I'm trying to install faac and am running into errors. Here are the errors I get when trying to build it:
[root#test faac]# ./bootstrap
configure.in:11: warning: underquoted definition of MY_DEFINE
run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal
aclocal:configure.in:17: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library
common/mp4v2/Makefile.am:5: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined
common/mp4v2/Makefile.am:5:
common/mp4v2/Makefile.am:5: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'
common/mp4v2/Makefile.am:5: to `configure.in' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.
libfaac/Makefile.am:1: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined
libfaac/Makefile.am:1:
libfaac/Makefile.am:1: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'
libfaac/Makefile.am:1: to `configure.in' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again.
configure.in:17: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
Does anyone know what this means? I was unable to find anything about this so I figured I'd ask you guys. Thank you for your help.
EDIT:
Here's my versions of linux, libtool, automake and autoconf:
[root#test faac]# libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 2.2
Written by Gordon Matzigkeit <gord#gnu.ai.mit.edu>, 1996
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[root#test faac]# autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[root#test faac]# automake --version
automake (GNU automake) 1.9.2
Written by Tom Tromey <tromey#redhat.com>.
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[root#test faac]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant)
I think the first thing to check is that you have libtool installed.
Edit:
This is what I get on Ubuntu 8.04:
$ ./bootstrap
configure.in:11: warning: underquoted definition of MY_DEFINE
configure.in:11: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
configure.in:11: or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal
configure.in:4: installing `./install-sh'
configure.in:4: installing `./missing'
common/mp4v2/Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp'
$ libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.26 Debian 1.5.26-1ubuntu1 (1.1220.2.493 2008/02/01 16:58:18)
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
$ autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.61
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software. You may redistribute copies of it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.
$ automake --version
automake (GNU automake) 1.10.1
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Written by Tom Tromey <tromey#redhat.com>
and Alexandre Duret-Lutz <adl#gnu.org>.
So your problem is that automake/conf don't know about libtool.
You need to reinstall all of them. Either from all from source, or all from binary packages.
If installing from source, ensure they are all installed to the same location.
Maybe your automake doesn't know about your libtool for some reason. It looks like you've got two copies of libtool installed, which might be confusing it.
Maybe you should remove both copies, plus all automake, autoconf installs, and reinstall them (possibly from source?).
I guess the first step is to find out the locations of the active copies of the tools:
which libtool
which automake
which autoconf
It sounds like autoconf/automake cannot find libtool.m4, and therefore cannot resolve the macro AM_PROG_LIBTOOL. Look for this file under your libtool installation and copy/link it under /usr/share/aclocal/.
Related
I installed gcc-9.3.0 by apt, but I can only use it with sudo like
sudo gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0
Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
and
gcc --version
gcc (OpenFOAM) 6.3.0
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
I want to use it without sudo.
What is the difference?
How can I use gcc-9.3.0 from my normal user account?
GCC doesn't need special sudo rights - the difference you see is because you have 2 versions installed, but version 6 appears in your regular PATH before version 9.
To fix it, add the install directory of GCC 9 to the front of your PATH.
I am a green hand about linux and I am using a server to run my R code through qsub xx.pbs. When I library "Rcpp" package, I got this error:
Error: package or namespace load failed for ‘Rcpp’ in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...):
unable to load shared object '/data/user77/Rlib/Rcpp/libs/Rcpp.so':
/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by /data/user77/Rlib/Rcpp/libs/Rcpp.so)
However, when I used ldd --version to find out what is the current version of glibc, I got this:
ldd (GNU libc) 2.17
When I ran /lib64/libc.so.6, I got this:
GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.17, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23).
Compiled on a Linux 2.6.32 system on 2021-01-02.
How can I fix this problem? Thanks a lot for your providing solutions!
(PS: I am not allowed to use sudo.)
Currently I have GNU Make version 3.82 and I need GNU Make 4.x or higher. I do not have sudo privileges so I downloaded latest make-4.2.93 version from https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/ in my local folder /home/username/local/bin/make-4.2.93. I tried to do following in order to add this to my path:
I added this line in my .tcshrc file:
set path=( $path /home/username/local/bin/make-4.2.93)
But my default make version still is the same old one.
make --version
GNU Make 3.82
Built for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
How can this be made right?
Thanks.
I want to set default compiler from clang to gcc in termux (android application).
gcc isn't available in official repo so I used pointless community repo. But now I can't configure the termux to use gcc instead of clang.
usr/bin/ contain g++, gcc, gcc-8, g++8.
But gcc --version command shows default clang.
gcc-8 --version shows:
"CANNOT LINK EXECUTABLE "gcc-8" : library "libc++_shared.so" not found
linker: CANNOT LINK EXECUTABLE "gcc-8": library "libc++_shared.so" not found.
I had this problem as well. The question that is asked by #Andy J is unfortunately less than helpful because there is not even ldconfig in this environment and I saw on Reddit that one of the developers said it's not even needed. (I doubt they are correct but it's not needed to fix this problem.
Do:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$PREFIX/lib
export PATH=$PATH:$PREFIX/lib
Then finally you should be able to use GCC version 8.0.
~/gccbuild $ gcc-8 --version gcc-8 (GCC) 8.3.0
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for
copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or F
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Personally I'm trying to install it so that I can compile GCC 12, wish me luck with that lol.
I'm reading the chapter 2.3.1 of Getting Started Guide for Linux (Release 16.04.0), and I just saw :
Required:
glibc >= 2.7 (for features related to cpuset)
The version can be checked using the ldd --version command.
When I ran ldd --version I got
ldd (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.9) 2.19
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper.
Does that mean my glibc version is 2.19?
I've tried some ways to upgrade the version, but got nothing new.
Actually, on The GNU Library, I noticed
Latest News
2016-02-19: glibc 2.23 released.
So how can I get the version of 2.7?? Does Getting Started Guide for Linux (Release 16.04.0) give the wrong message?