I have a RHEL box that I need to put under a moderate and variable amount of CPU load (50%-75%).
What is the best way to go about this? Is there a program that can do this that I am not aware of? I am happy to write some C code to make this happen, I just don't know what system calls will help.
This is exactly what you need (internet archive link):
https://web.archive.org/web/20120512025754/http://weather.ou.edu/~apw/projects/stress/stress-1.0.4.tar.gz
From the homepage:
"stress is a simple workload generator for POSIX systems. It imposes a configurable amount of CPU, memory, I/O, and disk stress on the system. It is written in C, and is free software licensed under the GPL."
Find a simple prime number search program that has source code. Modify the source code to add a nanosleep call to the main loop with whichever delay gives you the desired CPU load.
One common way to get some load on a system is to compile a large software package over and over again. Something like the Linux kernel.
Get a copy of the source code, extract the tar.bz2, go into the top level source directory, copy your kernel config from /boot to .config or zcat /proc/config.gz > .config, the do make oldconfig, then while true; do make clean && make bzImage; done
If you have an SMP system, then make -j bzImage is fun, it will spawn make tasks in parallel.
One problem with this is adjusting the CPU load. It will be a maximum CPU load except for when waiting on disk I/O.
You could possibly do this using a Bash script. Use " ps -o pcpu | grep -v CPU" to get the CPU Usage of all the processes. Add all those values together to get the current usage. Then have a busy while loop that basically keeps on checking those values, figuring out the current CPU usage, and waiting a calculated amount of time to keep the processor at a certain threshhold. More detail is need, but hopefully this will give you a good starting point.
Take a look at this CPU Monitor script I found and try to get some other ideas on how you can accomplish this.
It really depends what you're trying to test. If you're just testing CPU load, simple scripts to eat empty CPU cycles will work fine. I personally had to test the performance of a RAID array recently and I relied on Bonnie++ and IOZone. IOZone will put a decent load on the box, particularly if you set the file size higher than the RAM.
You may also be interested in this Article.
Lookbusy enables set value of CPU load.
Project site
lookbusy -c util[-high_util], --cpu-util util[-high_util]
i.e. 60% load
lookbusy -c 60
Use the "nice" command.
a) Highest priority:
$ nice -n -20 my_command
or
b) Lowest priority:
$ nice -n 20 my_command
A Simple script to load & hammer the CPU using awk. The script does mathematical calculations and thus CPU load peaks up on higher values passwd to loadserver.sh .
checkout the script # http://unixfoo.blogspot.com/2008/11/linux-cpu-hammer-script.html
You can probably use some load-generating tool to accomplish this, or run a script to take all the CPU cycles and then use nice and renice on the process to vary the percentage of cycles that the process gets.
Here is a sample bash script that will occupy all the free CPU cycles:
#!/bin/bash
while true ; do
true
done
Not sure what your goal is here. I believe glxgears will use 100% CPU.
So find any process that you know will max out the CPU to 100%.
If you have four CPU cores(0 1 2 3), you could use "taskset" to bind this process to say CPUs 0 and 1. That should load your box 50%. To load it 75% bind the process to 0 1 2 CPUs.
Disclaimer: Haven't tested this. Please let us know your results. Even if this works, I'm not sure what you will achieve out of this?
Related
On Linux, a process' (main thread's) last program-counter value is presented in /proc/$PID/stat. This seems to be a really simple and easy way to do some sampled profiling without having to instrument a program in any way whatsoever.
I'm wondering if this has any caveats when it comes to the sampling quality, however. I'm assuming this value is updated whenever the process runs out of its timeslice, which should happen at completely random intervals in the program code, and that samples taken at more than time-slice length should be uniformly randomly distributed according to where the program actually spends its time. But that's just an assumption, and I realize it could be wrong in any number of ways.
Does anyone know?
Why not to try modern builtin linux tools like perf (https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page)?
It has record mode with adjustable frequency (-F100 for 100 Hz), with many events, for example, on software event task-clock without using of hardware performance counters (stop the perf with Ctrl-C or add sleep 10 to the right to sample for 10 seconds):
perf record -p $PID -e task-clock -o perf.output.file
Perf works for all threads without any instrumenting (recompilation or code editing) and will not interfere with program execution (only timer interrupt is slightly modified). (There is also some support of stacktrace sampling with -g option.)
Output can be parsed offline with perf report (only this command will try to parse binary and shared libraries)
perf report -i perf.output.file
or converted to raw PC (EIP) samples with perf script -i perf.output.file.
PS: EIP pointer in /proc/$pid/stat file is mentioned in official linux man page 5 proc http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html as kstkeip - "The current EIP (instruction pointer)." It is read at fs/proc/array.c:do_task_stat eip = KSTK_EIP(task);, but I'm not sure where and when it is filled. It can be written on task switch (both on involuntary when taskslice ends and voluntary when tasks does something like sched_yield) or on blocking syscalls, so it is probably not the best choice as sampling source.
If it works, which it could, it will have the shortcomings of prof, which gprof was supposed to remedy. Then gprof has its own shortcomings, which have led to numerous more modern profilers. Some of us consider this to be the most effective, and it can be accomplished with a tool as simple as pstack or lsstack.
I am profiling some code on a Linux system (running on Intel Core i7 4500U) to obtain the time of ONLY the execution costs. The application is the demo mpeg2dec from libmpeg2. I am trying to obtain a probability distribution for the mpeg2 execution times. However we want to see the raw execution cost when cache is switched off.
Is there a way I can disable the cpu cache of my system via a Linux command, or via a gcc flag ? or even set the cpu (L1/L2) cache size to 0KB ? or even add some code changed to disable cache ? Of course, without modifying or rebuilding the kernel.
See this 2012 thread, someone posted a tiny kernel module source to disable cache through asm.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-kernel-70/disabling-cpu-caches-936077/
If disabling the cache is really necessary, then so be it.
Otherwise, to know how much time a process takes in terms of user or system "cycles", then I would recommend the getrusage() function.
struct rusage usage;
getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, &usage);
You can call it before/after your loop/test and subtracted the values to get a good idea of how much time your process took, even if many other processes run in parallel on the same machine. The main problem you'd get is if your process start swapping. In that case your timings will be off.
double user_usage = usage.ru_utime.tv_sec + usage.ru_utime.tv_usec / 1000000.0;
double system_uage = usage.ru_stime.tv_sec + usage.ru_stime.tv_usec / 1000000.0;
This is really precise from my own experience. To increase precision, you could be root when running your test and give it a negative priority (-1 or -2 is enough.) Then it won't be swapped out until you call a function that may require it.
Of course, you still get the effect of the cache... assuming you do not handle very large amount of data with code that goes on and on (opposed to having a loop).
Here's a solution which may consume a lot of cpu usage (stolen from this article):
There's a difference in my Ubuntu 12 ec2 server, I have to use top -bn1 instead of top -ln.
Here's my related .tmux.conf file:
set -g status-right '#[fg=yellow]#[(getCpuUsage.sh)]'
It actually calls top every 2 seconds and outputs a whole lot of information. I think there should be a way involving less cpu consumption or use some flag to limit the output of top to only cpu usage.
I use the small tmux-mem-cpu-load C++ program. It's at least one fork/exec per update either way, but probably better than invoking a shell.
If I knew tmux-mem-cpu-load, I would become too lazy to write my own rainbarf:
It has a fancier look, but it is a Perl script so it is not a good idea to run it every 2 seconds (on my experience, 15 seconds suffice).
You can try vmstat(1). It displays the averaged CPU load over all CPUs: user, system, idle and IO wait in the last four fields:
vmstat|while read s;do [[ "$s" =~ ([[:space:]]+[0-9]+){4}$ ]]&&echo $BASH_REMATCH; done
stat top command.
press 1.
Press 0 then
Press "t" twice.
It will display bar graph of the CPU usage.
You can change the color by +z. Then color number in the list.
Is there a way to benchmark a bash script's performance? the script downloads a remote file, and then makes calls to multiple commandline programs to manipulate. I would like to know (or as much as possible):
Total time
Time spent downloading
Time spent on each command called
-=[ I think these could be wrapped in "time" calls right? ]=-
Average download speed
uses wget
Total Memory used
Total CPU usage
CPU usage per command called
I'm able to make edits to the bash script to insert any benchmark commands needed at specific points (ie, between app calls). Not sure if some "top" ninja-ry could solve this or not. Not able to find anything useful (at least to limited understanding) in man file.
Will be running the benchmarks on OSX Terminal as well as Ubuntu (if either matter).
strace -o trace -c -Ttt ./scrip
-c is to trace the time spent by cpu on specific call.
-Ttt will tell you time in microseconds at time of each system call running.
-o will save output in file "trace".
You should be able to achieve this a number of ways. One way is to use time built-in function for each command of interest and capture the results. You may have to be careful about any pipes and redirects;
You may also consider trapping SIGCHLD, DEBUG, RETURN, ERR and EXIT signals and putting timing information in there, but you may not get some results.
This concept of CPU usage of each command won't give you any thing useful, all commands use 100% of cpu. Memory usage is something you can pull out but you should look at
If you want to get deep process statistics then you would want to use strace... See strace(1) man page for details. I doubt that -Ttt as it is suggest elsewhere is useful all that tells you are system call times and you want other process trace info.
You may also want to see ltrace and dstat tools.
A similar question is answered here Linux benchmarking tools
I'm trying to find the best way to use 'top' as semi-permanent instrumentation in the development of a box running embedded Linux. (The instrumentation will be removed from the final-test and production releases.)
My first pass is to simply add this to init.d:
top -b -d 15 >/tmp/toploop.out &
This runs top in "batch" mode every 15 seconds. Let's assume that /tmp has plenty of space…
Questions:
Is 15 seconds a good value to choose for general-purpose monitoring?
Other than disk space, how seriously is this perturbing the state of the system?
What other (perhaps better) tools could be used like this?
Look at collectd. It's a very light weight system monitoring framework coded for performance.
We use sysstat to monitor things like this.
You might find that vmstat and iostat with a delay and no repeat counter is a better option.
I suspect 15 seconds would be more than adequate unless you actually want to watch what's happening in real time, but that doesn't appear to be the case here.
As far as load, on an idling PIII 900Mhz w/ 768MB of RAM running Ubuntu (not sure which version, but not more than a year old) I have top updating every 0.5 seconds and it's about 2% CPU utilization. At 15s updates, I'm seeing 0.1% CPU utilization.
depending upon what exactly you want, you could use the output of uptime, free, and ps to get most, if not all, of top's information.
If you are looking for overall load, uptime is probably sufficient. However, if you want specific information about processes, you are adventurous, and have the /proc filessystem enabled, you may want to write your own tools. The primary benefit in this environment is that you can focus on exactly what you want and minimize the load introduced to the system.
The proc file system gives your application read access to the kernel memory that keeps track of many of the interesting variables. Reading from /proc is one of the lightest ways to get this information. Additionally, you may be able to get more information than provided by top. I've done this in the past to get amount of time spent in user and system by this process. Additionally, you can use this to get information about the number of file descriptors open by the process. You might also use this to get detailed information about how the network system is working.
Much of this information is pre-processed by other applications which can be used if you get the information you need. However, it is rather straight-forward to read the raw information. Do a man proc for more information.
Pity you haven't said what you are monitoring for.
You should decide whether 15 seconds is ok or not. Feel free to drop it way lower if you wish (and have a fast HDD)
No worries unless you are running a soft real-time system
Have a look at tools suggested in other answers. I'll add another sugestion: "iotop", for answering a "who is thrashing the HDD" questions.
At work for system monitoring during stress tests we use a tool called nmon.
What I love about nmon is it has the ability to export to XLS and generate beautiful graphs for you.
It generates statistics for:
Memory Usage
CPU Usage
Network Usage
Disk I/O
Good luck :)