Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 days ago.
Improve this question
I need to use canvas to get the blob or dataURL of images in a Chrome extension. Some images are cross-origin and their servers do not allow cross origin which result in tainted data.
Since it is a Chrome extension, is there way to get the image data avoiding the cross-origin registriction?
I've seen extensions like Copyfish and Project Naptha.
Copyfish uses a reverse proxy. As for Project Naptha, it can process cross-origin images. But its code is complex, I didn't find out how it does this.
Get the data of cross-origin images in a Chrome extension
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 days ago.
Improve this question
I'm creating a website using MERN Stack the website will help people to create videos that create a voice over and subtitle on video.
The user would have to upload a video and write some text that would be sent to server and return for them the video they uploaded with subtitle and voice over of the content they have wrote.
so I have created a website that produce this functionality but what I got stuck with is how should I handle the files (videos uploaded, audio files, subtitles and final videos generated)
my current implementation handle everything on the production server as the client prefer that everything stay on the server (and he doesn't mind to through extra bucks for that)
the website is expected to handle between 1000-3000 request per day but I'm not sure with this load could a single server handle all of that? or should I get a server for handling the files and the other for my functionality?
I'm currently finishing my code to test this but I thought maybe someone here could help me to think about it differently or maybe I'm doing something naive and I should insist on using a third party service to handle the database and the files.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I have come up with various solutions like using inboxSDK or using gmail.js plugin. But are these the standard way of creating gmail extensions? Is there any another way? Can we use these plugins for production usage?
This may still depend on what you need to do with Gmail. You can use Gmail API in developing a chrome extension. You have to use chrome.identity to authorize your extension to make a request to Google APIs. You can also use gmail.js, but as stated in this related SO post this project isn't maintained by Google. You can also use Apps Script and make a web app then let your chrome extension send data through postMessage. Hope this helps.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
My website has suspicious GET to the site
http://p3nlhclust404.shr.prod.phx3.secureserver.net/SharedContent/HostingRedirect.html
The problem is that I get this error in all local projects in wampserver, and also in my hosted website (ovh hosting).
Why is my site making requests to this suspicious domain? Is this a security incident?
I guess you solved your problem by now, but just in case someone else is stuck on this weirdness in the future, I had the same "issue":
I'm using <name>.webdev.comfor my WAMP virtual hosts and I mistyped it wevdev somewhere. wevdev.com and all its subdomains redirect to that http://p3nlhclust404.shr.prod.phx3.secureserver.net 404 page.
Maybe you made the same typo!
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Google had this deal on youtube about sharing an issue on their site by leaving feedback. When you clicked on it, it took a screenshot of the current page. How can I do that in my application so I can see the error my users are having?
With Usersnap (http://usersnap.com), you can get screenshots from your users. They don't have to install any plugin or browser extension and it works with all major browsers (read: including Internet Explorer!).
Installing usersnap is as easy as installing Google analytics, i.e. adding a small JavaScript snippet to your page.
P.S: I'm a co founder of usersnap - if you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask.
Using ASP.NET, you could do something like this (see the "Calling with the IHttpHandler Method"):
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/95439/Get-ASP-NET-C-2-0-Website-Thumbnail-Screenshot
Then, your button would submit a request to the handler (possibly via AJAX), and you could either store the answer using the handler itself, or do a second postback with the results to your processing form.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Well, the title pretty much states the question...
SSL secures the communications, it does not provide content access mechanisms.
As long as there is no password/authentication restricting access to the pages, there's no reason a search engine would be unable to index them.
Yes.
They may choose not to spider over HTTPS, or they may choose to rate lower those sites that are available only over HTTPS, or they may choose to do any number of things. But they can certainly spider the Web over HTTPS just as easily as your browser can view a single Web page over HTTPS.