I have a 20 x 4000 dataframe in Python using pandas. Two of these columns are named Year and quarter. I'd like to create a variable called period that makes Year = 2000 and quarter= q2 into 2000q2.
Can anyone help with that?
If both columns are strings, you can concatenate them directly:
df["period"] = df["Year"] + df["quarter"]
If one (or both) of the columns are not string typed, you should convert it (them) first,
df["period"] = df["Year"].astype(str) + df["quarter"]
Beware of NaNs when doing this!
If you need to join multiple string columns, you can use agg:
df['period'] = df[['Year', 'quarter', ...]].agg('-'.join, axis=1)
Where "-" is the separator.
Small data-sets (< 150rows)
[''.join(i) for i in zip(df["Year"].map(str),df["quarter"])]
or slightly slower but more compact:
df.Year.str.cat(df.quarter)
Larger data sets (> 150rows)
df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']
UPDATE: Timing graph Pandas 0.23.4
Let's test it on 200K rows DF:
In [250]: df
Out[250]:
Year quarter
0 2014 q1
1 2015 q2
In [251]: df = pd.concat([df] * 10**5)
In [252]: df.shape
Out[252]: (200000, 2)
UPDATE: new timings using Pandas 0.19.0
Timing without CPU/GPU optimization (sorted from fastest to slowest):
In [107]: %timeit df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']
10 loops, best of 3: 131 ms per loop
In [106]: %timeit df['Year'].map(str) + df['quarter']
10 loops, best of 3: 161 ms per loop
In [108]: %timeit df.Year.str.cat(df.quarter)
10 loops, best of 3: 189 ms per loop
In [109]: %timeit df.loc[:, ['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 567 ms per loop
In [110]: %timeit df[['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 584 ms per loop
In [111]: %timeit df[['Year','quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{}{}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 24.7 s per loop
Timing using CPU/GPU optimization:
In [113]: %timeit df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']
10 loops, best of 3: 53.3 ms per loop
In [114]: %timeit df['Year'].map(str) + df['quarter']
10 loops, best of 3: 65.5 ms per loop
In [115]: %timeit df.Year.str.cat(df.quarter)
10 loops, best of 3: 79.9 ms per loop
In [116]: %timeit df.loc[:, ['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 230 ms per loop
In [117]: %timeit df[['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 230 ms per loop
In [118]: %timeit df[['Year','quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{}{}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1)
1 loop, best of 3: 9.38 s per loop
Answer contribution by #anton-vbr
df = pd.DataFrame({'Year': ['2014', '2015'], 'quarter': ['q1', 'q2']})
df['period'] = df[['Year', 'quarter']].apply(lambda x: ''.join(x), axis=1)
Yields this dataframe
Year quarter period
0 2014 q1 2014q1
1 2015 q2 2015q2
This method generalizes to an arbitrary number of string columns by replacing df[['Year', 'quarter']] with any column slice of your dataframe, e.g. df.iloc[:,0:2].apply(lambda x: ''.join(x), axis=1).
You can check more information about apply() method here
The method cat() of the .str accessor works really well for this:
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> df = pd.DataFrame([["2014", "q1"],
... ["2015", "q3"]],
... columns=('Year', 'Quarter'))
>>> print(df)
Year Quarter
0 2014 q1
1 2015 q3
>>> df['Period'] = df.Year.str.cat(df.Quarter)
>>> print(df)
Year Quarter Period
0 2014 q1 2014q1
1 2015 q3 2015q3
cat() even allows you to add a separator so, for example, suppose you only have integers for year and period, you can do this:
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> df = pd.DataFrame([[2014, 1],
... [2015, 3]],
... columns=('Year', 'Quarter'))
>>> print(df)
Year Quarter
0 2014 1
1 2015 3
>>> df['Period'] = df.Year.astype(str).str.cat(df.Quarter.astype(str), sep='q')
>>> print(df)
Year Quarter Period
0 2014 1 2014q1
1 2015 3 2015q3
Joining multiple columns is just a matter of passing either a list of series or a dataframe containing all but the first column as a parameter to str.cat() invoked on the first column (Series):
>>> df = pd.DataFrame(
... [['USA', 'Nevada', 'Las Vegas'],
... ['Brazil', 'Pernambuco', 'Recife']],
... columns=['Country', 'State', 'City'],
... )
>>> df['AllTogether'] = df['Country'].str.cat(df[['State', 'City']], sep=' - ')
>>> print(df)
Country State City AllTogether
0 USA Nevada Las Vegas USA - Nevada - Las Vegas
1 Brazil Pernambuco Recife Brazil - Pernambuco - Recife
Do note that if your pandas dataframe/series has null values, you need to include the parameter na_rep to replace the NaN values with a string, otherwise the combined column will default to NaN.
Use of a lamba function this time with string.format().
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'Year': ['2014', '2015'], 'Quarter': ['q1', 'q2']})
print df
df['YearQuarter'] = df[['Year','Quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{}{}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1)
print df
Quarter Year
0 q1 2014
1 q2 2015
Quarter Year YearQuarter
0 q1 2014 2014q1
1 q2 2015 2015q2
This allows you to work with non-strings and reformat values as needed.
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'Year': ['2014', '2015'], 'Quarter': [1, 2]})
print df.dtypes
print df
df['YearQuarter'] = df[['Year','Quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{}q{}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1)
print df
Quarter int64
Year object
dtype: object
Quarter Year
0 1 2014
1 2 2015
Quarter Year YearQuarter
0 1 2014 2014q1
1 2 2015 2015q2
generalising to multiple columns, why not:
columns = ['whatever', 'columns', 'you', 'choose']
df['period'] = df[columns].astype(str).sum(axis=1)
You can use lambda:
combine_lambda = lambda x: '{}{}'.format(x.Year, x.quarter)
And then use it with creating the new column:
df['period'] = df.apply(combine_lambda, axis = 1)
Let us suppose your dataframe is df with columns Year and Quarter.
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'Quarter':'q1 q2 q3 q4'.split(), 'Year':'2000'})
Suppose we want to see the dataframe;
df
>>> Quarter Year
0 q1 2000
1 q2 2000
2 q3 2000
3 q4 2000
Finally, concatenate the Year and the Quarter as follows.
df['Period'] = df['Year'] + ' ' + df['Quarter']
You can now print df to see the resulting dataframe.
df
>>> Quarter Year Period
0 q1 2000 2000 q1
1 q2 2000 2000 q2
2 q3 2000 2000 q3
3 q4 2000 2000 q4
If you do not want the space between the year and quarter, simply remove it by doing;
df['Period'] = df['Year'] + df['Quarter']
Although the #silvado answer is good if you change df.map(str) to df.astype(str) it will be faster:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'Year': ['2014', '2015'], 'quarter': ['q1', 'q2']})
In [131]: %timeit df["Year"].map(str)
10000 loops, best of 3: 132 us per loop
In [132]: %timeit df["Year"].astype(str)
10000 loops, best of 3: 82.2 us per loop
Here is an implementation that I find very versatile:
In [1]: import pandas as pd
In [2]: df = pd.DataFrame([[0, 'the', 'quick', 'brown'],
...: [1, 'fox', 'jumps', 'over'],
...: [2, 'the', 'lazy', 'dog']],
...: columns=['c0', 'c1', 'c2', 'c3'])
In [3]: def str_join(df, sep, *cols):
...: from functools import reduce
...: return reduce(lambda x, y: x.astype(str).str.cat(y.astype(str), sep=sep),
...: [df[col] for col in cols])
...:
In [4]: df['cat'] = str_join(df, '-', 'c0', 'c1', 'c2', 'c3')
In [5]: df
Out[5]:
c0 c1 c2 c3 cat
0 0 the quick brown 0-the-quick-brown
1 1 fox jumps over 1-fox-jumps-over
2 2 the lazy dog 2-the-lazy-dog
more efficient is
def concat_df_str1(df):
""" run time: 1.3416s """
return pd.Series([''.join(row.astype(str)) for row in df.values], index=df.index)
and here is a time test:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from time import time
def concat_df_str1(df):
""" run time: 1.3416s """
return pd.Series([''.join(row.astype(str)) for row in df.values], index=df.index)
def concat_df_str2(df):
""" run time: 5.2758s """
return df.astype(str).sum(axis=1)
def concat_df_str3(df):
""" run time: 5.0076s """
df = df.astype(str)
return df[0] + df[1] + df[2] + df[3] + df[4] + \
df[5] + df[6] + df[7] + df[8] + df[9]
def concat_df_str4(df):
""" run time: 7.8624s """
return df.astype(str).apply(lambda x: ''.join(x), axis=1)
def main():
df = pd.DataFrame(np.zeros(1000000).reshape(100000, 10))
df = df.astype(int)
time1 = time()
df_en = concat_df_str4(df)
print('run time: %.4fs' % (time() - time1))
print(df_en.head(10))
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
final, when sum(concat_df_str2) is used, the result is not simply concat, it will trans to integer.
Using zip could be even quicker:
df["period"] = [''.join(i) for i in zip(df["Year"].map(str),df["quarter"])]
Graph:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import timeit
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from collections import defaultdict
df = pd.DataFrame({'Year': ['2014', '2015'], 'quarter': ['q1', 'q2']})
myfuncs = {
"df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']":
lambda: df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter'],
"df['Year'].map(str) + df['quarter']":
lambda: df['Year'].map(str) + df['quarter'],
"df.Year.str.cat(df.quarter)":
lambda: df.Year.str.cat(df.quarter),
"df.loc[:, ['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)":
lambda: df.loc[:, ['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1),
"df[['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1)":
lambda: df[['Year','quarter']].astype(str).sum(axis=1),
"df[['Year','quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{}{}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1)":
lambda: df[['Year','quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{}{}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1),
"[''.join(i) for i in zip(dataframe['Year'].map(str),dataframe['quarter'])]":
lambda: [''.join(i) for i in zip(df["Year"].map(str),df["quarter"])]
}
d = defaultdict(dict)
step = 10
cont = True
while cont:
lendf = len(df); print(lendf)
for k,v in myfuncs.items():
iters = 1
t = 0
while t < 0.2:
ts = timeit.repeat(v, number=iters, repeat=3)
t = min(ts)
iters *= 10
d[k][lendf] = t/iters
if t > 2: cont = False
df = pd.concat([df]*step)
pd.DataFrame(d).plot().legend(loc='upper center', bbox_to_anchor=(0.5, -0.15))
plt.yscale('log'); plt.xscale('log'); plt.ylabel('seconds'); plt.xlabel('df rows')
plt.show()
This solution uses an intermediate step compressing two columns of the DataFrame to a single column containing a list of the values.
This works not only for strings but for all kind of column-dtypes
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'Year': ['2014', '2015'], 'quarter': ['q1', 'q2']})
df['list']=df[['Year','quarter']].values.tolist()
df['period']=df['list'].apply(''.join)
print(df)
Result:
Year quarter list period
0 2014 q1 [2014, q1] 2014q1
1 2015 q2 [2015, q2] 2015q2
Here is my summary of the above solutions to concatenate / combine two columns with int and str value into a new column, using a separator between the values of columns. Three solutions work for this purpose.
# be cautious about the separator, some symbols may cause "SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal".
# e.g. ";;" as separator would raise the SyntaxError
separator = "&&"
# pd.Series.str.cat() method does not work to concatenate / combine two columns with int value and str value. This would raise "AttributeError: Can only use .cat accessor with a 'category' dtype"
df["period"] = df["Year"].map(str) + separator + df["quarter"]
df["period"] = df[['Year','quarter']].apply(lambda x : '{} && {}'.format(x[0],x[1]), axis=1)
df["period"] = df.apply(lambda x: f'{x["Year"]} && {x["quarter"]}', axis=1)
my take....
listofcols = ['col1','col2','col3']
df['combined_cols'] = ''
for column in listofcols:
df['combined_cols'] = df['combined_cols'] + ' ' + df[column]
'''
As many have mentioned previously, you must convert each column to string and then use the plus operator to combine two string columns. You can get a large performance improvement by using NumPy.
%timeit df['Year'].values.astype(str) + df.quarter
71.1 ms ± 3.76 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
%timeit df['Year'].astype(str) + df['quarter']
565 ms ± 22.3 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
One can use assign method of DataFrame:
df= (pd.DataFrame({'Year': ['2014', '2015'], 'quarter': ['q1', 'q2']}).
assign(period=lambda x: x.Year+x.quarter ))
Similar to #geher answer but with any separator you like:
SEP = " "
INPUT_COLUMNS_WITH_SEP = ",sep,".join(INPUT_COLUMNS).split(",")
df.assign(sep=SEP)[INPUT_COLUMNS_WITH_SEP].sum(axis=1)
def madd(x):
"""Performs element-wise string concatenation with multiple input arrays.
Args:
x: iterable of np.array.
Returns: np.array.
"""
for i, arr in enumerate(x):
if type(arr.item(0)) is not str:
x[i] = x[i].astype(str)
return reduce(np.core.defchararray.add, x)
For example:
data = list(zip([2000]*4, ['q1', 'q2', 'q3', 'q4']))
df = pd.DataFrame(data=data, columns=['Year', 'quarter'])
df['period'] = madd([df[col].values for col in ['Year', 'quarter']])
df
Year quarter period
0 2000 q1 2000q1
1 2000 q2 2000q2
2 2000 q3 2000q3
3 2000 q4 2000q4
Use .combine_first.
df['Period'] = df['Year'].combine_first(df['Quarter'])
When combining columns with strings by concatenating them using the addition operator + if any is NaN then entire output will be NaN so use fillna()
df["join"] = "some" + df["col"].fillna(df["val_if_nan"])
I have several dataframes indexed more or less by the same MultiIndex (a few values may be missing on each dataframe, but the total rows exceeds 70K and the missing values is always less than 10). I want to attach/merge/concatenate to all of them a given dataframe (with same indexation). I tried doing this using a for iteration with a tuple, as in the example here. However, at the end, all my data frames do not merge. I provide a simple example where this happens. Why they do not merge?
df1 = pd.DataFrame(np.arange(12).reshape(4,3), index = ["A", "B", "C", "D"], columns = ["1st", "2nd", "3rd"])
df2 = df1 + 2
df3 = df1 - 2
for df in (df1, df2):
df = pd.merge(df, df3, left_index = True, right_index = True, how = "inner")
df1, df2
What is your expected result?
In the for loop, df is the loop variable and also the result on the left-hand side of the assignment statement. Here is the same loop with print statements to provide additional information. I think you are over-writing intermediate results.
for df in (df1, df2):
print(df)
print('-----')
df = pd.merge(df, df3, left_index = True, right_index = True, how = "inner")
print(df)
print('==========', end='\n\n')
print(df)
You could combine df1, df2 and df3 like this.
print(pd.concat([df1, df2, df3], axis=1))
1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd
A 0 1 2 2 3 4 -2 -1 0
B 3 4 5 5 6 7 1 2 3
C 6 7 8 8 9 10 4 5 6
D 9 10 11 11 12 13 7 8 9
UPDATE
Here is an idiomatic way to import and concatenate several CSV files, possibly in multiple directories. In short: read each file into a separate data frame; add each data frame to a list; concatenate once at the end.
Reference: https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/user_guide/cookbook.html#reading-multiple-files-to-create-a-single-dataframe
import pandas as pd
from pathlib import Path
df = list()
for filename in Path.cwd().rglob('*.csv'):
with open(filename, 'rt') as handle:
t = pd.read_csv(handle)
df.append(t)
print(filename.name, t.shape)
df = pd.concat(df)
print('\nfinal: ', df.shape)
penny.csv (62, 8)
penny-2020-06-24.csv (144, 9)
...etc
final: (474, 20)
I'm pretty new in python / pandas, so its probably pretty simple question...but I can't handle it:
I have two dataframe loaded from Oracle SQL. One with 300 rows / 2 column and second with one row/one column. I would like to add column from second dataset to the first for each row as new column. But I can only get it for the first row and the others are NaN.
`import cx_Oracle
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import xgboost as xgb
from sklearn.externals import joblib
dsn_tns = cx_Oracle.makedsn('127.0.1.1', '1521', 'orcl')
conn = cx_Oracle.connect(user='MyName', password='MyPass', dsn=dsn_tns)
d_score = pd.read_sql_query(
'''
SELECT
ID
,RESULT
,RATIO_A
,RATIO_B
from ORCL_DATA
''', conn) #return 380 rows
d_score['ID'] = d_score['ID'].astype(int)
d_score['RESULT'] = d_score['RESULT'].astype(int)
d_score['RATIO_A'] = d_score['RATIO_A'].astype(float)
d_score['RATIO_B'] = d_score['RATIO_B'].astype(float)
d_score_features = d_score.iloc [:,2:4]
#d_train_target = d_score.iloc[:,1:2] #target is RESULT
DM_train = xgb.DMatrix(data= d_score_features)
loaded_model = joblib.load("bst.dat")
pred = loaded_model.predict(DM_train)
i = pd.DataFrame({'ID':d_score['ID'],'Probability':pred})
print(i)
s = pd.read_sql_query('''select max(id_process) as MAX_ID_PROCESS from PROCESS''',conn) #return only 1 row
m =pd.DataFrame(data=s, dtype=np.int64,columns = ['MAX_ID_PROCESS'] )
print(m)
i['new'] = m ##Trying to add MAX_ID_PROCESS to all rows
print(i)
i =
ID Probability
0 20101 0.663083
1 20105 0.486774
2 20106 0.441300
3 20278 0.703176
4 20221 0.539185
....
379 20480 0.671976
m =
MAX_ID_PROCESS
0 274
i =
ID_MATCH Probability new
0 20101 0.663083 274.0
1 20105 0.486774 NaN
2 20106 0.441300 NaN
3 20278 0.703176 NaN
4 20221 0.539185 NaN
I need value 'new' for all rows...
Since your second dataframe is only having one value, you can assign it like this:
df1['new'] = df2.MAX_ID_PROCESS[0]
# Or using .loc
df1['new'] = df2.MAX_ID_PROCESS.loc[0]
In your case, it should be:
i['new'] = m.MAX_ID_PROCESS[0]
You should now see:
ID Probability new
0 20101 0.663083 274.0
1 20105 0.486774 274.0
2 20106 0.441300 274.0
3 20278 0.703176 274.0
4 20221 0.539185 274.0
As we know that we can append one column of dataframe1 to dataframe2 as new column using the code: dataframe2["new_column_name"] = dataframe1["column_to_copy"].
We can extend this approach to solve your problem.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df1 = pd.DataFrame()
df1["ColA"] = [1, 12, 32, 24,12]
df1["ColB"] = [23, 11, 6, 45,25]
df1["ColC"] = [10, 25, 3, 23,15]
print(df1)
Output:
ColA ColB ColC
0 1 23 10
1 12 11 25
2 32 6 3
3 24 45 23
4 12 25 15
Now we create a new dataframe and add a row to it.
df3 = pd.DataFrame()
df3["ColTest"] = [1]
Now we store the value of the first row of the second dataframe as we want to add it to all the rows in dataframe1 as a new column:
val = df3.iloc[0]
print(val)
Output:
ColTest 1
Name: 0, dtype: int64
Now, we will store this value for as many rows as we have in dataframe1.
rows = len(df1)
for row in range(rows):
df3.loc[row]=val
print(df3)
Output:
ColTest
0 1
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 1
Now we will append this column to the first dataframe and solve your problem.
df["ColTest"] = df3["ColTest"]
print(df)
Output:
ColA ColB ColC ColTest
0 1 23 10 1
1 12 11 25 1
2 32 6 3 1
3 24 45 23 1
4 12 25 15 1
I have 2 pandas dataframes, one of them contains dates with measurements, and the other contains dates with an event ID.
df1
from datetime import datetime as dt
from datetime import timedelta
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
today = dt.now()
ndays = 10
df1 = pd.DataFrame({'Date': [today + timedelta(days = x) for x in range(ndays)], 'measurement': pd.Series(np.random.randint(1, high = 10, size = ndays))})
df1.Date = df1.Date.dt.date
Date measurement
2018-01-10 8
2018-01-11 2
2018-01-12 7
2018-01-13 3
2018-01-14 1
2018-01-15 1
2018-01-16 6
2018-01-17 9
2018-01-18 8
2018-01-19 4
df2
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'Date': ['2018-01-11', '2018-01-14', '2018-01-16', '2018-01-19'], 'letter': ['event_a', 'event_b', 'event_c', 'event_d']})
df2.Date = pd.to_datetime(df2.Date, format = '%Y-%m-%d')
df2.Date = df2.Date.dt.date
Date event_id
2018-01-11 event_a
2018-01-14 event_b
2018-01-16 event_c
2018-01-19 event_d
I give the dates in df1 an event_id from df2 only if it's between two event dates. The resulting dataframe would look something like:
df3
today = dt.now()
ndays = 10
df3 = pd.DataFrame({'Date': [today + timedelta(days = x) for x in range(ndays)], 'measurement': pd.Series(np.random.randint(1, high = 10, size = ndays)), 'event_id': ['event_a', 'event_a', 'event_b', 'event_b', 'event_b', 'event_c', 'event_c', 'event_d', 'event_d', 'event_d']})
df3.Date = df3.Date.dt.date
Date event_id measurement
2018-01-10 event_a 4
2018-01-11 event_a 2
2018-01-12 event_b 1
2018-01-13 event_b 5
2018-01-14 event_b 5
2018-01-15 event_c 4
2018-01-16 event_c 6
2018-01-17 event_d 6
2018-01-18 event_d 9
2018-01-19 event_d 6
The code I use to achieve this is:
n = 1
while n <= len(list(df2.Date)) - 1 :
for date in list(df1.Date):
if date <= df2.iloc[n].Date and (date > df2.iloc[n-1].Date):
df1.loc[df1.Date == date, 'event_id'] = df2.iloc[n].event_id
n += 1
The dataset that I am working with is significantly larger than this (a few million rows) and this method runs far too long. Is there a more efficient way to accomplish this?
So there are quite a few things to improve performance.
The first question I have is: does it have to be a pandas frame to begin with? Meaning can't df1 and df2 just be lists of tuples or list of lists?
The thing is that pandas adds a significant overhead when accessing items but especially when setting values individually.
Pandas excels when it comes to vectorized operations but I don't see an efficient alternative right now (maybe someone comes up with such an answer, that would be ideal).
Now what I'd do is:
Convert your df1 and df2 to records -> e.g. d1 = df1.to_records() what you get is an array of tuples, basically with the same structure as the dataframe.
Now run your algorithm but instead of operating on pandas dataframes you operate on the arrays of tuples d1 and d2
Use a third list of tuples d3 where you store the newly created data (each tuple is a row)
Now if you want you can convert d3 back to a pandas dataframe:
df3 = pd.DataFrame.from_records(d3, myKwArgs**)
This will speed up your code significantly I'd assume by more than 100-1000%. It does increase memory usage though, so if you are low on memory try to avoid the pandas dataframes all-together or dereference unused pandas frames df1, df2 once you used them to create the records (and if you run into problems call gc manually).
EDIT: Here a version of your code using the procedure above:
d3 = []
n = 1
while n < range(len(d2)):
for i in range(len(d1)):
date = d1[i][0]
if date <= d2[n][0] and date > d2[n-1][0]:
d3.append( (date, d2[n][1], d1[i][1]) )
n += 1
You can try df.apply() method to achieve this. Refer pandas.DataFrame.apply. I think my code will works faster than yours.
My approach:
Merge two dataframes df1 and df2 and create new one df3 by
df3 = pd.merge(df1, df2, on='Date', how='outer')
Sort df3 by date to make easy to travserse.
df3['Date'] = pd.to_datetime(df3.Date)
df3.sort_values(by='Date')
Create set_event_date() method to apply for each rows in df3.
new_event_id = np.nan
def set_event_date(df3):
global new_event_id
if df3.event_id is not np.nan:
new_event_id = df3.event_id
return new_event_id
Apply set_event_method() to each rows in df3.
df3['new_event_id'] = df3.apply(set_event_date,axis=1)
Final Output will be:
Date Measurement New_event_id
0 2018-01-11 2 event_a
1 2018-01-12 1 event_a
2 2018-01-13 3 event_a
3 2018-01-14 6 event_b
4 2018-01-15 3 event_b
5 2018-01-16 5 event_c
6 2018-01-17 7 event_c
7 2018-01-18 9 event_c
8 2018-01-19 7 event_d
9 2018-01-20 4 event_d
Let me know once you tried my solution and it works faster than yours.
Thanks.