Currently we have a configuration of two Azure SignalR services and two web app services that are configured with the two signalr services (below code). My question is whether ServerStickyMode is required since the documentation is confusing, we have documentation that says its mostly not required since we are using a Azure SignalR service and a post that says it is required, I ran into issues with it disabled it does not work all the time, just intermittently, so it really is required. Would the amount of instances (sku units) also affect ServerStickyMode?
*Not Required?
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/signalr/scale?view=aspnetcore-7.0#azure-signalr-service
"The only circumstances in which sticky sessions are not required are:"
When using the Azure SignalR Service.
"Sticky sessions, also known as client affinity, is not required, because clients are immediately redirected to the Azure SignalR Service when they connect."
*Required?
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/whats-new-in-azure-signalr-1-1-0-preview-1/#:~:text=Also%20when%20sticky%20mode%20is%20enabled%2C%20service%20won%E2%80%99t,only%20enable%20it%20when%20there%20is%20a%20need.
"The typical connection flow when using SignalR service is that client first negotiates with app server to get the url of SignalR service, then service routes client to app server.
When you have multiple app servers, there is no guarantee that two servers (the one who does negotiation and the one who gets the hub invocation) will be the same one.
We hear a lot of customers asking about whether it’s possible to make the two servers the same one so they can share some states between negotiation and hub invocation. In this release we have added a new “server sticky mode” to support this scenario.
To enable this, you just need to set ServerStickyMode to Required in AddAzureSignalR():"
Any help would be appreciated.
.AddSignalR().AddAzureSignalR(options =>
{
options.Endpoints = new[]
{
new ServiceEndpoint(configuration["SignalRConnectionStringPrimary"],
EndpointType.Primary, "Primary"),
new ServiceEndpoint(configuration["SignalRConnectionStringSecondary"],
EndpointType.Primary, "Secondary")
options.ServerStickyMode = ServerStickyMode.Disabled;
};
I am expecting that any published data on SignalR will be received by the subscribers.
Related
i want to develop a Game using Azure Cloud but i am not sure which ressources i could use for it. Folowing is my problem:
There is one publisher which is providing some messages. I need to find a way to add subscriber on demand. That means whenever i need more subscriber i need to add them without changing any settings on the portal.
All subscriber needs to get the published message at the same time.
Received message from the publisher needs to be deleted for all subscriber at the same time.
Is there a ressource or a way which fits theese needs?
Thanks.
Azure SignalR Service is WebSocket Gateway service that covers all your requirements.
While you could always host your own server, the service supports scaling out.
I'm architecting an application used for team tasks management. The requirement is that every member of a team can add a task, and other members can see those tasks immediately.
The different services that I'm choosing are Azure Function, Azure Service Bus, Azure SQL DB and SignalR.
My idea is:
User adds a task in a Javascript client application in the Browser which will be sent to Azure Function.
Azure Function adds the user to the SQL DB. Sends an event called TaskAdded to Azure Service Bus.
SignalR receives the message, generate a new list of tasks and update client browsers in real time.
My question is, what communication/integration protocols (binding, message) should be used to make all the services work together to meet the requirement?
Service Fabric was just announced at the build conference. I was reading the scarce documentation about it and I have a question.
I'm evaluating Service Fabric for hosting CRUD like microservices that are at the moment built in ASP.NET WebApi.
Is Service Fabric geared towards hosting small pieces of functionality that receive data, process it and return the result, rather than hosting CRUD WebApi types of application?
Service Fabric enables the creation of both stateless and stateful microservices.
As the name suggests, any state maintained by an an instance of a stateless service will be lost if the node goes down. A new, fresh instance will simply be spun up elsewhere in the cluster.
Stateful services offer the ability to persist state without relying on an external store. Any data stored in a Reliable Collection will be automatically replicated across multiple nodes in the cluster, ensuring that the state is resilient to failures.
A common pattern is to use a stateless service as the client-facing gateway to the application and then have that service direct traffic to the app's partitioned stateful services. This hides the work of resolving partitions from clients, allowing them to to target one logical endpoint with all requests.
Take a look at the WordCount sample for an example of how this works. The WordCount.WebService stateless service acts as the front end to the application. It simply resolves the partition based on the incoming request and then sends it on. The WordCount.Service stateful service (partitioned based on the first letter of the word) immediately puts those incoming requests in a ReliableQueue and then processes them in the background, storing the results in a ReliableDictionary.
For more details, see the Reliable Services Overview.
Note: for now, the best way to expose WebAPI endpoints to clients is to self-host an OWIN server in the stateless service. ASP.NET 5 projects will soon be supported as well.
This video answers my own question: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2015/2-704. In summary, we should use Stateless Services to host ASP.NET based sites or API's which persist data to external data stores.
If you don't have state (or have it externally), Stateless Service is the way to start.
Answer to the original question is "both". Basically, anything that have main() function (with couple of more extended contract methods to talk to Service Fabric) can be a service in Service Fabric world.
I'm building a game for Windows Phone 8 and would like to use Windows Azure SQL Database for storing my users' data (mostly scores and rankings).
I have been reading Azure's documentation on SQL Database and found this link which describes just the scenario I'm looking for (it's Scenario B in the picture): I want my clients (the game running in a user's windows phone) to get data from an SQL Server through a middle application also hosted on Windows Azure.
By reading further the documentation (personally I think it's really messy and hard to find what you're looking for in there), I've learned that I could use Cloud Services for this middle application, however I'm not sure if I should use a background worker which provides an HTTP API or a worker with a Service Bus Relay (I discovered that I can use service bus in WP8 in this link).
I've got a few questions that I couldn't find an answer to:
1) What would be the "standard" way to go in this case?
2) If both ways are acceptable, are there other advantages to using a Service Bus other than an easier way to connect and send messages to my middle application? What are the disadvantages?
3) Is a cloud service really what I'm looking for (and not just a VM with the middle application code running in it)?
Its difficult to answer these sort of question as there are lots of considerations. I don't believe there is a necessarily 'standard way'.
The Service Bus' relay service's purpose is to help traverse firewalls and NATs, not something that directly relates to your scenario, I suspect.
The Service Bus, though, also includes a messaging capability which provides queues, topics and subscriptions to use to exchange messages between clients or client/server.
You could use the phone client to write and read messages to/from queues. you would then have a worker role hosting your application logic and accessing the database as needed.
Some of the advantages of using messaging include being load leveller, helping handling peaks in traffic (at the expense of latency), helping separating concerns and allowing you to accept requests from the clients when the backend is down as so can help with resiliency.
In theory they can also help you deliver messages to the client in the same fashion, by using a queue or subscription per client, but for a large number of clients this may become a management issue.
On the downside you would have to work with what is a proprietary protocol, and will need to understand the characteristics and limitations of the service bus. you will need to manage the queues and topics over time. there will also be some increased latency, although typically not an issue and, finally, you will have to implement asynchronous messaging on the client side which has advantages but is also harder to implement.
I would imagine that many architectures follow the WEB API route by using a web role cloud service exposing the API. The web role can then perform any business logic and connect to the database in the background.
A third option, which you didn't mention, is to use Windows Azure Mobile Services and implement your business logic as a service API there
We are looking to use Windows Azure to host our existing SaaS platform and extend our functionality and capability. WE will be taking adavantage of both the data storage and application and web service functionality of Azure.
My question is as follows:
Some of our clients will not want Public CLoud access. Since our datastore stores sensitive client data many of them will require our whole system to be hosted internally on their own network and servers.
If we setup a full Azure setup of database and connected applications and processes how difficult is it to be able to duplicate that system for a specific client on their own servers and network using existing Microsoft technologies?
I know its a vague question and I also have a liminted understanding of Azure so whatever information you can provide here would be most appreciated.
Thank you
It sounds like you need the flexibility of a hybrid cloud/on-prem solution. Likely the best solution is the Windows Azure Service Bus. Essentially, you configure a WCF web service in the cloud (SOAP, REST, etc) that performs asynchronous brokered messaging between your on-premise application and your web application. This can be performed using queue messages, for example:
The web application (cloud) requests resources from the brokering service (cloud) by sending a queue message
The service handles the queue message and makes it available to the consuming (on-prem) service
On-prem service checks for new messages from the brokering service, gets the request for data, and returns desired data from DB
On-prem service sends message to brokering service with desired data
Web app (cloud) checks for new messages from the brokering service, then uses the data from on-prem service
Service bus is secure, asynchronous, fault-tolerant, and ensures that both components are decoupled.
Another method is to use Windows Azure Connect, which is a VPN solution that sets up network-level connnectivity. I recommend Service Bus because it promotes a more robust and scalable architecture, and fault-tolerance is high.