can join this collection with sales_flat_order_item and then filter as you wish.
HTH